Jump to content

Em

Members
  • Posts

    1,359
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Em

  1. Em

    Impressions Of The Day

    "fast reply": Barev dzez!
  2. Em

    Tigran Hamasyan

    Jazzed Out http://www.angelcityjazz.com/artists/tigran-quintet
  3. Արթուր ՄԵՍՉՅԱՆ. Ամենից շատ վախենում եմ պարապ մարդուց /templates/ja_teline/images/printButton.png Հասարակոււթյուն Հեղինակ` Մարինե ՂԱՐԱԽԱՆՅԱՆ /images/stories/N169/10pageMeschyan.jpgՄատենադարանի նոր մասնաշենքի գլխավոր ճարտարապետ, սիրված երաժիշտ Արթուր Մեսչյանի հետ հանդիպումը կայացավ անսպասելիորեն: Քանի որ նախապես հրաժարվել էր` տպագիր մամուլին հարցազրույց չտալու պատճառաբանությամբ, ես որոշեցի հանդիպել Մատենադարանի նոր մասնաշենքը կառուցող«Ալբերտ Կարախանյան և որդիներե շինարարական կազմակերպության ղեկավարի հետ` պարզելու` ինչպե՞ս է ընթանում շինարարությունը: Ալբերտը հազիվ էր սկսել ծանոթացնել աշխատանքներին, երբ շինհրապարակում հայտնվեց ինքը` Արթուր Մեսչյանը: Ինչպես ասում են` բարևեց ու կրակն ընկավ: Փոխադարձ թախանձանքներին (ես իրեն էի համոզում, որ պատասխանի իմ հարցերին, ինքն ինձ, որ«ձեռ քաշեմե իրենից), արվեստագետը տեղի տվեց` միայն մեկ հարցի պատասխանելու կեսկատակ-կեսլուրջ ժլատ պայմանով: Ես իհարկե հետո համոզվեցի, որ դա ոչ թե քմահաճույք է կամ ինքնագնահատանքի ձև, այլ պարզապես ինքնանվիրումով աշխատող մտավորականի, համեստագույն մարդու վարքագիծ, ով պարզապես չի ուզում, որ իրեն խանգարեն և ընդհատեն: Կներեք, հարգելի պարոն Մեսչյան, բայց ես էլ իմ գործն եմ անում, գուցեև` ոչ այնքան կարևոր: - Ի տարբերություն մտավորական և ոչմտավորական անվանյալների (այդպես եմ ասում, քանի որ այդ բառի իմաստը չեմ հասկանում), ես սարսափելի չեմ սիրում խոսել: Ինչո՞ւ. այսքան տարի խոսում ենք, ու գրեթե ոչինչ չենք անում: Եկեք սուս մնանք ու գործ անենք: - Համաձայն եմ, բայց դուք աշխատում եք, ընդ որում ազգային մեծ գործ եք անում: Պատմեք, խնդրում եմ, Մատենադարանի կառուցվող մասնաշենքի մասին: - Դա` ուրիշ: Շատ գրագետ կառույց է: Նախատեսված էր կառուցել այնպես, որ քաղաքի ոչ մի կետից չերևա: Նպատակը մեկն էր` գլխավոր մասնաշենքի հետ չմրցել: Գլխավորն այդպիսին էլ պետք է մնա, իսկ նորը կլինի նրա սահուն, փափուկ շարունակությունը: Այն միայն պոլիտեխնիկի բակից է տեսանելի: - Ի դեպ` պոլիտեխնիկի մասին. մի առիթով դուք ասել եք` իսկական տղամարդը պիտի պոլիտեխնիկն ավարտի: - Անպայման: Ընդ որում լավ սովորի: Ես որ նախագահ լինեի, այդպիսի հրաման կտայի, որ հայ տղամարդկանց մեծամասնությունը պոլիտեխնիկում սովորեն, գոնե պետական և քաղաքական գործիչները: - Ինչո՞ւ: - Այդ դեպքում ահագին սխալներ թույլ չէինք տա, տղամարդը մինչև գիշերն անքուն գծագիր չգծի, ես նրան չեմ հավատում` ինչ թեմայից էլ խոսի` գիտությունից, փիլիսոփայությունից, թե քաղաքականությունից: Ճարտարագիտական կրթությունը զարգացնում է ռացիոնալ մտածողությունը: Սա իմ սուբյեկտիվ կարծիքն է: Հարց տվեք ինձ: - Ահա, տեսնո՞ւմ ես, իսկ քիչ առաջ չէիր ուզում,- խոսակցությանը ժպտալով միջամտում է շինարարության ղեկավար Ալբերտ Կարախանյանը: - Պարոն Մեսչյան, ո՞ր թվականից եք սկսել նախագծային աշխատանքները: - 1987 թ. որոշվեց, որ կցակառույց պիտի արվի, բայց դա նախագծային համեստ առաջադրանք էր, քանի որ ֆինանսավորման խնդիր կար: Շինարարության մի մասը` կամարաշար հատվածը, կառուցեցինք խորհրդային տարիներին, սակայն երկրաշարժի հետևանքով աշխատանքներն ընդհատվեցին: - Իսկ ինչպե՞ս ստացաք երկրորդ առաջարկը, որքան գիտեմ` դուք այդ ժամանակ ԱՄՆ-ում էիք: - Ի դեպ երբ ինձ առաջարկեցին, կարծում էին` Բոստոնում եմ, բայց արդեն վերադարձել էի: - Այսինքն ձեր վերադարձը համընկավ առաջարկի հե՞տ: /images/stories/N169/10%20page%20Meschyan1.jpg - Սա թերևս իմ կյանքի երջանիկ համընկնումներից մեկն էր: - Այս հանդիպումն էլ իմ կյանքի երջանիկ համընկնումներից է... Հայաստանում սա ձեր ո՞րերորդ նախագիծն է: - Չորրորդ, իսկ իմ կյանքի 11-րդ կառույցն է: Սրանով ես ինձ բավարարված և կայացած եմ զգում: Եթե շարունակվի այնպես, ինչպես մենք ենք ուզում, սա կլինի դարի գլուխգործոց, գլուխ չեմ գովում, իսկապես և ճարտարագիտական, և կառուցման որակի տեսանկյուններից յուրահատուկ շենք է, ընդ որում, ոչ միայն Հայաստանի սահմաններում: Վերջերս մի իտալացի էր եկել, ապշել էր` այս ամենը տեսնելով: Սա արժեք է, որն արդեն ազգային պատկանելություն չունի: Ընդ որում մի մարդու աշխատանք չէ, այս գործին լծված է 400 մարդ` այդ թվում վարպետներ և բանվորներ, որոնց մասին չգիտես ինչու, վերջին ժամանակներս մոռանում ենք: Եվ կարիք չկա անընդհատ շեշտելու, թե Հայաստանում լավ վարպետներ չկան, վստահորեն ասում եմ` լավ շինարար-վարպետներ այսօր կան և այն էլ շատ, պարզապես պետք է նրանց գործ տալ և լավ վարձատրել: Շենք կառուցելը, շինարարության արժևորումը Հայաստանում շատ թերի են: Հավաքվում են մարդիկ` շինարարներ, արժեք են ստեղծում, տուն են պահում: Վերջին տարիներին Երևանում այսքան շինարարություն է կատարվել, վարպետի, բանվորի, շինարարի մասին ինչքա՞ն ենք լրատվամիջոցներում կարդացել... Ի՞նչ են ցուցադրում հեռուստատեսությամբ, երգեր` լավ կամ վատ, ապա` որտեղ ում են ծեծել կամ սպանել, քանի տուն են կողոպտել և... սերիալներ: Կարծես շինարարական արժեքը Հայաստանում գոյություն չունի: Ախր շենք կառուցելը մարդկային միջավայր կառուցել է, այն, ինչ մենք անում ենք, միայն շենքը չէ, աշխատող մարդիկ են` իրենց ճակատագրերով, իրենց հպարտությամբ, որ մասնակից են ինչ-որ արժեքի ստեղծման: Նրանք պիտի լինեն առաջին տեղում, ավելի իմաստավոր և կարևոր կլինի նրանց պատմածն իրենց աշխատանքի մասին, քան իմ փիլիսոփայական մտքերը: Ինձ շատ է հուզում և մտահոգում, որ իրական արժեքների մասին այսօր Հայաստանում չի խոսվում, էկրանն ու թերթերը լցնում ենք միայն վատ բաներով: Թերթերը բացում ես` ուզում ես կախվել, այնպիսի տպավորություն է, որ կյանքը կանգ է առել, ոչ շենք է կառուցվում, ոչ երեխա է ծնվում, ամեն ինչ շատ վատ է, գնացեք կախվեք: Այդ կարծրատիպը խախտելու համար պետք է շփվեք այն մարդկանց հետ, ովքեր արժեք են ստեղծում, ովքեր«մեյդանումե չեն, այլ առավոտյան սուս ու փուս արթնանում են, գալիս գործի, երեկոյան մթան հետ տուն վերադառնում, լվացվում են, երեխեքին կերակրում, պառկում քնելու: Կարգին մարդիկ նրանք են: Իսկ ես գծողներից եմ: - Նոր մասնաշենքն ի՞նչ բաժիններից է բաղկացած լինելու: - Մենք Մատենադարանի համար պետք է ապահովենք երկու գործառույթ` հարմարավետություն և ապահովություն: Ապահովությունը ստեղծվելու է երեքհարկանի բունկերի միջոցով, որն ունի աստիճանավանդակ և վերելակ: Բունկերն ունի ներքին ընթերցասրահ` այն գրքերի համար, որոնք ոչ մի դեպքում այնտեղից չպետք է դուրս տարվեն: Բայց վիրտուալ մատենադարանը, որի սերվերը գտնվում է բունկերում, հնարավորություն կտա ուսումնասիրել