Lev7 Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 Jermaine Jackson Plans Entertainment Center In Armenia AP Jermaine Jackson of the legendary Jackson 5 revealed plans Monday to build an entertainment complex in Armenia and said he hoped that his brother Michael Jackson would join in a reunion concert marking its opening. Jackson, a singer and bass guitar player who has pursued a solo career, is on a 12-day visit to this impoverished landlocked Caucasus Mountain nation. He said the complex could include a hotel, a restaurant as well as a television company. Pop sensation The Jackson 5 - brothers Jackie, Tito, Jermaine, Marlon and Michael ` was formed by their father Joe in the 1960s in Gary, Indiana. Michael Jackson, the youngest in the band, helped propel the group to its peak of popularity in 1972 during a tour in Britain. The Jacksons' last album was released in 1989. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hytga Posted February 10, 2006 Report Share Posted February 10, 2006 i read that he planned a similar project in his hometown, but it's dragging on and maybe won't be completed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bakersfieldian Posted February 11, 2006 Report Share Posted February 11, 2006 Oh God No!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantom22 Posted February 11, 2006 Report Share Posted February 11, 2006 Just make sure he is not alone with children un-chaperoned. Where the h--l are our Armenian celebrities that the Jacksons have to do this? Oh God No!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lev7 Posted February 11, 2006 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2006 Just make sure he is not alone with children un-chaperoned. Where the h--l are our Armenian celebrities that the Jacksons have to do this? Imagine if he molested a child there, his body will be found somewhere in Hrazdan river lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantom22 Posted February 11, 2006 Report Share Posted February 11, 2006 Therefore you have nothing to worry about. Yet, I don't think he molested the children whose parents sued him either in 1993 or lately. He is a weirdo, but not a pedophile. .Imagine if he molested a child there, his body will be found somewhere in Hrazdan river lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takoush Posted February 11, 2006 Report Share Posted February 11, 2006 I very much doubt that Jackson molested that boy. I truly think that he was innocent, considering how money hungry and arrogent the boy's parents were. He just showed kindness and he got ridiculousness in return. I felt sorry for him for what they put him through. He is quite a bit weird and extremely eccentric but he was innocent about molesting that boy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azat Posted February 12, 2006 Report Share Posted February 12, 2006 remember this was not the first time he was accused of this... He bought out the other boy some years back Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armjan Posted February 12, 2006 Report Share Posted February 12, 2006 for a second, I was wondering why the pacers forward was visiting armenia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantom22 Posted February 12, 2006 Report Share Posted February 12, 2006 Azat, You mean he bought out the parent. If your child was truly molested, would you sell his soul for a price? Do you remember the woman who claimed to have found a finger in her Wendy's burger? It was a sham. A very devious boss of mine once stated. "It is not the reality that is important, but the perception." Therefore, if many feel that Michael Jackson's relationship with young boys is a sexual one, a devious parent can take advantage of this and make a lot of money. If this truly happened, I doubt the parent would take the money. He or she would want the molester put away for good. Azat, make yourself happy. Find a girfriend you loves you. Then you will not hae to focus upon the life of Michael Jackson. If you had a more satisfying sex life, you would not have to channel your frustration. Jackson should not be befriending young boys. It is very stupid on his part, given his weird appearance and actions. If there is really smoke here, then the 1993 case should be re-opened and all the facts should be brought out. The 2004-2005 case was clearly a sham. Thre plaintiff's family were totally dishonored. I know of a few such cases in California, where similar persons filed suit with no sensitivity too whom it would harm. Luckily, they did not prevail. remember this was not the first time he was accused of this... He bought out the other boy some years back Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takoush Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 Azat, You mean he bought out the parent. If your child was truly molested, would you sell his soul for a price? Do you remember the woman who claimed to have found a finger in her Wendy's burger? It was a sham. A very devious boss of mine once stated. "It is not the reality that is important, but the perception." Therefore, if many feel that Michael Jackson's relationship with young boys is a sexual one, a devious parent can take advantage of this and make a lot of money. If this truly happened, I doubt the parent would take the money. He or she would want the molester put away for good. Azat, make yourself happy. Find a girfriend you loves you. Then you will not hae to focus upon the life of Michael Jackson. If you had a more satisfying sex life, you would not have to channel your frustration. Jackson should not be befriending young boys. It is very stupid on his part, given his weird appearance and actions. If there is really smoke here, then the 1993 case should be re-opened and all the facts should be brought out. The 2004-2005 case was clearly a sham. Thre plaintiff's family were totally dishonored. I know of a few such cases in California, where similar persons filed suit with no sensitivity too whom it would harm. Luckily, they did not prevail. Yes. He's just being too trusting of people and befriending with regular people that have been and are after his money. Anybody that is popular and with great deal of money must be very cautious and he's not. He's just being silly about it. He must exercise caution on his part, it's imperative for someone in his position, I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azat Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 Azat, You mean he bought out the parent. If your child was truly molested, would you sell his soul for a price? Do you remember the woman who claimed to have found a finger in her Wendy's burger? It was a sham. A very devious boss of mine once stated. "It is not the reality that is important, but the perception." Therefore, if many feel that Michael Jackson's relationship with young boys is a sexual one, a devious parent can take advantage of this and make a lot of money. If this truly happened, I doubt the parent would take the money. He or she would want the molester put away for good. Azat, make yourself happy. Find a girfriend you loves you. Then you will not hae to focus upon the life of Michael Jackson. If you had a more satisfying sex life, you would not have to channel your frustration. Jackson should not be befriending young boys. It is very stupid on his part, given his weird appearance and actions. If there is really smoke here, then the 1993 case should be re-opened and all the facts should be brought out. The 2004-2005 case was clearly a sham. Thre plaintiff's family were totally dishonored. I know of a few such cases in California, where similar persons filed suit with no sensitivity too whom it would harm. Luckily, they did not prevail. Look who is giving who advice... Phantomaz, believe me I have no time to follow anyone else's life let alone some has been douche bag named Michael Jackson. Based on all the info you wrote it might lead people to believe that you are the one who is idealizing him and following all his moves. I am not saying that you are but it might lead others to believe that. As for finding a girlfriend, I think it would be wise for you to do that so you dont have to spend all your time following Mr Jackson's life. maybe your Jewish wife did not want to give you babies because she knew you would let them sleep in the same bed as psychotic men... Now get lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantom22 Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 My ex-wife was 100% Armenian. It was my brother who had a Jewish wife and my cousins who married Jews. Please explain why my ex chose to do away with pregnancies in all her three marriages. I do not idolize Jackson, but believe in fairness. If he truly did these things he should be put away. If you are judging him solely due to the prejudice of people with viewpoints like you, then you are accusing him solely upon appearances. Look who is giving who advice... Phantomaz, believe me I have no time to follow anyone else's life let alone some has been douche bag named Michael Jackson. Based on all the info you wrote it might lead people to believe that you are the one who is idealizing him and following all his moves. I am not saying that you are but it might lead others to believe that. As for finding a girlfriend, I think it would be wise for you to do that so you dont have to spend all your time following Mr Jackson's life. maybe your Jewish wife did not want to give you babies because she knew you would let them sleep in the same bed as psychotic men... Now get lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.