Armen Posted September 16, 2004 Report Share Posted September 16, 2004 Guys, I understand that the article below does not cover the movie that much but it has some interesting facts about the cast. Moreover it mentions Atom Egoyan, and, most importantly, porn among other things so we will go off the topic, which is OK. But my primary interest is the rock opera and the movie, which I think is the best movie about Jesus Christ. And the reason I think so is that the athmosphere this movie, its cast and the music create was not matched by any other movie about Christ's life, including the latest idiotism from Mel Gibson. So, try not to get worried by everything that will upset you... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://groong.usc.edu/world/am/msg02533.html Butt is it art? Eye Weeekly 09/09/04 Atom Egoyan has an essay in the latest issue of Granta about Paul Thomas, a porn-star-turned-director who's a legend in the adult industry. The piece has a chipper and patronizing tone; Egoyan points out that, before he was in porn, Thomas played Peter in the film version of Jesus Christ Superstar. Egoyan calls into question Thomas' career choices and ridicules him and his industry in the process. Here's a different side of the story: according to most biographies, Thomas was delighted to get out of mainstream Hollywood and become a porn star. He is considered an excellent director, his films come recommended by sex-positive stores like Good Vibrations in San Francisco. He works for Vivid, a company that insists on condom use by its performers, showing respect for their health. He makes films with an eye for costuming, attractive stars and storyline, and he doesn't pander to dangerous trends. Thomas hit some rough spots (he was jailed in 1982 on cocaine-related charges), but seems like someone who has, with no pun intended, a good grip on things. Egoyan waxes on about Thomas' acting potential, but the truth is Peter is a small role in Jesus Christ Superstar and his performance was not particularly inspired. So why all the regret on Paul's behalf, Atom? According to the special features on the Jesus Christ Superstar DVD, other actors in the cast seem far worse off: Ted Neeley (Jesus Christ) is doing something that sounds suspiciously like Jesus Christ Superstar dinner theatre now and Yvonne Elliman (Mary Magdalene) has only one film highlight in her entire career: Jesus Christ Superstar. Though I am rarely surprised when people deride the adult-film industry, I was really pissed off by Egoyan's smug attitude. It's unforgivably sanctimonious for the man who made Exotica to question the career trajectory of someone who genuinely seemed to enjoy himself and do well in the sex trade. Although Egoyan was possibly trying to convey the mundane nature of contractual eroticism, the heavy-handedness of the strip club scenes in Exotica is intolerable and some of the character development and dramatic tension rivals the worst porn for artificiality. Disdain ranging from bemusement to hostility for the adult-film industry is nearly unanimous among people in other creative fields, and Egoyan is not the only one with the added temerity to capitalize on sex-worker chic in his own work. In 1999, Ian Gittler, a photographer who's worked for Rolling Stone, published a coffee-table book called Pornstar, made up of photographs he took of people in the business beginning in the early '90s. Along with some half-decent to breathtakingly beautiful photos of industry players (the ones of Sharon Mitchell are magnificent), it includes a meandering diary of Gittler's observations. The back cover features Bret Easton Ellis, gushing about how Gittler treats the world of porn with "compassion and sympathy." I've read the whole thing twice and found neither in amounts worth specifying. What I did see is someone who would be out of a job photographing rock stars if he editorialized on them in the same way he does about porn actors. Gittler claims his initial desire was to show this industry in a more glamorous light but that he quickly became disillusioned by the various abuses. This is disingenuous rationalizing: Gittler is way too clever not to have seen all the obvious shit coming. He just needed a virtuous excuse, in this age of sex-positivity, to publish his condescending views. His arrogance is exposed at the end of the book, when Nina Hartley calls to see if she can purchase some of the photos he took of her (which he sold to Newsweek), to make some profit of her own. Gittler sniffs, "I don't know that it really matters, but I've never profited from this work as a pornographer, and don't want to start now." A new trend in cinema will make watching this attitude play out very interesting: real sex. The Brown Bunny, released in the US last month, features a ctual Hollywood star Chloë Sevigny actually giving head. John Cameron Mitchell is working on a film called Shortbus, which also features real sex between the actors. Already people are scrambling to assert their artistic credibility. In a recent interview, Mitchell said that sex has been cheapened by porn, its only purpose to arouse, whereas his film intends to explore the emotional lives of the characters as well. Through all their creative grandstanding, I hope these people won't forget: they, too, work in an industry that produces more garbage than not, where people *** to get work, and have to suck it up to make it to the top. Oh, and the purpose of porn, though it often gets mired in conflict and corruption, is pleasure. Pleasure is good. -- Sasha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamavor Posted September 16, 2004 Report Share Posted September 16, 2004 (edited) Jesus Christ Superstar was a great Rock Concept. I have to say that Ian Gillan is hundred times better vocally than the hippie (nothing personal) Ted Neely. Armen, you know in that times it was hard to get anything from beyond the Iron Curtain and I remember what an excitement this Rock opera was in my generation. It played (I guess equally in the East and West) an important educational role through beautiful musicianship and masterful performance. It sparked the curiosity among young people about their Lord, just like Beatles and Purple at the time were the main reason to learn English BTW, since then I haven't missed anything from Andrew Lloyd Webber. Edited September 16, 2004 by gamavor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.