մատյանների վիրտուալ տարբերակները: Ապա գրապահարաններն են` 30000 գրքի համար: Միջանցքի վերջում գտնվում է«մատուռըե` ապակե դռնով, որտեղ պետք է պահպանվի Սուրբ գիրքը, ի դեպ այն պետք է հանվի նախագահների երդման արարողության ժամանակ: Ունենք տպագիր գրականության բաժին, մամուլի բաժին: Իհարկե ամենակարևոր բլոկը ձեռագրատունն է, արխիվը, գիտաշխատողների սենյակները, վարչական մասը (նախկին մասնաշենքից տեղափոխվելու է այստեղ), համակարգչային և թվայնացման բաժինները, բավականին շքեղ ընթերցասրահ ունենք, 220 տեղանոց դահլիճ: Գիտահետազոտական ինստիտուտի դասական տարբերակի ներքին կառուցվածքը բավականին գրագետ ձևով պահպանված է, ամենակարևորը` բավարարում է Մատենադարանի պահանջները, համենայնդեպս այն ծավալները, որոնք մենք ստեղծում ենք, առաջիկա 20 տարում Մատենադարանի բնականոն գործունեության համար բավարար կլինի: - Ինչո՞վ եք առաջնորդվել ճարտարապետական լուծումներ փնտրելիս: - Իմիջիայլոց 21-րդ դարի ճարտարապետական հնարքներն օգտագործելու մեծ գայթակղություն կար` բարձր, մեծ ապակիներ և այլն, բայց մտածեցի` ավելի ազնիվ և արդարացի կլինի, եթե ոչինչ չհնարեմ, այլ ուղղակի շարունակեմ գլխավոր մասնաշենքը: Ձևավորելիս հաշվի է առնվել այն հանգամանքը, որ սա համենայնդեպս թանգարան չէ, այլ ինստիտուտ: Գրքի նկատմամբ վերաբերմունքը պարտադրում է, որ ճարտապետական լուծումները լինեն համաչափ: Նախասրահի հատակը և գրանիտե սյուները նմանվելու են Զվարթնոց տաճարին: Ի դեպ շենքը իրականում չորս անգամ ավելի մեծ է, քան երևում է. երեք քառորդը մխրճված է ժայռերի մեջ: Դրանով մենք կրճատել ենք տեսողական ծավալը: - Ո՞րն է լինելու Մատենադարանի հին մասնաշենքի գործառույթը: - Մեր նպատակն է` ավելացնել ցուցասրահները, քանի որ դրանք շատ սահմանափակ են: Մատենադարանի հին մասնաշենքը կդառնա թանգարան-ցուցասրահ: - Ե՞րբ է նախատեսված շինարարության ավարտը: - Ոչ թե կարծում ենք կամ մտածում ենք, այլ բացումը միանշանակ լինելու է սեպտեմբերի 21-ին` Անկախության 20-ամյակի օրը: Կարծում եմ` սա ամենալուրջ ազգային օբյեկտն է, դարի կառույց, որն իսկապես կդառնա հայկական խորհրդանիշ: Ես ասում եմ ոչ թե ազգային սնափառությունից ելնելով, այլ անկանխակալ գնահատմամբ: - Ձեր հանդիսատեսն անհամբեր սպասում է, թե Մեսչյանը երբ է ավարտելու շինարարությունը, որ դարձյալ կիթառը վերցնի ձեռքը: Քանի որ գիտենք` շինարարությամբ զբաղվելու ժամանակ կիթառն ու երգը մի կողմ եք թողնում: - Մեսչյանն այլևս չի երգելու, նա գնալու է Անտառաշեն` ձի պահելու, իմիջիայլոց հանաք չեմ անում, ամենայն լրջությամբ եմ ասում: Էնքան երգող կա, թող երգեն, էլի: - Իսկ Մեսչյանն ինչի՞ց է վախենում: - Ամենից շատ վախենում եմ պարապ մարդուց, զբաղված մարդը ժամանակ չունի ցույցի գնալու, ժամանակ չունի բամբասելու, շենքի բակում նստելու և բողոքելով նարդի խաղալու: Ամեն ինչ սկսվում է նրանից, թե ինչ ենք անում այս կյանքում, ինչպես է սկսվում մեր օրը: Եկեք դա արժևորենք: Եթե դա արժևորես, ուրեմն և հայրենասեր կլինես, և մտավորական: Եթե դու մի բան ես անում` երկիրն էլ է ոտքի կանգնում: Կյանքը շատ պարզ է. աշխատում ես` լավ ես ապրում, չես աշխատում` վատ ես ապրում: Աշխատում ես` լավ քաղաքացի ես, ազգասեր ես, լավ ծնող ես:
  4. http://www.reporter....d-by-azerbaijan Wikileaks: Armenians can't be defeated by Azerbaijan by Emil Sanamyan Published: Tuesday February 22, 2011 Washington - "Azerbaijan, even with its focus on improving its military capability, is unlikely anytime soon to structure a force large or well-equipped enough to overcome the terrain advantages enjoyed by the NK Self-Defense Force and the Armenian army," former U.S. Ambassador to Azerbaijan Anne Derse argued at the end of her tenure in Baku. According to the July 2, 2009 cable that is part of Wikileaks cache and was first published by Russkiy Reporter on February 22, Derse believed that Azerbaijan assumed "a much rosier scenario for NK than it has any plausible reason to expect." Derse served as U.S. ambassador to Azerbaijan from 2006 to 2009 and is currently the ambassador to Lithuania. In a January 2009 cable, also published by Russkiy Reporter today, Derse notes that Azerbaijani "President's rhetoric has vastly outpaced the results" of Azerbaijan's military build-up. The Washington view Derse's analysis is in line with U.S. assessment of the balance of forces in Karabakh that former U.S. officials and experts have communicated publicly, their views unaffected by Azerbaijan's ballooning military spending expected to top $3 billion in 2011. Ross Wilson, another former U.S. Ambassador to Azerbaijan (2000-2003), and Stephen Blank of the U.S. Army War College offered similar analyses during a panel discussion at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington on February 18. Blank stressed that Ilham Aliyev is "sadly mistaken" if he believes, as he often says publicly, that Azerbaijan could successfully undertake a military operation to capture Karabakh. Blank suggested that his conclusion was based on an in-depth and recent analysis by a group of Western experts. "Any military campaign will seriously set back Azerbaijan's interests in the region including with respect to solving this [conflict] and I say that in part because I don't think a military effort will succeed," Wilson remarked . "This is extremely difficult terrain, the Armenians hold the high ground and it is very, very difficult to try to take that kind of territory without truly overwhelming force" which Azerbaijan does not possess, Wilson noted. Wayne Merry, a former State Department and Pentagon official, argued in May 2009 that in addition to the terrain and other physical limitations, Azerbaijan would be facing the Armenian military that has "a clear record of superiority in operational art [that] they would exercise in the inherently advantageous role of defenders of a skillfully prepared position." The realities on the ground "should persuade any rational Azeri not to resort to war. Even the most favorable battlefield outcome would leave Azerbaijan immeasurably worse off than before," Merry wrote. He warned further that "it is not out of the question that the existence of an Azeri state could hang in the balance, as in a major renewed war it might be in the combined interests of Armenia, Russia and Iran to redraw the map of the eastern Caucasus. Unlikely, but history is replete with precedents." © 2011 Armenian Reporter
  5. Em

