Guest Posted June 14, 2000 Report Share Posted June 14, 2000 I'll try to translate the part of the "Legend of Babelon Tower" which I remember. "When God created the earth people where speaking one language. They were of one color and had the same habits. They worshiped the God, made sacrifices in his honor and expressed their gratitude for the bread and water the God gave them.As time passed by people of the earth developed and one day they decided to build a tower and see the God. They started to build the tower at the city of Babelon. Those who started the construction were long dead when the tower was almost compleeted. But the God punished the people of the earth for their attemped to become gods themselves. He pained them in different colors, mixed their languages so that nobody was able to understand the other, and changed their habits. After this people started to argue who was the best among them to own the tower. Finally as a result of war the tower was destroyed". My question is: Should we build the tower again? Note: Sarcasm is accepted but try to have a point! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 15, 2000 Report Share Posted June 15, 2000 I am not sure if we should. But only GOD would be able to do so (impossible) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 15, 2000 Report Share Posted June 15, 2000 Basically the Bible tells us that the Anti-christ will try to build a falsely united kingdom. However, this doesn't mean everyone should continue with their petty factions, Armenian vs. Azeri, Sinhal vs. Tamil, Albanian vs. Serb, etc ad nauseum! We must work for peace, because it is the perfect will of our Lord. We must pray for the conversion of the Azeris, did you know many are converting to Evangelical Christianity? I am not saying throw in the towel and say "Here Turks and Azeris come and take our lands, pillage and sack." What I am saying is there comes a point when we must look beyond nationalism and see each other as God's children. All the divisions are artificial. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 16, 2000 Report Share Posted June 16, 2000 quote:Originally posted by farsisteve@aol.com:Basically the Bible tells us that the Anti-christ will try to build a falsely united kingdom. However, this doesn't mean everyone should continue with their petty factions, Armenian vs. Azeri, Sinhal vs. Tamil, Albanian vs. Serb, etc ad nauseum! We must work for peace, because it is the perfect will of our Lord. We must pray for the conversion of the Azeris, did you know many are converting to Evangelical Christianity? I am not saying throw in the towel and say "Here Turks and Azeris come and take our lands, pillage and sack." What I am saying is there comes a point when we must look beyond nationalism and see each other as God's children. All the divisions are artificial. The perfect will of our Lord was presented to us by Jesus Christ 2000 years ago. Since then thousands of wars have been fought. Please, define what the lable "petty faction" meens: can we apply it only to Irish vs. English, Spanish vs. Bask, or US vs. China vs. Russia vs. Iran, Paki vs. India, all these are petty factions too. Is being a petty or non-petty a matter of population, or geopolitical significance or smth. else. And also, can we find a strong and peaceful force to lead us in the struggle for peace? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 16, 2000 Report Share Posted June 16, 2000 Yes Berj, I would definetely include the Pakistan vs. India bickering and all the others you mentioned as petty factions. Yes it is all just a repetition of Cain and Abel being played out over and over. Is there a strong force to lead us to peace? Yes, there is, his name is Jesus Christ! I don't mean to sound like a Bible-thumper, I am not necessarily a fundamentalist Christian, but I really do believe that only God can bring us true peace. I don't however believe in Globalization. It harms more than it helps and I hate to see the Americanization of the world, as much as I love the U.S. Mexicans should be Mexicans, Chinese should be Chinese, etc. My God, the last time I went to Ensenada Mexico, I had to go all over town to find a Panaderia (self serve bakeries with traditional Mexican sweet breads and hot chocolate), but boy was there a Winchell's Donut shop on every corner! