hosank Posted December 22, 2006 Report Share Posted December 22, 2006 istambul and ankara?... we can let the greeks take constantinople, it's their's anyways. who would want to take a filthy childmolesting turkish city like ankara? btw, irlandahay, turkish specialforces or not. armenians have spirit. this is what should happen, if azerbeijan strikes again, (obviously they will be defeated on the eastern front), but armenia can then annexe naxichevan as an azeri threat to armenian sovereignty, this will give us at least some international backing, this would also lead to an openess of turkish barbarism, that has been hidden for the past few years in order to get into the EU. the world will see turkey and azerbaijan for what they truly are and europe, which is already hostile to turkey, will be openly against it. armenians, being the best soldiers in the region will kill all. turks are no match, unless they commit large units to the armenian front, this will result in a russian intervention, since russian border security is in charge of the armenian border. at the same time, an attack by turkey will be condemned by the US anyways, in our lifetime, we will be walking in sadarak, gulfa, ordubad and naxichevan city. the celebration will be in the honour of all armenians of every generation. older armenians may not be there physically, but they will still be there, as every armenian who has ever walked the earth will join in celebration. armenians are not "one person" for ever person represents his entire lineage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zurderer Posted December 23, 2006 Report Share Posted December 23, 2006 we can let the greeks take constantinople Great, so you give permission greeks to take istanbul. Now, what they need is only turkish permission, after armenian one. who would want to take a filthy childmolesting turkish city like ankara? Turkish city? how can it be. Istanbul have more turkish people, and historically ankara is not turkish city. btw, irlandahay, turkish specialforces or not. armenians have spirit. Yeah, Like lord of the rings. Spirits helped king, why should not they help armenians. taking nahcivan? Great, so after karabag we will have another place, that would be emtied by her people. Instead of taking nahcivan, You should try to populate karabag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aubépine Posted December 23, 2006 Report Share Posted December 23, 2006 Turkish city? how can it be. Istanbul have more turkish people, and historically ankara is not turkish city. What are you talking about? Istanbul is the whore of the world, to quote a poet. Today it is the capital of Kurdistan as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellektor Posted December 24, 2006 Report Share Posted December 24, 2006 well then, join the struggle!! we won't win with words, (well...we can win diplomacy), but naxichevan will not 'give' itself, we must take what is rightfully ours. When last December the barbaric Human Culture-deficiency Viruses were sledgehammering the khachkars of Jugha cemetery in broad daylight, the RoA had its chance to deploy troops in Nakhijevan and gun down the scum from the "Azeri" army who were busy annihilating centuries old human civilization. Recently I read in an interview with Samuel Karapetian that a French-Jewish scholar had told him "Armenia should have attacked and killed those soldiers who were destroying human civilization. Now that you haven't done it, you are responsible for having deprived humanity of that heritage." He added, " the world community would have understood and nobody would have protested." And he's damn right. It's our fault. It's our defeatist attitude. I have raised this question a thousand times but it seems not many are interested. I mean the so-called peace talks with Azerbaboons. How on earth any self-respecting Armenian can even think of giving land to the Turks when the Turks are occupying more than 90% of Armenian territory? Yes hosank, SakoPasha and GevorgP, we have to take back what's ours. Province by province we'll take what Turks have usurped from us by genocide. I only hope the Armenian people will be wise and responsible enough not to allow any politicians from any political ideology sow the seeds of doubt in our minds that the Turk will ever be civilized or they will say OK, now we have the 7 regions we'll be friends and no hard feelings. Once they get the liberated field Artsakh, they'll ask for mountainous Artsakh, then Siunik and finally they'll destroy Armenia and pan-Turkism will win. We have to be firm: no concessions, on the