    Ruben Haxverdian

    I'm wondering as to who you are...
  6. Anoushik jan, I am not defending them in the least...merely questioning why it was done on such a large scale manner. Logistically, it doesn't make sense to spend the resources (FBI, U.S. Atty, local law enforcement, etc.) to bring down 74 persons of a gang which is inconsequential in the grand scheme of things. And, it doesn't end here...there's one more wave coming... Yes, let's clean them out of our neighborhoods; let's stop them from skimming our card numbers at gas stations and car washes; and let's use these men as examples in trying to deter the kids who may believe this to be a lucrative route. Yet, I don't believe this sullies our name. It's a small group of (relatively) organized crooks. The media is fueling hatred against being Armenian. THERE WAS NO VALID REASON FOR THE TASK FORCE TO BE ORGANIZED AND CONDUCT WORK OUT GLENDALE. However, it's the best way to keep a larger population in said city in "check". It gives the law enforcement in said city a little more leeway in their profiling and harassment of Armenians. It also helps pit the Parska Hyes and Beiruta Hyes against the Hayastancis... We don't have community leaders. We have individuals with Armenian last names who are seeking positions in government and the community to further their individual causes/ interests. But, luckily, a new generation is making attempts to remedy that...hoping they keep to their aim...
  7. Funny how this "crackdown" is being so perfectly staged- as if an entire people are being placed in the spotlight; being held accountable for their bad seeds. Some questions arise as to why exactly the task force was out of Glendale. Well, good for them. Now that the masterminds and thugs are cleared off the streets, L.A. err...the more affluent cities of Glendale, Sherman Oaks and Encino will be safer. One need only be a resident of the greater L.A. area to understand that this whole sting reeks...just sayin'...
  8. Em

    Մտքեր

    I so wish you would write and share...
  9. Sirunik es- Reincarnation
  10. Dorians featuring Artyom Manukyan
  11. Em

    Tigran Hamasyan

    http://www.tigranhamasyan.am/ http://www.facebook.com/h.tigran http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/culturemonster/2011/01/tigran-himasyans-global-.html Cannot explain in words how magnificent he is. He embodies genius. I have been following his work for two years now, yet experiencing it live left me in awe of him.
  12. http://www.esiweb.org/pdf/esi_document_id_108.pdf
  13. Em

    Words Of Wisdom

    "In the name of the best within you, do not sacrifice this world to those who are its worst. In the name of the values that keep you alive, do not let your vision of man be distorted by the ugly, the cowardly, the mindless in those who have never achieved his title. Do not lose your knowledge that man's proper estate is an upright posture, an intransigent mind and a step that travels unlimited roads. Do not let your fire go out, spark by irreplaceable spark, in the hopeless swamps of the approximate, the not-quite, the not-yet, the not-at-all. Do not let the hero in your soul perish, in lonely frustration for the life you deserved, but have never been able to reach. Check your road and the nature of your battle. The world you desired can be won, it exists, it is real, it is possible, it's yours." -Ayn Rand
  14. Anchap shnorhakal em bolorict!
  15. Em

    Art in Yerevan

    More subjective art, close by... http://photography.n...plates-armenia/ ~~~~~~~http://images.nationalgeographic.com/wpf/media-live/photos/000/233/cache/license-plates-azerbaijan_23333_990x742.jpg License Plated Road, Nagorno-Karabakh Photograph by Alex Webb, National Geographic This Month in Photo of the Day: National Geographic Magazine Features The license plates were taken from cars abandoned by Azerbaijanis fleeing their homes as Armenia and Azerbaijan fought over control of the region in the early 1990s. Now they line roadside walls in the town of Vank and are seen as trophies of victory.
  16. Em

