Miracle Or Not?

[Sasun]

Let's see what the forumers think about this. Please note that one question can't exceed one line, so I had to keep it short. By "seeing" a miracle I definitely mean seeing in normal conditions healthwise as well as seeing without any unnatural influences such as drugs and alcohol. I also mean not just seeing but using other senses. Also you are convinced that it is not an illusion. For instance, water turns into wine in front of your eyes, you can smell and taste it, as well as check in the lab to make sure that it was definitely water and it is definitely wine now. You get the idea...

[Sip]

Sasun, before I answer, first you have to define "miracle" explicitly.

[Sip]

My dictionary has 3 definitions for it:

 

1. act of God: an event that appears to be contrary to the laws of nature and is regarded as an act of God

2. amazing event: an event or action that is totally amazing, extraordinary, or unexpected

• It’ll be a miracle if we get there on time.

3. marvelous example of skill: something admired as a marvelous creation or example of a particular type of science or skill

• a miracle of modern engineering

 

Encarta® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1999,2000 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Developed for Microsoft by Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

 

Obviously 2 and 3 do occur in our daily lives and is more of a subjective view of a job well done. But I suspect you mean strictly the first one.

[Sasun]

Sasun, before I answer, first you have to define "miracle" explicitly.

style_images/master/snapback.png

Something that has no explanation by sciences. You can take examples of wideley known types of miracles, for example a man walking on the water.

 

So I guess it is number 1 from your definitions.

[nairi]

Sip, that's what I thought, and also, why should a miracle be necessarily religious or the work of (some) God?

 

Sure things happen around us that are hard to explain, but maybe that's just because we don't have the ability to understand them yet. I don't think every "miracle" is necessarily the work of God, if it is at all.

[Sasun]

Well, when I put up the questions I was not thinking exactly as acts of God, but let's say with or without the idea that it maybe an act of God.

[ED]

Today a miracle happened,

 

when i drove home from work, all along i had a loose tire, as soon as i exited freeway i made a left turn my car wobled and there was a gas station right next to it (union 76) the guy at the startion was amaized this tire dident go loose wile driving on the freeway, wow i.i.i.i guess ( as gas station guy told me ) I'm one lucky SOB not to loose it on the freeway.

[ED]

Courtesy of Roger Waters,

It’s a Miracle

 

 

Miraculous you call it babe

You ain't seen nothing yet

They've got Pepsi in the Andes

McDonalds in Tibet

Yosemite's been turned into

A golf course for the Japs

The Dead Sea is alive with rap

Between the Tigris and Euphrates

There's a leisure centre now

They've got all kinds of sports

They've got Bermuda shorts

They had sex in Pennsylvania

A Brazilian grew a tree

A doctor in Manhattan

Saved a dying man for free

It's a miracle

Another Miracle

By the grace of God Almighty

And the pressures of the marketplace

The human race has civilized itself

It's a miracle

We've got warehouses of butter

We've got oceans of wine

We've got famine when we need it

Got designer crime

We've got Mercedes

We've got Porsche

Ferrari and Rolls Royce

We've got choice

She said meet me

In the Garden of Gethsemene my dear

The Lord said Peter I can see

Your house from here

An honest family man

Finally reaped what he had sown

A farmer in Ohio has just repaid a loan

It's a miracle

By the grace of God Almighty

And the pressures of the marketplace

The human race has civilized itself

It's a miracle

We cower in our shelters

With our hands over our ears

Lloyd-Webber's awful stuff

Runs for years and years and years

An earthquake hits the theater

But the operetta lingers

Then the piano lid comes down

And breaks his f***ing fingers

It's a miracle

[Anoushik]

Sasun, before I answer, first you have to define "miracle" explicitly.

style_images/master/snapback.png

This was my first thought too after I read through the poll question

[Anoushik]

Today a miracle happened,

 

when i drove home from work, all along i had a loose tire, as soon as i exited freeway i made a left turn my car wobled and there was a gas station right next to it (union 76) the guy at the startion was amaized this tire dident go loose wile driving on the freeway, wow i.i.i.i guess ( as gas station guy told me ) I'm one lucky SOB not to loose it on the freeway.

style_images/master/snapback.png

Edward, I'm glad that nothing serious happened.

[Anoushik]

Sasun, how about:

 

9. Something that seems like a miracle could have a logical explanation; even if it's not found yet we'll find that logical explanation in the future.

 

...Or something like that

[DominO123]

Self-awarness is a miracle.

[Armen]

Self-awarness is a miracle.

style_images/master/snapback.png

 

That's a mighty thought.

[DominO123]

That's a mighty thought.

style_images/master/snapback.png

 

I will add that self-awarness is the only real miracle.

 

I can not answer Sasuns poll, nothing in the choices satisfy me.

 

A physicist observe light as particle, he just made light as a particle insteed of wave... he did miracle, but the reason why this miracle did happen was because he was self-aware in the first place.

 

Self-awarness is miracle, and every miracles are just the consequences of this miracle.

 

I watch the stars and have a mystical feeling, I watch nature, the trees and I have a mystical feeling... those miracles that are the stars, the trees, our Sun are just the consequences of the only real miracle. Self-Awarness.

[Siamanto]

Sasun,

You forgot number 10:

 

If I think that I'm witnessing miracles than either

a- I'm so exhausted that

I have a dream to sit down and relax under a palm tree

style_images/master/snapback.png

or

b- I had too much of

Wine...a Christian thingy

style_images/master/snapback.png

Edited February 24, 2005 by Siamanto

[shaunt]

I want to say that there can be no such thing as miracles, since everything that occurs in this world is a possible way the world could be. Logical laws determine these possible states of affairs; there can be no illogical event.

 

But that type of a response wouldn't do justice to the miraculous. We cannot overlook the miraculous as a cultural phenomenon, or else you get answers like the one I gave above. And this completely destroys the beauty of the miraculous.

Edited February 24, 2005 by shaunt

[Sasun]

Sasun, how about:

 

9. Something that seems like a miracle could have a logical explanation; even if it's not found yet we'll find that logical explanation in the future.

 

...Or something like that

style_images/master/snapback.png

Yes, of course, I kind of assume that miracle or not a miracle, if something happens it could not be illogical.

[Sasun]

I want to say that there can be no such thing as miracles, since everything that occurs in this world is a possible way the world could be. Logical laws determine these possible states of affairs; there can be no illogical event.

 

But that type of a response wouldn't do justice to the miraculous. We cannot overlook the miraculous as a cultural phenomenon, or else you get answers like the one I gave above. And this completely destroys the beauty of the miraculous.

style_images/master/snapback.png

Well, if you define a miracle as something illogical then there really are no miracles, we agree on that.

[Solaris]

Hey Sasun, was it my attitude to miracles that inspired you with the idea of this poll?

 

I'll pose the question differently: in my opinion the right question is not whether or not we believe in miracles, but whether we want to believe. Makes a lot of difference.

 

I've already said in that "wretched" thread on Jesus' birth that events usually referred to as miracles are not necessarily supernatural, 'cause there are always other possible explanations. We can be hoaxed, mistaken, or deluded, or the event isn't what it seems to be, or simply our knowledge is not enough to explain it scientifically. Consider if David Copperfield's show was performed before a person who has no idea that there exist such things as tricks. And the telephone would certainly seem a miracle to the contemporaries of Jonathan Swift.

 

The trick is that if we "fancy" a particular miracle, we may be inclined (perhaps subconsciously) to stick to the idea of miracle ignoring all other possible explanations, to the degree of defying them when they are being pointed out by someone else. A great many people seem to crave for some "tangible" mystic experience or proof of supernatural. If one believes in some religion, they'll simply want certain phenomena to be a miracles proving their beliefs (Sasun and his stigmata). They simply won't welcome rational explanations.

 

So if we see an "unbelievable" thing, we should neither believe nor disbelieve, but rather register the event and try and test all possible explanations. And the dosage of vino taken prior to the alleged mystic experience should be the first thing to check out…

 

And one more thing for you Sasun:

 

Imagine a friend (who has always been sober and stable as far as you know) comes to you to confide that (s)he hears voices and sees angels – symptoms that are common both for delusional mental illnesses and divine contact. You will:

 

a. Revere her/him as someone having contact with God;

b. Arrange a meeting for her/him with a good physiatrist.

 

What would prevail, your belief in divine contact or the concern and responsibility for the friends' mental health?

[Sasun]

Hey Sasun, was it my attitude to miracles that inspired you with the idea of this poll?

Yeah, you were very inspiring

I'll pose the question differently: in my opinion the right question is not whether or not we believe in miracles, but whether we want to believe. Makes a lot of difference.

It is another question, different from my question. Both are right.

I've already said in that "wretched" thread on Jesus' birth that events usually referred to as miracles are not necessarily supernatural, 'cause there are always other possible explanations. We can be hoaxed, mistaken, or deluded, or the event isn't what it seems to be, or simply our knowledge is not enough to explain it scientifically. Consider if David Copperfield's show was performed before a person who has no idea that there exist such things as tricks.  And the telephone would certainly seem a miracle to the contemporaries of Jonathan Swift.

Well, everything is possible, and if you are saying that one of the possibilities is that "our knowledge is not enough to explain it" then I don't have a disagreement. But I had the impression that for you delusion or hoax are more preferable answers.

The trick is that if we "fancy" a particular miracle, we may be inclined (perhaps subconsciously) to stick to the idea of miracle ignoring all other possible explanations, to the degree of defying them when they are being pointed out by someone else.

That would be another extreme. However, when you see a fellow walking on water then you should certainly consider a miracle as at least a valid possibility.