contrary, the Azerbaboons have to return Shahoomian, Getashen, Artsvashen and the rest of occupied territories they usurped during the war. Later the illegal Moscow/Kars treaty will have to be rendered void, Nakhijevan returned to Armenia, trillions of dollars of damage must be paid for the destruction of 27000 Armenian monuments (as accounted for by Argam Ayvazian) in Nakhijevan alone. The baboons will pay compensation to 400,000 to half a million Armenians they threw out and whose belongings they usurped by genocidal acts perpetrated in 1988-1992. On a later date, they will return Gandzak and retreat to the other side of the River Kur, the indisputed border between Armenia and Aghvank (who by the way were extinct when the Turds invaded after the 11th century). If we keep on being positive and rejoice in our victory, we will throw the "Azeri" garbage out of our home before the end of the 21st century. Know that by then the "Azeri" Vaseline oil wells will have already dried out and Israel will not need that pipeline anymore. http://www.armeniangenocide.com/photos/data/500/medium/Destruction-jugha-azeri-beasts-det.jpg Nakhijevan, December 2005 not 1905, 1915, 1918 or even 1988. The most worthless garbage ever produced in the history of the universe, the "Azeri" Turk, has just turned centuries old human heritage into a pile of rubble Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 25, 2006 Report Share Posted December 25, 2006 I agree, it would have been completely justified to attack Nakhichevan; I'm sure that the Armenian leadership considered it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takoush Posted December 25, 2006 Report Share Posted December 25, 2006 Hellektor jan; I agree with everything you said above. Indeed why do we continue to have a defeitus attitude when we won the war in Karabagh in 1994 and we could have gone as far as Baku. What negotiations????? I say to hell with negotiations and get more of Karabagh, like the other regions you have mentioned, i.e., Shahoomian and the rest. And seize Nakhichevan too. Nakhichevan always belonged to us. If only that 'sadgelik' Lenin didn't agree with the kakturks to give it to the Azerbaboon eshek Azeris. Agreed. Armenia should never agree to negotiate, I mean about Karabagh's lands that our brave guys fought with their might and with their life. Never. And plus we won. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zurderer Posted December 25, 2006 Report Share Posted December 25, 2006 What are you talking about? I am talking about istanbul. I am sure you heard it. It is known by people. Unlike some minor cities. Istanbul is the whore of the world, to quote a poet. Yeah you can find a lot poets about istanbul. That city deserve it. Today it is the capital of Kurdistan as well. well, I dont see any problem at this. Do you? Istanbul is capital of all nations in Turkey. (Including, Turks, kurds, zazas, lazs, ext.) Just think about, why these nations choose istanbul? by the way, what is your problem with kurds? most of them are asimilated armenians, I dont see you have problem with armenians. I agree, it would have been completely justified to attack Nakhichevan; I'm sure that the Armenian leadership considered it. Yep, do it. You are invincible, super human. Attack nahcivan, you have right to attack. You will win war and gain everyland you lost before. But wait a little, If you are such suberb, why did you lost that lands.(Not talking about 1915, but before.) Anyway, have a nice dream. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takoush Posted December 25, 2006 Report Share Posted December 25, 2006 Hellektor jan; I agree with everything you said above. Indeed why do we continue to have a defeitus attitude when we won the war in Karabagh in 1994 and we could have gone as far as Baku. What negotiations????? I say to hell with negotiations and get more of Karabagh, like the other regions you have mentioned, i.e., Shahoomian and the rest. And seize Nakhichevan too. Nakhichevan always belonged to us. If only that 'sadgelik' Lenin didn't agree with the kakturks to give it to the Azerbaboon eshek Azeris. Agreed. Armenia should never agree to negotiate, I mean about Karabagh's lands that our brave guys fought with their might and with their life. Never. And plus we won. Սիրելի Հելեքթոր: Ես ալ քու արդար ու Հայրենիքի մէն մի տրոբումով խռովուած անուշ հոգիդ շատ լաւ կը հասկնամ ու անշուշտ կը բաժնեմ քու բոլոր տեսակէտներդ: Մեր արդար իրավունքները երբ անիծապատ թշնամին կը շարունակէ անիրավաբար կորզել մեզմէ ու երբ ամբարտավանորէն կը շարունակէ մեզ հետ զռուցել, ինչպիսին է այս կեղտոտ Զուրտըրըրը; քու անուշ հոգիդ կը խռովուի ինչպէս նաեւ իմ հոգին եւ ինչպէս նաեւ հոս այս Հայկական Ֆորումի շատ շատերուն որոնց ազնիւ հոգին նաեւ կը ցաւի այս բոլոր անիրավութիւններուն ի դիմաց: Թող որ չի խռովուի քու հոգին ու մեր բոլորին հոգիները, մենք այո հաճախ խոսելով եւ բայց նաեւ պայքարելով պիտի հասնինք մեր նուիրական ու մեր պապերէն մեզ տրուած ու մեզ հանցնուած իրավունքներուն; որպիսին են մեր հայրենի նուիրական եւ լրիւ հողերը եւ ինչպէս նաեւ մեր սիրելի Հայրենիքի ուրճացումը: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 25, 2006 Report Share Posted December 25, 2006 I'm not too familiar with this part of Armenian history, but I think that it was given to the Azeris by the Russians/Soviets as some kind of a deal. It wasn't of our own free will, and we weren't in power in order to counter it. If you're talking about the Seljuk conquest of Armenia, well, in 1045 Armenia was taken by the Byzantines and in 1064 when the Seljuks came, the Byzantines left Armenia without putting up a fight, so there was no organized entity left to defend it. If Armenians and Byzantines (who themselves were partly of Armenian origin) had given up their rivalries and had cooperated, history wouldn't have been the same. It doesn't really matter though... If we can't correct history we can still make it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellektor Posted December 25, 2006 Report Share Posted December 25, 2006 I'm not too familiar with this part of Armenian history, but I think that it was given to the Azeris by the Russians/Soviets as some kind of a deal. It wasn't of our own free will, and we weren't in power in order to counter it. If you're talking about the Seljuk conquest of Armenia, well, in 1045 Armenia was taken by the Byzantines and in 1064 when the Seljuks came, the Byzantines left Armenia without putting up a fight, so there was no organized entity left to defend it. If Armenians and Byzantines (who themselves were partly of Armenian origin) had given up their rivalries and had cooperated, history wouldn't have been the same. It doesn't really matter though... If we can't correct history we can still make it. Dear Dave, Download and read this PDF (or from this location, same file with a different name) which was also mentioned by Arpa in this post in this very thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellektor Posted December 26, 2006 Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 Սիրելի Հելեքթոր: Ես ալ քու արդար ու Հայրենիքի մէն մի տրոբումով խռովուած անուշ հոգիդ շատ լաւ կը հասկնամ ու անշուշտ կը բաժնեմ քու բոլոր տեսակէտներդ: Մեր արդար իրավունքները երբ անիծապատ թշնամին կը շարունակէ անիրավաբար կորզել մեզմէ ու երբ ամբարտավանորէն կը շարունակէ մեզ հետ զռուցել, ինչպիսին է այս կեղտոտ Զուրտըրըրը; քու անուշ հոգիդ կը խռովուի ինչպէս նաեւ իմ հոգին եւ ինչպէս նաեւ հոս այս Հայկական Ֆորումի շատ շատերուն որոնց ազնիւ հոգին նաեւ կը ցաւի այս բոլոր անիրավութիւններուն ի դիմաց: Թող որ չի խռովուի քու հոգին ու մեր բոլորին հոգիները, մենք այո հաճախ խոսելով եւ բայց նաեւ պայքարելով պիտի հասնինք մեր նուիրական ու մեր պապերէն մեզ տրուած ու մեզ հանցնուած իրավունքներուն; որպիսին են մեր հայրենի նուիրական եւ լրիւ հողերը եւ ինչպէս նաեւ մեր սիրելի Հայրենիքի ուրճացումը: Անահիտ Թագուհի ջան, Շնորհակալ եմ քաջալերանքիդ համար: Այս ծըրտըրըրը այնքան էլ կեղտոտ չի համեմատած շատ օտար թուրքերի որ հանդիպել եմ ուրիշ հայկական ֆորումներում: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hosank Posted December 26, 2006 Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 when the time will come, i will be the first to put my foot on naxichevani soil, over the corpses of dead azeri pigs. why did we not go to baku?: 1st...Armenia was never at war with the Վայրագ Անմարդկային. it was a war of independence and sovereignty fought between armenians and azeris. that is why armenia never literally intervened. obviously armenia sent weapons, volunteers and supplies. but the point is that it is not supposed to look like a land invaded by a neigbhouring nation. now...oh so constantinople ( or your trash istambul) is more turkish then ankara? yes....hmm...im sure the ancient greeks and the roman emperors had turks in mind when designing it,.. 