I R A N

[hytga]

I think that's a little extreme view. Although i hope that not how things turn out. In any case they'll not be invading from azerbaijan. They've learned their lesson about occupaiton. But if they do resort to military airstrikes from azerbaijan, it would jeopardize the baku cheihan or any other pipeline from azerbaijan, just as it would jeopardize the gas pipeline.

[armjan]

seems like the drums of war are starting to beat again.

 

Is the U.S. going to go to war against Iran IYO?

[Sip]

There is absolutely no way. Unless Iran does something really stupid like pull a 9/11 caliber stunt to send the American public running around like headless chickens (similar to the actual 9/11), there is no way the US is going to take military action against Iran.

[ED]

seems like the drums of war are starting to beat again.

 

Is the U.S. going to go to war against Iran IYO?

 

 

sadly i think so, not a total war but probbly major military strikes using new nuclear weppons US wants to test

 

there are very hard time ahead in comming years and its not ending with Iran, Seryia is next, Lebanon, and arabian penisila

[MosJan]

Abassi: Iran Trained 40 Thousand Suicide Bombers Ready to Hit US and UK

17.04.2006 23:47 GMT+04:00 Print version Send to mail In Russian In Armenian

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ A 40-thousand battalion of suicide bombers ready to hit targets in the US and UK has been formed in Iran, head of Islamic Revolution Guards Corps Hassan Abbassi stated. As reported by AP, the audio with Abbassi’s statement was conveyed to British journalists.

 

Meanwhile UK Prime Minister John Blaire stated that London will not support the US in war against Iran. The UK can support to diplomatic measures for normalization of the situation.

[MosJan]

Armjan if you don;t mind i like to merge 2 topics

 

http://hyeforum.com/index.php?showtopic=13737&st=25

[MosJan]

Is the U.S. going to invade Iran

[MosJan]

PENTAGON CALLED REPORTS ON US INVASION OF IRAN SOON 'ABSURD SPECULATIONS'

 

*

 

Pentagon called reports on forthcoming US invasion of Iran “absurd speculations,” US military department’s official representative Bryan Whitman stated at a briefing in Pentagon.

 

“Like the international community the US President chose diplomacy as a preferred approach to stop Iran’s nuclear programs,” Bryan Whitman said.

 

At the same time Bryan Whitman did not fully deny the US has plans of military operations in the region. “No one will believe Pentagon does not have plans for all types of potential military developments, including those in Iran,” Whitman said. He remarked, Pentagon forms plans based on any development of the situation, RIA Novosti reports.

[Zartonk]

Is the U.S. going to invade Iran

 

Excuse the obviousness:

 

Iran is not Iraq.

 

I do not see the possibility of an American air-strike anytime soon, but rather a sabotage of the IRI from within.

[MosJan]

Iran is no problem but The GW is his one trigger happy SOB

[ED]

Iran is no problem but The GW is his one trigger happy SOB

 

 

is or not, he just an idiot, soon before his second trem is up those nazies will see that they attack iran, irag started this way, oh noooo diplomacy we want diplomacy first (but we keep all our options open)

 

not only me but far smarter washington insiders have called this monkey the WORST PRESEDINT EVER, what good has he done for US or for World? NOTHING obsolutly nothing but make his daddy richer.

 

when in 1973 arab inbargo of oil, Nixon imposed price control on oil, why this idiot not doing the same?

oil is above 3$ a gallon, soon willl be 4 and he along with DICK cant be more happy about it

 

listen to this, exxon/mobil ceo retires and along with his salary which he got over the years, he got a retierment packedge of 400 million$ and company make more profit then ever, not to mantion halliberton who overcharges goverment on hourly bases and no independent commisiion has the guts to invastigate why or make them acountable for it.

 

9/11 my ass, if not involved thiose voulchers saw the opertunity and are cashing in BIG time

 

every time i look at this idiot presedent i get nervios, anrgry, frustreted...............why is this guy a presedent? he should have a job as a bozzo in a circus

[Azat]

listen to this, exxon/mobil ceo retires and along with his salary which he got over the years, he got a retierment packedge of 400 million$ and company make more profit then ever, not to mantion halliberton who overcharges goverment on hourly bases and no independent commisiion has the guts to invastigate why or make them acountable for it.

 

God bless him for negotiating a deal like that. Whats wrong with getting 400, 500 milion or even a billion dollars if you did your job?

 

Is it their fault that we all sit in our cars alone and drive 40 miles to work each way?

[ED]

God bless him for negotiating a deal like that. Whats wrong with getting 400, 500 milion or even a billion dollars if you did your job?

 

Is it their fault that we all sit in our cars alone and drive 40 miles to work each way?

 

 

and God bless US of A, the melfunctioning corporation

I dont know, one might of done the same, we are greedy creatures, especialy US makes them like so, but still something is wrong with the picture, soon you and I will pay $4 for gallon, and thats not the end of it, wile detriot is in hibernation japanise are already taking over car (hybread) market

 

how much exxon invested in reserch for this technology? and how much did this goverment did? war cost is over 500 BILLION and growing, trade gap is widnening with china, soon there will be chinise SUVs here, made by china, invested by americans

 

what I'm saying is, no senace of a vission for future for this goverment, and big corporations are givin a tax breaks along with freedom to screew you and me.