A great many people seem to crave for some "tangible" mystic experience or proof of supernatural. If one believes in some religion, they'll simply want certain phenomena to be a miracles proving their beliefs (Sasun and his stigmata).  They simply won't welcome rational explanations.

But you are not offering a rational explanation. Skepticism is not necessarily rational, and not even an explanation. I really don't see why skepticism is made such a big deal. Who cannot doubt? I have never met such a person who is unable to doubt. The article that you provided a link for does not mention a number of other people who have witnessed Therese Neumanns stigmata. That's kind of biased don't you think? Just pick a person's testimony who has doubts, but consider all those other folks who are sure of what they saw as delusional or faking, etc... very typical of skeptics

So if we see an "unbelievable" thing, we should neither believe nor disbelieve, but rather register the event and try and test all possible explanations. And the dosage of vino taken prior to the alleged mystic experience should be the first thing to check out… 

I can see why you think that way, because you are not aware of many instances of miraculous events

Actually what a skeptic would do is to check the for "vino" and other types of influences, and once nothing is found, conclude that the person is delusional. That's a sad level of investigation.

And one more thing for you Sasun:

 

Imagine a friend (who has always been sober and stable as far as you know) comes to you to confide that (s)he hears voices and sees angels – symptoms that are common both for delusional mental illnesses and divine contact. You will:

 

a. Revere her/him as someone having contact with God;

b. Arrange a meeting for her/him with a good physiatrist.

 

What would prevail, your belief in divine contact or the concern and responsibility for the friends' mental health?

style_images/master/snapback.png

Hmm... why would I revere just because someone had a divine contact? That would not be one of my choices. So my choices would be to either believe or disbelieve. But if it really happened I would be very curious to ask him/her how that happened, what exactly happened during that contact, etc... such things would shed more light on whether I would believe or not.

 

So now it is your turn to answer your questions I think it is pretty obvious...

Edited February 24, 2005 by Sasun

[Anileve]

I believe in miracles. Miracles are very good. Miracles make me happy. Therefore I don't believe I should stop taking miracle inducing substances.

[Armen]

In materialist science miracles are called "paradox".

 

For example the Big Bang theory includes such a phrase: "physically paradoxical singularity". Translated to normal human language it will mean God's miracle.

Edited February 25, 2005 by Armen

[Arvestaked]

So yoiu are calling everything people cannot explain a miracle. That is ridiculous. The "physically paradoxical singularity" is essentially that it was apparently a monopole. Just because we do not understand it does not mean it was a miracle. If I may revive an example, rain was probably once considered a miracle. I think we should show some maturity and not be so presumptuous.

[Armen]

So yoiu are calling everything people cannot explain a miracle. That is ridiculous. The "physically paradoxical singularity" is essentially that it was apparently a monopole. Just because we do not understand it does not mean it was a miracle. If I may revive an example, rain was probably once considered a miracle. I think we should show some maturity and not be so presumptuous.

style_images/master/snapback.png

 

Your call to maturity is cute. Consider changing your avatar.

 

Materialist science bases lot of stuff on paradoxes. Meaning they construct their theories on unexplainable stuff. They use a linguistic tool like the word "singularity" to explain something in materialist logical terms. This means they believe a paradox (unexplainable contradiction) can be a base of some sound logic. Escencially, this is the nature of a mirace. Unexplainalbe contradiction that brings to logical results.

[Siamanto]

Hey Sasun,

...

events usually referred to as miracles are not necessarily supernatural, 'cause there are always other possible explanations. We can be hoaxed, mistaken, or deluded, or the event isn't what it seems to be, or simply our knowledge is not enough to explain it scientifically. Consider if David Copperfield's show was performed before a person who has no idea that there exist such things as tricks.  And the telephone would certainly seem a miracle to the contemporaries of Jonathan Swift.

 

The trick is that if we "fancy" a particular miracle, we may be inclined (perhaps subconsciously) to stick to the idea of miracle ignoring all other possible explanations, to the degree of defying them when they are being pointed out by someone else. A great many people seem to crave for some "tangible" mystic experience or proof of supernatural. If one believes in some religion, they'll simply want certain phenomena to be a miracles proving their beliefs (Sasun and his stigmata).  They simply won't welcome rational explanations.

.....

Imagine a friend (who has always been sober and stable as far as you know) comes to you to confide that (s)he hears voices and sees angels – symptoms that are common both for delusional mental illnesses and divine contact. You will:

 

a. Revere her/him as someone having contact with God;

b. Arrange a meeting for her/him with a good physiatrist.

 

What would prevail, your belief in divine contact or the concern and responsibility for the friends' mental health?

style_images/master/snapback.png

Solaris,

I hear you. For the record, I would give Sasun much more credit as a rational and critical mind, regradless of how much I tease him!

 

PS. Sasun,

I don't remember you as someone religious. What happened? A miracle!