Jump to content

Is Kerry A Charlatan?


Armat

Recommended Posts

Sorry mods that this is off topic but could not help myself :)

Armen please provide evidance of Kerry's charlatanism or you risk yourself being one!

Kerry's recond on Armenian issues is an established fact.No Armenian with character should trash someone who has been a true friend all along.

My evidence is the undeniable statistical pattern of both republican and democratic presidents giving electoral hopes for Armenians before elections and then not sticking to them after they get into the office. U.S. foriegn policy does not depend on either democratic or republican values. They are for domestic consumption. The only difference in foreign policy conduct over long time already has been in the style.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Armen please provide evidance of Kerry's charlatanism or you risk yourself being one!

Kerry's recond on Armenian issues is an established fact.No Armenian with character should trash someone who has been a true friend all along.

 

 

Armen-My evidence is the undeniable statistical pattern of both republican and democratic presidents giving electoral hopes for Armenians before elections and then not sticking to them after they get into the office. U.S. foriegn policy does not depend on either democratic or republican values. They are for domestic consumption. The only difference in foreign policy conduct over long time already has been in the style.

 

Armen

First you generalize both parties on mainly Genocide recognition issue however there are lot more issues then just genocide.

 

Throughout his 20 year tenure in the Senate, John Kerry has been a principled and effective champion of issues of vital concern to Armenian-Americans. He has led efforts to fight for US recognition of the Armenian Genocide; he cosponsored Bob Dole's 1990 resolution and is currently a sponsor of S.Res.164. He has led initiatives to lift the Turkish-Azeri blockades of Armenia and authored Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act, has fought to increase aid and expand trade with Armenia (he is currently a cosponsor of S.Res.1557), supports the full participation of Nagorno-Artsax in the peace negotiations and has fought to maintain military parity between Armenia and Azerbaijan

How is the above make him a charlatan!You have not shown any evidance hence I got to assume you are the real charlatan,judging without any substance.

Edited by Armat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Armen

First you generalize both parties on mainly Genocide recognition issue however there are lot more issues then just genocide.

 

Throughout his 20 year tenure in the Senate, John Kerry has been a principled and effective champion of issues of vital concern to Armenian-Americans. He has led efforts to fight for US recognition of the Armenian Genocide; he cosponsored Bob Dole's 1990 resolution and is currently a sponsor of S.Res.164. He has led initiatives to lift the Turkish-Azeri blockades of Armenia and authored Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act, has fought to increase aid and expand trade with Armenia (he is currently a cosponsor of S.Res.1557), supports the full participation of Nagorno-Artsax in the peace negotiations and has fought to maintain military parity between Armenia and Azerbaijan

How is the above make him a charlatan!You have not shown any evidance hence I got to assume you are the real charlatan,judging without any substance.

Armat,

 

There are lot more issues where we can get information on Kerry's conduct as a politician. Let us not focus on Armenian issues only.

 

Go here: http://www.georgewbush.com/KerryMediaCenter/

 

and read what a charlatan Kerry is.

 

He has been unpricipled and ineffective on a very big number of issues. This brings me to a conclusion that he is going to change his position on Armenian issues as soon as his interests change. This proves his former conduct on Armenian issues to be a mere coincidence.

 

This effectively makes you a misinformed and lost voter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Armen

I thought you might have had a better judgment then visiting Bush site and reading trash, far cry from objectivity.

Bush has overturned the military parity between Armenia and Azerbaijan which was established by Clinton adm.Bush has actively been against many Armenian issues including the latest about using public funds by Turkey for lobbying purposes. Let me take the opportunity and state that Kerry as a Mass senator has helped Armenian American politicians get elected such as RACHEL KAPRIELIAN from Watertown and supporting Armenian issues. The record is pretty solid. I rather base my judgment on the substance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Armat,

If we go back to Clinton era, let me remind you that Lisabon OSCE summit - the single most heavy Armenian diplomatic defeat - happened during Clinton and with active participation of his administration. Not to mentioned how actively the Bush father cabinet helped Armenia in everything in early 1990s.

Turkey's most strong threat to Armenia (military attack) happened in winter 1993, during Clinton and calmed by Russians not Clinton.

As far as Kerry is concerned, he is just as much a hypocrite as Bush. That's the nature of US politics (and modern politics in general). They need to raise money and they do it with every possible way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Armen

The main point is that Kerry has been supporting Armenians for long time. That is on record and that's why all major Armenian organizations indorse him.

I would reserve to call him hypocrite, charlatan what have you until he proves to deserve those adjectives and untill then you don't have to vote but don't spoil it for others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Armat,

If I were to chose between Bush and Kerry as an American I would chose Kerry. Simply because he can speak logically and is actually going to be the President, unlike the Bush situation, where you don't know who is the actual president Cheney or Bush. And most importantly you don't know why is it that way.

