Hayastanci Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 PanARMENIAN.Net/ “Azeri army will attack Armenia in a few days” the Media Forum, an Azeri newspaper, reports referring to www.hurhaber.com Turkish web-site. “Diplomatic sources provided the information,” the web-site reports. According to the web-edition, “the Azeri government has seriously prepared for liberating Karabakh and official Baku has resolved to launch a war”. The intense relations between the U.S. and Azerbaijan are due to “forthcoming military operations in Karabakh”. «Hurhaber.com» states that U.S. President George Bush will receive an Azeri representative today. The web-site points out that “Bush has a positive attitude to towards Azerbaijan launching military operations in Karabkh”. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yervant1 Posted April 20, 2006 Report Share Posted April 20, 2006 PanARMENIAN.Net/ “Azeri army will attack Armenia in a few days” the Media Forum, an Azeri newspaper, reports referring to www.hurhaber.com Turkish web-site. “Diplomatic sources provided the information,” the web-site reports. According to the web-edition, “the Azeri government has seriously prepared for liberating Karabakh and official Baku has resolved to launch a war”. The intense relations between the U.S. and Azerbaijan are due to “forthcoming military operations in Karabakh”. «Hurhaber.com» states that U.S. President George Bush will receive an Azeri representative today. The web-site points out that “Bush has a positive attitude to towards Azerbaijan launching military operations in Karabkh”. They are welcomed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DominO123 Posted April 21, 2006 Report Share Posted April 21, 2006 PanARMENIAN.Net/ “Azeri army will attack Armenia in a few days” the Media Forum, an Azeri newspaper, reports referring to www.hurhaber.com Turkish web-site. “Diplomatic sources provided the information,” the web-site reports. According to the web-edition, “the Azeri government has seriously prepared for liberating Karabakh and official Baku has resolved to launch a war”. The intense relations between the U.S. and Azerbaijan are due to “forthcoming military operations in Karabakh”. «Hurhaber.com» states that U.S. President George Bush will receive an Azeri representative today. The web-site points out that “Bush has a positive attitude to towards Azerbaijan launching military operations in Karabkh”. Rubbish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armenak Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 Day two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vava Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 Rubbish once again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hytga Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 Day two. actually it's day 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heavy G Posted April 23, 2006 Report Share Posted April 23, 2006 What are our chances of defending it though, anyone know? As far as I know, Azeris been building their army for a while now with all that oil revenue. Whats in the books? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 24, 2006 Report Share Posted April 24, 2006 (edited) Since we would be on the defensive side, we shall take advantage of Karabagh's rugged landscape. Armenia's army is the strongest one in the Caucasus for now (and, Asdvadz ouze ne, forever), and combined with Karabagh's army, the Azeris won't have much chance. Then, they can go back to destroying rocks... The oil money doesn't mean much. In around 40 years, oil will run out. The Armenian Diaspora won't, neither will Armenia. Edited April 24, 2006 by Dave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Accelerated Posted April 24, 2006 Report Share Posted April 24, 2006 Lets not get cocky, another war would be a disaster for both sides. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lev7 Posted April 28, 2006 Report Share Posted April 28, 2006 BAKU RUBBISHES TURKISH WEBSITE REPORT AzerNews Weekly, Azerbaijan April 27 2006 Azerbaijan will launch an attack on Armenia in the coming days, a Turkish report has said. Azerbaijani officials have dismissed it as groundless. Turkish hurhaber.com website quoted diplomatic sources as saying that the Azeri government has made serious preparations for liberating Upper (Nagorno) Garabagh from occupation and that Baku has passed a decision to restart hostilities. Armenia has occupied 20% of Azeri territory in defiance of international law since the war broke out in the early 1990s which has claimed thousands of lives and displaced 700,000 of Azeris from their homes. The report linked the expanding US-Azeri relations to the military action to be waged in Garabagh, saying that US President George Bush welcomes the idea of launching military action. The website also indicated that the operations would affect the oil price. Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanian said the Garabagh conflict could not be settled through war, which is confirmed by EU representatives. "Military action by Azerbaijan may become its last mistake," he said when commenting on the Turkish site's report in a news conference held jointly with Austrian Foreign Ministry Secretary of State Hans Vinkler. "Azerbaijan may restart war only when all hope for peace is gone. However, the Azeri leadership can't make this decision on its own," Oskanian said. Oskanian added that Armenia would closely follow the talks on the Garabagh conflict to be held during President Ilham Aliyev's upcoming visit to Washington. Armenian Defense Minister Serzh Sarkisian could not help voicing his concerns over Azerbaijan's warnings about the resumption of military action and the country's growing military expenditure. "We are not afraid of war but don't want it to flare up. An agreement [ceasefire] on ending hostilities was reached in 1994 with Russia's mediation. Our