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 29, 2000 Report Share Posted June 29, 2000 AZERBAIJAN LIFTS BAN ON *** BETWEEN MEN MEDIA RELEASE BY ILGA-EUROPE Gay activists in Azerbaijan report that the ban on ***ualrelationships between men in that country has been lifted. A specialedition of "Azerbaijan", the official newspaper of the Parliament,published on 28 May, reports that the Parliament has approved a newCriminal Code, and that the President has signed a decree bringing itinto force in September. The text of the new Criminal Code is alsopublished. From this it is clear that the old Article 113 (inherited>From the Soviet era, and which punished anal *** between men withthree years imprisonment) has been replaced with a new Article 150,which bans only forcible ***ual acts. Azerbaijan has applied for membership of the Council of Europe,and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe is due to voteon its application on Wednesday 28 June. The introduction of the newCriminal Code is part of the widespread legal and institutionalreforms undertaken by Azerbaijan in order to bring its institutions upto the standards required by the Council of Europe. These standardsinclude the abolition of laws which ban same-*** relationships. ILGA Europe has been campaigning for the last 18 months toensure that Article 113 is repealed as a condition of membership ofthe Council of Europe. Last month a Committee of the ParliamentaryAssembly proposed that acceptance of Azerbaijan's membership on 28June be made subject to a specific obligation to repeal Article 113. Nico Beger, ILGA-Europe co-delegate to the Council of Europe,commented: "This is very good news. Article 113 created real problemsfor gay people, particularly through extortion by corrupt policeofficers." Her co-delegate Nigel Warner added: "Since the historic ruling by theEuropean Court of Human Rights in the Dudgeon case in 1981 some 22countries and territories in Europe have repealed laws banning gayrelationships. In the whole of Europe only Armenia, the RepublikaSrpska entity of Bosnia Hercegovina and the Chechen Republic stillmaintain such laws". THE INTERNATIONAL LESBIAN AND GAY ASSOCIATION The International Lesbian and Gay Association is a world-widefederation of 350 national and local groups dedicated to achievingequal rights for lesbians, gay men, bi***uals and transgendered peopleeverywhere. THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE The Council of Europe's main role is to strengthen democracy,human rights and the rule of law throughout its member states. Foundedin the wake of the Second World War, it is the continent's mostimportant human rights organisation, with some 41 member statescommitted to observing its human rights standards. The European Convention on Human Rights is the most significant of itsmany human rights treaties. The European Court of Human Rights settlescomplaints of violations of this Convention. The Council of Europe is governed by the Foreign Ministers ofits member states (who together form its decision-making body, the"Committee of Ministers") and by Representatives from theirparliaments (who make up its "Parliamentary Assembly".) Moreinformation on the Council can be obtained from its website, www.coe.fr NB: The Council of Europe is not the same as the EuropeanUnion, which is primarily an economic institution, comprising 15 WestEuropean member states Berj's P.S.: I'M PROUD OF ARMENIA!!!Hail Armenia, Hail Serbs, Hail Chechens! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 6, 2000 Report Share Posted July 6, 2000 quote:Originally posted by Berj:[Hail Serbs, Hail Chechens![/b]Hail Serbs ??? How can an Armenian, when taking into account our experience of genocide, stand up for those that practise it ? 'Ethnic cleansing' (possibley the ugliest term in the English language) has been a policy of the Serbians in the last decade. How can you support that ?I don't understand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 6, 2000 Report Share Posted July 6, 2000 Hagopian jan Because the Serbs are Orthodox Christians, so that makes it ok! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 6, 2000 Report Share Posted July 6, 2000 quote:Originally posted by Hagopian: Hail Serbs ??? How can an Armenian, when taking into account our experience of genocide, stand up for those that practise it ? 'Ethnic cleansing' (possibley the ugliest term in the English language) has been a policy of the Serbians in the last decade. How can you support that ?I don't understand Do you take any other news except from CNN and BBC. Because when they say "WORLD COMMUNITY CONDEMNS..." they just mean NATO. Actually, the situation in Kosovo has changed, and now the Albanians are cleasing the Serbs and burning their churches. Anyway, I hailed Serbs as an etnic entity who didn't passed the gay rights legislation. Please, read before replying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 6, 2000 Report Share Posted July 6, 2000 quote:Originally posted by farsisteve:Hagopian janBecause the Serbs are Orthodox Christians, so that makes it ok!Farsi,Didn't you noticed the word "Chechens" in my posting. They're definitly not Christians. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 7, 2000 Report Share Posted July 7, 2000 So what if they let men get off on each other. With all the problems facing Armenia, i don't really see gay men as being a big issue. Live and let live. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 8, 2000 Report Share Posted July 8, 2000 quote:Originally posted by Hagopian:So what if they let men get off on each other. With all the problems facing Armenia, i don't really see gay men as being a big issue. Live and let live.That's exactly what I'm talking about: concidering all the problems Armenia is facing now, why are we being pressed to pass those irrelevant gay rights and sect rights legislations. There are gays in Armenia, but they are so few that they don't even need a legislation. Let them go to Netherlands, this is a very good place for them. Does this world have a right to gay free zones or not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 8, 2000 Report Share Posted July 8, 2000 hayastan@ mnum e Hayastan yev k@mna HAyastan .!!!!karevor che vorkan djvar lini kam vorkan Vat lini Sotsyalakan yev kam Finansakan Vojak @ Hayastany .isk inch veraberum e gay massayin astavts irenst het . heto inch vor ka gay Hayastanum ? urmen inch Hayastan@ vorakazrkvum e amborjovin ? mi kani gay unenalov Hayastan@ yev Hay azg@ dartsav q@erch u palas ? voch !!! yerbek . Tvek n@ranst azatutyun yev kam kiyevyan kamurjits. azat torek inch kuzen tor anen kuzen tor trnen Hayastanits durs kuzen tor trenen iyskan Liberal yev azatamoll USA norits em asum vorkan el vat lini mer azgi vichak@ menak norits mnum enk Hay yev der shat barstr enk mer makrutyamb shat u shaterits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 13, 2000 Report Share Posted July 13, 2000 JanFedayi,Es vonc eghav vor Astvats@ irenc het? Astvats@ mer het a!, Satanan a irenc het! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 13, 2000 Report Share Posted July 13, 2000 Apjan de mikich el irants het tor erni mek el tesar xelkernin havaken gluxner@.yev te Satanan Chliner Astsu Raderr@ voch mekn el cher imana.!!! Kliner Sovorakan Sirrvats Trra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 29, 2000 Report Share Posted August 29, 2000 Excerpt from report by Armenian news agency Noyan Tapan on 22nd August Yerevan, 21st August: Only in the past 10 years has the ArmenianApostolic Church managed to carry out its mission, Archbishop (?ArsenBerberyan) noted at a meeting at the Azdak club of the Union ofConstitutional Rights. However, he said, sectarianism simultaneouslystarted spreading throughout the country. The archbishop also accused theArmenian government of failing to include the history of religion in thecurriculums of general education schools and of indifference towards thechurch and religion. For example, the archbishop said, the ArmenianApostolic Church has been given one building in Vanadzor, while otherreligious organizations have been allocated forty. The archbishop also expressed concern at some of the conditions forArmenia's membership in the Council of Europe, particularly those on thelegalization of the rights of ***ual minorities and sectarianism. Speaking about the current activities of the Armenian ApostolicChurch, Berberyan said that the task of the church was to train a largenumber of clergymen - around 200 trainees have already joined seminariesin Echmiadzin, Sevan and Gyumri. [Passage omitted: chairman of the union says that despite spread ofatheism during the Soviet period, Armenians managed to hold on toChristianity] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 29, 2000 Report Share Posted August 29, 2000 quote:Originally posted by Berj:Speaking about the current activities of the Armenian ApostolicChurch, Berberyan said that the task of the church was to train a largenumber of clergymen - around 200 trainees have already joined seminariesin Echmiadzin, Sevan and Gyumri.Karcum em chen moracel trainingi mej mtcnel "How to run a successful business in Church" ararkan. Dzez chi tvum vor yekexecin gnalov korcnuma ir dern u demq@? Miguce eta patjar@ vor mardik darnum en taber axandneri andam? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 30, 2000 Report Share Posted August 30, 2000 Garo, I think you are right. Rather than to think on how to provide spiritual leadership, the Armenian Church is counting on the Government to crack-down on the sects. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 30, 2000 Report Share Posted August 30, 2000 Agreed 100%. I'm already feeling psycological difficulties when visiting the churches, especially ones in Yerevan and Echmiadzin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 30, 2000 Report Share Posted August 30, 2000 The Armenian Church, seating on the laurels of a national church status, corrupted, outdated, aimless finds the courage to demand things from the government and the people (in this case not the same thing). If they had a little bit of shame and decency they would be helping the nation. But no. With diaspora money they build a huge church in a country with probably the highest number of churches per capita in the world. They don´t share the same fighting spirit of other Christian churches, concern for inequality, human rights, corruption, poverty, disintegration of the Armenian social fabric. Their role in most of the diaspora has been a shame. And we call this charlatans our spiritual and national leaders... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 30, 2000 Report Share Posted August 30, 2000 Diaspora money? I guess the Diaspora people gave their money to the Church for the sole purpose of building and renovating our ancient churches and monasteries, otherwise they would have given them to our Armenian government.Don't blame the church for that , blame the contributors. Our Church survived the Soviet refime and managed to keep a great part of the population Christians. And now the Western modern sects found a fertile land to cultivate their crops. There is no need to Christinize the Christians , they can try their luck in Iran , Saudi Arabia , Kuwait , India and China. We have the same problem here in Greece too, that is why I am angry about this issue. Are we doing what we are supposed to do for our Armenia , or we are just expecting others to act so that we can easily critisize them afterwards from a safe distance? If you don't like our Church , just stay away and do as is suit for you, but don't dare fight it , because our faith and devotion is greater than anything.Create something valuable and convince us to take care of it , otherwise just stop patronizing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 30, 2000 Report Share Posted August 30, 2000 I agree 200% with RAFFIAHARONIAN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 30, 2000 Report Share Posted August 30, 2000 It’s amazing how averse some people are to criticism of Armenian Church. I think our concern with well being of church prompts us to recommend changes to the best of our intellectual ability. Criticism doesn’t mean we do not support it. It just means we see some things that are wrong and would like to point it out. I agree with MJ, that church should have only spiritual role in our lives. There should be complete separation of Church and State. Armenian State should not treat Armenian Apostolic Church any differently. Church should be able to adequately use its ample resources to serve people. I hate to bring it up, but we live in a capitalist world and all religious organizations should be competing to serve our religious and spiritual needs. It’s to the best of Armenian Church that it has competition, because it will listen to its congregation more closely. Don’t forget that monopoly is corruptive. Armenian church has a historical advantage over its competitors, considering the existing infrastructure and resources. Can someone explain me how and why can a new sect pose a threat to Armenian Apostolic Church. There must be obviously something wrong with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 30, 2000 Report Share Posted August 30, 2000 Raffi, I have posted my reply to you in the Christianity section. My understanding is that this section is supposed to be on Globalization. Why don't we transfer the "religious" conversation to that section... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 30, 2000 Report Share Posted August 30, 2000 Back to the subject of Globalization... Berj, I think your alegory on Babelon is quite entertaining, but I suspect the goal of globalization is somewhat different from the massage of the allegory. The goal of globalization is not to reach God, or to compete with God. Its goal is just prosperity, and opportunity for all. Sure, it is a game where only the strong survive. But is in't it always the case? The strong survive, and the weak struggle for "goiapastpanutiun," evantually ceasing to exist. I think Globalization is Armenia's only chance... [This message has been edited by MJ (edited August 30, 2000).] [This message has been edited by MJ (edited August 30, 2000).] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.