Dan

Well, Azat, it's a $ game. So I can't tell. Giguerre is amazing, but I'm still gonna go with a Sens vs. Wild final. I want to see those two play against each other. That would be interesting.

Like I said, GOLF CANCUKS GOLF!!!!!! The Wild were really solid in the last 3 games. Good for them. I'm looking forward to a Sens vs. Wild final. That should be interesting.

Vava, If history is about to be made, the Canucks usually help.... No team in NHL has ever come from a 3-1 deficit more than once in the playoffs. Now the Canucks have helped the Wild make history. If you ask me, I'd say GOLF NUCKS GOLF!!!!!! At least the Leafs had CONSISTENT goaltending in their last game vs. Flyers. Sheeeeeeeeeesh. Cloutier has got to go. He honestly sucks (lately). Maybe he needs some smelling salt to wake up. That was one stupid game. Not to mention the obvious offside that wasn't called, and which resulted in a goal. The dude was wayyyyyyy ahead of the blue line. In leaps and bounds. Whoooooooooaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. I'm impressed. And the bogus calls... wow. Man, ya gotta love the refs. They simply don't wanna see an all-Canadian final. Yea, and when a team sends a player who is wearing a full-face mask to hit others (taking advantage of the full face mask), I lose all respect I had for that team. Willie Mitchell. And they pretended he was injured. False news spread from the Wild team. All the time, I knew he wasn't injured. It was a mind game. I think the Canucks got a bit cocky about their 3-1 lead, and they fully deserve what they got in the last 2 games. Never underestimate your enemies. The Canucks lost the series in game 5. Period. Kudos to Sens. That's one consistent team. Roloson was amazing, by the way. So is Lalime. I just want to watch good hockey from now on, not a poor performance like the Nucks' last 2 games. So if they're not gonna friggin pull themselves up, they better leave the playoffs and go home.

You probably wouldn't, because that's the only way of life you could perceive of. If I did time travel and became a kid 500 years ago somehow (but knew about computers, technology, etc), only then would I kill myself, because I would realize how boring the situation I'm living in (500 years ago), is. No computers???? I wouldn't be able to survive.

LOL. Good point. But who says kids 500 years ago didn't do drugs? There's opium out there, and you'll get high if you eat it, you know? You don't need processed pills like Ecstasy or anything to get high. <_<

So I assume you will also argue that anti-depressants don't cause liver cirrhosis, eh? And that Depleted Uranium doesn't cause cancer. After all, you just love arguing with me and trying to prove me wrong. My friend, I talked about Ecstasy because I am familiar with it. I'm also familiar with tobacco, and tobacco has given me more problems so far than the E. Marijuana is NOT addictive, and it has no more undesirable effects than Nicotin. I don't need a lesson in chemistry. I'm familiar with the structures and the chemical names. Experience gives me a better perspective. This, by the way, is my last reply. Not looking for arguments with you, as I'm aware that you are impossible to debate an issue with.

Actually, Domino, you are wrong. Possession of drugs is illegal. If they find me with one pill of Ecstasy, I can be charged with posession under the Criminal Code and Controlled Substances Act. Why? Because if you got it, then there must be someone selling it, and you encouraged the sale of that drug, and were thus complicit in the crime because you did not report it. Unless you've got really good connections in the police dept., you will be held and brought to court. How do I know this? Well, let's just say I've seen it happen. The bill I am talking about makes the usage and trade of pot legal. That is, you can go and buy it anywhere, in the market, etc., just like you can get cigarettes. And I happen to think that if those drugs are decriminalized, the black market will eventually cease to exist for those drugs, and since the drug will be accessible any time for anyone above a certain age, there will be less crime related to drugs. One more thing: if posession of any quantity of drugs is decriminalized, that means that traders can't be charged with posession of those drugs (trafficking), which indirectly means that what we're looking at is an implicit legalization of the drug in question. And if it's only an issue of addiction, tobacco is more addictive than marijuana. I've smoked pot and cigarettes, and I can tell you that cigarettes are more addictive than pot. Cigarettes have worse effects on health than does pot or Ecstasy. Why is it legal? That's for you to ponder. Everything takes time. It's just like the black liberation and women's movement.

If something is decriminalized, it means that cops can't pursue me criminally for doing it. Thefore, it is within my legal rights. It's either legal, or illegal. No in-betweens.

Vava, PM Jean Chrétien is pushing for a bill to legalize pot and marijuana. Our neighbors to the south, however, are pressuring Chrétien because the legalization would somehow "pose significant danger to US citizens." I support the legalization of recreational drugs too. By the way, I think it was nairi that was questioning this: Canada does have sniffing dogs at the airport.

Oh, OK. I asked cos I haven't seen it, so I was wondering why. Thanks.

I think it's a mixture of fish, snake, and dragon's head. LOL. But it's a cool logo (regardless of the fact that it doesn't really relate [as far as I know] to the Canucks' history/team). It's just a 'C' for Canucks, with a fancy angry fish-head.

Wait wait, we're still not through yet. We gotta kick some more Wild butt, and then we'll kick the Ducks out.

Ehehhehe, that goal should've been counted. Pooor Dallas cowboys.. Oooops, I mean Stars. The Canucks lost. YIKES!!!!!!!!! But we still lead the series 3 - 2!!! Note: If anyone checked out the NHL website right after the game, there was a note saying the Wild have forced game 6 and 7. Apparently, NHL is hopeful for a Wild comeback. That explains the horrible officiating. After all, it's the NATIONAL (as in American?) hockey league, right? Man, Azat, the Ducks' logo sucks. GO CANUCKS GO!!!! GO SENS GO!!!

Hey Vava, did you watch the Sens vs. Flyers game? We just won!!!!!!!! :clap: Man, the Sens were playing really well. I hope they reach the finals. Canucks too! GO CANUCKS GO!!! GO SENS GO!!!

Embarrassment? How come?

Ahhhh Real Madrid 1-5 I bet they're still pretty good.

Sip, I agree with you. Here in Toronto, it's the same scene. I think people sit in coffee shops mainly because they want to be around people, and some even go to flirt. LOL. Man, if you take a look at the people around you in the coffeeshop, you'll feel like everyone is out there to flirt with one another. I ABSOLUTELY HATE THAT. And that's why I hate coffee shops. And I really hate people who take their laptops to coffeeshops - I think they do it to show their laptops. LOL. I mean, OK, say if you're living in residence, and sometimes you feel the need to go out and be around people and work at the same time on your laptop, that's fine, but I know people who go to coffeeshops and open their laptops and they really don't need to do that. Besides, how can ANYONE do anything in a coffeeshop? I can't concentrate on anything while I'm in there. But I like going to coffeeshops with friends before going to a bar or whatever. Especially in the winter, where all you wanna do is get inside any shop after the walk from the subway station, I think coffeeshops are pretty cool at winter. And I love Starbucks' coffee. And they play Jazz all the time, which is pretty cool.

LOL Azat. No please, no insect pics. THE CUP BELONGS TO THE CANUCKS!!!!

I donno. I just came across it and was It's BBC, I mean, they wouldn't just spread rumors.

Heh!! Where are the ducks?! Quack Quack, they lost! One more time: Quack!

Here's the link.

No, it was on BBC. I have the article.

Me too, me too!! Yea, I enjoyed the Koreans' game too!

We shall see how mighty the ducks are.