Anonymouse

Since when did this thread become about me? I guess I was wrong to play nice and try to mend things. I must have been too much of an annoyance for one Dutchess of Holland so she had to get allies to feel more secure and better able to absorb my annoance and that would explain why this thread is now about me. Arpa Papa, I only live to be an eternal annoyance for you. And I'm sure, if you could, you would have me banned eternally from this place! Have you pleaded your case to the moderators? I cannot imagine the internet getting to someone so seriously unless one happens to be an old senile man.

You need to get out of the house more old man Arpa, or allow me to call you, Papa. I don't even know who you are and nor am I interested. But I am flattered that you get so worked up over me and you know so much about me. I guess you never learned to be satisfied with your own banal life and so, like a thrill seeker, you seek to find out about others to forget about your own putrid insignificance.

Are you planning to marry your cousin? I don't think so. Be quiet Shahan Araradian. This thread is only for serious people considering marrying their cousin. Those who are not concerned with the trivial pursuits of marriage but are much more concerned and consumed with the Satanic place that is United State of America have their own proper thread and forum called International Politics.

Yea gdavidyan, listen to Shahan Araradian about not getting married before getting a job or business. But let me interpret whhere Shahan Araradian left off. By getting a job or business it means by you getting a job or a business. However, it does not mean working at a company or for someone else or just merely providing labor power. He means you must engage in subsistence farming or have your own little wooden shed where you make your clothes and build your chairs, tables and bed to sleep on, and have a well to fetch water and stuff, because otherwise you will be nothing more than an automaton mired in the fields of misanthropy providing nothing more than labor power for your greedy corporate puppet masters. And by the way, per Shahan Araradian, you should not come to the United States gdavidyan, as that is not what a Shahan Araradian would do, and nor should you. You will be a slave like Neo in The Matrix before Morpheus showed him how deep the rabit hole can go. So be wise my friend. I suggest you take your new cousin-wife and run away into the woods or a farm and start a nice "A Little House on the Prairie" lifestyle, per the recommendations of Shahan Araradian.

Kim Kardashian was the author of George Bush's Iraq surge plan. It's not working.

You my friend are correct and you win a life sized replica of Kim Kardashian's arse made from Tempur-pedic!

Kim Kardashian provided the mathematical calculation which allowed the completion of the internet. Al Gore claimed credit.

Kim Kardashian was an important scientist who helped expand the field of astronomy and spaceflight. Her work can now be observed as the Griffith Observatory or the internets.

When you see an attorney, tell him all the facts and make sure to tell him what you worry as the possible legal implications. Most attorneys provide a free consultation. If he takes the job there might be a retainer fee. If not, they may work on a contingency basis. Know this, this might not be cheap, but if you really love your cousin, err, this girl, then you should be willing to go through with the costs. And by the way, don't be too "loving" trying to be the ideal romantic type like from the Arthurian romances. I understand you love the girl and all, but seriously dude. And what's this about being khandot is bad? Mi kich el petke khandot linel. Everything has its place. Sometimes you need to be rough and tough, sometimes you should be possessive and protective, and other times a "liberal nut". And seriously dude, you should get a grip. Be a man. Even if you love your cousin, stop sobbing and get a grip over yourself. And by the way, any sensible Armenian should stop listening to Armenchik, Armen Aloyan, Tatoul, and any of them useless pieces of Turko-Asiatic influenced mongrels. Maybe if you stop listening to Armenchik and trash that CD, God will grant you a good attorney who can save your love. But first you must save yourself from that crying. Be a little mannish. Me thinks that, even if it's your cousin, girls are girls and they love a man more than half-a-man. Cheers mate.

You should probably talk to an attorney who deals with immigration law and family law respectively. This is a legal matter. Forget the family, that is already phucked.

You must like them. Is it because of the escapism they offer or is it because you just find that interesting and nothing else? By the way, I love the Audrey Hepburn thing you got goin on!

Hayastan.com? I have never even been on that website my little urchin. It seems I am upsetting the balance of the force between Nairi and her woodland friends.

