Alla Posted September 25, 2002 Report Share Posted September 25, 2002 "TURKEY REALLY WAS GOING TO ATTACK ARMENIA IN AUTUMNN1993", FORMER HEAD OF STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL SECURITY,MAYOR GENERAL EDUARD SIMONIANTS SAYS YEREVAN, September 23 (Noyan Tapan). The other day, in theArmenian press, with an allusion to Greek Ambassador to Armenia,Leonidas Chrisantopulos, who occupied the position in 1993-4, asensational message appeared: Turkey intended to attack Armeniain October 1993. Alluding to the reconnaissance data he hadreceived from the French Ambassador to Armenia and verified byUS Ambassador to Armenia Harry Gilmore, the Greek diplomatstated the Armenian authorities were well informed about thepossible provocation - the impending intrusion into Armenia. TheRA National Security Council put the army on high alert. Withthe request to comment on that statement, NT correspondentSusanna Petrosyan turned to Mayor-General Eduard Simoniants whowas the head of the State department of the RA National Securityin 1993-4. NT: To what degree does the statment of former GreekAmbassador to Armenia Chrisantopulos corresponds the real stateof things? E.S. Turkey, really, was going to attack Armenia in autumn1993. Moreover, it was not the only case: for several years,several times, there was the peril of a possible invasion of theTurkish army, including the episode mentioned by the Greekambassador. I can doubtlessly state that the information aboutthe intrusion of the Turkish army into the Armenian territoryreached us not only through diplomatic sources. In accordancewith the Security Council's decision, really, correspondingmeasures were taken. According to the president, the NS chiefadvisor of the apparatus, all possible resources were activated,including military, political and diplomatic. As is known, theintrusion itself did not take place. Real threats took place,the Turkish army was redislocated along the frontier shared withArmenia, field head quarters were set ready, the army was fullyorganized and equipped with technics and arms. The reality ofthe threat of intrusion was extremely high. I do not want to talk immediately about the terms, but theperils of the kind were more than once in 1993, including theautumn period, about which the ambassador speaks. NT: How was the threat eliminated? E.S.: I repeat, the Turkish army was redislocated along thefrontier: all the regulation points were activated. The threatwas the most real. In respect to the methods we indertook forpractically neutralizing the threat, I think, it is not time tomake it public yet. I have no right. The Turkish factor, as such, played quite an essential rolein the events taking place in 1993. I mean both the Artsax warand lots of political and diplomatic demarches undertaken bydifferent states, as well as the negotiations on settling anypossible contacts, including Turkey, and on the other hand,these are events that resulted in coldness oif the realtionsetc. In this context, the immediate threat of Turkey's militaryinterference in the events in the region, especially inArtsax, was high. Turkey actively prepared for theinterference in the Artsax issue, the military way of solution- not excluded. Let alone Turkey's constant help to Azerbaijan with arms,instructors and so on; well it, in a way, goes without saying,and is background phenomenon. But the thing is that it was, intheir opinion, not sufficient and they were getting ready forreal intrusion. NT: To what degree is the threat of Turkey's intrusion intoArmenia real nowadays? Is it today as strong as in 1993? E.S.: No. From the viewpoint of threat, the Turkishintrusion today is incomparably less real than it was in 1992-3.But, in fact, it is not excluded. The events may unfol in themost unxpected way, and such conditions may come up when thetemptation for Turkey will sufficiently high, and the generalevent chain will highly contribute to making a decision of thatkind. That's why, to say that the threat is 100% excluded, wouldbe a lie, but today, the probability of their invasion is lowenough. NT: What is it connected with that they came to evaluatethe situation more really? E.S. Not only with this. The matter is that it is not atall useful for Turkey to indulge in any military conflicts,moreover, they are urged to by the US. This is both aparticipation in terroristic acts and the possible intrusioninto Iraq and so on and so forth. So in this concern, it wouldbe an extreme luxury for Turkey to commence another conflict. I think it is alone quite sufficient fir us to talk aboutlow probability of conflict today with Turkey's participation inthe territory of Armenia and Artsax. It is today unreal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arpa Posted October 2, 2002 Report Share Posted October 2, 2002 quote:Originally posted by Alla:"TURKEY REALLY WAS GOING TO ATTACK ARMENIA IN AUTUMNN1993", FORMER HEAD OF STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL SECURITY,MAYOR GENERAL EDUARD SIMONIANTS SAYS YEREVAN, September 23 (Noyan Tapan). The other day, in theArmenian press, with an allusion to Greek Ambassador to Armenia,Leonidas Chrisantopulos, who occupied the position in 1993-4, asensational message appeared: Turkey intended to attack Armeniain October 1993. Alluding to the reconnaissance data he hadreceived from the French Ambassador to Armenia and verified byUS Ambassador to Armenia Harry Gilmore, the Greek diplomat.........Susanna Petrosyathe territory of Armenia and Artsax. It is today unreal.It surprises me that the above item has no generated and discussion.How credible is it?My repeated questions of why Turkey is still blockading Armenia that remains unanswered to this day may have been partially answered.It is common knowledge that blockade is an act of war. The above proves that. Turkey not having found acceptable grounds to attack Yerevan may have been using the blockade, cold war if you will, as a substitute for hot war.One almost wishes that they had in fact attacked Yerevan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bellthecat Posted October 2, 2002 Report Share Posted October 2, 2002 I was travelling through eastern Turkey in July and August 1993. The PKK problem looked like it was growing out of control, but I did not see any evidence of large scale troop movements and the actual situation along the Turkish/Armenian border was fairly relaxed. However I do remember that there was extensive war-mongering and "tub thumping" (MJ :-) ) going on in the Turkish media, to the extent that I actually recorded some of their TRT radio broadcasts. I should dig them out and have a listen to them again. Steve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJ Posted October 2, 2002 Report Share Posted October 2, 2002 quote:Originally posted by bellthecat:However I do remember that there was extensive war-mongering and "tub thumping" (MJ :-) ) going on in the Turkish media, to the extent that I actually recorded some of their TRT radio broadcasts. Dear Cat, Your beautiful smile has been duly noted. What a charming personality... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamavor Posted October 3, 2002 Report Share Posted October 3, 2002 I was hoping at that time that they will really attack Armenia. I repeat, at that time:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alla Posted October 5, 2002 Author Report Share Posted October 5, 2002 and why did you hope for something like that to happen? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.