    Ara Oshagan

    Father Land a book signing event with photographer Ara Oshagan Glendale, CA – Glendale Public Library presents the newly published book by Vahe and Ara Oshagan Father Land, on Friday, November 12, 2010, at 7 p.m., in the Glendale Central Library Auditorium, 222 East Harvard Street, Glendale. The program will be presented in English and Armenian and will include a slide presentation of photos from the book. Admission is free and the seating is limited. Library visitors receive 3 hours FREE parking across the street at The Market Place parking structure with validation at the loan desk. Father Land is a poetic and personal journey through the rugged, human and history laden landscape of Karabagh/Armenia: a unique collaboration between a photographer son and his well-known, writer/late father. A family steeped in Armenian literature and art, Vahé and Ara Oshagan's work is the result of an intensely felt connection to their heritage and homeland. Father Land is a literary and visual contemplation of Karabagh's present day, its history and its culture, as well as a meditation on transnational identity, land, and paternal bonds. Ara Oshagan is a photographer whose work revolves around the intersecting themes of identity, community, and memory. His work is in the permanent collection of the Southeast Museum of Photography, Florida; the Downey Museum of Art, California; and the Museum of Modern Art in Armenia. http://www.armeniancalendar.com/pictures/4574_1_GPLAOshagan.jpg
  17. http://www.businessi...k+(ClusterStock) I Am Ashamed Of What Russia Has Become Mikhail Khodorkovsky | Nov. 6, 2010, 2:14 PM http://static.businessinsider.com/image/4cd59a00cadcbb2f7d130000-401-316/mikhail-khodorkovsky.jpg Mikhail Khodorkovsky, one of the original Russian oligarchs, is the former CEO of giant Russian oil company Yukos. He was once the richest man in Russia, worth more than $15 billion. In 2003, after opposing Vladimir Putin, Khodorkovsky was prosecuted and convicted on tax-related charges and sent to prison in Siberia. A few days ago, Khodorkovsky delivered the closing statement in a new trial, one in which prosecutors allege that he stole all the oil produced by Yukos from 1998 to 2003. The verdict, which is not likely to surprise anyone, will be delivered December 15. Below is Khodorkovsky's statement, translated from the Russian on The Moscow Diaries: I can recall October 2003. My last day as a free man. Several weeks after my arrest, I was informed that president Putin had decided: I was going to have to "slurp gruel" for 8 years. It was hard to believe that back then. Seven years have gone by already since that day. Seven years – quite a long stretch of time, and all the more so – when you've spent it in jail. All of us have had time to reassess and rethink many things. Judging by the prosecutors' presentation: "give them 14 years" and "spit on previous court decisions", over these years they have begun to fear me more, and to respect the law – even less. The first time around, they at least went through the effort of first repealing the judicial acts that stood in their way. Now – they'll just leave them be; especially since they would need to repeal not two, but more than 60 decisions. I do not want to return to the legal side of the case at this time. Everybody who wanted to understand something – has long since understood everything. Nobody is seriously waiting for an admission of guilt from me. It is hardly likely that somebody today would believe me if I were to say that I really did steal all the oil produced by my company. But neither does anybody believe that an acquittal in the YUKOS case is possible in a Moscow court. Notwithstanding, I want to talk to you about hope. Hope – the main thing in life. I remember the end of the '80s of the last century. I was 25 then. Our country was living on hope of freedom, hope that we would be able to achieve happiness for ourselves and for our children. We lived on this hope. In some ways, it did materialise, in others – it did not. The responsibility for why this hope was not realized all the way, and not for everybody, probably lies on our entire generation, myself included. I remember too the end of the last decade and the beginning of the present, current one. By then I was 35. We were building the best oil company in Russia. We were putting up sports complexes and cultural centres, laying roads, and resurveying and developing dozens of new fields; we started development of the East Siberian reserves and were introducing new technologies. In short, – we were doing all those things that Rosneft, which has taken possession of Yukos, is so proud of today. Thanks to a significant increase in oil production, including as the result of our successes, the country was able to take advantage of a favourable oil situation. We felt hope that the period of convulsions and unrest – was behind us at last, and that, in the conditions of stability that had been achieved with great effort and sacrifice, we would be able to peacefully build ourselves a new life, a great country. Alas, this hope too has yet to be justified. Stability has come to look like stagnation. Society has stopped in its tracks. Although hope still lives. It lives on even here, in the Khamovnichesky courtroom, when I am already just this side of 50 years old. With the coming of a new President (and more than two years have already passed since that time), hope appeared once again for many of my fellow citizens too. Hope that Russia would yet become a modern country with a developed civil society. Free from the arbitrary behaviour of officials, free from corruption, free from unfairness and lawlessness. It is clear that this can not happen all by itself, or in one day. But to pretend that we are developing, while in actuality, – we are merely standing in one place or sliding backwards, even if it is behind the cloak of noble conservatism, – is no longer possible. Impossible and simply dangerous for the country. It is not possible to reconcile oneself with the notion that people who call themselves patriots so tenaciously resist any change that impacts their feeding trough or ability to get away with anything. It is enough to recall art. 108 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation – arresting businessmen for filing of tax returns by bureaucrats. And yet it is precisely the sabotage of reforms that is depriving our country of prospects. This is not patriotism, but rather hypocrisy. I am ashamed to see how certain persons – in the past, respected by me – are attempting to justify unchecked bureaucratic behaviour and lawlessness. They exchange their reputation for a life of ease, privileges and sops. Luckily, not all are like that, and there are ever more of the other kind. It makes me proud to know that even after 7 years of persecutions, not a single one of the thousands of YUKOS employees has agreed to become a false witness, to sell their soul and conscience. Dozens of people have personally experienced threats, have been cut off from family, and have been thrown in jail. Some have been tortured. But, even after losing their health and years of their lives, people have still kept the thing they deemed to be most important, – human dignity. Those who started this shameful case, – Biryukov, Karimov and others, – have contemptuously called us "entrepreneurs" [«kommersanty»], regarding us as low-lifes, capable of anything just to protect our prosperity and avoid prison. The years have passed. So who are the low-lifes now? Who is it that have lied, tortured, and taken hostages, all for the sake of money and out of cowardice before their bosses? And this they called "the sovereign's business" [«gosudarevoye delo»]! Shameful. I am ashamed for my country. I think all of us understand perfectly well – the significance of our trial extends far beyond the scope of my fate and Platon's, and even the fates of all those who have guiltlessly suffered in the course of the sweeping massacre of YUKOS, those I found myself unable to protect, but about whom I remember every day. Let us ask ourselves: what must be going through the head of the entrepreneur, the high-level organiser of production, or simply any ordinary educated, creative person, looking today at our trial and knowing that its result is absolutely predictable? The obvious conclusion a thinking person can make is chilling in its stark simplicity: the siloviki bureaucracy can do anything. There is no right of private property ownership. A person who collides with "the system" has no rights whatsoever. Even though they are enshrined in the law, rights are not protected by the courts. Because the courts are either also afraid, or are themselves a part of "the system". Should it come as a surprise to anyone then that thinking people do not aspire to self-realisation here, in Russia? Who is going to modernise the economy? Prosecutors? Policemen? Chekists? We already tried such a modernization – it did not work. We were able to build a hydrogen bomb, and even a missile, but we still can not build – our own good, modern television, our own inexpensive, competitive, modern automobile, our own modern mobile phone and a whole pile of other modern goods as well. But then we have learnt how to beautifully display others' obsolete models produced in our country and an occasional creation of Russian inventors, which, if they ever do find a use, it will certainly be in some other country. Whatever happened with last year's presidential initiatives in the realm of industrial policy? Have they been buried? They offer the real chance to kick the oil addiction. Why? Because what the country needs is not one Korolev, and not one Sakharov under the protective wing of the all-powerful Beria and his million-strong armed host, but hundreds of thousands of "korolevs" and "sakharovs", under the protection of fair and comprehensible laws and independent courts, which will give these laws life, and not just a place on a dusty shelf, as they did in their day – with the Constitution of 1937. Where are these "korolevs" and "sakharovs" today? Have they left the country? Are they preparing to leave? Have they once again gone off into internal emigration? Or taken cover amongst the grey bureaucrats in order not to fall under the steamroller of "the system"? We can and must change this. How is Moscow going to become the financial centre of Eurasia if our prosecutors, "just like" 20 and 50 years ago, are directly and unambiguously calling in a public trial for the desire to increase the production and market capitalisation of a private company – to be ruled a criminally mercenary objective, for which a person ought to be locked up for 14 years? Under one sentence a company that paid more tax than anyone else, except Gazprom, but still underpaid taxes; and with the second sentence it's obvious that there's nothing to tax since the taxable item was stolen. A country that tolerates a situation where the siloviki bureaucracy holds tens and even hundreds of thousands of talented entrepreneurs, managers, and ordinary people in jail in its own interests, instead of and together with criminals, – this is a sick country. A state that destroys its best companies, which are ready to become global champions; a country that holds its own citizens in contempt, trusting only the bureaucracy and the special services – is a sick state. Hope – the main engine of big reforms and transformations, the guarantor of their success. If hope fades, if it comes to be supplanted by profound disillusionment, – who and what will be able to lead our Russia out of the new stagnation? I will not be exaggerating if I say that millions of eyes throughout all of Russia and throughout the whole world are watching for the outcome of this trial. They are watching with the hope that Russia will after all become a country of freedom and of the law, where the law will be above the bureaucratic official. Where supporting opposition parties will cease being a cause for reprisals. Where the special services will protect the people and the law, and not the bureaucracy from the people and the law. Where human rights will no longer depend on the mood of the tsar. Good or evil. Where, on the contrary, the power will truly be dependent on the citizens, and the court – only on law and God. Call this conscience – if you prefer. I believe, this – is how it will be. I am not at all an ideal person, but I am – a person with an idea. For me, as for anybody, it is hard to live in jail, and I do not want to die there. But if I have to – I will not hesitate. The things I believe in are worth dying for. I think I have proven this. And you opponents? What do you believe in? That the bosses are always right? Do you believe in money? In the impunity of "the system"? Your Honour! There is much more than just the fates of two people in your hands. Right here and right now, the fate of every citizen of our country is being decided. Those who, on the streets of Moscow and Chita, Peter and Tomsk, and other cities and settlements, are not counting on becoming victims of police lawlessness, who have set up a business, built a house, achieved success and want to pass it on to their children, not to raiders in uniform, and finally, – those who want to honourably carry out their duty for a fair wage, not expecting that they can be fired at any moment by corrupt bosses under just about any pretext. This is not about me and Platon – at any rate, not only about us. It is about hope for many citizens of Russia. About hope that tomorrow, the court will be able to protect their rights, if yet some other bureaucrats-officials get it into their head to brazenly and demonstratively violate these rights. I know, there are people, I have named them in the trial, who want to keep us in jail. To keep us there forever! Indeed, they do not even conceal this, publicly reminding everyone about the existence of a "bottomless" case file. They want to show: they – are above the law, they will always accomplish whatever they might "think up". So far they have achieved the opposite: out of ordinary people they have created a symbol of the struggle with arbitrariness. But for them, a conviction is essential, so they would not become "scapegoats". I want to hope that the court will stand up to their psychological pressure. We all know through whom it will come. I want an independent judiciary to become a reality and the norm in my country, I want the phrase from the Soviet times about "the most just court in the world" to stop sounding just as ironic today as they did back then. I want us not to leave the dangerous symbols of a totalitarian system as an inheritance for our children and grandchildren. Everybody understands that your verdict in this case – whatever it will be – is going to become part of the history of Russia. Furthermore, it is going to form it for the future generation. All the names – those of the prosecutors, and of the judges – will remain in history, just like they have remained in history after the infamous Soviet trials. Your Honour, I can imagine perfectly well that this must not be very easy at all for you – perhaps even frightening – and I wish you courage!
  18. What's wrong with the Armani ads?
  19. Barev, Anoushik jan. Great question. Very relevant topic. Where to start? I can say so much, yet the prevailing thought is that if both the male and female are educated (the more so the better in this regard) they are able to build a union wherein both have close to equal rights and respect. When the woman is more educated, the relationship suffers. It's more difficult to keep an educated woman "in line". Of course, this issue is not exclusive to Armenians, yet it is a very valid concern for us. Some of the education I have received has directly challenged or negated the norms, values and/or expectations of my culture, yet I think I have found the balance of allowing the former to open me up whilst the latter I practice daily. I will elaborate later re how it has affected my relationship(s).
  20. Em

