skhara Posted June 28, 2005 Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 So uh, who is in favour of applying eugenics to the Armenian population and making us blond haired and blue eyed Aryans again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hytga Posted June 28, 2005 Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 you sure this topic belongs in science and technology seciton? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skhara Posted June 28, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 Yeah. Eugenics is a science right? Anyway, actually I like my 'chocolate-brown' hair color (although that's not Aryan), but I don't like my eye color. Can I order a set of blue eyes? Preferably the light blue variety, although I'll take dark-blue just the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaunt Posted June 28, 2005 Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 So uh, who is in favour of applying eugenics to the Armenian population and making us blond haired and blue eyed Aryans again? style_images/master/snapback.png Again? I would prefer we apply eugenics to Armenian women and make them all red heads and freckled, . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armjan Posted June 28, 2005 Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 (edited) Again? I would prefer we apply eugenics to Armenian women and make them all red heads and freckled, . style_images/master/snapback.png freckled, are u sure? prefer brunette or blondes I never understood what the facination/attraction with red heads. Edited June 28, 2005 by armjan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hytga Posted June 28, 2005 Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 i like the dark haired ones just fine (straight). it gives them certain elegance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skhara Posted June 28, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 (edited) Again? Ya. Just like Armenians used to be, before Turks made us 'dark'. I would prefer we apply eugenics to Armenian women and make them all red heads and freckled, i like the dark haired ones just fine (straight). it gives them certain elegance. You guys aren't taking this seriously. If we are not focused on the blond haired blue eyed Aryans as the ultimate goal we'll never succeed. A lot of Armenian babies are born with blond or light brown hair. See at least at birth the Aryans want to get out. Edited June 28, 2005 by skhara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kakachik77 Posted June 28, 2005 Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 this thread belongs to bullshit section Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Posted June 28, 2005 Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 this thread belongs to bullshit section style_images/master/snapback.png Speaking of which, maybe we will take it under consideration Kakachik, and devote a special section for our member’s amusement who would be interested. I totally agree with you and it stinks like one to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skhara Posted June 28, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 this thread belongs to bullshit section style_images/master/snapback.png Bulshit!!!!! ??????? Bringing back the Aryans is bulshit to you?! Don't you want to bring back our ancestors superior, godly genes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kakachik77 Posted June 28, 2005 Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 I will give a very short reply. NO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kumkap Posted June 29, 2005 Report Share Posted June 29, 2005 Ya. Just like Armenians used to be, before Turks made us 'dark'. You guys aren't taking this seriously. If we are not focused on the blond haired blue eyed Aryans as the ultimate goal we'll never succeed. A lot of Armenian babies are born with blond or light brown hair. See at least at birth the Aryans want to get out. style_images/master/snapback.png where did you get the idea armenians were blond and blue-eyed at one time? xenophon, writing in the 4thc. b.c., described armenians as hairy with black hair and a jutting aquiline nose. seems things haven't changed much. as for whether we'll succeed unless we're aryans (or perceived that way), well sure, white people are on the top now and have been for the last 600 years or so. but these things go in cycles. it's almost comical watching these self-righteous american christians go around spreading their anti-middle east hysteria and promoting the idea that america and other white countries (i guess israel is a white country now, forget they are supposed to be semitic) should carry christianity, the torch of civilization, into battle against the dark middle-eastern horde. did these people forget where christianity came from? read the bible from cover to cover and you will not encounter a single white person in the entire narrative. not a single event related in the bible takes place in white countries. instead the events take place in what is now egypt, iraq, syria, jordan, israel, iran, turkey, etc. what would their "civilization" be without christianity? and yet christianity came from the middle east! the earliest of examples of writing come from there. the first law code was written there. agriculture is thought to have started there. abraham was born there. many of the old testament narratives have mesopotamian origins, these same mesopotamian sources make mention of a people of ararat. they make no mention of any people remotely related to western europeans. linguists who are proponents of the anatolian-farming hypothesis of indo-european origins tell us that all the european languages (with a few exceptions) descend from a single language that was spoken in anatolia thousands of years ago. this means that the languages of the people who were living in what is western europe