skhara

No. Not really. Germans never were with semi-oriental mentalities.

Yeah, and Argentina did too, a while ago.

That where I found it yes.

Voltaire characterised the Turks as: "tyrants of the women and enemies of arts". He also spoke of the need: "to chase away from Europe these barbaric usurpers" He accused the Turks of having destroyed Europes ancient heritage from :"the Orient’s Christian realm" and wrote: "I wish fervently that the Turkish barbarians be chased away immediately out of the country of Xenophon, Socrates, Plato, Sophocles and Euripides. If we wanted, it could be done soon but seven crusades of superstition have been undertaken and a crusade of honour will never take place. We know almost no city built by them; they let decay the most beautiful establishments of Antiquity, they reign over ruins." In this passage Voltaire refers to the brutal 500 year Ottoman occupation of Greece

Dave, don't you mean Voltair and turks? I also read Candide. There is little mention of turks except for the ending. There are a lot of references of being swindled by Jews. Voltair was no friend of turks. He thought them quite bloodthirsty.

Browsing on the net, I thought you guys may find these a bit interesting: http://www.circassianworld.com/Photos/Photos.html

Lebanon Crisis Is a Foreign Tug-Of-War http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireSt...TC-RSSFeeds0312 BEIRUT, Lebanon Nov 12, 2006 (AP)— Behind Lebanon's deepening political crisis is a tug-of-war between the United States and its Middle Eastern opponents Iran and Syria a battle with high stakes for America's push for greater democracy in the region. At the center is the Iranian- and Syrian-backed Hezbollah's demands for a larger role in the Lebanese government, now dominated by anti-Syrian politicians with strong backing from the United States and Europe. The crisis deepened Saturday when two Hezbollah Cabinet ministers and three others from an allied Shiite party resigned hours after talks to form a unity government collapsed. Hezbollah and its allies want enough seats in 24-member Cabinet to wield veto power, a prospect that has some Lebanese on edge after the guerrillas' war with Israel last summer. Western-backed Prime Minister Fuad Saniora refused to accept the resignations, but it was unclear whether his weak government had the clout to force the ministers to stay on. Lebanon's pro-Syrian President Emile Lahoud insisted Sunday that the Cabinet has lost its legitimacy, arguing the constitution requires the government to be representative of the country's religious sects. Hezbollah, whose popularity among many of Lebanon's majority Shiites rose after its war Israel, has threatened mass street protests to topple the government. The collapse of Lebanon's government would be a major setback to one of the U.S. diplomatic successes in the Middle East. The United States was instrumental in forcing Syria to withdraw its army from Lebanon last year in the wake of the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, a killing his supporters blamed on Syria. Syria denied involvement, but mass protests in Beirut and international pressure forced Syria to leave, ending its nearly three-decade dominance of its smaller neighbor. Shortly afterward, Lebanon held democratic elections a rarity in the Arab world which brought an anti-Syrian majority to the Parliament and Cabinet. Washington has warned Lebanon's government one of the friendliest to the United States in over two decades is at risk of falling apart. Some in the region have sounded similar warnings, saying giving Hezbollah veto power would bring Lebanon back under the influence of Iran and Syria, the main supporters of the Shiite guerrillas.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireSt...7836&page=1 Iran Vows Retaliation if Israel Strikes By NASSER KARIMI TEHRAN, Iran Nov 12, 2006 (AP)— Iran's military will retaliate swiftly and strongly if Israel attacks any Iranian nuclear sites, the Foreign Ministry said Sunday. The warning came two days after Israel's deputy defense minister suggested Israel might be forced to launch a military strike against Iran's disputed nuclear program as "a last resort." "If the Zionist regime commits such stupidity, the response by the Iranian military will be swift, strong and crushing," Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammed Ali Hosseini said. "Iran will take no longer than a second to respond." The comments by Israeli Deputy Defense Minister Ephraim Sneh were the clearest yet from a high-ranking official of possible military action against Iran. However, the Israeli government later said the comments did not necessarily reflect its views or those of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. Israel bombed Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor in 1981 to destroy Saddam Hussein's nuclear weapons program. While Israel neither acknowledges nor denies possessing nuclear arms, it is thought to have about 100-200 nuclear warheads, according to a 2006 report by the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies. Hosseini downplayed the possibility of an Israeli attack. "The situation and capability of the Zionist regime are far too small to threaten Iran," he said. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, meanwhile, again criticized the U.N. Security Council over its efforts to impose sanctions on Iran because of its nuclear program. Iran says its program is for peaceful energy purposes, but the United States and other Western countries fear its a cover for developing weapons. "It is most embarrassing that the U.N Security Council, which should be the defender of nations' security and rights, threatens countries pursuing nuclear fuel for peaceful purposes under the law," Ahmadinejad said, addressing the general assembly of Asian Parliaments Association for Peace in the capital, Tehran. He accused the U.N. of applying a double standard, saying it was pursuing Iran "while those countries, armed with nuclear weapons, deny the rights of other countries to produce nuclear fuel and exploit it for peaceful purposes. ......................................