Other than that, my personal view of U.S. electoral system is that everyone who gets to the top is a charlatan, which means he cannot fully deliver his promises. That's just technically impossible. Who is more or less charlatan is a different issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Granted that 99% of politicians are liars (is it news to anyone?), Kerry seems much better positioned for Armenian issues than Bush. I think it is obvious. However, I don't think Kerry or anyone else for that matter could go against the US national interests. I am sure Kerry will deliver only a small portion of his promises, nonetheless he will do more than Bush for us Armenians.

 

Other than that, I don't like his unclear stance too. For example, I try to understand his stance on Iraq war but cannot understand it. Is he for the war or against it? Sometimes he makes the impression that he is against it, and sometimes that he is for it, depending on how his response will support his election chances.

 

But I would not go as far as to say that he will not deliver any of his promises to Armenians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

KERRY DENIES ACCEPTANCE OF ARMENIAN 'GENOCIDE'

 

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 8. ARMINFO. The US Democratic Party's Presidential Candidate, Senator John F. Kerry, put a damper on the expectations of Armenian lobbyists on the issue of genocide. Kerry denied claims made by the Armenian lobby in late August that he will accept the Armenian Genocide resolution. The Presidential candidate told Zaman that he contributed to Senator Robert Dole's initiatives on the subject in 1990, but said he has not made any statement that he would accept the resolution either before the upcoming elections on November 2nd or within the last 10 years. Kerry said, "Turkey is one of America's oldest allies and it will remain so."

 

In the first round of debates between the presidential candidates, Kerry narrowed the gap between him and his Republican rival, US President George W. Bush. Kerry, like Bush, gave his full support to Turkey's accession to the European Union (EU). The Massachusetts Senator added that Turkey's candidacy is a must for both Europe and Turkey. He said if he is elected President, the friendship between the two countries will be maintained as is. At a Democrat Party committee meeting on October 2nd, the Senator paused when he was told that his statement that he intends to accept the alleged Armenian genocide deeply upset Turkish society and voters of Turkish origin. He asked when he had made the statement and was told "last month." Kerry responded by absolutely denying it and stressed that he has said no such thing over the past ten years. At a musical festival titled "Armenstock-Kef for Kerry" held on August 28, 2004 that was organized by the American National Committee for Armenians (ANCA) in Massachusetts, a letter allegedly sent by Kerry was read by Democratic Congressional member, Barney Frank. The letter conveyed that the Democratic Presidential candidate would accept the resolution on April 24, 2005, the 90th anniversary of the alleged Armenian genocide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am very up front as to my support for Kerry, as I was about my role in the Wesley Clark campaign and my support of Republican John McCain.

 

Armen clearly is attempting to undermine any support for John Kerry among Armenians. Isn't it interesting that he mentions this article and then produces it moments later? The Armenian establishment (to be read as wealthy and socially conservative) have been hoodwinking rank-and-file Armenians for decades to believe that their well-being lies with the US Republican Party. In truth, it only assures the well-being of the affluent Armenians who are in charge of our community.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

America-Hye, I don't care who becomes U.S. president because I know it's all the same for Armenia. I just provided an article, which - if it is true indeed - effectively proves that Kerry is not only a charlatan but also a lier. Same goes for Bush, with a little difference. Bush is a funny stupid lier :) Carry on with your campaign, I mean Kerry on ...:)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is your answer. Armen is an avid Bush supporter

Armen Posted on: Oct 6 2004, 01:57 PM

Don't make a mistake!

Group: Moderator

Posts: 1432

Joined: 5-October 03

From: Armenia <-> US

Member No.: 1446

Vote for Bush!...I mean would you give LTP a second chance? Vote and leave a comment!!!

style_images/master/snapback.png

 

:shocking: :D America-Hye you made my day. Thanks man :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Bush had not used his dirty politics in South Carolina in 2000, McCain would probably be President today. Has Bush been any more supportive of Armenian issues than McCain would have been? I would have supported McCain over Gore.

Bush is an absolute disaster as President. Why anyone would want to vote for him is incomprehensible, unless they are an avowed Evangelical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You see Armen EVEN wants Bush as President of Armenia

style_images/master/snapback.png

 

Oh yes, THAT I would love to see.