[Zartonk]

what I'm saying is, no senace of a vission for future for this goverment, and big corporations are givin a tax breaks along with freedom to screew you and me.

 

No one will argue here...

[Azat]

and God bless US of A, the melfunctioning corporation

I dont know, one might of done the same, we are greedy creatures, especialy US makes them like so, but still something is wrong with the picture, soon you and I will pay $4 for gallon, and thats not the end of it, wile detriot is in hibernation japanise are already taking over car (hybread) market

 

how much exxon invested in reserch for this technology? and how much did this goverment did? war cost is over 500 BILLION and growing, trade gap is widnening with china, soon there will be chinise SUVs here, made by china, invested by americans

 

what I'm saying is, no senace of a vission for future for this goverment, and big corporations are givin a tax breaks along with freedom to screew you and me.

I agree with some of the points that you are making and each time I go to the gas station and end up paying 50+ dollars to fill up my small 4 cylinder car it misses me off too, but its not Exxon to be blamed nor is it their responsibility to spend a penny of their money to research alternative fuel vehicles. They are a huge cash cow now, but the years when oil was 8 or 10 or 15 or even 20 dollars a barrel and when they were loosing money I dont think any of us were sitting in front of the PC saying "Gosh maybe I should send money to Exxon"

 

And if the Japanese do a great job with the hybrid(the cars out there suck as the mileage improvement is not enough. They have to do better) less and less oil will be consumed and prices will come down to as demand will decrease. For now China and India are buying all the worlds oil. Gold too...

 

Everything else I agree, this administration is full of crooks who screw us and use our own blood as lubricant.

[Yervant1]

Everything else I agree, this administration is full of crooks who screw us and use our own blood as lubricant.

The lubricant is not helping though, you're still feeling the PAIN.

[ED]

The lubricant is not helping though, you're still feeling the PAIN.

 

 

 

becouse here is no lubricant bro, chor chor $%##@#$% en ok ok wont say more

but at list they can use vasoline

[skhara]

hy is this guy a presedent? he should have a job as a bozzo in a circus

 

Its not like it matters anyway. I'll take a monkey (Bush) over a snake (Clinton).

[vava]

There was a very interesting article in the March issue of the New Yorker that discussed in depth the various American perspectives on regime change in Iran. Personally, I think any sort of confrontation will be a last resort - we're nowhere near that right now, despite Ahmadinejad's best efforts.

 

I do find it strange that he represents quintessentially, everything that the US administration would want in the leadership of a "rogue" state. He's handing it to them on a silver platter. "Come and get me"

[Azat]

Its not like it matters anyway. I'll take a monkey (Bush) over a snake (Clinton).

not in a million years

[skhara]

Flush them all down the drain.

[Yervant1]

Flush them all down the drain.

Skhara I guess you're still upset at Clinton for what he did in 2000? Any other president would have done the same thing because I don't think presidents are running the country.

[skhara]

Iranians "won't give a dam".

 

April 29, 2006— In a new report, the United Nations concludes Iran is moving ahead with its nuclear program, continuing to make fuel that could be used in nuclear bombs and continuing to defy the United Nations.

 

During the last 30 days, Iran has conducted three separate missile tests, promised Sudan it will share its nuclear technology and announced an expansion of its uranium enrichment program.

 

"They really are engaged in their own Manhattan project," said Marc Gerecht of the American Enterprise Institute. "And they are deadly serious about this. And it would be foolish to underestimate their capacity and their will here." The stage is set for a showdown at the U.N. Security Council showdown over a resolution to punish Iran.

 

Before an enthusiastic crowd in northwestern Iran Friday, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, declared, "The Iranian nation won't give a damn about such useless resolutions."

......

 

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1904709...TC-RSSFeeds0312

[KGB]

There will be no attack on Iran. Iran is not even close to developing nuclear weapons; all the propaganda in the U.S. media is simply the result of the news media looking for, and finding, work to do.

 

The way I see it, this whole thing is mainly about keeping oil prices high. Keeping oil prices high will help the mullah regime remain in power by allowing them to take care of their people and purchase loyalty, not necessarily in that order. Threatening the world with ambitions to obtain nuclear energy, which "may lead to the development of nuclear weapons," will keep the markets "threatened," which will - along with the chaos in Iraq, a possible attack on the Saudis' oil infrastructure, as well as the forces of supply and demand - help keep prices high.

[hytga]

i don't see how's that beneficial. If they're not going to attack iran, it's less likely they'll attack the saudi oil infrastructure. since it'll deprive them of even more oil as the demands are already high.

And how's it beneficial to keep the markets threatened?

in either case, i don't see this as an overexaggeration by the media. In fact they're being a little modest. Remember before the war in iraq. Saddam was allowing inspectors. Iran has been more bold but the media coverage is not as intense as you'd expect.