Talk About Hatin'...

[Anoushik]

So, Farewell Then, Jacques ChiracTake your scorn for the Anglo-American world with you.

By Anne Applebaum

Posted Tuesday, May 8, 2007, at 7:21 AM ET

 

"All political careers end in failure," a British statesman once wisely said. Judging by the wreckage of the famous political career that ended this week, he was even wiser than he knew. With the election of a new president of France on Sunday, the lengthy professional life of Jacques Chirac—French president for 12 years, mayor of Paris for 18 years, twice French prime minister for a total of four years—comes to a grinding halt, apparently to the great relief of his compatriots.

 

In the coming weeks, there will be plenty of time to discuss the virtues and vices of his successor, President-elect Nicolas Sarkozy. But before Chirac fades from the scene altogether—or before he becomes embroiled in corruption investigations—I'd like to take this opportunity to recall some of the highlights of his diplomatic career. Many Americans know him only as the man who made the right decision about Iraq, albeit for the wrong reasons. But try, if you can, to leave Iraq aside: Chirac's more important diplomatic legacy lies elsewhere.

 

Ponder closely, for example, what Chirac has had to say about Africa, where his country has enormous influence, in many places far outweighing ours. During a visit to the Ivory Coast, Chirac once called "multi-partyism" a "kind of luxury," which his host, president-for-life Félix Houphouet-Boigny, could clearly not afford. During a visit to Tunisia, he proclaimed that, since "the most important human rights are the rights to be fed, to have health, to be educated, and to be housed," Tunisia's human rights record is "very advanced"—never mind the police who beat up dissidents. "Africa is not ready for democracy," he told a group of African leaders in the early 1990s.

 

On Britain: "The only thing they have ever done for European agriculture is mad cow disease. … You can't trust people who cook as badly as that."

 

On Russia: "For his contribution to friendship between France and Russia," Chirac decorated Vladimir Putin last year with the highest order of the Légion d'honneur, a medal reserved for the closest foreign friends of France (Churchill, Eisenhower), despite the deterioration of the Russian president's human rights record. A few weeks later, Chirac decided to hold his 74th birthday party in Riga, Latvia, after a NATO summit. He invited President Putin, disinvited President George W. Bush, and snubbed the Latvian president in the process. As the diplomatic scandal grew, the guests all begged off, and the birthday dinner never took place.

 

On Saddam Hussein: "You are my personal friend. Let me assure you of my esteem, consideration, and bond."

 

On Eastern Europe supporting the United States in the United Nations: "It is not really responsible behavior. It is not well-brought-up behavior. They missed a good opportunity to shut up."

 

On Iran's nuclear program: "Having one or perhaps a second bomb a little later, well, that's not very dangerous." Theoretically, Chirac was supposed to be negotiating with Iran to give up its nuclear program at the time.

 

On hearing a French businessman address a European summit in English, "deeply shocked," he stormed out of the room.

 

As I say, it's a very important legacy: One of consistent scorn for the Anglo-American world in general and the English language in particular, of suspicion of Central Europe and profound disinterest in the wave of democratic transformation that swept the world in the 1980s and 1990s, of preference for the Arab and African dictators who had been, and remained, clients of France. In his later years, Chirac constantly searched, in almost all international conflicts, for novel ways of opposing the United States. All along, he did his best to protect France from the rapidly changing global economy.

 

It was, in other words, the legacy of a man who was deeply conservative, almost Brezhnevite in his view of the world - so much so that the word most often used to describe his political beliefs is "stagnation." But as he leaves office, the loudest condemnation of his twelve years as head of state comes not from the outside world, but from the French themselves. Don't listen to me, listen to them: After all, it is they who have just elected a man who promised to "break with the ideas, the habits and the behavior of the past."

 

"The French people have chosen change," Sarkozy declared during his acceptance speech Sunday night. "I will implement that change." And what they want, it seems, is a change from Chirac.

 

http://www.slate.com/id/2165750/?GT1=10034

[Shahan Araradian]

On Saddam Hussein: "You are my personal friend. Let me assure you of my esteem, consideration, and bond."

It was all a show. Saddam and bin Laden were both "actors" in that show. The entire war in Iraq and Afghanistan is a business. Not every democracy joined the caravan to loot and pillage in order to bring revenue to their own multi-national corporations. (France under Chirac was one that didn't join.)

 

The war in Iraq alone has already cost $424 billion (and going) -- http://costofwar.com/.

 

That's $424 billion in revenue for American corporations! From the companies that build the bombs, cruise missiles, grenades, and ammunition (Lockheed, Boeing, Raytheon) to those that build the tanks (United Defense) to those that provide logistical support (Halliburton)...

 

EVERY bomb dropped on Iraq is business to them! EVERY tank or Humvee or Apache lost is good and welcomed by them (the military-industrial complex) because it's Business.. it bring revenue!

 

The American president and vice-president convinced/tricked the American people into spending now almost half a trillion dollars on a meaningless war to put money into the very corporations that they and their friends own large shares of!

 

And by controlling the media, they (the military-industrial complex and investors in defense and oil corporations) pit American against innocent Iraqi, American against innocent Palestinian, American against innocent "terrorist." All fabricated LIES with the SOLE intent of going to war to bring revenues to the corporations they own. How? By consuming bombs (which the U.S. Army must pay an American corporation to manufacture), destroy bridges, only to have those very SAME bridges repaired by American companies (such as Parsons)... And guess who pays the bill?

 

Ain't life grand for these handful of players controlling the show?

 

Life won't be so grand for America's next generation, with all the bad karma their parents (actually only a handful of them with friends in the Bush administration) spread throughout the Middle East and Muslim world. Bad karma that will come back to bite them badly when today's orphaned Iraqi and Afghan children have grown up with vengeance simmering in them for 20 years... Children with lost brothers, cousins, sisters, and entire families... MILLIONS of childhoods stripped away irreversibly... Who knows what that type of vengeance boils in their blood, and what type of acts they are capable of doing? I'm afraid that most of us will live to witness it. The U.S. has given birth to them today.

 

From Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie

Big Lie is a propaganda technique, defined by Adolf Hitler in his 1925 autobiography Mein Kampf as a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously".

 

"Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it." - Adolf Hitler

Edited May 9, 2007 by Shahan Araradian

[AK-47]

 

"Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it." - Adolf Hitler

Cough "Iraq has weapons of mass destruction" cough