axel

She's not that feminine, is she? Her being a pain in the *ss (for me) doesn't suffice to qualify her for womanhood, does it?

It seems you speak out of experience But I am not in favor of women masculinisation, dear. Genders are complementary. Women should remain feminine and men should remain virile.

He is in the semis at Roland Garros! Just defeated three-times champion Guga (Kuerten) in 4 sets 6-2 3-6 6-4 7-6 !!

Finally a scientifically-grounded explanation as to why we have so many "gay rights" sympathizers and "male feminists" on this board. I wouldn't be surprised that these include the infamous anilevian lobby...

Shafarevich's book is a study of socialism throughout history from ancient societies, medieval sects/heresies to modern communism. His main argument is that socialism emerging in unrelated societies at different times in man history must imply that it follows from something deeper in man than mere rational development, that it corresponds to some profound instinct. The socialist system is a source of alienation but it itself derives from some instinct Man seems to be prisoner of. There are a number of other important ideas expressed and I do not recall each one of them as I read it a few years ago. You may find it in russian on the web (www.voskres.ru/shafarevich). I do not speak russian but I know the cyrillic alphabet and from what I could gather it is there together with other works Cochin not only studies the mechanism behind the revolution but its very nature, the nature of the ideas/conceptions that subtend it, modern democracy, reason left to itself, the ideological and sociological forces that work towards producing a new type of man with no understanding, no tradition, no moral tie... His ideas may easily be extrapolated to the boshevik revolution (he died in 1916). But it is far too rich and dense for me to summarize here. Here are a few quotes taken from one of his works I quickly translated. There are not that emblematic of his studies, yet may give a basic idea of his actual perspective "The general will, one believes, is that of the majority. It is not. The law, under this regime, rather expresses that against which the majority has not yet rebelled, that which was able to be done without her willing the contrary. The myth of the actual active will of all, imposing itself upon each only has a value of legal fiction, not any real one. What one means by the will of the all, is the will of some, formed, imposed, reigning in certain precise conditions due to the force of things and the nature of the regime" "Disaggregating the voting matter, isolating the individuals, so as to make them inorganic, what one refers to as liberty, indifferent and homogenous, what is called equality, nonetheless imposing them some mutual adherence one names fraternity, in one word, reducing them to some docile and perishable magma, such is the effect of machinism." "There is no such example in history of a more profound and complete social dissolution. Free thought killed society because it killed the human person. Dissociating man from any natural or moral tie, it gave him up as a wreck to the social tide. In his soul, it only left a ruin, egoism, it called reason and that will either be hate or fear..." PS: Sorry guys for interfering in your discussion

Gamavor, regardless of the actual brand, make sure it comes with a quality display, preferably high-res (>= 1400x1050).

In the first quote or maybe I misuderstood something...

Indeed, the word "crook" in the mouth of Thénardier has a very special resonance. Definitely unequaled. PS: Naïri jan, good to see you back! It's been a while

http://www.armland.site.gr

Doesn't this definition apply to the "french model" you appear to be defending? I congratulate you for being aware of your own as the "I hate to say this" seems to suggest.

Could you explain the difference?

This is not only true of western democracy but of all ideological systems. Systems alienate man by their very nature. All mechanical attempts at regulating/conditioning Life are satanic in essence. PS somehow related question, have you read Igor Shafarevich's socialist phenomenon? and Augustin Cochin's studies on the french revolution? The latter are extremely insightful and relevant (with a thorough analysis of the actual mechanisms of modern democracy and societies of thought (ie freemasonic societies) from a non-conspirationist point of view), alas only available in french (on the web). If you are interested, I can provide the link

I found this modern version on the web: http://www.elkalima.com/pdf/a/ot/ecclesiastes.pdf HTH btw, the same passage is quoted in Andrei Rublev.

this was not to be understood in a literal fashion

Don't jump to conclusion too fast. My real name is that of an archangel

I think Armenia first needs to get rid of imbeciles such as you. But it remains to be proved that you are in fact armenian which does not seem quite obvious to me.

Sorry for repeating myself, our assimilation in today's modern/judaized society is first and foremost a spiritual one. biological assimilation is a direct consequence of spiritual assimilation. race in itself is not worth preserving, we are not animals. spirit is, for we are humans. race is only to be preserved if it helps the development and preservation of the spirit. it does to a certain extent but it is clearly not sufficient (just look at some "full-blooded" armenians on this board) and it certainly should not stand as an end in itself.

Your understanding of "God's chosen people" is the judeo-materialistic one, not the christian one. So please, tell me, what does relate to Armenia? Your ideology itself is not armenian in any sense of the word. PS: I use the term materialistic and modernity in the "philosophical" sense, not in the common one. (I put the word in quotes for it sounds a bit pretentious ) PPS: Please understand that I'm not pushing for what you refer to as "modernity" or "pop culture" as your friend TAP likes to put it.

Actually I suppose this was all masterminded by Stormig to serve as a dissuasive illustration of what verbal violence may actually lead to: "Forum environmentalist" Sasun's pacifying intervention. Quite an awful perspective indeed considering her aversion towards ecologists.

My mistake, I shouldn't waste my time with mentally-retarded ricains who need smileys and recorded laughs to recognize humor.

Are you not?

Well we have fought for centuries in defence of our Christian Faith only to apostatize it today that we are no longer being oppressed. Aren't you one of those very apostates? You might rant at "modernity" all you want, judging from your ideology whose premises are naturalistic/materialistic, you unconsciously bear its rotten fruit.

True it often goes unnoticed. Take this statement for instance "Nothing a little shaving and make-up can't take care of, I'm sure". It seems inoffensive at first glance. Well make no mistake about it, this is an outrageous attack on Sip's gender-classification skills.

Sorry I am not used to filling my posts with smileys. I still need some practise. Maybe I should make an effort and participate in zero-entropy threads such as Mandy's welcoming.

You want me to get another warning (Azat this one does not count, does it?) Don't worry, I have better things to do than write poetry to an unsensitive slut. I see little offence there, I mean, from a french point of view.