For the record, I was referring to the Amelekites story. As to the establishment of a jewish state, I ws under the impression that much of that came about as a result of bungled british colonialism of the era, culminating in the Balfour declaration in 1917- behind which were not just traditional Zionists like Herzl or Weissman, but Christian, and even anti-semetic european influencers as well. Why palestine? Well, I suppose it's because the British controlled it at the time.... as for the jews, I believe they would have accepted any state. But that's a moot point; would it have been any better had they been granted a state anywhere else? Cypress, for example? I don't think 'misery' can be avoided in these kinds of things, unfortunately.
Let's at least try and look to the future or be minimally pragmatic: Peace can only be achieved from within - it cannot be imposed by force, else it will merely be transient. The Palestinians and their allies must reign-in their extremist elements, and establish a true authority that not only has credibility amongst the people, but recognises that peace can only be accomplished through co-existance. The Isreali people in turn must also reign-in their extremist factions; they must demand their governement to make true concessions to Palestinian peoples - concessions that will allow Palestine to grow into and economically viable, self-sufficient nation. Properity will lead to moderation & long-term peace. This is the only path that has any chance of success - sure there'll be bumps, but both nations will have to walk that path together.
Granted, the above doesn't much concern Lebanon - apart from the interwined relations/objectives of the Hesbollah and Palestinian 'freedom fighters'.