Yervant1 Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 Why we should read... `Family, Honour, Morality' by Yervant Odian (Selected Works, 796pp, pp5-233, 1956, Armenia) Armenian News Network / GroongJanuary 21, 2013 by Eddie Arnavoudian Yervant Odian more famous for his satire 'Comrade Panchooni' wrote`Family, Honour, Morality', more than one hundred years ago. Itremains today both enjoyable and instructive. A reconstruction ofArmenian life in Istanbul during the late 19th and early 20thcenturies, it is a brutally forthright critique of the corrupt anddissolute Armenian elite that exercised tyranny over the Ottomancapital's large Armenian community. This elite of wealthy merchants,arm-in-arm with the Church hierarchy, both sunk in a moral marsh,finds its typical representatives in Ghugas Effendi and Father Mikias,unquestionably two enduring characters of modern Armenian fiction. Like many novels in the realist tradition, `Family, Honour, Morality'is a stark exposure of the ugly power of money in a society devoid ofegalitarian or democratic structures. In Armenian literature, thisnovel has another welcome merit, ironically one born of a certainflawed narrowness of focus. Depictions of the degenerate elites arenot uncommon in the modern Armenian novel. But Odian's almostexclusive focus on scenes of immoral and criminal personal anddomestic lives, disregarding the wider social sphere, proves unusuallyilluminating. `Family, Honour, Morality' has telling resonance, backwards andforwards. With this and his other novels of Istanbul life Odianprovides a link in an illustrious tradition - the bold telling oftruths about the Armenian privileged classes - secular andreligious. Then and now they cloak themselves in an aura of virtue andsaintliness only so as to better conceal their misappropriations andtheir dissoluteness, and as a means also of retaining the moral highground from where to cajole and bully the people into silentobedience. It is a critical tradition that originates with the 5thcentury founders of Armenian historiography and one that is indesperate need of recovery. Odian's is not however just an acute socio-historic denunciation. Theforce of his presentation is sustained by artistic merit that he isoften charged with lacking. A facility for story-telling, simple andlucid language, a capacity for generating authentic social relationsand characters combined with wit and humour in description, bringalive Armenian Istanbul along with many a personality, among them thechief protagonist Ghugas Effendi, a wealthy businessman and sexualpredator who ceaselessly proclaims the virtues of family, honour andmorality, contemptuously tramples upon them all. Even if elsewhereequalled in modern Armenian literature, Odian's exposure of theestablishment's putrid core has certainly not been bettered. I. The contours of elite decadence are visible at the novel's outset whenwe encounter the intolerably arrogant and presumptuous Ghugas Effendipreparing to conduct a vicious vendetta against Satenig, a powerlessand impoverished widow, who had the temerity to detain him on his wayhome from chairing a weekly Charity Association meeting. Run togetherwith this plotline is a constellation of sub-plots, each a window onArmenian Istanbul's mores, its daily life and most critically on theimmoral physiognomy of its leading lights. Ghugas Effendi is no accidental or isolated figure. Of lowlybeginnings, and a murky past, he is now an influential member of theArmenian establishment integrated in addition into the highestechelons of Ottoman society. Mingling with high priest and seniorstate officials he is, like them, rotten and crooked to a bone. He is`wealthy and held ostensibly in great respect' but: `Terrible,sickening stories circulated about the tragedy of those who had falleninto the claws of a businessman who had commenced his career as ausurer and driven by unrestrained greed for wealth had resorted to theworst possible deeds, especially when dealing with the defenceless,weak and innocent (p27)'. Having by such means accumulated sufficient capital, `to advance hisbanditry' by more legitimate means Ghugas Effendi sets himself up as amerchant in Istanbul where in a final leap he secures himself the roleof an official supplier to the Ottoman state. In this capacity heparticipates enthusiastically in a well-oiled system of corruption andin `cahoots with dodgy ministers', `begins robbing the statetreasury'. But instead of punishment Ghugas Effendi is repeatedlydecorated for his `honoured services to the state'. Having thus joinedthe mainstream: `Parallel to his wealth, his reputation as a clever and honourable man also rose. Dirty deeds from old times were forgotten, covered over; no more would the curse of his victims reach the heights of his honour...' (p27) Eager for a share of the secular elite's plunder, the