the turk argues that Artsax/arstakh has never been part of armenia. MJ, supposedly an armenian, argues the same thing. now us, as armenians, who do we concentrate our efforts on? answer me this question. what MJ said is not a historical fact, it is a historical revision. i don't intend to spend my time giving you all the facts on historical armenian province of artsakh, because you know all to well what the facts are. i will just say that if Artsax has not been part of armenia for MOST of its history, then it has NEVER been part of azerbaijan for ALL of its history. once again, i am not going to give you any historical facts, because you know the facts too well, plus i would assume that the turk is who i'd have to convince, and not an "armenian." but if you are so armenian and care so deeply about artsakh as to not even tolerate the word "Artsax", then aren't you aware that according to the azerbaijanis, who you agree with on with MJ's comment, that "arsakh" is not armenian word, it is a caucasian albanian word, and don't you know that caucasian albanians are ancestors of azerbaijanis??? of course this is a big revision carried out by azerbaijani and turkish gov't sponsored revisionisst historians on the payroll, but i hope this will shut your mouth. concentrate your efforts where it needs concentration. if its possible, tell me how to change my nick name and i'll change it to artsakh if you really care for it so much. ----------------------------------- now, lets get back to our topic, well lets hear your thoughts.