Jump to content

Just To Share...


Arvestaked

Recommended Posts

Armen there is no need to get technical. Listen to any classical music even modern music and each person takes away something subjective meaning even though composer may have felt an inspiration from a fly there is no way that he can convey that in concrete terms in music. Music is sound! Human made instrumental sound is abstract by default. For example Nairi mentioned sabre dance. If you did not know the title and the composer personal heritage, background etc and played this to bunch of Latin Americans, I can assure you they may feel not a single sword or anything close to original music’s inspiration. It is all subjective.

style_images/master/snapback.png

 

The fact that it is named "Sabre Dance" is subjective. Because the name is a different association that is there so that we can classify or for some other reason. But for example the rythm is not abstract. Anyone could identify its rythm. Or we can all identify rythms of different nations. The same Latin Americans for example.

 

Armat, I think there is a difference in our (mine, yours, everyones) definition of "abstract" that's why there is a misunderstanding perhaps.

 

If we say the music is totaly abstract, we are just discriminating our listening sense. Our hearing is not different from our sense of smell, vision, touch etc. They all have a different degree of tangibility (and therefore different degree of abstraction) but none of them is totaly subjective.

 

If hearing is subjective then vision is too as we may feel very differently about the same woman based on her looks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 207
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Armat, with your definition, everything in life is abstract.

 

I made a distinction between that which can be sensed (concrete) and that which cannot be sensed (abstract). Music can be sensed with the ears.

style_images/master/snapback.png

Nairi I disagree.Abtract can be sensed.Mark rothko's late paintings can be seen and they are still abstract.We are talking about content and to what extand that can be percieved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I am basically saying is that if applying the same reason why we consider an abstract painting abstract, in music, music would be the most abstract of all arts. Because it`s not figurative, or any as simple as that.

QB above.I agree totally furthermore not just figurative but any representational reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Art is not about thinking as far as I am concerned. Abstract art is an illusion.

style_images/master/snapback.png

 

Art's whatever you want it or make it to be. To you it might be illusion, to another it might be thought, emotion and whatever else they feel. http://gogortilozforum.com/style_emoticons/default/newaug5.gif To each his own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Art's whatever you want it or make it to be. To you it might be illusion, to another it might be thought, emotion and whatever else they feel. http://gogortilozforum.com/style_emoticons/default/newaug5.gif To each his own.

style_images/master/snapback.png

 

Honorable Ms., I don't remember why did I say that but that was meant to be something very smart. As of now it has lost its validity a bit, however, I give it another try...

 

So, everything goes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have the freedom to consider it whatever you want. Everyone sees, feels, and thinks art differently. http://gogortilozforum.com/style_emoticons/default/painter.gif

 

one mans art can be another mans garbage.

Edited by whitelotus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have the freedom to consider it whatever you want. Everyone sees, feels, and thinks art differently. http://gogortilozforum.com/style_emoticons/default/painter.gif

 

one mans art can be another mans garbage.

style_images/master/snapback.png

Surely there is a standard for good art and bad art, don't you think so?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all have our own standard within ourselves.

style_images/master/snapback.png

So if my five year old son bangs on the piano keys randomly but he thinks it is a great music then according to your logic it is. :) Hey who we are to disagree right? and who gives us the authority to judge right?

There is a fundamental flaw in your thinking. Art can be judged according to its particular linage, history, great contributors, historical significance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if my five year old son bangs on the piano keys randomly but he thinks it is a great music then according to your logic it is.

 

Yes to your son it's great music, but it doesn't mean to you it might be the same. http://die-pretty.net/forum/images/smiles/25.gif

 

My point is, each individual has a different idea and opinion of whats great and what's not. Who are we to put a rubber stamp on something and say for example that ' All Abstract Art is crap.' It's just one persons opinion. Even if lets say the majority thought it sucked, it still wouldn't make abstract art crap because there might be one person out of a 100 who thinks it's brilliant. And that my friend takes away the rubber stamp that All abstract art stinks. http://die-pretty.net/forum/images/smiles/25.gif

 

Everyones idea of art and beauty is different. http://die-pretty.net/forum/images/smiles/5.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if my five year old son bangs on the piano keys randomly but he thinks it is a great music then according to your logic it is. :)
style_images/master/snapback.png

 

Actually my one-year-old niece tends to produce miracles when randomly banging on the piano :P We all stop what we're doing to enjoy her "concerto". I bought her a harmonica for new year's eve. Now she plays them both at the same time :) Still random, but worth listening to :)

 

But I see your point. I also see Lily's though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is, each individual has a different idea and opinion of whats great and what's not. Who are we to put a rubber stamp on something and say for example that  ' All Abstract Art is crap.' It's just one persons opinion. Even if lets say the majority thought it sucked, it still wouldn't make abstract art crap because there might be one person out of a 100 who thinks it's brilliant. And that my friend takes away the rubber stamp that All abstract art stinks. http://die-pretty.net/forum/images/smiles/25.gif

 

Everyones idea of art and beauty is different. http://die-pretty.net/forum/images/smiles/5.gif

style_images/master/snapback.png

No, I disagree. A great amount of knowledge and experience in the field of study determines what is good art and what is bad art.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I disagree. A great amount of knowledge and experience in the field of study determines what is good art and what is bad art.

 

 

Anoushik jan. I'm not objecting to your claim. I think what you are saying is very correct. I'm not arguing about what is good quality and what isn't, or whose idea of art is better than the others. I'm just stating that everyone has a different idea of whats beautiful to them. Nothing more, nothing less. :)

Edited by whitelotus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Anoushik and Armat.

 

What people fail to understand is that art is before anything else, the communication of your "being." More talented you are, more you will be able to reproduce this. A child will only hit the piano keys... people may like that, and find it a masterpiece, but there is no "knowledgeble" representation of his being with this act.

 

What makes it a masterpieces is innovation and the capacity to represent(talent) your "me of the moment."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fully agree with the arguments you've made. What I pointed out is the first step. I simply said that different people have different ideas and opinions of what art is to themselves. This is where it all starts , from square one and then you build on top of that to gain knowledge and experience. You guys made the argument that it doesn't make what they think of art, really art. I couldn't agree with you more. I just stated the first building blocks under the whole conclusion we've come to. http://die-pretty.net/forum/images/smiles/61.gif Edited by whitelotus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...