troops have already taken preeminent defense positions and we have been invigorating our positions with engineering facilities over the past 12 years," he said. He said the Caucasus is a very small area, which makes regional countries dependent on each other. "For this reason, a resumption of military action could bring about negative consequences for us," the Armenian defense chief said. Sarkisian claimed that Azerbaijan's statements that its military spending has doubled are nothing but "blackmail". Former Armenian foreign minister Alexander Arzumanian said he does not expect any drastic changes in the conflict resolution. "However, considering Azerbaijan's statements made following the two presidents' meeting in the French town of Rambouillet, it is not ruled out that this country may resume military operations." Azerbaijan threatened to use force to free its territories from Armenian occupation after the latest unsuccessful round of talks between the two countries' leaders. The Azeri Defense Ministry spokesman, Ilgar Verdiyev, said the report contradicts reality and peace talks are underway. The Foreign Ministry official, Tahir Taghizada, declined to comment on such "rubbish" published by the Turkish site. He said Azerbaijan is still adhering to a peaceful option to resolve the dispute, but warned that the Azeri people's patience was not boundless and the country "won't negotiate for the sake of negotiating". If the talks yield no fruit, Azerbaijan reserves the right to regain its lands no matter what it takes, Taghizada said. The outgoing US ambassador to Azerbaijan, Reno Harnish, said on Friday it was necessary to get rid of the military rhetoric to resolve the long-standing dispute. "A resumption of hostilities in the Caucasus could completely destroy the region." The diplomat said the negotiations to settle the conflict had intensified over the past two years. "Tangible results have been achieved in agreeing the principles of a fair and lasting peace," Harnish said, adding that Washington would continue to do its utmost to accomplish the goal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutchy Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 Read this article, it is not from official press therefore not adopted here. http://www.panarmenian.net/library/eng/?nid=105 Also this... Armenian Army: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_of_Armenia Azeri Army: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_of_Azerbaijan It is clear that the Azeri army has put more money to their security forces. I have met them in München too, when in training excercises. They are very good I saw them in some training. If you read the text from Sergey Minasyan and Grigor Hakobyan, then it is metal to the bone I think. I saw the other Armenian army video's with music. You guys have also old equipment in the video. But I don't agree with the final section of the text in 'PANArmenian news' of the air defense systems. Because of the US army training standard of the Azeri pilots and the Turkish army's land forces standard. But who knows when the war breaks out? I hope for a diplomatic solution to please both sides. War is not nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Negrug Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 and since wan did wikipedia become a relabel sours for aZero or Armenian information on any subject the place is crawling w/ ......... SOB's who have made falsifying history and the truth their national agenda & identity wikiDopia is THE place for them back in days you had equipment ...... all we had was hunting shotguns and home made grenade launchers - w/ BTW did more harm to us Armenians then to azeros and even then what happened ?? we all know the outcome of it. so don't underestimate, don't even second the capabilities of Armenian or Artsax Army's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hytga Posted May 5, 2006 Report Share Posted May 5, 2006 aZeroLMAO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutchy Posted May 5, 2006 Report Share Posted May 5, 2006 and since wan did wikipedia become a relabel sours for aZero or Armenian information on any subject the place is crawling w/ ......... SOB's who have made falsifying history and the truth their national agenda & identity wikiDopia is THE place for them back in days you had equipment ...... all we had was hunting shotguns and home made grenade launchers - w/ BTW did more harm to us Armenians then to azeros and even then what happened ?? we all know the outcome of it. so don't underestimate, don't even second the capabilities of Armenian or Artsax Army's It's not that wikipedia, in political way you are right. Wikipedia has political influences. But in military terms it has good writers. The war what happened, let them go. The thruth is also not in forums but by the scientists. But if you look to some writers, this time Armenian writers tell this, I can believe it. When it was Turkish, I will say 'yeah right'. Because every citizen said their armies are the best. Like US, nobody can strike us till 11 sept 2001. Now there are movies with terrorist attacks in the us, yes it is now realizeable that every country can be attacked. Armenians with shotguns, pfeeeuw... Never heard about that. You guys were armed to your teeth with Avtomat guns and ammo. Some with rockets too. The Azeri's weren't able to do anything at all. Here in a forum, you are free to write everything what you want without any painful words ofcource. Let's talk about it. Why you think it is all crap? Don't you believe the Turks have trained the whole Azeri army plus supplying them with weapons from the East German army stocks that was delivered to Turkey in 1990? Tell everything, it is good for us to talk about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hytga Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 armenians weren't armed to their