And this is where nairi replies to me without replying to me directly. It's that stage of the thread where she is already fed up after buttons being pushed. Thinking she is psychic and knows my motivations, she will spill her opinion because it's better to ignore everything else. She would much rather make assumptions and generalizations, all the while claiming she hates generalizations and mice who make them. When I stated that I talk about women, because as a man, this thread is written from the perspective of me as a man, she wouldn't believe that and why should she, right? She won't have that! How dare anyone introduce anything related to subjective perceptions, and the ability to differentiate between things! That is how racists are born! After pointing out nairi's hypocrisy, she became even more inflamed and irate. That is the way she is. She cannot possibly stand dissent, disagreement or anything or anyone that has views that fall way beyond her ideological prism of no stereotypes, men are evil, women can do no wrong, and "I am always right because I can't stand criticism."

I know, but that is how I am able to push your buttons.

I win.

Once again, like typical women, she assumes that all her experience and her life is the reference point for the world. There are plenty of exceptions to rules, that there are "so many" could be because you were either juts (a) fortunate enough to meet all the exceptions or ( b ), even if they weren't you will in your mind warp them to be the exceptions. I'm not changing anything, toots. I clearly stated "most women" several times, including "exceptions to the rule". That you read that was not meant to be read out of context and should be read in the context of my general stance. You either misread or misunderstood it out of context, or you intentionally did so. Innate hatred towards women? Where do you gather that? If you are going to make baseless accusations, you should back them up. And now, my guess is, you will cower and run away. How have I lashed at women? By stating that most women like like to make over a guy? This is not an issue of whether men should be more compromising than women, or vice versa, it's an issue of compromise period. That I happen to speak about women, is from my perspective as a man, toots. Well then it's a good thing that you don't! Otherwise, hyeforum would be nairiless and that would certainly be a bad thing. How are my views 19th century when just 50 years ago it was still the norm? And what about my views are wrong or evil or backward? Please tell me. The most successful couples that you know. Again, this is not about you. Who cares about what you know? To you, it's a feminist world of where women can do no wrong, men are evil, and compromise is the way like in a hostage negotiation. So you would compromise if you were to get into a relationship? I would be hard pressed to believe that and I believe this is in fact a prime reason for your choice to remain in solitude. Don't be a hypocrite, toots.

Haha, this post made me chuckle. Nairi is obviously trying to get really personal now that I exposed her hypocrisy. Without knowing anything she assumes I have never had sex, and that I have not been in a long-term relationship. Very well for the Dutchess from Holland. Like I said, good to know you aren't giving any men hell and you're choosing a life of solitude.

Mexico (not really) But I do remember a funny line from the movie, From Dusk Till Dawn "Where are you going?" "Mexico" 'What's in Mexico?" "Mexicans"

Oh please, this is the silliest excuse of not pleasing your supposed partner. And when they wander off and cheat the women shriek and go, "Oh noes! ! How could he have done such a thing?!" And you would know because you're a man! Right? And you are making a generalization because you do not believe in making generalizations! Right? Trust me, toots, I don't know what men you have been hanging around with, but twice a week is an understatement of immense proportions.

I'm sorry, it's been a long day. But, are you agreeing with me or disagreeing?

Oh joy. You reject it because you have met exceptions to the rule and you go on thinking like that. To think otherwise is counter to your ideological prism (and we all have one we just don't always agree on the prism). Yes, and I clearly stated that I was talking about most women, and I also clearly stated exceptions do not disprove the rule, no matter how much people want to appeal to their own idea of the way things ought to be. Who cares about who you know? This isn't about you. If that were the case, why bother even having studies and things of that nature? Why not just get scientists and researches to just come and knock at your door and ask you for your opinions, or better yet, they can just come to hyeforum and read and get all the research they need. The key word here is belief. You can choose to believe whatever you want to believe. Did I say anyone is forcing me? This isn't about force, nor is it about finding your carbon copy. You folks, and especially you, can't seem to understand the difference between respecting and accepting someone for the person that they are, versus trying to make them take the road down to compromise. If friends have to try so hard to appeal to their friends to find common ground, that friendship will lead to dissolution and division. My point stands. And just like you claim you have seen exceptions all around you, I, too, have witnessed exceptional relationships where the couples accept each other for who they are and do not impose their egos on one another and talk about "compromise". You compromise when you are a negotiator negotiating with someone who is holding hostages. That isn't what a relationship is supposed to be. If you believe that, then good thing you have chosen to be single.

