Jump to content

Sevres


Arpa

Recommended Posts

Once again, hopefully with enough force this time.

The item does not comment about the Armenian position and intention. Doe this mean that this time we will leave it to the Kurds to argue our case for us??

Will they do better than the British, the French, the Russians and Pres. Wilson of the US?

Are the Kurds talking about themselves or about all the enslaved minorities of the Anatolian Empire?

Note: I did neither said Turkish Empire or Ottoman Empire, as Anatolia is nothing but a mini-empire ready to implode held together only by the muzzle of the military.

What? You say implode?

Were we ready ehen the mighty Moscow empire imploded?

 

 

A New Opportunity of Sevres Agreement Realization

 

Arm TV

27 Aug 2003

 

`Noyan Tapan' agency in their reference to `Marmara' daily newspaper

of Istanbul informed about a new opportunity to realize the Sevres

Agreement. During the meeting dedicated to the 83-years anniversary of

the agreement some of the participants, in particular, Kurd ones

demanded from UNO and European Union to create the Government of

Kurdistan according to the Sevres agreement. The representatives of

left-wing social-political statesmen, the member of European Council

from Greenpeace were present at the meeting. The collection of

signatures was organized to represent the document to the government

of Sweden. Sweden is one of the countries that recognized the

Armenian Genocide and this is not the first time it occurs in such

discrepancy with Turkey during enactments like this.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hey Gamavor!

What is the difference between a Treaty and a Conference?

Can Armenians plead Nolo Comprendere, i/e plead insanity as they were indeed insane at the time, i.e. had no mind of their own?

 

Treaty of Sevres; In full

http://groong.usc.edu/treaties/sevres.html

Sevres;Pertaining to Armenia;

http://www.cilicia.com/armo10j.html

 

Lausanne;Caution, this is a Turkish site!

http://www.ermenisorunu.gen.tr/english/rel...d_lausanne.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW!!!

Browse this site, click on ALBUM and observe the deadly Armenian weapons of mass destruction(WMD), and the fierce Armenian warriors. Make special note of the nuclear, cnnnons, fighter jets, tanks and apcs, howitzers, SAMs, chemical and other hi-tech weapons!!!??? Not to fotget a couple of bones(probably Urartuan) as proof of Armenians' "genocide" of Turks.

I couldn't write a better comedy even if I tried.

 

Lausanne;Caution, this is a Turkish site!

http://www.ermenisorunu.gen.tr/english/rel...d_lausanne.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About the Album

Our braves heavily outnumbered f.... the hell out of the Turkish Army. Their elders probably still have nightmares when they hear about armed Armenians. These cowards, totally incapable of any warfare were only successful of killing civilians. Hundreds and thousands of them. Turk is foremost synonymous of coward. What else you can expect from mongolo-semitic scum.

 

Honestly I have never studied the Sevres treaty. One thing is for sure. All other subsequent accords, conferences, multilateral agreements etc. have been drafted and ratified without the main actor - Republic of Armenia. Ataturk fell in love with Lenin and in the mean time Armenians were labeled contra-revolutionaries in Russia and traitors in Turkey.

 

 

PS: Arpa, 4 years ago I crossed the 'border' between Germany and Holland with 140 km/h. Do we want to cross the turkish border with 80 miles per hour. I don't think so. I would rather cross the Georgian border with that speed. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sevres treaty, or better to say, the Armenian articles of that treaty, have never been ratified, moreover, have been plaid back in Lausanne. It has no legal value.

 

Most importantly, the Kars treaty of October 1921, where Armenia is a signatory, overwrites any other treaties that have been signed between the parties prior to that date.

 

Kars treaty is the only treaty Armenia has leverage over by a sheer fact of being a signatory to it (and in no other treaties.)

 

The only legal framework Armenia can theoretically use to advance any [territorial] disputes [in fact this treaty is more than about territory] is in the framework of this treaty (which would be a very uphill battle). It has to be also understood that before Armenia may advance any claims on this basis, it has to resolve the issue with Russia, since the latter is the guarantor of the execution of the articles of this treaty as granted to her by the article 15 (16?) of March 1921 Moscow treaty between Russia and Turkey.

 

Everything else is irrelevant from legal-political perspective.

 

However, the two governments of the Republic of Armenia have decided not to pursue this issue in the most logical manner. Their attitude is that if/when diplomatic relations would be established, a new treaty would be signed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...