1500 years before turks ever came into existence. ah lord of the rings...nice movie...the book was better though. you obviously are not very skilled in the art of war my friend...you seem to forget that morale is a huuge player in war. armenians don't lack it, considering war would mean the deaths of the turkish and azeri murderers who caused so much pain. why did armenia not invade naxichevan when they had the chance? they did think of it, and they massed troops there for sure. but, the turkish bastards were smart in negotiations with the soviet sluts. they reshaped the borders of armenia in order to have a border with the other Վայրագ Անմարդկային. this meant that in an event of a war, turkey would invade the whole thing,and that was what they were going to do yet, 2 more facts to consider: 1, under international law, it would have been a breach of sovereignty of azerbaijan..as gay that it seems, we must understand that the greater victory for armenia is having the international community on it's side. second, armenia was in the middle of a war on one front..they were not about to start another, which would widen the war to the entire caucasus, and later the middleeast and the world... what do the jews have to do with armenia? why do you always talk about the jews? they have NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS one thing we must understand, is that it is pointless to be reckless. we must watch our tongue, we must be the more intelligent, the more civilized, we must not look like the turkick animals. the time of liberation will come, it might be through arms, but what will lead to it will be by armenian's even greater quality, speech. obviously we will give nothing to the azeri pigs, no negotications. we must go forward, not backwards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zurderer Posted December 26, 2006 Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 It doesn't really matter though... If we can't correct history we can still make it. I am just trying to say,You can loose war. Dont be idiots, calculate first than attack nahçivan. Russia will not help you and you will lost all war.(Including karabag.) This invincible army story is stupidy. now...oh so constantinople ( or your trash istambul) is more turkish then ankara? yes....hmm...im sure the ancient greeks and the roman emperors had turks in mind when designing it,.. 1500 years before turks ever came into existence. I think, Hitits did not designed ankara for Turks too. If ancient greeks and roman emperors though they can siege and take other cities, They should accept possibility of loosing their cities too. So everything fair, when greeks and armenians were powerful, they expanded their territories. When Turks were powerful, they extended their territories too. So Istanbul is a turkish city like ankara. Sorry van is also a turkish city. If you have power change it, If you have not dont talk about tales. you obviously are not very skilled in the art of war my friend... No my ancestors were peaciful guys. you seem to forget that morale is a huuge player in war. You mean older wars, their importance decreased. Or do you think, after 300 spartans we would watch 300 armenians? armenians don't lack it, considering war would mean the deaths of the turkish and azeri murderers who caused so much pain. Yeah Turks have not any moral, we are chickens. I dont think biggest fear of Turkish soldiers are armenian army. I think,when you take(If possibil) all western armenia, You will not any armenian at west or east armenia.(Your population is decreasing body, You first priority should be this. Not some land, you can nor populate neither survive.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
annannimusss Posted December 26, 2006 Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 Zurderer,actually the Armenian population of Armenia is now slghtly increasing and has stablized. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GevorgP Posted December 26, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 (edited) Zurd-er-er Said: "No my ancestors were peaciful guys." Turks always kissed the hands that could not cut. And in recent decades we see Turks mostly Kissing. Do you agree? Edited December 26, 2006 by GevorgP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zurderer Posted December 26, 2006 Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 Zurderer,actually the Armenian population of Armenia is now slghtly increasing and has stablized. Great, a land without people does not mean much. Turks always kissed the hands that could not cut. And in recent decades we see Turks mostly Kissing. Indeed, but at least we have freedom to choose hand that we will kiss. what about you? you are a loyal kisser of Russian hand(It dont help you much) and you have no freedom to kiss other hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GevorgP Posted December 26, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 (edited) Great, a land without people does not mean much. Indeed, but at least we have freedom to choose hand that we will kiss. what about you? you are a loyal kisser of Russian hand(It dont help you much) and you have no freedom to kiss other hands. Good Zurderer; nice discussion. Let discuss the subject by points, without emotions. 