Just imagine, we would bomb Turkey back to 11th century! We would have 12 aircraft carriers delpoyed in Sevan lake! Oil contratcs with Saudy Arabia! A fine company like Halliburton would be based in Armenia! Dear God make this possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Armenian National Committee of America

888 17th St., NW, Suite 904

Washington, DC 20006

Tel: (202) 775-1918

Fax: (202) 775-5648

E-mail: anca@anca.org

Internet: www.anca.org

 

PRESS RELEASE

October 9, 2004

Contact: Elizabeth S. Chouldjian

Tel: (202) 775-1918

 

KERRY CAMPAIGN SETS RECORD STRAIGHT

ON FALSE STORY IN THE TURKISH PRESS

 

-- Reinforces Strong Record on Armenian Issues;

Stresses Sharp Differences with President Bush

 

WASHINGTON, DC - The text of the Kerry campaign's response to a

fabricated story that recently appeared in the Turkish newspaper

Zaman is provided below.

 

`We appreciate John Kerry's quick action to set the record straight

regarding a blatantly fabricated attempt to misrepresent his 20-year

record of principled support for U.S. recognition of the Armenian

Genocide, strong U.S.-Armenia ties, and other issues of special

importance to Armenian American voters,' said ANCA Executive

Director Aram Hamparian.

 

`Senator Kerry's rapid response to this latest act of desperation by

deniers of the Armenian Genocide underscores the depth of his

commitment to recognizing the Armenian Genocide, highlights the

importance he attaches to reaching out to Armenian American voters,

and dramatically illustrates the contrast between his record of

principled leadership and the President's neglect and opposition to a

broad range of Armenian American issues.'

 

#####

 

For Immediate Release Contact:

 

Mark Kitchens, 202-464-2800

October 9, 2004

 

RESPONSE TO FALSE REPORTS IN ZAMAN ABOUT JOHN KERRY'S

POSITION ON ISSUES OF IMPORTANCE TO ARMENIAN AMERICANS

 

Today John Kerry Spokesman Mark Kitchens issued the following

statement in response to false reports in Zaman about John Kerry's

position on issues of importance to Armenia Americans. "There is no

truth to the report published recently in the Turkish newspaper

"Zaman."

 

"John Kerry's record in the Senate and his statements during this

campaign have consistently supported U.S. recognition of the

Armenian Genocide. "John Kerry is a long-time leader on issues of

concern to Armenian Americans and is proud to have been endorsed

by the Armenian National Committee of America.

 

"The choice for Armenian Americans is clear. They can either have four

more years of neglect and even outright opposition from the Bush

administration, or a Kerry-Edwards administration that supports the

issues they care about and welcomes their input."

 

- 30-

 

 

[GROONG NOTE: Here's the Zaman article in full. Over the last 2 days

it has been submitted to us 8 times. --AB ]

 

 

Kerry Denies Acceptance of Armenian 'Genocide'

 

Zaman Online - Zaman.org

INTERNATIONAL 10.09.2004 01:57 Saturday

 

[some versions also dated:

October 8, 2004

Source: Zaman Gazetesi

http://www.zaman.com/?bl=international&alt...041008&hn=12850 ]

 

 

The US Democratic Party's Presidential Candidate, Senator John F. Kerry, put

a damper on the expectations of Armenian lobbyists on the issue of genocide.

 

Zaman Turkey -- Kerry denied claims made by the Armenian lobby in late

August that he will accept the Armenian Genocide resolution. The

Presidential candidate told Zaman that he contributed to Senator Robert

Dole's initiatives on the subject in 1990, but said he has not made any

statement that he would accept the resolution either before the upcoming

elections on November 2nd or within the last 10 years. Kerry said, "Turkey

is one of America's oldest allies and it will remain so."

 

In the first round of debates between the presidential candidates, Kerry

narrowed the gap between him and his Republican rival, US President George

W. Bush. Kerry, like Bush, gave his full support to Turkey's accession to

the European Union (EU). The Massachusetts Senator added that Turkey's

candidacy is a must for both Europe and Turkey. He said if he is elected

President, the friendship between the two countries will be maintained as

is.

 

At a Democrat Party committee meeting on October 2nd, the Senator paused

when he was told that his statement that he intends to accept the alleged

Armenian genocide deeply upset Turkish society and voters of Turkish origin.

He asked when he had made the statement and was told "last month." Kerry

responded by absolutely denying it and stressed that he has said no such

thing over the past ten years.

 

At a musical festival titled "Armenstock-Kef for Kerry" held on August 28,

2004 that was organized by the American National Committee for Armenians

(ANCA) in Massachusetts, a letter allegedly sent by Kerry was read by

Democratic Congressional member, Barney Frank. The letter conveyed that the

Democratic Presidential candidate would accept the resolution on April 24,

2005, the 90th anniversary of the alleged Armenian genocide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...