Arpa Posted November 21, 2006 Report Share Posted November 21, 2006 Has anyone seen the burning issue of the day? Mel Gibson was all but crucified for using anti-S** omething or other language. Look at this and tell us who is anti-someting or other. LOS ANGELES - He called two black hecklers the “n-word” and enthusiastically referenced a time when blacks were often victims of civil rights abuses, but Michael Richards said his verbal barrage during a stand-up routine was fueled by anger and not bigotry. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15816126/ Search and find more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arpa Posted November 21, 2006 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2006 (edited) fueled by anger and not bigotry. "Anger and not bigotry"? We all get angry. When we are angry at our children, our kin, our spouses and friends we call them "N's" J's" T's" and other epithets??Let's not get this wrong. I have many an African American use the word, if all in love to one another. Yet it all depends how and where one uses it. I have addressed my colleagues with words like "polloK' and "wop" They all love it, and not only that respond in kind adding more hilariry. It all depends how and why those terms are used and by whom. Who is the bigot ant-so and so? Gibson or this clown and his ilk? Edited November 21, 2006 by Arpa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kakachik77 Posted November 21, 2006 Report Share Posted November 21, 2006 Arpa, this is just a publicity stunt to bring back Michael Richards? Nobody has heard of him for the past 5 or so years after Seinfeld was done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arpa Posted November 21, 2006 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2006 (edited) Arpa, this is just a publicity stunt to bring back Michael Richards? Nobody has heard of him for the past 5 or so years after Seinfeld was done. I'm sure you're right dear Little Tulip. Seinfeld my v***k. I have never watched it, yet you don't have to tell me that it was not a vehicle to trash everyobody elses' culture. If only the average American would learn to sort out "comedy" from "insult".No matter how insultful those so called comedians maybe, you will never se them insult such primitive and savage practices of "circumcision" and the black robed and side burned clowns of their own cukture. Some day, a million years from now the world will wake up and see who are the most bigotted people of this world. Hint? Not the Irish, not the Polish, not the Armenian, not even the Arab. But trashing other peoples' culture, identity, historical sagas and tragedies (I'm sure you know what I mean), is TYPICAL!! Typically xenophobic. Was that term created to describe certain peoples' attitude towards the "rest of the non-chosen world"? If only the rest of the world knew what xenophobia and bigotry really meant!! Above all. Who needs a vulgar and offensive clown of his kind! Only one people would equate vulgarirty and offense with humor and comedy and get away with it. Brings to mind that piece of shit Borat, or whatever the kak his name may be. Just imagine if he were of Polish, Irish, Scottish, or Aramazt mi arastseh, Armenian ethnicity. Edited November 21, 2006 by Arpa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Posted November 21, 2006 Report Share Posted November 21, 2006 I saw this performance last night on Letterman and must tell you iether he was on some kind of drugs or just a publicity stunt, Richerds was crying his guts out and Jerry Signfeld came on to rescue him. Yes Arpa I agree with you, looks like double standards are drawn for one perticular group of people and emagin if it was a black man who said the oposite, years ago when Lewis Farrakan made such comments networks and media were all over him, i wonder how quickly this will fade away? like so many "savage yak" stories, ops come and think of it! there was never a "savage yak" story, or greedy dimond selsman, the double crossing arms dealer, neo-con likudnik Machevellli wanna be scums. but there is a wonderfull program on discovery and history chanal every night, guess what is it... ok I wondered to far away from the topic. Michel Richers apologiesed and did so Mel Gibson, coke anyone? poor hollywood actors, there are under so much light....leave these people alone, they have suffered for 5000 years, let them have there fun makes me sick to my stomack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arpa Posted November 21, 2006 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2006 (edited) name='Edward' date='Nov 21 2006, 08:51 PM' post='182292' ==== ok I wondered to far away from the topic. Michel Richers apologiesed and did so Mel Gibson, coke anyone? poor hollywood actors, there are under so much light....leave these people alone, they have suffered for 5000 years, let them have there fun makes me sick to my stomack Dear Ed, I am confused as I seldom do Are you saying "they have suffered for 5000 years" (fables and more fables, they only brought/bring it on themselves), having insulted their entire neighborhood if not the entire world to ridicule and dsidain, to mean what I think you mean? What gives them, regardless of "having suffered for 5000 years" the right to trash every other culture? Edited November 21, 2006 by Arpa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Posted November 21, 2006 Report Share Posted November 21, 2006 Dear Arpa, if you read my post one more time you'll understand lots of others suffered, and do suffer, and becouse of the 5000 year old suffering, the suffering they injected far surpases there 500...what ever suffering. Arpa Yexpayr hangist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arpa Posted November 21, 2006 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2006 (edited) Dear Arpa, if you read my post one more time you'll understand lots of others suffered, and do suffer, and becouse of the 5000 year old suffering, the suffering they injected far surpases there 500...what ever suffering. Arpa Yexpayr hangist By all means Yeghpayr Yetvart, as some of us diaporans would call you. But, when anyone insults us, as they have done for 5000 years, and insults our most loyal American compratriot and patriotic "brothers" , the "n****rs". There has to be a line. What will be next? Who will stop him from insulting the "Armo..s", those "varmints" that antagonize their most "staunch allies" and their only "friends" in the Middle Eaat??!! Edited November 21, 2006 by Arpa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.