    Impressions Of The Day

    Sometimes one must travel around the world to realize that the treasure was in his backyard the entire time. ( A la the Alchemist.)
  21. Em

    Մտքեր

    Perhaps, worse still is never being challenged; staying stagnant, fixed.
  22. Em

    Waiting for Tables

    "Perhaps we have become so defined by our loss that we cannot imagine ourselves without it." http://www.brooklynrail.org/2010/03/local/waiting-for-tables Waiting for Tables by Nancy Agabian I was trying to imagine living in Sunnyside. A historic landmark built in the 20s, one of the first shared living communities in America, Sunnyside Gardens features two and three storey attached brick homes nestled between shared gardens, courtyards, and walking streets. When I first encountered Sunnyside’s tall trees fanning over peaked rooftops, I couldn’t believe such suburbia was a ten-minute subway ride from Midtown. But mostly I was curious how the idyllic neighborhood contained two of its inhabitants, the Armenians and the Turks, and their ancient, bloody grudge. /article_image/image/6292/agabian1-web.jpgNeighborhood restaurants are just one noticeable aspect of Sunnyside's Armenian and Turkish population. Dracula's Place, serving traditional Romanian cuisine Photos by Miller Oberlin. I discovered Sunnyside when my partner and I were looking for a home. We had just arrived from Armenia, where he was born, and where I had lived on a year-long Fulbright. Returning to New York City to encounter Armenian shops, Turkish restaurants, and both languages spoken on the street was intriguing. As an Armenian American, I was well aware of the enemy status between the two groups. My grandmother had been a child when the Ottoman Empire was shrinking and shifting ultra-nationalistically to a Turkish Republic. She survived the systematic series of death marches and mass killings that the ruling Young Turks waged in Eastern Anatolia to displace and decimate large numbers of Christian Armenians and their whole strata of society, along with anyone not Turkic, such as Assyrians, Greeks, and Jews. Every April 24, I had commemorated the genocide with other Armenian Americans, had signed petitions for the U.S. Congress to recognize the event, and had become enraged as the Turkish government continued to deny the truth with claims that the number of Armenian deaths is inflated and that just as many Turks died in a civil war. During my year in Armenia, however, I discovered that many Armenians, like my partner, resented the manipulation of the Catastrophe (as the events of 1915 are also known) as a nationalistic tool. A formerly Soviet republic, Armenia occupies an especially precarious position: the tiny landlocked nation of under 3 millions souls has closed borders with Turkey and Azerbaijan since the war with the latter over the region of Karabakha—cease-fire has been in effect for over 15 years. But Armenia’s worst enemy seems to be its own nationalism, which enables government corruption to spread wealth among the well-connected while financially crippling everyone else. Nationalism also forced Muslim Azeris and Kurds in Armenia to flee persecution during and after the war, leaving a mono-ethnic, highly conformist and generally intolerant society. Many dissenting Armenian friends expressed to me that they were wary of the government-sponsored genocide commemorations for breeding an “us vs. them” mentality. I also learned that there was resistance on the other side of the border in Turkey. Though the history of the Armenians has not been taught for generations in Turkish schools, local Anatolian villagers have known of the atrocities through oral tradition. In the past few years, more Turks have been realizing that they have Armenian blood through grandmothers who were rescued as girls from the death marches to assimilate into Turkish culture. When Hrant Dink, the prominent Armenian editor of Agos, a Turkish-language Armenian newspaper in Istanbul, was assassinated outside his office by an ultra-nationalistic Turkish teenager in January, 2007, unprecedented demonstrations took place. A spokesperson for Armenians in Turkey, Dink identified as a Turkish citizen. Though he spoke openly about the Armenian Genocide and was charged with the national crime of “insulting Turkishness,” he stated publicly that he had personally moved beyond the Armenian rage over the crimes of the past. To memorialize him, demonstrators in Turkey carried signs that read, “We are all Hrant,” implying that Dink wasn’t “the other” but Turkey itself, and all of Turkey suffered his loss. On a trip to Tbilisi, Georgia, the same week that Dink was shot, I was further enlightened about Armenian and Turkish relations when I encountered an Azeri man who could speak better Armenian than me. At the centuries-old Turkish baths, he told me that his neighborhood was mixed with Azeris, Turks, Kurds and Armenians—basically a quartet of enemy nationalities—who were longtime friends. I didn’t have time to discover this utopian community, but eight months later I moved to Woodside, just east of Sunnyside; walking under the sycamores, I wondered if the Armenians and Turks of Sunnyside were like their mythic counterparts in Tbilisi. I became curious to find out how they wound up in the same neighborhood. I wanted to know the dynamic among the neighbors, hoping to discover that people had bridged differences and forged friendships in a united front against American assimilation. After living in Armenia, an ethnically homogeneous place, where the “enemy” is rarely encountered but often imagined, I theorized that one positive aspect of living in New York was that its diversity provided a unique opportunity for longtime adversaries—landing in a new place and time—to confront their troubles. I imagined Armenian and Turkish teenagers in Romeo and Juliet romances, and little black-haired toddlers playing in courtyards. I envisioned elderly people sipping thick unfiltered coffee, which they didn’t claim as Armenian or Turkish, as they read each other their fortunes in the swirled coffee grounds. When I was more rational, I presumed that I would run into trouble during my search, and when I got paranoid, I feared no one would talk to me. Previously, I had tried to engage in dialogue with Turkish restauranteurs and shop owners in Manhattan, but it was invariably awkward. Sometimes I could identify when a stranger was Turkish with a kind of ethnic radar that I attributed to a vestigial sixth sense from when our ancestors lived together as foes. Though I was nervous about tapping into this inherited animosity in Sunnyside, I was more excited by the fantasy of neighborly love. My investigation into the relationship of the Sunnyside Armenians and Turks took place last spring, several months before the governments of Armenia and Turkey announced that they would work towards establishing diplomatic relations. Public protest in the Armenian diaspora erupted in response to the announcement of the pending agreement, especially over a proposed historic commission which will look into the “question” of the genocide. But Armenia has been struggling economically ever since the Soviet collapse, and diplomatic relations with Turkey could lead to an opening of the border, which would improve Armenia’s trade. Nearly a hundred years later, it seems the demands of the present have finally caught up with the need to atone for the past. /article_image/image/6293/agabian2-web.jpgThe Turkish Grill This wasn’t the case in Sunnyside, though I discovered that economics forced people together there, too. To learn how the two groups wound up in the same neighborhood, I met with Edvard, a Romanian-Armenian journalist, at the back of Baruir’s, a small Armenian shop on Queens Boulevard which has been roasting coffee beans in a giant copper contraption in their store window for nearly 45 years. Every weekend a group of older Armenian men, in their 60s, 70s and up, meet in Baruir’s back store room to eat, drink, and talk politics around a table, like village elders. Edvard emerged from their lair and set up two folding chairs for us by the freezers. He took off his hat to reveal his graying, bald head, crossed his legs, and smilingly gave me a rundown of the Armenians in the neighborhood. A few were from Bulgaria, some from Syria, and a group arrived from Armenia starting in the 1980s before the breakup of the Soviet Union. But the vast majority came from Bucharest, when nearly 5,000 Romanian-Armenians fled Communism during the 60s and early 70s with the help of the Displaced Persons Act. Edvard chronologically outlined the local Armenian social clubs, sports teams and businesses, many now defunct. One social group used to meet regularly at the Wendy’s on Queens Boulevard, “but then they moved to Cedar Grove,” Edvard grinned with a gleam in his eye that I didn’t understand. He explained that the Wendy’s crew was pretty old and Cedar Grove is a cemetery in Flushing. The joke underlined a pertinent point, though. When I asked Edvard if there was tension between the Armenians and their Turkish neighbors he said, “No, because the Armenians had already dissolved by the time the Turks arrived.” Apparently the Armenian community in Sunnyside was a ghost of its former self. I had read online that Turkish people began settling in Sunnyside in the early 80s, prompted in part by the Turkish prime minister, Turgut Ozal, who ushered in a period of economic growth with export and openness with the West; the majority of the community arrived during the mid to late 90s. By this time, many of the Romana-hye (the Armenian name for Romanian Armenians) had moved out of the neighborhood since the late 70s on their climb toward upward mobility. On another day, I went to Transylvania, a Romanian restaurant with a sign emblazoned with a