1) Choosing the hands to kiss: a. At Armenian Genocide two million, not armed, Armenians didn't kiss the hands of the Turks; in terms of becoming Muslim and being saved, which is allowed by your religion. Do you agree? Thus for us there are hands that Armenians would NEVER kiss (under no circumstances!). This is a small Christian moral. But Ataturk kissed the "Non Believer" Lenin's hands. Because he supported Turkey and allowed to create the FAKE Turkeybijan,(Azerbaijan) and in return Ataturk became a "great" Communism proponent. At that time the territory could not be joined to Turkey outright, given the international situation, therefore the only choice was creating the Turkey-bijan. 2) Population reproduction speed: a. I agree that Armenia can not boast on population reproduction rate and that the Turks are the best in the Industry. But let's discuss the production quality a little bit: i. Armenians are winners of the recent World Chess Championship, and they are recognized as the most intelligent chessman in the World, which is indicator of their nation's intelligence rate. In past, Russia, EU countries, India, China, Georgia and other countries, several times became the winners. But regardless of the prominent reproduction rate there are no Turks in the Chess Olympus. ii. Can you name please some great Turk scientists that are world wide known, I don't mean Historians, I mean physics, mathematicians, biologists, etc. The only thing that matters in the nowadays World, and is critical for their FUTURE survival, is QUALITY! QUALITY! QUALITY! Հողը սուրբ է, դա շիրիմն է մեր նախնյաց, Հողն է պահում օրօրոցը հայ մանկաց, Հողը զգոն սաղավարտ է պահապան, Դրանից վեր չկա ոչ մի, ոչ մի բան: Հողն է ծնում հողն է պահում ազգերին, Հողն է թաղում հող չպաշտող ցեղերին, Հողը սուրբ է՝ եւ մատուռն է մեր ուխտի, Հողը սուրբ է ու փարոսն է պանդուխտի: Հերոսների արյան գինն է մեր հողը Այդ արյունից էլ անգին է մեր հողը Կայքից վեր է, կյանքից վեր է մեր հողը Նախնյաց նվեր եւ պատվեր է մեր հողը: Edited December 26, 2006 by GevorgP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormig Posted December 26, 2006 Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 The only thing that matters in the nowadays World, and is critical for their FUTURE survival, is QUALITY! QUALITY! QUALITY! More like obsolete nowadays, given every baby is given a chance to live and "survive," regardless of quality of health/life. Moreover, I don't see mankind catching up with the ideal understanding you covet anytime soon. I find it unlikely that the Chinese or Indians will have problems "surviving" into the future regardless of the scientists they produce or don't. Or, if you care to bundle all of them up as one entity, same with Africans. So apparently the industry still pays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neko Posted December 26, 2006 Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 one thing we must understand, is that it is pointless to be reckless. we must watch our tongue, we must be the more intelligent, the more civilized, we must not look like the turkick animals. You fail on all 5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zurderer Posted December 26, 2006 Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 (edited) Let discuss the subject by points, without emotions Ok, I think you will find me enough calm and objective. I hope you will show same objectiveness too. At Armenian Genocide two million, not armed, Armenians didn't kiss the hands of the Turks; in terms of becoming Muslim and being saved, which is allowed by your religion. Do you agree? No, I am not. As I said before, you have and had not freedom to choose hand you will kiss. Infact a lot conversion happened but after more than enough conversion, Young Turks banned it. So armenians had no chance to convert. Also dont be naive, If young Turks were so religious, they wont punish innocents. It is against my religion too. Thus for us there are hands that Armenians would NEVER kiss (under no circumstances!). Infact my friend, you are ready to kiss turkish hands. Problem is that, Turkey goverment want more than kissing, karabag and forgeting armenian genocide claims. Because he supported Turkey and allowed to create the FAKE Turkeybijan,(Azerbaijan) and in return Ataturk became a "great" Communism proponent. We call this as diplomacy. Both soviets and