Well said Arpa, this is just filth.

These guys are such animals with not an ounce of civility. This is stereotypical turk behavior.

There is something wrong to throw away your hard earned cash on this garbage. It gets old pretty quick.

Pirates of the Caribean.

Freedom House? lol --- Can we call it Hryadom House instead? Here is a nice article about Hryadom House: http://www.exile.ru/2005-December-28/freed...or_fascism.html

He means a political precedent, not a historic one.

Hopefully they keep to just screwing Georgia and leave Armenia out of this.

His character is Kazakh. I know he doesn't look Kazakh, but its not like Americans know what Kazakhs look like.

He is making fun of Kazakhs and Americans at the same time. Its quite funny to us, but I can understand why Kazakhs are so pissed since he gives off the impression that Kazakhs are backward retards, prostitutes, perverts, gypsy-catchers, jew-catchers, dog-eaters, ill-mannered and brazen, etc.... Enjoy: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4...Borat&hl=en http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=54...Borat&hl=en http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2...Borat&hl=en http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3...Borat&hl=en http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7...Borat&hl=en http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2...Borat&hl=en

Wow! This is much faster than googlemaps.

No. Hitler thought Armenians were what was left of the Persians after letting Jews destroy it. That's all I know that he "considered" Armenians as.

Bah they all come from semitic writings, including our own precious Christianity -- or at least this is how it is told. No, that's why I keep comming back here.

You are wrong Arpa, Iran is Aryan land.

Ha ha. I remember you linking those kuban forums, I went and read some of those threads out of curiousity. What's a "white"? On those forums they kept talking about "cherniye". Not all of them were anti-"cherniye" btw, one guy was saying how he had many "chernih" friends. They, of coarse were talking about "Caucasians". I was just laughing at the coloqial usage. There are plenty of times on applications or various legal documents in America when one has to list their race, or their race is stated for them like on a traffic ticket for example. Typically there is listing that is most often stated as White/Caucasian. Now I don't know about this "white" thing because if it was up to those kuban guys, they'd change it to Cherniy/Caucasian, but I definitely know that I am Caucasian.

What do Russians and Jews have do to with each other? Now if this is your experience, it tells me that you've only associated with Russian Jews and no real Russians. Actully it is not so incredible. Some of them may very likely be, not that their grunts realize it however. There are conspirital overtones there, but there was a story printed in an Armenian paper on the subject. Actually some Jewish-observer for the former USSR organisation complained about the article. Also, 'white' is not a race -- its a color.

'hitler' did not "didnt let" nor did he "didn't let" quite simply because "hitler" had another ambitions. I have no problem with the Aryan identity of the Armenian people. Likewise Persians are also Aryan. In fact, Germans borrowed "Aryan" -- I don't think there was much of this as a self-identity amongst Western Europeans.

I see Europian Union is in the first spot. I suppose if it was The European Union, Russia would run away with it by a long shot.