today were gradually replaced by languages spoken by people originating from anatolia who migrated into europe. it is also thought that these anatolian migrants introduced agriculture into europe, which means that europeans were hunter-gatherers until people from the middle east introduced farming to them. thus middle easterners in a sense gave europeans their language, agriculture, and their religion. anyway america and its army of trailer trash is on its last legs. china is going to leave it in the dust over the next few decades (who would you rather have do your math homework, a chinese kid or some spoiled brat who spends the whole day with his xbox). it will bankrupt itself by starting numerous wars against other muslim countries, repealing all its environmental regulations, doing away with taxes period, and teaching creationism while denigrating science in schools. armenians will start immigrating to china to live the big life, and then people like you will come along and advocate eugenics to give armenians slanty eyes so we fit in more. but if you have it your way, by the time that happens we'll all be blond and blue eyed, eating hamburgers and hot dogs, listening to the ear-splitting twang of country music, and sending our three sets of step-kids to family counseling. as i said, these things go in cycles. in the 7-9th centuries baghdad and damascus were the greatest centers of learning in the world. look where they are now. white people are on top now. good for them. but it wasn't always so. in fact it wasn't even such a hot thing to be white when i was in high school in the mid-90s, when they were making movies like white men can't jump, half the skits in in living color made fun of white people, you had people like danny ferry in the nba, and reginald denny was getting pulled out of his truck and onto the street while black people ran up and threw bricks at his head until he puked his eyes out. look at the nba, how many white people do you see there? how about the skill positions in football. britney spears, justin timberlake, jessica simpson, christina aguilera, they all just rip off black people's music, they don't have their own. they might seem tough when they're dropping bombs on third-world cities from thousands of feet in the air, but take their guns away from them and their not so hot. in fact, as we speak the most powerful military in the world is being bogged down by a bunch of guys running around in sandals with 30-year old rifles. to make a long story short, i am happy with my genes and don't desire to look like anyone else. i don't care if people consider me or my race white or not, we made it through 3000 years with these genes and can make it through another 3000 (so long as the u.s. doesn't start a nuclear war with one of our neighbors). our problem has been not so much what we look like but our location, and i don't think we can change that now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kakachik77 Posted June 29, 2005 Report Share Posted June 29, 2005 and AMEN to that - Kumkap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anoushik Posted June 29, 2005 Report Share Posted June 29, 2005 where did you get the idea armenians were blond and blue-eyed at one time? xenophon, writing in the 4thc. b.c., described armenians as hairy with black hair and a jutting aquiline nose. seems things haven't changed much. ... did these people forget where christianity came from? read the bible from cover to cover and you will not encounter a single white person in the entire narrative. not a single event related in the bible takes place in white countries. instead the events take place in what is now egypt, iraq, syria, jordan, israel, iran, turkey, etc. what would their "civilization" be without christianity? and yet christianity came from the middle east! the earliest of examples of writing come from there. the first law code was written there. agriculture is thought to have started there. abraham was born there. many of the old testament narratives have mesopotamian origins, these same mesopotamian sources make mention of a people of ararat. they make no mention of any people remotely related to western europeans. linguists who are proponents of the anatolian-farming hypothesis of indo-european origins tell us that all the european languages (with a few exceptions) descend from a single language that was spoken in anatolia thousands of years ago. this means that the languages of the people who were living in what is western europe today were gradually replaced by languages spoken by people originating from anatolia who migrated into europe. it is also thought that these anatolian migrants introduced agriculture into europe, which means that europeans were hunter-gatherers until people from the middle east introduced farming to them. thus middle easterners in a sense gave europeans their language, agriculture, and their religion. style_images/master/snapback.png Very well said. And it wasn't only middle easterners who gave europeans their language and culture, but we know specifically who did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kakachik77 Posted June 29, 2005 Report Share Posted June 29, 2005 (edited) I recently read that based on mtDNA analysis Armenians are closest to Cypriots Greeks Turks (surprise, surprise Kurds Sephardic Jews Palestinian Arabs Romanians note that mtDNA is typically passed on only from the mother during sexual reproduction, meaning that the mitochondria are clones. This means that there is little change in the mtDNA from generation to generation, unlike nuclear DNA which changes by 50% each generation. Since the mutation rate is easily measured, mtDNA is a powerful tool for tracking family lineage, and has been used in this role for tracking many species back thousands of generations. Edited June 29, 2005 by kakachik77 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skhara Posted June 29, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 29, 2005 (edited) I was laghing my butt off while posting in this thread. And my postings were nothing other than silliness. Although I got this slightly nauseating sensation when I read kumkamps post, especially the last paragraph; but I smiled again when I realised, he/she too was being silly. Turks (surprise, surprise Kurds Sephardic Jews Palestinian Arabs Edited June 29, 2005 by skhara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anoushik Posted June 29, 2005 Report Share Posted June 29, 2005 skhara, it would have been funny (I guess, not so sure about that) if we knew that no Armenian believed that. But you know very well that this is not the case. Why confuse people? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kakachik77 Posted June 29, 2005 Report Share Posted June 29, 2005 actually I thought the ghost of Vigil was haunting you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kumkap Posted June 29, 2005 Report Share Posted June 29, 2005 And my postings were nothing other than silliness. style_images/master/snapback.png true, very true. this thread belongs in the humor and bullshit section. you can still dream though, in fact look at the hryas. they leave palestine 2000 years ago as a semitic tribe, and come back in 1948 reincarnated as slavic looking people with nice european features from the white north. they play up their whiteness to the american wasp crowd, who embrace them as their white brothers because it enables them to prove to themselves that the jews were a white people, and therefore jesus was a white man. they do this b/c wasp christian fundamentalists appear to have a deep psychological need to establish a connection btwn themselves and the origins of christianity, since they do not have one. they use this to convince themselves that middle eastern people are somehow alien to the foundations of christianity and the biblical lands, which makes it easier to support the ethnic cleansing of palestinians from the rest of the former british mandate of palestine, as well as other attacks on middle eastern peoples (iraq). anyway these are just some of my impressions from living in the united states and observing public figures and the media. there is hope skhara! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skhara Posted June 30, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2005 kumkap, What are you talking about? Who mistakes Jews for wasps? They must be smokin' some very potent hashish and I'd like to try some so I too can go "Whooaa, dhuuuuuuude, the Jews are like wasps man." I'm trying to think of some. Hmm..... Madeline Allbright? Hmmm...... Oh damit, the writing on her forhead gives her away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skhara Posted June 30, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2005 Romanians I always thought that Vlad Dracule looked Armenian. http://www.qsl.net/w5www/dracula.html Anyone agree? Many Romanians have similar eyes to Armenians although they have a lighter complexion. Speaking of which, I wish Armenians had generations of impalers. Vlad scared the crap out of Turks when he made turk-kebabs out of them. Can you imagine? Being more barbaric then the Turks themselves? Well if we had been, there would be no turks on the west side of the Caspian. Better late than never. Although I don't have the stomach for it. Any volunteers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hytga Posted June 30, 2005 Report Share Posted June 30, 2005 i didn't know she was jewish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kumkap Posted June 30, 2005 Report Share Posted June 30, 2005 kumkap, What are you talking about? Who mistakes Jews for wasps? They must be smokin' some very potent hashish and I'd like to try some so I too can go "Whooaa, dhuuuuuuude, the Jews are like wasps man." I'm trying to think of some. Hmm..... Madeline Allbright? Hmmm...... Oh damit, the writing on her forhead gives her away. style_images/master/snapback.png i think you misread, because i didn't say people mistake jews for wasps, just that they deliberately appeal to the prejudices of wasps by promoting the idea that jews belong to the superior culture of the west or are part of western civilization. i guess my point is they shouldn't appropriate the term anti-semitism for themselves if they don't view themselves as semites. if they do, then they should embrace the semitic culture of their origins, adapt to the culture of the middle-east generally, and not denigrate the middle-east and its people by acting as if they are uncivilized, primitive, and something to be wiped out. otherwise it just makes their country look like an alien colony of the west (a foothold in the middle east for america in this case). to madeleine albright you can add paul wolfowitz, richard perle, douglas feith, michael ledeen, michael chertoff, and stephen bryen, among others. can you tell these people are hrya just from their name? i can't. but they all have very close ties to hrya organizations. you know these people work hard to win over public opinion for israel - how many times have you heard "israel is the only democracy in the middle east" (not true that it's a democracy), or "we are in a war to defend judeo-christian civilization" (completely fabricated concept - where was the judeo-christian alliance in the waning days of the ottoman empire when the judeo-muslim donmehs conspired with the turks to wipe out armenians and greeks, popularizing their "nationalization of the economy" and pan-turkist ideas?) same thing with communism in russia. do people forget that at one time socialism was considered a hrya ideology? as soon as israel became a country though and the u.s. became its patron, hryas became the biggest chearleaders of the u.s. in the cold war. it always revolves around them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.