Jump to content

Scientific knowledge vs. books questioning it


Recommended Posts

There's nothing wrong if he has nothing to say, unless he insists on saying it.

Gravity regardless how you define it exists!!! Not sure? Drop an object and observe. Calculating the force of earth’s gravity is essential to any space travel. This is elementary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gravity regardless how you define it exists!!! Not sure? Drop an object and observe. Calculating the force of earth’s gravity is essential to any space travel. This is elementary.

Armat, just ignore him for your own sake. There is no way that you could discuss with someone that reject the bases of science and later on try to use science to support his delusions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This story is so cool.I mean it reads like a surralistic painting.

 

A Prophetic Vision

 

Recently, I had an out-of-body experience on the subject of pole shift that I shared on the Art Bell Coast to Coast radio show on April 17. Here is a summary of that vision:

"It was in the morning, and I was walking on a road that runs past my farm located in one of the hill towns in the Berkshires of Massachusetts. The road runs north to south, and I was walking toward the north. The Sun was to my right in the east. It was a hot day so I assume that it was during the summer. As I was walking, the Sun seemed to get brighter which drew my attention to it. I looked directly at it - something you should never do! As I did, the sun moved across the sky so quickly that in a matter of seconds it crossed toward the west, so that now it was on my left where it stopped. I then looked around and everything seemed normal. I moved forward in time an hour or so and observed the treetops moving back and forth as a fierce wind had come out of nowhere. Within minutes dust blocked my line of sight. Then, with the typical pop-like sound I hear when entering or leaving an out-of-body experience, I was returned to the present time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think if you knew enough of physics, you could infact not refer to "earth" as having gravity... but the theoryof gravitation suggests that all things have gravity, which is the direct ratio of there mass.. and the number.. 6.6E-11... << the coefficient constant of gravitation as it supposedly stands "proven" ... lol.. infact this is how they got the mass of the earth, and this is why newton couldnt proov his theory of gravitation until it was proven in the early 1960's or so..

 

Gravity.. is a very genera, term actually.. and as we observe an object fall to the "ground" it is relative to the mass of the earth.. infact, if there was an object large enough, lets say the size of the moon "in mass" it would completely throw off the equilibrium of the earths athmosphere.. which sounds very very unreal right?? well if you agree to gravity, thenyou can t say no to this,,. its based on the same "proof" and same constant coefficient.. .. so i dont even know.. lol..

 

Gravity, is or is not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This story is so cool.I mean it reads like a surralistic painting.

 

A Prophetic Vision

 

Recently, I had an out-of-body experience on the subject of pole shift that I shared on the Art Bell Coast to Coast radio show on April 17. Here is a summary of that vision:

"It was in the morning, and I was walking on a road that runs past my farm located in one of the hill towns in the Berkshires of Massachusetts. The road runs north to south, and I was walking toward the north. The Sun was to my right in the east. It was a hot day so I assume that it was during the summer. As I was walking, the Sun seemed to get brighter which drew my attention to it. I looked directly at it - something you should never do! As I did, the sun moved across the sky so quickly that in a matter of seconds it crossed toward the west, so that now it was on my left where it stopped. I then looked around and everything seemed normal. I moved forward in time an hour or so and observed the treetops moving back and forth as a fierce wind had come out of nowhere. Within minutes dust blocked my line of sight. Then, with the typical pop-like sound I hear when entering or leaving an out-of-body experience, I was returned to the present time.

You made my day. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gravity regardless how you define it exists!!! Not sure? Drop an object and observe. Calculating the force of earth’s gravity is essential to any space travel. This is elementary.

How do you know it's gravity? Don't appeal to your version of what the world should be. Despite labeling that process as "gravity", we don't know what "gravity" is. For example. the Hollow Earth theory, or the Theory of Concentric Spheres states that we are held fast to the ground not by gravity, but by centrifugal force as the earth rotates. Theoretically gravity must exist for Einstein's theory to be correct. What if they are all wrong? It is a theory, and all measurements based off of this theory are therefore also assumptions. Theories are theories treat them all the same. Appealing to belief doesn't determine them to be any more truthful than they already are. Either we have to be really "scientificial" and discard things that we simply don't know, or we admit that science is and does carry a religious aura, of belief. This is why many scientists, and pseudo scientists like Domino, resort to name calling when their intellectual matrix cracks, because it is as much faith as it is science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you know it's gravity? Don't appeal to your version of what the world should be. Despite labeling that process as "gravity", we don't know what "gravity" is. For example. the Hollow Earth theory, or the Theory of Concentric Spheres states that we are held fast to the ground not by gravity, but by centrifugal force as the earth rotates. Theoretically gravity must exist for Einstein's theory to be correct. What if they are all wrong? It is a theory, and all measurements based off of this theory are therefore also assumptions. Theories are theories treat them all the same. Appealing to belief doesn't determine them to be any more truthful than they already are. Either we have to be really "scientificial" and discard things that we simply don't know, or we admit that science is and does carry a religious aura, of belief. This is why many scientists, and pseudo scientists like Domino, resort to name calling when their intellectual matrix cracks, because it is as much faith as it is science.

LMAO!!! very true.. and if anyone doesnt agree with that.. then.. i ask why not??

 

lol.. i mean, the number 6.67E-11 is also very very theoretical, the standard deviation for it is considered zero.. that means according to this number it is infact PERFECT.. which is nonesense,, yet we are tahught this way... oh well :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LMAO!!! very true.. and if anyone doesnt agree with that.. then.. i ask why not??

 

lol.. i mean, the number 6.67E-11 is also very very theoretical, the standard deviation for it is considered zero.. that means according to this number it is infact PERFECT.. which is nonesense,, yet we are tahught this way...  oh well :)

I don't. Relativity does not need Newtonian gravity to exist... yet! anon baby cry and call others pseudo-scientists because he is attacked for saying nonesense. When someone say similar nonesenses and still refuse to accept his mistakes and twist them, he only worth being ignored and exposed for what he is, a balloon full of air.

 

To other readers: The theory of relativity replace gravity and does neither need Newtonian gravity to exist. Relativty is yet another interpretation of attraction between two masses by curving space. But one will expect that the one(anon) that admitted not so long ago of not knowing much about physic is now a specialist on that field too.

Edited by Fadix
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol.. i mean, the number 6.67E-11 is also very very theoretical, the standard deviation for it is considered zero.. that means according to this number it is infact PERFECT.. which is nonesense,, yet we are tahught this way... oh well :)

This number is confirmed and calculated by atomic clocks as well gevo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't. Relativity does not need Newtonian gravity to exist... yet! anon baby cry and call others pseudo-scientists because he is attacked for saying nonesense. When someone say similar nonesenses and still refuse to accept his mistakes and twist them, he only worth being ignored and exposed for what he is, a balloon full of air.

 

To other readers: The theory of relativity replace gravity and does neither need Newtonian gravity to exist. Relativty is yet another interpretation of attraction between two masses by curving space. But one will expect that the one(anon) that admitted not so long ago of not knowing much about physic is now a specialist on that field too.

That horrible spelling is indicative of frustration. Alas, I'm having an effect. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...