teeth. A cuzin of mine was in karabakh during the war (in the hot spots). Some were armed barely with pistols. not even shotgons. it was not untill after the ceasfire that armenia recieved resoanable caches of weapons from russia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosJan Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 guess what most of the weapons we have in Artsax are frome azeris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutchy Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 Good to know for me... But I also saw a picture in Karabach with a T-72 tank captured by you guys without shooting a single bullet. Now it is a place to visit. But also the Azeri's are armed too with Turkish supplied weapons of Russian origin. Is it right to tell that both sides have now the same armor and guns? That the situation now is balanced? Before the war, I had never heard about the Caucassus countries, I didn't know about the excistance of Armenia and Azerbaijan. Please make your answer not so difficult for me. But I have studied guns and armor from the both sides now, what weapons there are used, military training, etc.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yervant1 Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 Good to know for me... But I also saw a picture in Karabach with a T-72 tank captured by you guys without shooting a single bullet. Now it is a place to visit. But also the Azeri's are armed too with Turkish supplied weapons of Russian origin. Is it right to tell that both sides have now the same armor and guns? That the situation now is balanced? Before the war, I had never heard about the Caucassus countries, I didn't know about the excistance of Armenia and Azerbaijan. Please make your answer not so difficult for me. But I have studied guns and armor from the both sides now, what weapons there are used, military training, etc.. If you studied armor from both sides then you know, why are you asking something that you know already? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutchy Posted May 10, 2006 Report Share Posted May 10, 2006 I would like to share it with you or other members. I think that the existance of such forums are to discuss not? Come on, let's talk about is, maybe I can learn from you and/or you can learn something from me. First I want to tell you something: I have learnt some things from Turkish people here in Holland, so I can also learn from Armenian friends for sure. (not political) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutchy Posted May 10, 2006 Report Share Posted May 10, 2006 and since wan did wikipedia become a relabel sours for aZero or Armenian information on any subject the place is crawling w/ ......... SOB's who have made falsifying history and the truth their national agenda & identity wikiDopia is THE place for them back in days you had equipment ...... all we had was hunting shotguns and home made grenade launchers - w/ BTW did more harm to us Armenians then to azeros and even then what happened ?? we all know the outcome of it. so don't underestimate, don't even second the capabilities of Armenian or Artsax Army's Yes it is true that the 'Wiki-thing' has many political influences. But try to see through of that propaganda or something. I don't underestimate an army, never forget it that I have written this okay? Me, as an ex-soldier, I have learn to see your enemy, if also he/she is one person or not, you with your whole army, never to underestimate it and it is the strongest army. Because 1 man also can kill 10 maybe more like 100 people when in ambush defense. Booby trap or road side bomb for example. Or like muslim high tech weapon: suicide bomb elite commando technology shit that can explode when a man has a bourqa and kills many of your friends. To loose you need a dumb army. See the sample video beneath: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L91RxLrGvPM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DerOhannesian Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 I would like to share it with you or other members. I think that the existance of such forums are to discuss not? Come on, let's talk about is, maybe I can learn from you and/or you can learn something from me. First I want to tell you something: I have learnt some things from Turkish people here in Holland, so I can also learn from Armenian friends for sure. (not political) what decent are u of? armenian or azerbaijan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutchy Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 I'm Dutch, but I like Turkish and Armenian people. Here I have good relations with Turks and Armenians. I don't know Azeri people, I only read on the internet or see illegal workers here in Holland. But I'm very concearned about the disputes over Karabach. Now I have read that Turkey has bought SLAM-ER cruise missiles with 250km range it only gets more interesting for me. What for weapon shound Armenia buy? But why you are asking for my decency? Do I speak like a Turk? Yes you are right, if we both say yes than we don't have anything to speak. And if we have differences in opinion than we can learn from each other. Who is telling that you people are bad? So, we are also interested in other cultures and politics. But the Armenians don't have one thing that we have: Capability to drink a lot of beer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamavor Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Beer is for plebs. Vodka is for drinkers and Brandy is for essense of life. Dude, don't worry Armenia has everything to defend herself and even a little bit more:) As to Turkey's missles, - well the CIS countries have a unified air-defence system. A Turkish attack on Armenia would defenately mean a world war. An Armenian attack on Turkey would mean justice for all:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.