Churchhierarchy, with one hand holding tight to the merchant's coat tails,reached shamelessly for his wallet with the other. The merchant elitewas not altogether displeased, for in exchange, the men of god,abandoning all moral qualm, happily legitimised standing and authorityof the Ghugas Effendis that had taken up leading posts in thecommunity. Typical among such miscreants is Father Mikias a `seniorpriest' `then nearly 60' who has successfully transformed `thebusiness of chaplaincy to the rich into a personal monopoly'(p12). `Of course, he expects the full rewards for his services in theother world' but nevertheless `whilst awaiting heavenly remuneration'he obtains such material benefits here on earth that `ensure him quitea luxurious and comfortable life (p12).' Father Mikias is a grisly figure of gross misconduct stalking thehomes of the rich with mind and body ready to leap at profitableopportunity. Knowing which side his bread is buttered, while `arrogantand bold towards his inferiors' he is `a hypocrite and crawler' beforethe rich and `for this he was loved and respected.' (p12) Evercalculating profit and loss he has no loyalties. Denied the lucrativerole of intermediary in Ghugas Effendi's plan to marry off hisdaughter to the rich Paris-based Armenian jeweller Levon, the slightedMikias without compunction turns tables on his former patron. Inexpectation of a purse he proceeds to offer his services to theSamsaryan family also eager to marry their daughter to the same Levon. Thereafter between Ghugas Effendi and Father Mikias tension,contradiction and animosity surfaces in a silent battle of grasp andgain. Knowledge of each other's crimes and misdeeds are accumulated asarsenals of threat and blackmail that produce between the warringfactions of merchant and priest a sort of balance, a peace shame andfear of exposure that enabled both to better rob everyone else. Protected by contacts in high office and by the hired media happy toblind public opinion to Ghugas Effendi's crimes and misdeeds and withwealth and status according him power that `can drown opponents in asingle drop of water', he enjoys virtual immunity when indulging hisdepraved sexual criminality. His victims, Satenig, Shushanig, a younggirl he rapes, and Yeranig, his sister-in-law that he abuses, appear tohave no means of redress. II. As incident is piled upon incident and revelation follows revelationin a complex of expertly balanced plot and sub plot, Odian lays barethe power of money that transforms vice into virtue. Haji Toumig, a charismatic, honest but deceived bar owner in a workingclass district together with young and educated Serkis, an energeticdoer and fixer, set about seeking compensation for Satenig whosereputation Ghugas Effendi has smeared and whose eviction from her homehe has also engineered. Their systematic investigation unearths theevidence of Ghugas Effendi's rape of Shushanig. Failing to obtainjustice for either, one Sunday morning in a Church courtyard crammedwith worshippers they subject Ghugas Effendi to a humiliating publicdenunciation that also brings to light the underbelly of Istanbul'sbrothels, pimps and prostitutes that serviced the elite's degeneratepleasures. Ghugas Effendi however, is only momentarily unbalanced. He hascomplete confidence that `money will help cover everything up andexonerate him'. Indeed as his wife remarks, this would not be thefirst time he has `cloaked misdeed with money or influence' (p220). Ashort while later we meet him relaxed and content: `I have once againfallen on my feet, he thought to himself. So here and there they willeat us up, for a few weeks they will gossip about us. Let them bark asmuch as they want as soon as I dispose of a few hundred pounds as agift to some orphanage, some hospital or charity, a few pounds to thenewspapers too, I shall then once again become, and even more so, thehonourable Ghugas Effendi (p137)'. Sprawling plot and narrative, conditioned in part by requirements ofserialisation, do frequently test the reader's patience. Thinned outdevelopment, often bowing under the weight of immaterial detailendangers flow and continuity, while characters do not always stand ontheir own two feet, often lacking emotional or psychologicalcompleteness. Shushanig and Satenig, for example, the two main femalecharacters, are shadows, almost faceless, serving only as highlightersof Ghugas Effendi's criminal monstrosity. Nevertheless within the terms of the plot, though possessed of apronounced limp, characters remain upright and so plot and sub-plotskeep turning, at moments driven by genuine dramatic tension, bygripping immediacy, biting satire and many a turn of phrase or commentthat captures something revealing not just about the decadent elitebut about the daily life of the common people who contrary to theirelites do live lives of honour and morality; about