MosJan Posted March 31, 2007 Report Share Posted March 31, 2007 TANER AKCAM FOUND INNOCENT The Sisli Office of the Public Prosecutor adjudicated that historian Taner Akcam who in his article, published in the Agos journal, wrote the sentence “I believe that what happened between 1915 and 1917 was holocaust,” was innocent. The Office of the Public Prosecutor stated that using the word ‘holocaust’ is within the lines of freedom of speech and does not contain an expression of insult against Turkey. The decision was announced 12 days after the assassination of Hrant Dink, who was judged in violation of Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code (TCK) for also expressing the word ‘holocaust.’ Taner Akcam has backed his former colleague, Dink, with the article which said, “If using the word ‘Holocaust’ is a crime then I am committing it at least once every single week. I have to be a collaborator in Hrant’s alleged crime in order to clear this situation of injustice,” Turkish Daily News reports. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yervant1 Posted March 31, 2007 Report Share Posted March 31, 2007 TANER AKCAM FOUND INNOCENT The Sisli Office of the Public Prosecutor adjudicated that historian Taner Akcam who in his article, published in the Agos journal, wrote the sentence “I believe that what happened between 1915 and 1917 was holocaust,” was innocent. The Office of the Public Prosecutor stated that using the word ‘holocaust’ is within the lines of freedom of speech and does not contain an expression of insult against Turkey. The decision was announced 12 days after the assassination of Hrant Dink, who was judged in violation of Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code (TCK) for also expressing the word ‘holocaust.’ Taner Akcam has backed his former colleague, Dink, with the article which said, “If using the word ‘Holocaust’ is a crime then I am committing it at least once every single week. I have to be a collaborator in Hrant’s alleged crime in order to clear this situation of injustice,” Turkish Daily News reports. What a hypocrisy, can someone tell me please to stop laughing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosJan Posted March 31, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2007 stop laughing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosJan Posted March 31, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2007 Taner Akcam will be in LA soon - on the 20th he will be in one of Armenian schools / will take part in discussion about the ‘holocaust’ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yervant1 Posted March 31, 2007 Report Share Posted March 31, 2007 Taner Akcam will be in LA soon - on the 20th he will be in one of Armenian schools / will take part in discussion about the ‘holocaust’ If we replace the word "Genocide" with "Halocaust" will the Turkish government accept that what happened in 1915 was an Armenian Holocaust? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosJan Posted March 31, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2007 no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takoush Posted March 31, 2007 Report Share Posted March 31, 2007 If we replace the word "Genocide" with "Halocaust" will the Turkish government accept that what happened in 1915 was an Armenian Holocaust? You know something? Now the Jews will not like it; because "Holocaust" is supposed to be named only after their 6 Million deaths by the Nazis. Ours is supposed to be called "Genocide" that's it. The Jews in here or everywhere will not be happy with the Turks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aubépine Posted March 31, 2007 Report Share Posted March 31, 2007 The word "Holocaust" is ok and "Genocide" is not? I'm a bit a confused here. It doesn't matter if the Jews will not like it. They do not own the word Holocaust even if they try to put it in dictionaries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DominO123 Posted March 31, 2007 Report Share Posted March 31, 2007 The word "Holocaust" is ok and "Genocide" is not? I'm a bit a confused here. It doesn't matter if the Jews will not like it. They do not own the word Holocaust even if they try to put it in dictionaries. Genocide has legal connotations the word Holocaust not. Turkey already signed the genocide convention. They are not that stupid, call it everything but not genocide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantom22 Posted April 1, 2007 Report Share Posted April 1, 2007 (edited) If the situation in Turkey was not so horrible, as it caused the death of Hrant Dink, it would be laughable. This is truly " The Theatre of the Absurd." stop laughing. Edited April 1, 2007 by phantom22 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zartonk Posted April 1, 2007 Report Share Posted April 1, 2007 (edited) There is a difference between Holocaust and holocaust. Holocaust is the Shoah, the great holocaust, THE holocaust, whereas