full moon and a bat in flight alongside the cheerful proclamation “Dracula’s Place.” Inside the restaurant, among white tablecloths and a giant portrait of a Romanian king, a co-ed group of elderly Romanian Armenians congregated every Thursday. They were an extension of a group called Armenian Social Life of Western Queens, originating 35 years before. When I asked why the Romana-hye moved to Sunnyside, one man guessed that the shared gardens reminded the Romana-hye of Bucharest. But most people said more definitively that the rents were cheap and it was close to Manhattan where they could work. The executive director of TAMEF, the Turkish American Multicultural Educational Foundation, also offered the common sense answer: when the Turks arrived in the 80s and 90s the rents were affordable in Sunnyside. And it wasn’t the only place they immigrated to; the Turkish populations were actually larger in Brooklyn and New Jersey. These un-exciting answers about surviving economically went contrary to what I was hoping to hear: that Turks and Armenians wound up in the same neighborhood because once they arrived in an unfamiliar land, they found comfort amongst their Near Eastern, albeit estranged brethren. Even if part of my imagined scenario were true, I doubted anyone would admit it. Armenians repeatedly told me there was little relationship between the two people; in fact, no Armenian could suggest a Turk for me to talk to. One elderly Romana-hye man stated very clearly: “We don’t want to know it [the Turkish community] exists, we have no relation whatsoever, we don’t approach them and they don’t try to approach us.” /article_image/image/6294/agabian3-web.jpgThe storefront of Baruir, an Armenian coffee and grocery store in Sunnyside. Louiza, a Romanian-Armenian dentist a generation younger than the Baruir and Transylvania crowds, told me she had Turkish patients and they were friendly, but she didn’t think the two groups should be compared, since the Turks were Middle Eastern while Romanians were European. Of a darker complexion, I’ve always considered myself belonging to the subset of Middle Eastern Americans. Ironically, the blonde, European-identified Louiza and I have the same origins; her grandparents were also genocide survivors who spoke both Armenian and Turkish. A sheepish smile came over her face as she told me how just the other day she had unknowingly used the Turkish word, perde, while talking to her priest about curtains. “‘Perde?!’” she imitated the priest’s dismay. But then she realized it was close to the Romanian word, perda. “Romania was also conquered by Turkey,” she noted. Perhaps this was a reason why the Armenians in Romania strongly identified with their first adopted homeland. Louiza said, “Romanian culture had a tremendous impact on our lives. We speak Romanian daily.” She explained how poor they were when they first arrived to Sunnyside and how hard they had to work to survive, since they didn’t know English. She described the Romana-hye as clannish, marrying within their own community and not Armenians, never mind Americans, until a generation later. So it’s understandable how an insular, tighly-knit community, struggling to make its way in a foreign country, would feel indifference toward a clearly identified ethnic enemy. One man told me that 50 of his relatives, his entire family in Romania, immigrated to New York. Why bother getting to know anyone else, never mind Turks? I doubted if I was going to meet an Armenian in Sunnyside who had the time or interest for such an endeavor. I could have inquired about the first Romana-hye generation born in the U.S., but most hadn’t been raised in Sunnyside. Their parents were Louiza’s peers, the so-called 1.5 generation, who scaled the American dream by becoming doctors, dentists, bankers, and engineers. As they became successful, married, and had families, they moved to more upscale neighborhoods in Queens, then to points east on Long Island. Louiza told me that if you hadn’t moved out of Sunnyside by 1977, you were still here. /article_image/image/6295/agabian4-web.jpgInside Barulr, An Armenian Coffee shop and grocerySarkis, who founded Armenian Social Life of Western Queens, was one of the Romana-hye who stayed. A spry octogenarian in matching beige sweater and slacks, also known as Sergio, he was proud to tell me his group’s motto. “Fun” he said slowly, holding up his index finger, “leads to Friendship” second finger. He smiled, his eyes seeming to enlarge behind his sizable glasses. “Leads to Love” third finger, “leads to the most important of all, Unity.” He showed me a looseleaf binder filled with an annotated list of videos of the ASLoWQu meetings he’d organized, ranging from the Armenian alphabet to the 1989 Armenian earthquake, from health to taxes. I asked him if the group met to keep their unique dual-heritage intact. He exclaimed, “Many of these people are widowed! I tell them to reach out to their friends, exercise their mind, don’t be sad! The main point is to give spiritual support, to help with loneliness.” He then told me about his recent near-death experience when he collapsed during an ASLoWQu event and was rushed to the hospital, suffering an embolism. When he was brought to consciousness four days later, he questioned why, at the age of 80-something, he had been given another chance at life. In fact, he was a fan of the purpose-driven-life philosophy of Rick Warren. I cringed at his mention of the anti-gay marriage czar until I listened more deeply to Sergio. He had a place here among his people. When I broached the topic about the Turks in the neighborhood, he said, “Many Turkish families are friendly. There’s no animosity. My super of my building is a Turk and we are good friends. We’re helping each other. He calls me ‘amucha’ which means ‘uncle’.” He laughed as he said the word and raised his hand as if his super was waving or slapping him on the back. “They have no relationship with the past Ottoman Empire. The Turkish government has inherited the sins of the old Turks. But the people now are against Hrant Dink’s killer, who was a disturbed and indoctrinated teen. Just like during the massacres there were good Turks who saved Armenians and didn’t allow them to be massacred; they were against what happened. They aren’t all the same. You can’t blame a whole country for a minority who committed the atrocities in the past.” Sarkis presented an image of unity that I had fantasized about earlier. It was a rare vision, and I certainly hadn’t expected to find it at Dracula’s Place. At one point, one Armenian told me that I should send in a spy to talk to the Turks. He suggested an American girlfriend could do the interviews for me without revealing the material would be used for a parallel history on Armenians. He was concerned the Turks wouldn’t speak with me, and if they did, I would be too subjective to not become outraged by their views. I brushed him off and deemed such a reconnaissance mission unethical. But in one Turkish store, the two friendly, 30-ish guys behind the counter, each working on alternate days, kept telling me that the owner would be in the next day; it took four tries before I realized they were the owners, passing me off to each other, till one of them said, as if speaking of someone else, “He won’t want to talk about the history, I can tell you that much.” I had never identified myself as Armenian, but his ethnic radar must have tipped him off. I feared I would never find a Turk to talk to. If this wasn’t depressing enough, Sunnyside reminded me of death. It was first introduced to me by a friend who later died. An Armenian writer and resident my age had recently succumbed to leukemia. There was a huge cemetery nearby. My parents were closing in on their eighties, and I had just turned forty, which caused a radical shift in my thinking; how much time do I have left to do something important with my life? When I had lived in Armenia, I glimpsed a different attitude toward death; there was less a sense that every moment was so urgent and precious, and less of the angst that New Yorkers have about “being somebody.” I tried to return to the Eastern mindset of valuing life in the present and not worry so much about my article. And then the executive director of the Turkish American Multicultural Educational Foundation returned my call. Nervous as I walked over to Sunnyside for my first interview with a Turk, I wondered how we might dispute history. I had to stop on the blooming street corners to scribble down my thoughts about Americans valuing time and life as a commodity. Lobbying Armenian-Americans officially use the number 1.5 million to describe the quantity of people who died in the Catastrophe. But the true crime was not the number, but the suffering. There was the physical suffering of both those who survived and died, and the psychological suffering of witnessing such human depravity, and the emotional suffering of losing family. There was all the culture that was destroyed—art and schools and churches—that the world lost, not just Armenians. Turks lost their neighbors, friends and peers: they lost a question, an intellectual challenge, a certain kind of spirit that comes with difference. And hundreds of thousands of Turks suffered and lost their lives, directly as soldiers fighting in the war, and indirectly from the resulting spread of disease and poverty. 