Good point. As I mentioned earlier - I'm not really up to speed as to the TARC's mandate, nor their legalese statement. My guess is that they are saying that legally, based on their preliminary findings, the genocide convention DOES apply to the crimes in question. As to whether a complete, exhaustive, historical analysis was actually executed (one that satisfies both sides of participants) that remains to be determined. I figure, this was the only sort of compromise that the TARC could possibly arrive at - in other words, somewhat of a stalemate.