MosJan Posted June 23, 2001 Report Share Posted June 23, 2001 Written by Hrayr AVETISSYAN“CHORRORD ISHKHANOUTYOUN” daily Online, No. 216, Wednesday June 13, 2001, Yerevan - Armenia Thus the negotiations around Gharabagh have ‘failed’ again. The negotiation process is frozen. And the civilized world is not able by any means to understand what the authorities of Armenia want after all. As long as the negotiation process was ongoing, these authorities were agreeing upon anything – pulling out Armenian armed forces from the liberated (and not ‘OCCUPIED’ – A.K.) territories, leaving Gharabagh under the sovereignty of Azerbaijan, supplying a corridor across Meghri, etc. Now it comes out that Gharabagh has to be an independent state, and that we do not agree on a lower status. What happened during the past couple of months? What are the expectations from the negotiation process? There are several possible alternatives: Alternative 1:The authorities of Armenia, in order to appear as ‘the good guy’ in the eyes of the external world, had in the beginning accepted the presented proposals, then at the end refused, by arguing the predominant public opinion in Armenia which is unfavorable to such a solution. Hence it becomes clear that as a result to such policies, the whole world may very hastily position itself against Armenia, and no state will defend Armenia by opposing internationally adopted and accepted norms. While a possible re-start of war under international sanctions, means an unavoidable defeat. Alternative 2:The authorities of Armenia have in reality given their consent to all the presented proposals (including the corridor over Meghri), only that they had expected from the West some investments in several billion dollars. But suddenly Russia appeared and inhibited the authorities of RA from accepting such a document, for 2 main considerations:a. Firstly, Meghri is a zone of ultimate strategic importance to Russia as well, and Russian frontiers-guards are deployed there.b. Secondly, if the West will buy Meghri by paying several billion dollars, then it has to bargain about the price with Russia and not Armenia. Russia does not tolerate, as in the Armenian saying, “to render a favor to the bridegroom by kissing the cheeks of the bride” (harsi tsherov pesin lavoutyoun anel). Alternative 3:In reality, Armenia and Azerbaijan (represented by the persons of ex-Communist Party Secretary of Azerbaijani SSR and his ex-subordinate - Gharabagh Silk Factory Communist organization secretary – A.K.) have long ago ‘understood each other’ and have agreed upon the following: Armenia carries out its negotiation ‘tactics’ from its ‘victorious’ positions, while Azerbaijan initiates a new war, the result of which will be the OCCUPATION of the territories in priory determined and agreed. In case of realization of this ‘variante’, Aliyev’s son can peacefully inherit his father’s, Heydar Aliyev’s throne, while Robert Kocharyan continues to rule over Armenia as a ‘patriotic’ “VOYIN” (combatant – A.K.), who was ‘strongly wishing’ a ‘From Sea To Sea Armenia’, but was as always defeated at the end. This is in fact the only alternative, as a result of which it becomes possible for them to sell the LIBERATED territories (including Gharabagh), at the same time pretending the roles of ‘national heroes’ (because they could have sold the territories earlier, but they didn’t). Alternative 4:Simply, the authorities of Armenia have fallen in the middle of a silly situation. Lacking any perspective, they are being guided by the impulsion of the moment. This means that they are doing what is adequate at the given moment. And this in its turn means that at a certain ‘given moment’ they will simply be expelled from the ruling levers and nobody would protest against it. Therefore, there exist 4 explanations of all this. It is quite easy to notice that in all four cases there isn’t a special difference whether the entity OCCUPYING the post of the President of Armenia is a breathing human organismor an empty pack of “Dirol” chewing gums. Because the absolute absence of thinking capability is obvious and common in all of the 4 cases. HRAYR AVETISSYAN“CHORRORD ISHKHANOUTYOUN” daily Online, No. 216, Wednesday June 13, 2001, Yerevan - Armenia Don’t miss to read the original Armenian text of this and many other interesting articles in the bravest newspaper in Armenia - “CHORRORD ISHKHANOUTYOUN” daily Online at: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.