1.5 million sounded like a deal; it matched up so nicely with the 15 in 1915, easily remembered like a commercial message. It must have seemed threatening to Turks who deny history: a ploy to accuse them of wrongdoing, to demand reparations, to take away their nation, their culture. Armenians swoon over Mt. Ararat, the symbol of their land on Turkish territory, and some of them actively want it back. I'm not interested in land or numbers, I imagined telling the Executive Director of TAMEF. I believed in healing the cultural loss on both sides, much of which stemmed from the fear and hatred that allowed such an event to happen. Peace and reconciliation wouldn’t come until people in the present—in Turkey, in Armenia, in the diaspora—faced their own prejudice which had been passed down through the generations and institutionalized. As I walked down the street, by the laundromat, the real estate office, the Turkish and Armenian groceries, I thought about my connection to land. I moved fairly easily from neighborhood to neighborhood, city to city, even country to country. Would I die defending Woodside? Hardly. Would anyone feel spiritually attached to aluminum siding, shiny chrome gates, and electric wires dangling from cheap balconies into the apartment below? It could be that such a place of impermanence would encourage people to get along, since they’re not going to fight to the death over parking spaces. In a place of flux and rental units, everyone can co-exist, even if your allegiance is still to the land where you come from, the flag of origin—Brazil, Croatia, Greece, Colombia—hanging neatly in your window. “Co-existence”: it is not the same as talking, changing, and growing together. Veysel, the Executive Director, greeted me in the dark space of the Center and walked me into his sunny office facing the elevated 7 train tracks. I smiled at him and he didn’t quite smile back. He was a big black-haired man with a quiet demeanor, wearing square-shaped rimless glasses and a white button-down shirt. Unlike all my Armenian subjects who wouldn’t broach the topic till I asked, Veysel immediately launched into the question of Armenian-Turkish relations. “Turkish people have no problems with Armenians,” he said. “They live peaceably everywhere. They go to the same shops, restaurants and cafes, sitting together and talking together.” I wasn’t quite sure which Armenians and Turks were sipping coffee in which cafes, but I nodded my head. “We’re very happy that the Turkish government and the Armenian government are getting closer together,” Veysel went on, and again I nodded. The Turkish president had recently been to Armenia for a soccer match between Armenia and Turkey in the fall, an unprecedented diplomatic event. But then Veysel said, “I don’t want to talk politics, but just personally about our center.” In a place of diversity, he said, it was important that people learn about each other, so that we can all get along. He said they had visited the Irish Center in Long Island City and had coordinated a Japanese-Turkish night. “Right after Hrant Dink was assassinated, we wanted to visit the Armenian community here and offer our condolences,” he said. “But we couldn’t contact the right person. My Armenian friend told me that there were other people who would be more open.” He then asked if I knew of an Armenian group that was specifically for Armenians from Turkey. I recalled some Armenian graduate students from Istanbul for whom Turkish is their mother tongue. When I told Veysel, he was excited, as much as peeked through his reserve. “It would be good to meet with Armenians without talking about things that divide us. We can talk about what brings us together,” he said, “and respect whatever our religion and culture is.” I asked Vesyel, “Do you think the Armenian culture and the Turkish culture are similar?” “They’re almost the same!” he enthused. “Except for religion, we’re very alike.” And then he said, “We should look to the future and forget about the past.” Though 50 years separated them, Veysel seemed similar to Sergio. Perhaps it was the glasses, and the deliberate yet gentle manner of speaking. I discovered later that TAMEF was affiliated with Fethullah Gulem, a prominent spiritual leader in Turkey, who preaches the combination of Islam with science and modernity, including interfaith dialogue. Like Sergio with Rick Warren, Veysel had his own spiritual guide. He honestly wanted people to get along, and he actively wanted to be part of that effort, and was even willing to take risks, like approaching Armenians in the aftermath of Hrant Dink’s assassination. But by looking to the future, he seemed to want to speed up the process of reconciliation in the present, skipping over the acknowledgment of the past. The past also proved problematic at Massis Food, a sizable store with “European and Mediterranean Foods,” advertised on their sign. Massis is the word that Armenian speakers use as a name for Mt. Ararat. The owner, Raffi, a tall Armenian from Beirut with close-cropped, salt and pepper hair, told me that he had an equal number of Turkish and Armenian customers. Apparently, the Armenian name doesn’t scare his Turkish customers away. After Raffi greeted and rang up customers that he knew by name—some Armenian, some Turkish—I asked, “Do you ever talk about the history with your Turkish customers?” He shook his head no. “These people don’t know the history. It’s been kept from them, so I don’t bring it up.” His neutral stance wasn’t surprising, given his role in the neighborhood. It was a common sense business practice to not bring up ages old-disputed bloodshed. When I spoke to Yasemin, the young, pretty owner of the Turkish Grill, she echoed Raffi’s diplomatic proprietor stance. She told me that she never asked people where they were from. Yasemin was from Ankara, and she had friends from all over the world. In fact, her sister had married an Armenian man. She told me that both families had trouble accepting each other, but eventually her family came round. The Armenians never did. Yasemin said her brother-in-law was the nicest guy she had ever met. But tragically, he died young from cancer. Still, his family wouldn’t be in touch with her sister, their daughter-in-law, nor their grandchildren. It occurred to me that Yasemin must have been quite tolerant to not hold a grudge against Armenians when her sister had been so mistreated by them. Here she was, warmly welcoming me into her restaurant on a busy Saturday to talk. Yasemin told me that the restaurant’s location wasn’t chosen so much for Sunnyside’s Turkish population, but because of its foot traffic, location to the subway, and close proximity to Manhattan—for business reasons. She and her brother operated the Turkish Grill; other members of her family ran four other restaurants. Her father-in-law ran Ali Baba, located near the Armenian Cathedral at 34th Street and 2nd Ave in Manhattan, which I had always heard was Kurdish. Yasemin told me her father-in-law was indeed Kurdish, and so was her father. “Kurds and Armenians are close to each other,” she proclaimed. I didn’t mention to Yasemin that some of the Kurds had killed Armenians during the spring of 1915, promised by the Turks a homeland if they helped with the extermination. Instead I agreed with her that the Kurds’ situation of the last 25 years in Turkey—of being persecuted as second class citizens with limited rights and lack of autonomous rule—had been similar to what the Armenians endured in the Ottoman Empire. But I also told her that Kurds who had lived in Armenia were harassed and driven out after the Soviet Collapse. She told me, “Yes, my family was there; Armenians killed one of them.” I didn’t know what to say, but it did not occur to me to apologize in the name of Armenians. In graduate school all I wanted was a Turkish person to apologize to me as a symbolic act to heal historical hurt. Later, I met two different Turkish female artists in New York who acknowledged the genocide, and I received a sense of closure. At a dinner party at Brighton Beach, when a Turkish choreographer actually apologized and held my hand, it felt wrong; she hadn’t done anything to me. Still, when I read recently that an online apology was issued by nearly 30,000 Turkish citizens for what happened in the Ottoman Empire to Armenians, I couldn’t help being impressed with the risk and coordinated effort these individuals took to act where their government had failed. Some part of me now wishes that I had told Yasemin that I was sorry for the crimes against Kurds in Armenia. I suspect she would have waved it off. She told me how many Armenian jewelry businesses in Jersey hire Turkish employees and vice versa, explaining, “It’s been so long, no one cares. Most people don’t know what happened. We killed them, they killed us, and made them leave the country, but they did some bad things too. So we can’t keep going on like this.” Though she was half Kurdish, Yasemin considered herself Turkish. “There’s no such thing as a Kurdish restaurant, or a Kurdish citizen,” she said. She made a comparison to the way Americans can identify as certain nationalities or ethnicities, but they’re all U.S. Citizens. She said that Kurds should be able to speak and study their language, because Turkey was a multi-ethnic society. Yasemin was a good reminder that even a nationalistic nation is not a monolith, but has its own system of subsets and groups, which can be divided further into allegiances and persuasions, which can be broken up even more by camps and families, until you finally get to the level of the individual holding many identities at once, or none at all. The woman in a windbreaker, panties, and sunglasses was crawling down a wall and gradually found her way to her feet; the roar of cars zooming on a highway was her only soundtrack. The room was dark but for the spotlight on her. As she slowly moved toward the front of the room, one foot after the other, her face immobile, I nearly cried. Irem, the Turkish choreographer who’d held my hand and apologized, was doing a solo performance at the Judson church. Afterwards, Mehmet told her that it reminded him of the plight of the homeless. Before the performance, Mehmet had found me in