the position ofmother-in-laws fearful that a son's new wife will undermine theirpower and authority; about the transformation of marriage into afinancial transaction where profit and loss account for everything andlove nothing. `Family, Honour, Morality' is additionally generous with the images ofIstanbul life, its coffee and wine bars, its Armenian café owners andartisans and its white collar workers - accountants, clerks andsecretaries. Interestingly, the manual working class however - theporters, fire fighters, fishermen, carpenters and others who appear innumbers in Yeroukhan's short stories - are largely absent. Two thirds into the novel, in a series of twists, turns and secretnegotiations all the plot's knots appear to have been cut, albeit insomewhat romantic fashion. Ghugas Effendi has once again escapedjustice having paid out a private settlement to Shushanig. Satenig isa widow no more, happily married to her one time lodger Karekin, whileShushanig ties the knot with Serkis who has become her champion. Levon,and Ghugas Effendi's daughter, Rozig rush off to marry in Paris wherethey are later joined by Levon's mother. III. At this point the reader cannot but fear that the remainder of thenovel will be intolerably dull. But not so! Out of the blue, as if hehas suddenly remembered an important omission, Odian turns now to adramatic account of Ghugas Effendi's entrapment and sexual abuse ofhis sister in law Yeranig, an account that not only completes thepicture of the man's utter depravity but additionally underlines thebarbarism of women's oppression within the highest reaches of societytoo. Yeranig is a significant contrast to Ghugas Effendi's other two femalevictims. Whilst Satenig and Shushanig do eventually escape GhugasEffendi's grasp, it is only through the efforts of men, of Serkis,Karekin and Haji Toumik. Yeranig however is no passive victim. Apowerful woman caught in impossible economic straits, when driven tothe edge she summons the will to resist the man who has planned `tokeep her as an object for his pleasures.' (p203) Her self-drivenrevolt is a fine affirmation of human independence and dignity even atthe precipice of total disintegration. Demonstrating ability, and not for the first or last time, to delveinto emotional and psychological depths, Odian movingly communicatesthat `unusual energy and will power' that Yeranig feels once havingdetermined to assert her dignity. (p207). Soon after her `decisivearrangements' to break from her tormentor `a sort of spiritual easeand joy' descends upon her. Touched by a sense of exhilaration andpride she thinks it `impossible that anything in the world couldpossibly stop her from carrying out her decisions (p215).' In thesesame passages Odian offers us some sharp images of Ghugas Effendi'simpotent rage when his rich man's sense of entitlement is thwarted bychallenge and disobedience of those occupying a lower social stationthan his own. A fine reflection indeed of the arrogance andpresumption of the privileged. `Family, Honour, Morality' reaches an entirely satisfactory conclusionwhen Ghugas Effendi dies, days after a night of debauchery duringwhich he is stabbed in a dispute, maybe with a pimp, at one of hisfavourite brothels. Despite previous public exposure, despite thesordid circumstances of his life and death, in an act ofself-preservation the entire Armenian establishment with an outpouringof false grief and sickening glorification, coalesce and solidifyaround Ghugas Effendi. Ghugas Effendi's crimes are but the tip of an iceberg of establishmentdegeneration. To protect itself, to preserve its moral mask and tofend off criticism or challenge from society, Ghugas Effendi's lifemust once again be whitewashed, refurbished and wall-papered. So hisfuneral became a celebration of collective hypocrisy and deceit with: `All well-known merchants and capitalists, as well as foreigners holding important positions in the commercial world present. The ceremony was led by the Patriarch, together with six Bishops, 14 reverends and 30 parish priests. The oration was given by the Patriarch, who as his theme opened with the Biblical phrase `A man after the heart of God.' (p230) Engraved upon Ghugas Effendi's tombstone was an encomium in versewritten by none other than Father Mikias who was rewarded handsomelyso for the privilege. The entire affair is parcelled and wrapped up by the press thatenthusiastically fills column upon column with encomiums to a man`whose passing' it is claimed `represents an irrecoverable loss' forthe community, to one who though a `modest man' was of `highintellect', to a `model husband and father' who `brought up twobeautiful daughters' who can proudly `decorate the Armenian nation.' IV. `Family, Honour, Morality' is a fine novel, as literary work andsocial history. It is marked however besides its artistic limits - theincompleteness