holocaust could be applied to, say, the death of the tens of millions of Native Americans. Anyhow, my reaction was identical to Yervant. The legislation can't be weak enough to bow to a word change. There must have been another loophole. Edited April 12, 2007 by Zartonk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikephoros_Phokas Posted April 12, 2007 Report Share Posted April 12, 2007 (edited) ... "Where have the pa shas gone, running from place to place with cudgels in their hands, scimitars in their belts, blood in their eyes? .... Political opponents? Bring them down. Writers? Beat them. Turks? Send them to their deaths. Greeks? Take their money. Armenians? Chop off their heads. Arabs? String em' up ... Bandits? We'll be with you shortly. Hooligans? Show them right in. ... And now where have you gone, scampering from one bolt hole to the next like sly little weasels? Have you had your fill of slaughter? That's what we've been denied asking you?[15] [15.] Refik Halit, "Efendiler Nereye?," Zaman, 6 November 1918. cited in: Akcam, Taner; trans. Paul Bessemer. "A Shameful Act: The Armenian Genocide and the Question of Turkish Responsibility" Henry Holt and Company (New York, 2006) 245. For some very very strange reason I cannot enter "pa shas" as one word without the board software censoring it like: ****** Edited April 12, 2007 by Nikephoros_Phokas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosJan Posted July 21, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2007 THE INTIMIDATION CAMPAIGN AGAINST TANER AKÇAM * University of Minnesota sociologist-historian Taner Akçam, an international authority on the 1915 Armenian Genocide, is the target of an ongoing intimidation campaign to portray him as a convicted terrorist and a traitor to his native Turkey. A noted writer and lecturer on Turkish nationalism, the Armenian Genocide, and Armenian-Turkish dialogue, Prof. Akçam relocated to the United States in 2001, the year that his writings began to appear in English and the campaign against him was launched in response. In a sensational commentary published by the Washington, DC-based Assembly of Turkish American Associations, Akçam was denounced as a mastermind of terrorist violence, including the assassinations of American and NATO military personnel. Disseminated online by the 19,000-member Turkish Forum and posted since 2004 at the influential Genocide-denialist site Tall Armenian Tale, these allegations were soon copied to well over 10,000 Web pages, including Akçam's book reviews at Amazon and his persistently vandalized biography at Wikipedia. He began receiving death threats after Turkish Forum posted his contact information so that readers could "send greetings to this traitor." Following the November 2006 publication of Akçam's critically acclaimed study, A Shameful Act: The Armenian Genocide and the Question of Turkish Responsibility, the campaign intensified. Akçam's lectures and book tour were violently disrupted, and poison-pen letters were emailed to the hosting universities. Tellingly, a planned disruption at Yeshiva University was called off after conference organizers appealed to the Turkish Consulate in New York. In February 2007, en route to lecture at McGill University Law School, Akçam was detained in the Montreal airport for nearly four hours on suspicion of terrorism. He was shown, as evidence, his vandalized Wikipedia biography. Just one month before the Montreal incident, the assassination of Akçam's friend and colleague, Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, had put Turkey's intellectuals on high alert. They knew that in the months before his murder, Dink had been targeted as a traitor by an increasingly vicious media campaign. Leading the pack was Hürriyet, one of the most widely read newspapers in Turkey. In May 2007, citing the heightened danger to his own life, Akçam unmasked the secretive Webmaster of Tall Armenian Tale as Turkish-American illustrator Murad "Holdwater" Gümen of New York City. Death threats and denunciations followed. Hürriyet portrayed Akçam as a cowardly traitor who "vomits hate towards our country." No attempt was made to interview him, and his letter to the editor was ignored. "Once again, intellectuals and activists who dare to question the government's 'official history' are being put on notice," said Akçam on July 16. "This shameful campaign not only endangers my life and the lives of my colleagues, my family and friends; ironically enough, the very notion of free expression is being undermined by the very institution that depends on it most: the public press. "And what is the point, after all?" he continued. "I published a scholarly study that deviated from the official position of the Turkish State. One should ask the Turkish authorities whether they truly believe that shooting the messenger will prove that their position on 1915 is the correct one." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.