front of the church by calling me on his cell phone to say, “I’m here, where are you?” as if we’d been friends forever. Mehmet had responded to an email I’d sent around to speak to Turks in Sunnyside. He lived on Long Island, but he was willing to help me as a translator or a link to the Turkish community. He was in his 50s, had emigrated in 1975 after his military requirement, got his PhD at Cornell in economics, taught in the U.S. and Turkey and then became a businessman. He had two daughters, one at Bryn Mawr, the other in her 20s. Over tea after the performance, Mehmet told me why the Turkish grocery store owners may have avoided speaking with me. Right around April 24, the Turkish Federation and the Turkish Association of America, both funded by the Turkish government, bombard many Turkish Americans to contact Congress in protest of any Armenian attempts at U.S. legislative recognition of the Armenian Genocide. “It’s so irritating,” he said. “I delete the emails.” The Turkish Americans believe that Turkey is unfairly blamed and attacked by Armenians. He imitated the Turkish stance: “Why are Armenians doing this when we have treated them well?” Then he echoed Raffi’s claim that the history is not taught to Turks. “My parents’ generation knew what happened. But most of the Sunnyside residents, who were born in the 60s and 70s, are completely oblivious. It’s not taught in the universities.” Then he predicted responses: “They’ll try to ‘educate’ you, saying the Turkish side is not told, that they are the victims; the diaspora is the one falsely telling stories. But very few who are less educated might have read up and learned the realities. And the very educated will say that genocide is still going on with the Kurds in Turkey, with atrocities happening now.” I thought back on Raffi’s customers with whom he did not broach history since they were unaware of it. If they believed Armenians were destructive to Turkey’s image, why would they patronize an Armenian store? Mehmet replied that the Turks are trying to reconcile being American and more open-minded with the stories from the Turkish government. “They think they are being tolerant of Armenians, and if you share the music, food, and culture, you’ll be ‘buddy buddy.’” About TAMEF, Mehmet said that it “promotes tolerance among religions, and [they] are for peaceful coexistence, but they don’t want to talk about what happened to Armenians in the past; they want to talk about what happened to Muslims in the past.” Gulem’s tolerance only went so far. It was interesting to hear that Rick Warren’s counterpart is as flawed towards non-Muslims as Warren is to gays. Mehmet told me that he came from ten generations of Arabs in Turkey. And because he was Arab, he took a critical view of the official government position. “Turkish identity was created. It’s only 15% of the population. The rest is Circassian, Georgian, Serb, Croatian, Kurdish, Albanian, Greek, etc.” I had also been learning there were distinctions among ethnic Turks in terms of Muslims—the majority being Sunnis from mostly the Hanafite sect, followed by the Alevis who were Shia and secular—but also various ethnicities such as the Zazas and the Circassians, not to mention the Laz who once were Muslims but converted to Christianity, and the Hemshin who were once Christians but converted to Islam and speak a unique dialect of Armenian and Turkish. Mehmet told me that he grew up speaking Arab and Kurdish, and he learned Turkish in school. “I knew who I was, that my roots weren’t from Central Asia.” I looked at Mehmet’s facial features: high forehead, brown hair, small squarish nose, and light brown eyes, trying to discern Arab physiognomy. A mutual friend had claimed he looked Armenian, but I didn’t think so. Then again, Armenians, Turks, Kurds, Arabs: they each include a range of coloring and facial features, not easily identifiable. Mehmet then said that his mother’s maternal uncle saved the life of a 12-year-old Armenian girl, whom he had considered an aunt. So the family knew what had happened to the Armenians as part of their own personal history. When Mehmet came to the States, the first thing he did was buy a world history book. He believed that the genocide marked the point at which the Turkish government began lying to its people. Since then, scores of Kurds, intellectuals and other opposition groups have been murdered and imprisoned unjustly. He thought that in the next five years there would be a “blizzard of enlightenment,” with more and more people learning the truth. “Then all the dirt, all the killing will come out, of people whose only crime was a certain belief, their ethnicity or religion.” The State, he purported, will lose its credibility and people will rethink the other stories they were told. We could have talked much longer, but it was getting late. When the bill came, he insisted on paying. “Please, I’m your uncle,” he said, smiling. The issue of generosity came up when next we met, at a Turkish shish kebab restaurant in Sunnyside. Mehmet proposed approaching the guys behind the counter after having some dessert first. I asked Mehmet a few questions about his identity, and he told me how everyone spoke Arabic in Mardin, the town where he grew up. When his family moved to Aintep, he was told he spoke Turkish with an Arabic accent. He said he is just now learning the Arabic alphabet, since he never had the chance to learn it in Turkey. “So do you identify as Arab or Turkish?” I asked. He said, “I’m a bastard of cultures.” He explained that he didn’t identify as Muslim and was not religious, and he didn’t associate with Arabs, and he was not politically aligned with the Turkish government. But he said he was proud of Turkey, calling it “a cradle of civilization”. He described the generosity of the people, especially in the villages, and he gave an example of the small village where he once taught, where the poorest folks would share everything they had with you. I couldn’t help think of the way Armenian villagers, destitute after the earthquake of 1989 and the war that lasted till 1994, were renowned for their incredible generosity, too. I told him, “In Armenia, it’s an insult to thank people because you’re signaling some kind of formal exchange. But Armenians believe that kind of generosity is the natural course of life. As an American I couldn’t get used to not saying thank you.” “America is such a young country,” he said. “That generosity comes from ancient civilizations.” Mehmet mourned the destruction of the multicultural, multiethnic, multireligious society which had fostered that value of generosity and sharing. “Nationalism is the cancer,” he said. It was what had made people defensive and destructive. As Mehmet was speaking, I thought about his polite nature, his thoughtful observations. He was talking a lot, but he wasn’t the kind of person who spoke without listening. Rather, it seemed these conversations were necessary to voice his thoughts which were not widely heard. A Turkish academic living in Woodside later told me that dialogue was more open in Turkey than it was here. People were more able to talk to each other while living through the identity issues. But in America, where making a living took more of a priority than generosity, and where assimilation threatened their cultures, nationalisms of both Armenians and Turks were the prevailing attitudes. There went my theory that America was a unique place where people were confronted with each other. Later, when Mehmet asked the Turkish counter guys if I could talk to them, they simply declined. Still here we were, as Veysel had described, an Armenian and a Turk, of different generations and persuasions, sitting together, sipping coffee, talking to each other. As I was working on this story I gave a reading of work-in-progress at Topaz Arts Center in Woodside. During the Q & A, a couple of Turkish women described the difficulty they had when they learned about the Catastrophe for the first time; it had been shocking to hear what had been kept from them. One woman said that when she meets Armenians for the first time, she immediately says “I’m sorry!” and laments that many Armenians are unable to see her as a person first. When I met her for coffee on another day, she told me she was lonely and bemoaned that she could find so few like-minded Turks, and further, that she had trouble connecting with discriminating Greeks and Armenians. And yet she dreamed that Armenians would go back to live in Anatolia, on the land they were driven from. I blinked at this strange vision. Many Armenian American nationalists want Ararat back, and they were angry about the protocols of the recent Turkey-Armenia agreement calling for current borders to be recognized, since it seemed to ensure there would later be no chance of legally restoring lands to Armenia. But many other Armenian-Americans counter the reality of such a desire to live on Western Armenian lands, questioning the feasibility of diasporans moving en masse to historical Armenia. A common refrain is, “We don’t want to go back.” Putting aside the political reality, the obvious cultural differences, and the quality of life issues, I believe it’s also because the idea of Armenians living in the Anatolian countryside among multi-ethnic Turkish neighbors causes an amazing psychic rip—it is too difficult to envision a life of peace. Perhaps we have become so defined by our loss that we cannot imagine ourselves without it. Getting over this psychic disconnect is comparable to what Turks will have to go through, as a nation, when they admit the genocide and realize the whole of their history so differently. It will cause a great shift in the way that they understand themselves. So we have more in common than we realize: the impossible imagination.
×
×
  • Create New...