of character, the frequently insubstantial plot and adamaging generality, that we need not turn to here - by too many othertroubling issues to earn space on the same shelf as Yeroukhan'sclassic novel of Armenian Istanbul `The Amira's Daughter'. Throughout there is a deeply inauthentic chord, a constantundercurrent of contempt for the poor, a persistent misrepresentationthat depicts them repeatedly, and with little or no qualification, asan undeserving, parasitic class lacking any pride or ambition, and inwhich benefit cheats and fraudsters form a substantial percentage.Were these the views of Ghugas Effendi alone one would not bat aneyelid. But they are presented as those of the common people too andseep in addition into authorial commentary. Yet the one poor person weactually meet defies such representation. The widowed Satenig is `poor' but she is `at the same time proud.' `Ohmy god, can such incongruity really be imagined?' asks Odian.Evidently not by Odian himself! So much so that he presents Satenig asan exceptional figure, as one who proves the rule as it were. Satenigis poor. But she is `an extraordinary poor person' (p47), one sounusual that even `the other poor did not look upon (her) with afriendly eye.' She is even set apart in her social status, not one ofthe mass, but a teacher's wife. Perhaps these Victorian prejudicesthat swarm through the volume tainted the more privileged Armenianmiddle and higher classes of Istanbul into which Odian was born. Itbears future pondering. The most eye catching pothole however is the narrowness in thedepiction of Ghugas Effendi and the Armenian community in which helives. Indubitably a powerfully ugly, arrogant, vice-ridden presence,Ghugas Effendi's portrait is limited to his private life and to hisrelations within an isolated and almost ghetto-like Armeniancommunity. Both are as a result left lop-sided. In the Ottoman capitalthe Ghugas Effendis and indeed the wider Armenian community co-existedwith Turks, Greeks, Jews and others. Abstracted from this widercontext, neither community and nor more specifically elite can beadequately comprehended, especially in the era the novel is set. Through the Ottoman Empire and in Istanbul particularly, the Armenianbusiness class existed alongside and was indeed critically fashionedand defined by competitive war with representatives of other nationaleconomic units. Yet we never see Ghugas Effendi in his relations withhis Turkish, Greek or Jewish business counterparts. Indeed we evenhave no idea of the concrete nature of his own business. Nor do we seehim in those bent and subservient political relations to the Ottomanstate that Armenian merchant capital largely adopted, even as theArmenian nation was being systematically destroyed and Armeniancapital undermined. As significant is the silence on the Armenianelite's complicated relations to the Armenian National LiberationMovement. Odian is not of course required to reconstruct the merchant elite inits totality. Indeed his preferred ambit is suggested in the novel'svery title `Family, Honour, Morality'. But set in an age ofaccentuated nationalist ambitions and economic antagonisms that wereto lead to the Armenian genocide and the confiscation of Armeniancapital, narrowing its scope to private lives leaves us in the darkabout the manner in which the wider and more decisive tides and forcesshaped the fate of Armenian capital and its Ghugas Effendis. Perhapsfor the finality of the genocide, Ghugas Effendi's portrayal wouldhave been completed in a sequel. In his private persona however Ghugas Effendi has been caught well asthe wealthy but intemperate, egotistical, vengeful, smirking,self-satisfied, scheming monster possessed of a decisive, quick andsharp mind but at the same time morally degenerate and almostpsychopathic. Here a parvenu representative of the elite possessed ofdeepest contempt for the common people who resents rubbing shoulderswith them even in Church where all are supposedly equal before theirGod. A significant literary work despite shortcomings and lacunae, `Family,Honour, Morality', as an exposure of moral decay does not fail toremind us of our own shameless businessmen, politicians and publicfigures who also bray on about the sanctity of family, virtue andmorality whilst mocking them in their own lives. A story of money andstatus protecting sexual predators beyond the very grave, the novelcan hardly fail to additionally remind us of the countless moralscandals that surface from among the rich and wealthy in every age. --Eddie Arnavoudian holds degrees in history and politics fromManchester, England, and is Groong's commentator-in-residence onArmenian literature. His works on literary and political issueshave also appeared in Harach in Paris, Nairi in Beirut and OpenLetter in Los Angeles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.