Yervant1 Posted December 20, 2014 Report Share Posted December 20, 2014 OFFICIAL 1915 DOCUMENT SWEPT UNDER THE CARPETEmre Can Daglıoglu 12.17.2014 21:43NEWSJournalist Murat Bardakcı has announced that a Turkish HistoricalSociety [TTK] official removed 'dispatch registers' kept after thedeportation law was issued in 1915 from the Ottoman archives, and hidthem in the archive of another institution. According to Bardakcı,this was done not by official procedure, but was the outcome of anindividual's interference. Even the newly changed administration ofthe Turkish Historical Society does not know where these documentsare located at present.Murat Bardakcı, who has published the books titled 'Talat PaÅ~_a'nınEvrak-ı Metrukesi' (The Abandoned Documents of Talat *****) containingdocuments and private correspondence on the Armenian question found inthe private archive of Talat *****, and 'İttihatcı'nın Sandıgı'(The Wooden Chest of the Unionist) containing the correspondence ofhigh-ranking Unionist leaders, has made striking statements regardingthe Ottoman archives, which state officials claim are open on everyoccasion. Bardakcı said that a Turkish Historical Society [TTK]official removed 'dispatch registers' kept after the deportationlaw was issued in 1915 from the Ottoman archives, and hid themin the archive of another institution. According to Bardakcı,this was done not by official procedure, but was the outcome of anindividual's interference. Even the newly changed administration ofthe Turkish Historical Society does not know where these documentsare located at present. Bardakcı added that he guessed that the'records on abandoned properties [emval-i metruke]' were in the samelocation as the abovementioned dispatch registers, and that a properinvestigation could unearth all these documents.Dispatch registersThe dispatch registers mentioned by Bardakcı are lists which includethe number and names of Armenians subjected to forced deportationin 1915, and from which region they were deported. The dispatch,or deportation, was carried out according to orders received fromcentral government, by the keeping of records by local administratorswho implemented the deportation process on the Armenians who wereforced out of their settlements, and the control and updating of theserecords at the places they were sent to. The 'records on abandonedproperties', on the other hand, contained detailed informationregarding which assets or properties of the deported Armenianswere seized, the address, and number or kind of property, and alsoin the same location as the abovementioned dispatch registers, andalso information on the Muslim refugees located in places from whichArmenians were evacuated from, or on the institutions and persons theassets and properties were passed on to. Bardakcı points out that,although they do not cover all areas of settlement, a significantnumber of dispatch registers and abandoned property records arepresently in the archive. The reason Bardakcı presumes the abandonedproperty records and dispatch registers are kept together is that theDirectorate for the Resettlement of Tribes and Refugees ['İskan-ıAÅ~_air ve Muhacirin Muduriyeti'] to which the task of dispatch wasassigned, was also charged with the classification and organizationof abandoned properties.Taner Akcam: 'These registers can lead us to very importantinformation'Historian Taner Akcam's comments on Murat Bardakcı's claims:"If the mentioned 'dispatch registers' are the books within which theArmenians deported from each town and province are kept, then theirimportance cannot be exaggerated. Because these registers could help usaccess a lot of information, including first and foremost the numbersof people exterminated. That is to say, from what we understand bothfrom the Union and Progress trials that began in Istanbul in 1919, andfrom certain documents in the Ottoman archive, the 'normal' dispatch,or deportation, had to be done according to these documents. TheIstanbul Court Martial Authority sought to access these documentsduring the hearings, and asked after their location.As far as we know, no document was delivered to the court duringthose years. Similar records must have been kept at places identifiedas destinations.Now let us imagine that we have the names and numbers of 50 familiesexiled from Zeitun and reached Aleppo, then we must also know howmany families were forced to set out from Zeitun. The gaps in thefigures could provide us detailed information regarding the acts ofextermination. What I can finally say is that the Turkish HistoricalSociety has acted in line with its reputation. Of course, one mustalso ask: Why were the abandoned property records, along with thedispatch registers, collected from the archives and concealed at adifferent location?"http://agos.com.tr/en/article/9974/official-1915-document-swept-under-the-carpet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.