Sip

Maybe he can get a jump to conclusions mat?

I'd say try to find that special girl sooner rather than later.

That's a good one. Azat, LMAO at software engineers too

According to google translation tools: "I have leido some times that Murat nacio in town KRKJAN in Karabagh. It is truth or no?"

Here's my current theory on the subject ... A man wants what a man wants. A woman wants what other women want. So how does this play out in the context of the desirable "jerk"? Well, if he is behaving like a jerk towards a woman, then he must not be interested in that woman as he can probably get other women. And thus, as you see, the theory starts to work beautifully as now the woman gets infinitely fascinated by this subject who is most likely desired by other females. Otherwise, why on earth would he pass up such an opportunity and why isn't he being nice?

And now this ... Woman Driving Through South Carolina Hits Hippopotamus

I would but I have no idea what you said. Based on my limited knowledge on the subject, I am guessing it has to do with the bees trying to have sex with the birds?

Yes I totally agree. Movses, you are the greatest most forgiving person on earth, right?

Hi welcome to the forum. Hope you stick around for a while.

BJ's! That red is by far the best beer I have ever had anywhere.

Enjoy! http://members.cox.net/richw/lego.htm

All I am saying is that there is the type of guy that women just throw themselves at him for various reasons. He doesn't have to lie or play or anything ... he just gets chicks and doesn't necessarily have to do or say anything "dishonest".

Shushan Petrosian kicks ass (usually).

I like the way he talks, I like his songs, I think he is quite intelligent. I wouldn't let my kids idolize him and I would run in the opposite direction if I saw him coming towards me.

Dude gevo, get with the program dude. Nairi doesn't have a boyfriend so it's her way of saying she doesn't wear any underwear either. Ok I must be a dumbass since if Movses doesn't tear me to shreds, Nairi might.

Skit, you don't need to be "hamest" or any other way just to keep people around you. You just be you .... and be a good person (however you define good for yourself). The rest will follow. The first thing to realize is that being alone is not such a bad thing if you are the person you want to be. Now of course when I say "you be you", it is a very vague thing to say. Most of us don't even start to figure out what that means until well into adulthood and even then, that definition for us keeps changing over and over. But the important thing is not trying to become what our moms, relatives, or teachers want us to become, but trying to understand what they are telling us and then make our OWN decisions about our "selves". After that, everything just sort of falls into place ... then you will start to be happy with yourself. You will naturally start to give off positive vibes and will have an upbeat attitude about things... and that in turn is what will draw people to you.

I think Shake Sperian said it best: "To thine own self be true ..." That's is what matters. I fully agree with you allarmeniangirl and I also agree with Shiner that you just can't be the same "self" with everyone. There is a bit of everything in all of us ... we have faults ... we have good and bad sides. In each of us there is always a bit of jelousy, fear, hatred, greed, etc and most often a good person is one that is able to hide and mask those effectively. You can't control what you think ... well maybe you can but in order to control it, you have to think about it! What you can control is how you act and behave and what you do and say as those can change depending on the environment one is in as well. As a related note, I have said before that I think you are what you seem to be (i.e. how you act) so by doing whatever it is you are doing, you are being yourself! The related thread on this is here. ... so the last part of what I am trying to say is hanging out with those who would allow you to be the person you want to be is probably very important.

I just wanted to paint a more accurate picture of why I may or may not go see the movie as my decision may not necessarily depend on the quality of the movie per se. Stormig, I stand corrected. I guess with Aramaic it will be a lot more understandable

It has been getting a lot of exposure ... then they had the "incident" with whether the pope gave it 2 thumbs up or not a few weeks ago .... I personally will probably not bother to go sit through it since it's in latin. Last year I think I saw 2 movies in total ... "dumb and dumberer" and "hot chick" (hmmm or maybe hotchick was the year before). This year I plan to spend my 2 movie budget wisely

What I don't want to know is where the sister is going to put the gloves.

You keep reliving your Hitler fantasy but there is no mention of vegeterianism nor storm troopers in description B. B seems to be in favor of "promotion of whole-grain bread and soybeans" which by itself does not imply vegetarianism. As a matter of fact, candidate A may be a vegeterian just as much as candidate B might be. I think what you are proving with this experiment is how much people tend to read more into a description than what is actually being said.

If you read the descriptions carefully you will notice that both could technically be describing the same person. They don't contain any statements that would clearly indicate two different individuals.

Hahahha ... Den you are so young and naive! This is so cute! But on a serious note, as a rule of thumb I think it's a bad idea to drag fights and arguments from other forums into this one. There is just no good that can come out of such a thing.

Why not just setup a simple website for it and give them links to that site? Do you really want to funnel dumb ass denialists into this forum? But I do agree with you that Domino is a kick ass dude. I personally don't think a "discussion forum" is a place to post article after article of evidence and analysis on a subject because 1) It is very difficult to keep it organized especially if it sparks discussion and 2) It will get lost among all the other things going on. Of course there is no problem with posting it but keeping things organized and archived in a useful way is not something that the "discussion forum format" is suitable for.

I am not so sure .... Yah on paper they seem unrelated but I would be much more worried about STDs with a druggie than with a "clean" person. Drug usage just screams diminished mental capacity at times to make proper choices ... actually the diminshed mental capacity in itself is what draws a lot of people to drugs. I mean it doesn't even have to be "drugs" ... I guess the effects of alcohol and it's impact on the exponensial increase in sexual promiscuity isn't a secret