Is The Universe Our Brain ?

[Guest Fadi]

There is around 100 billion neurons in our brain, there is about 100 billion galaxies in our Universe, from an approximation I did basing from the number of molecules forming the neurons, there is about 2000 billion billion in the entire human brain, and guess what, there is about the same number of stars in the Universe... Now the question is, is there as much solair system in the Universe, as there is atoms in the Brain ? We can extrapolate, ans say, is there as much quanta of life in the Universe, as there is "Quanta" supersymetric states in forming conscience as possible bases of life ?

 

Forget what I wrote above, but the question is still interesting, what if in fact the Universe itself is our brain ? And all this respect a kind of "fractal Universe Laws" and a kind of supersymetric kind of "communication." That will imply that the Einstein general relativity is not right, and the only reason why it works is because virtual-time itself is forced to be relative because it has to respect its "Quantum copy" in this sort of Fractal Universe.

 

The Proof of that could lie in the brain, under extrem stress, and when the brain enters in a states of destruction, the "time" for the subject seems to slow down, time in itself depend on the interpretation of movement, or better, the "possibility" of this movement. So imagine now that someone has been killed, and the brain before shuting down slows down, and more and more then finish... during that moment, the times for the subject slows down as well, more and more and more, imagine the individual is still conscient, and his brain creat a kind of dream world for him, since times slow down this dream world could last days for the indiidual, because his notion of time is not the same as another, that could happen, even if, the brain has been destroyed waiting an hours after his death... now, this thing that could be percieved as days, could very well last as well percieved years for the individual, because of the perception of time.

 

Now, lets suppose a kind of relativity that influance two different people in the same exact system, for one, one hour is percieve as very very long, for the other, very very slow... now, we view one hour very short, of course it depend, but in normal life, its short, its that way because we concieve this time span as that, this time span is based on our perception nothing more, if we were able to find one hour, very very very slow, we would be in a place and see things very very slowly moving. On the other way, if we were to find one hour, very very quick, we would see things, and our mind that goes with it, moving very very fast. Thats it. Times is an illusion of the present, I said in my other post that present does not really exist, but whay if, it is the only thing it exist as time, with a span time of t = 0 ?

 

http://www.anzwers.org/free/universe/universe.gif

 

The above picture is the one of our Universe,

 

Sounds like the brain, maybe may brain is the Universe of little things asking if it is expending, searching new planets where other things are living in, and I am there God. And that my life has been mesured by those things as something like 13.7 Billion years.

[Dan]

Correlation does not imply causation. Simple as that.

 

What on Earth are you talking about? Your theory is ummmmm... how shall I put it... illogical.

 

[Guest Fadi]

Dan, an advice for you, if you want to have any discussion with someone, start by questioning if you understood what the other said, before calling the theses as illogical.

 

As for correlation, a strong correlation some times could be suggestif of causation, and since I have not affirmed what I said in the first paragraph as an absolute truth, you can in no way remind me something I did not imply.

 

Ther is many other new theories that proves in fact the similairities of the brain and the Universe, one of those is called the Holographic brain vs the Holographic Universe, dimentions that could all be hiden in a simple flat two dimentional thing... this theories try to explain the brain as a holographic data keeper, and many evidences have been brough to prove that, one of those being the way the brain record informations, and that after removing a part of the brain that is keeping an information in question, the subject forget or lose those datas, and later on those same data"s that have been lost are remembered. The exact same think now is extrapolated about the Universe, and the supersymetric "communication" and how a photom that is Quantumly broken communicate with its other half instantaniously, and even they have shown that the communication pass trew metals or objects, and it seems that the said communication is not influenced by a physical barrier.

 

In fact, the only reason our brains think like the way the Universe work, is because our brain is made exactlly like the Universe, in fact, our brain is our Universe. And everything that goes with it.

[Dan]

But thats... still... uhhhh... illogical... Donno, just doesn't seem logical to me. That's all. I'm not criticizing it. Just saying that I don't find it reasonable.

 

Another thing though, you are constructing your argument in a way that basically says that if this is true, then this must be so. But you can't go from one thing to another without establishing a solid base with which you can justify the jump from statement to conclusion.

[Guest Fadi]

Dan, I am using a methodology of comparaison to demonstrate something, and its possibility, there is no such thing as "proof" in science other then mathematic, all is about "evidences" only mathematic has what we call "proof" so from that basis I bring possibilities, if I were to bring a proof of that, I would have presented myself to the scientific community to be candidate to have a Nobel Prize for having found the secret of the universe.

 

As for logical, the bases of physic is not anymore based on logic, "logical explanation" has been killed by the physicists when they presented Quantum mechanic, all the bases of atoms does not respect logical rules, or at least they defy human logic. I can give a plenty of examples to prove that.

[Sip]

100 billion is a very small number. How many books do you have on your bookshelf? 15? Do you realize there are more ways to rearrange those books on your bookshelf than the 100 BILLION galaxies you are talking about in the universe or the neurons in your brain?

 

Now imagine the "complexity" of just a small library

[Guest Fadi]

Actually, I have more then 100.

 

Yes, you are right, but as well, there is thousands time more possibility of neural connections in the brain then there is atoms in the entire Universe.