You speak as if stereotypes are on par with fairy tales, pixie dust, and the old lady that lived in a shoe. Stereotypes are real, precisely for the fact that they exist. If they were not, they would not be there. Stereotypes are used to describe generalities. Even though one should not judge a book by its cover, stereotypes do have an affect humanity as they are a reflection of human perception. Choosing to ignore them, and make the exceptions as the rule does not absolve all the generalities that are common to the genders. I have never stated, at least I believe I have not, that all women are one monolithic entity. But for the most part, women do behave in certain ways that makes them women, aside from the obvious physical manifestations. Men behave in certain ways that makes them men, aside from the obvious physical manifestations. That there are women that do not like shallow comedies and do not want to change their man, does not mean that most women out there are not like that. Most women like shopping, most women talk a lot, most women gossip, most women like to give their homes a makeover just like their men. Most women, in fact, get together with a man for the prime reason of trying to "change him". There is always something wrong with a man and women have the 'make over' gene to try and change that. And, it is no accident that the purse is designed to look like a woman's vagina. Like I said, this is not about finding anyone who is 100% in tune. It's about accepting me for who I am and not trying to pretend to do so, and then try and change me or force me to make compromises here and there. I think you of all people can identify with this the most. One does not have to be my carbon copy in values or views to just accept me.

People traded and bartered before there was any government. When government has failed in places such as Ireland, or the Old West, people still traded and still had markets. Government is not a prerequisite for human interaction and trade. This is more unsubstantiated theoretical Marxist conjecture. You state "capitalism WILL be history" as if you know anything beyond your ignorance. Never speak in absolutes about the future. By doing so, you display the first sign of gross economic ignorance, as anyone who has studied the subject knows about the principle of uncertainty. You really don't read what I post do you? I never accused you of engaging in conspiracy theories. I merely pointed out that I used to sift through conspiracy theories, learning about things I considered many to "not know." I only raised that point, to point out your self-absorption into your own little world in which you believe you have figured out all the truths and falsities and you are privy to certain esoteric knowledge that the faint masses do not possess. After I told you I do not believe the media, you again typed the same regurgitated nonsense about how I follow CNN and MSNBC. It's really pathetic because you really have nothing to argue or say beyond the few little truths you think you have learned by reading http://www.marxists.org/.

First of all, this has everything to do with efficient resource allocation and maximization of utility. Nevermind that overtime there is a lowering of quality of all things publicly owned, or "public". The public is a fallacy and no such holistic entity exists. Through time there is a lowering of quality and an increase in corruption and carelessness. That the government workers and civil servants are guaranteed an income through the taxed people virtually their whole time in office there will be no regard for the well being of the alleged "people" they claim to represent. (think abuses of power by the police department). The most extreme form of this was witnessed in the Soviet Union towards its post war era. Thus an increased emploment in the 'public sector' such as government jobs and facilities will follow with carelessness, imcompetence, and laziness. And when was the last time the U.S. military was anything successful? U.S. power is based on a chimera. Read this critique of the public sector: http://www.mises.org/resources/b344f24c-cd...65-0941a0d333bb We can listen to Michael Moore with all his wonderful stories of socialist bliss and ignore everything else and call that reality. The key here is you don't understand the dynamics of anything, which is why you are forced to resort to unsubstantiated assertions like this one here: That is patently false. The government is nothing like the free market, as it is based on a monopoly of violence in a given territory, and on coercion. The onus is upon you to make your claim. You will now run away as you previously did when called upon to illuminate our ignorance. Yea, that's what Marx said. Marx also said that capitalism will be in the dustbin of history. Look who's laughing now. China, the biggest capitalist country is emerging from its Marxist wet dream. The government is never "for the people", it is "for the government".

It's funny you blame capitalism for all the world's ills. Nevermind that "capitalism" was originally a pejorative term invented by Marx. The culprit has always been the hand of government.