turks had same enemy.why not cooperation? You should learn difference between kissing hand and working together. a. I agree that Armenia can not boast on population reproduction rate and that the Turks are the best in the Industry. But let's discuss the production quality a little bit: My friend, your problem at roa is not birth rate. Problem is that armenians are leaving ROA. Their beloved, sacret land. i. Armenians are winners of the recent World Chess Championship, and they are recognized as the most intelligent chessman in the World, which is indicator of their nation's intelligence rate. In past, Russia, EU countries, India, China, Georgia and other countries, several times became the winners. But regardless of the prominent reproduction rate there are no Turks in the Chess Olympus Your history doesnot show that chess masters. Where were they, when they were needed. Also I dont see a genious rule at ROA. The only thing that matters in the nowadays World, and is critical for their FUTURE survival, is QUALITY! QUALITY! QUALITY! that quality quantity discussion is absurd.Or do you think, armenians have some gens superior to Turks? Edited December 26, 2006 by zurderer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takoush Posted December 26, 2006 Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 (edited) Հողը սուրբ է, դա շիրիմն է մեր նախնյաց, Հողն է պահում օրօրոցը հայ մանկաց, Հողը զգոն սաղավարտ է պահապան, Դրանից վեր չկա ոչ մի, ոչ մի բան: Հողն է ծնում հողն է պահում ազգերին, Հողն է թաղում հող չպաշտող ցեղերին, Հողը սուրբ է՝ եւ մատուռն է մեր ուխտի, Հողը սուրբ է ու փարոսն է պանդուխտի: Հերոսների արյան գինն է մեր հողը Այդ արյունից էլ անգին է մեր հողը Կայքից վեր է, կյանքից վեր է մեր հողը Նախնյաց նվեր եւ պատվեր է մեր հողը: Սիրելի Կեվորք ճան: Ես թէեւ տակաւին առիթ չ՚ունեցայ կարդալու վերի գրութիւնները եւ ոչ ալ Զուրտըրըրի Զիրտըրըրի ցըբըրտուքները, սակայն այս քու դրած ոտանաւորդ շատ շատ սիրուն մի ոտանաւոր է: Արդեօք դո՞ւն ես գրեր թէ ուրիշ մէկն է գրեր բայց շատ աղւոր մի գրութիւն է սա: Շորհակալութիւն եւ ապրիս: Edited December 26, 2006 by Anahid Takouhi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamavor Posted December 26, 2006 Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 Your history doesnot show that chess masters. Where were they, when they were needed. Also I dont see a genious rule at ROA. The Turk has some points that shouldn't be ignored, however it is dumb to respond to his faulty logic. In one hand, he shows some concern about how awful Armenia's geopolitics look and in the same time he pushes his agenda to absurd levels of "kissing hands". Given the situation in South Caucasus, Armenian leadership is doing utmost to keep the balance of powers. The complimentary policy introduced by Vartan Oskanian is the only adequate policy that Armenia should pursue. Europeans (Turks included) may wish for more, but that is the reality. Armenia's national interests are not a mach for European interests. Actually our and European interests collide on more grounds than it is obvious. Europe, true to her humanistic approach to life and liberty, should recognize the Genocide and pursue Turkey to do the same as a crime against humanity before even starting any conversations about rule of law and democracy in Armenia. Europeans have no moral or any other right to teach us what is good for us before coming to terms with their own complicity of the Genocide as a crime against humanity, rather than ethnic feud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takoush Posted December 26, 2006 Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 (edited) Gams jan: I understand what you're saying; however there is an article that was put out in the Journal on Dec. 22, 2006 that a family member gave it to me last night written by Serge Sarkisian. I am going to type it and see what you think of it. It's called "In Spite of the Genocide..." by the way did you read about it? Edited December 26, 2006 by Anahid Takouhi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamavor Posted December 26, 2006 Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 No I haven't but I'm interested to read it. In spite of the genocide there should be a border where freaking Europe STOPS! Unless they decide to make all Armenians millioners. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takoush Posted December 26, 2006 Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 Please Gams jan: I haven't read the complimentary policy that was put out by V. Oskanian. Can you again summarize it for me? I thank you. A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.