Accelerated

hahahahah - They got one thing wrong though.....where is the guy in the convertible hurrying to?

Being able to appreciate the extraordinary graphical detail in some parts of that movie doesnt constitute a lack of intelligence.....

mmmm....I think I've heard enough of this nonsense <_<

LOL at: JDL and "I was very popular!" Hang on a sec....was there more than one Christian side? And I was under the impression that the Armenians were pretty much neutral and took-up arms only to defend their quarter of Beirut

yeah....well I imagine a real life scenario would have a lot more detail, this is just the imagination of our 'professor'.....I suspect his mind may have been elsewhere when he came up with this drivel (masturbating, perhaps...). It doesnt even have anything to do with Tellecoms/IT!

hey bud, thanx for the links will check em out..... yeah, I remmemer him giving us a sort of guideline like this one on answering these law scenarios....totally forgot about that....its too late so gonna have to make do with the bodgie plan we have in place now.... yeah, we've pretty much looked at all these - the f###ed thing is, the scenario is so vague that it leaves a HUGE number of issues to be adressed - one could write a 100 page report on this, if not more (we're sticking to 10 ) The 'professor' is clueless....I was under the impression this thing was due late January....he never posted anything up on the web (like he promised to), just announced it at the end of the last lecture which I happened to leave early to go to a party . But I actually asked him wether there were gonna be any announcements before I left and he said NO - the f###wit Thanks - will need it

Yeah winston....somehow I think hiring a hitman is illigal

if your still bored - u can make yourself usefull and keep searchin j/k bud

Thanks Dan, that first link looks very usefull.... cheers mate

Hey guys, im in deep d'oh. Im doing a subject called 'Legal Issues in Tellecommunications' and we gotto hand in a group assignment in a few days. The lecturer is hopeless and we have learnt little....here is the question: Obviously there is a bunch of issues involved, because the damn thing is so vague. My part of the case study is concerned mainly with the following: I basically gotto blaber on for 2-3 pages on this and also prepare a presentation, so any help on this is most welcome.... PS. by help I mean: links to important (recent) cases/decisions that are similar and sections of the law etc. thanks in advance (sorry for the jumbled post)

I done care if they introduce 'civil unions' for gays/lesbians: just as long as they dont call it marriage

Kill em all I say, escpessially the ones named Winston!

- well, I think its all been said, nothing to add really

mmm....I dont think we should be celebrating just yet. Lets wait and see what happens...

nothing to explain, really, just foolin around with the new member - my way of saying - welcome

Damn! I think my bubble just burst!

....sounds like one messed-up family

LOL - I called my parents 11:45, then turned off my phone

http://www.hondamotorcycles.com.au/resources/fireblade_tri_800x600.jpg For more information and specs click here Enjoy.

Cheers, big ears! Sips a tandz....

fight, I got bigger muscles than you!

LOL - I win Sip, u got the PM a sent u?

I should also note, 19th century British politics was largelly dominated by two individuals: d'Israeli - a charming Jew born to a middle class familly and (surprisingly) leader of the 'conservatives' (I forget the names of the two major political parties (wigs and torries I think), but for relevance sake will call them conservatives/liberals) and Gladstone - a practicing Christian, a humanist and the leader of the 'liberal' party. d'Israeli policies were staunchly pro-Ottoman and anti-Russian. Gladstone on the other hand although not the complete opposite, believed in freeing the Balkan peoples from Ottoman oppression - but not handing them to the Tsar. In any event he was constantly hampered by general British public opinion and the Queen (who happened to like d'Israeli and distrusted Gladstone, because fundamentally his views could mean that the British colonies and posessions should also rule themsleves). In any case Gladstone was the Prime Minister when the Crimean War started. He was against involvement, but the British public was whipped into a war frenzy and he had no choice but to declare war. It is almost certain without the British, the French would not have gotten involved. In fact they should have had little interest, but an alliance with Britain was Napoleon III's dearest wish.