Yervant1 Posted September 14, 2012 Report Share Posted September 14, 2012 TURKEY: A PERMANENT THREAT TO ARMENIA http://ramgavar.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=560%3Adavid-boyajian-turkey-a-permanent-threat-to-armenia&catid=56%3Aramgavar-mamoul&Itemid=27&lang=en David Boyajian, Belmont, Massachusetts, U.S.A. Mustafa Kemal Ataturk If Turkey were to open its border with Armenia, and the two establisheddiplomatic and trade relations, Turkey would still be a threatto Armenia. Turkey would be a threat even if it were to acknowledge the Armeniangenocide, pay reparations, and return stolen Armenian property. Andthe threat to Armenia would remain even if it someday regains itshomeland which now lies in eastern Turkey. Why? Because Turkey's belligerent policies towards Armenians, itspan-Turkic goals (PDF- Pan-Turkist Dreams and Post-Soviet Realities)in the Caucasus and Central Asia, and its neo-Ottoman ambitions poseessentially the same dangers today as at the time of the genocide. Andthey show no sign of ever changing. Aside from a general awareness of the genocide and present-day Turkishhostility, however, many Armenians and others are unfamiliar withkey details of past and present Turkish policies. Consequently,they underestimate the dangers that Armenia faces. Even the commonly held view that "in 1915 the Young Turk regimecommitted genocide against Armenians in Turkey" is dangerouslymisleading. The genocide actually lasted through 1923, five years after Turkey'sdefeat in WWI. Two regimes conducted the genocide: Ottoman YoungTurk and Kemalist. The latter, of course, founded today's allegedly"modern" Turkey. And the genocide took place not only in "Turkey"but also, ominously, on what was and is today the territory of theRepublic of Armenia. Endless Genocide Turkifying and Islamizing the remnants of its empire was a keyreason that Turkey destroyed its indigenous Armenian, Assyrian, andGreek Christians during WWI (1914-18). But Armenians and Armeniansoil also lay just across the border, in the Caucasus region of theRussian empire, directly in the path of Turkey's genocidal pan-Turkicjihad. Turkey committed genocide against those Armenians too, andripped large chunks of territory from the new Armenian Republic,which had just been reborn from Russian Armenia. Azeris -- Turkey's blood brothers then and now -- also conductedlarge-scale massacres of Armenians in the Caucasus in WWI andthrough 1920. [recep_tayyip_erdogan_t.jpg] Recep Tayyip Erdogan After Turkey's defeat in 1918, Turkish forces under Kemal (knownlater as Ataturk) continued the genocide in the Armenian Republicthrough 1920 and in Turkey through 1923. Like Turkish leaders today who lie and deceive, Kemal publiclyprofessed peaceful intentions toward Armenia. Secretly, however,he told his commanders that it is "of the utmost necessity thatArmenia be both politically and physically eliminated." Kemal, too,lopped off chunks of Armenia. Though it resisted heroically, only aSoviet takeover in December of 1920 saved Armenia from annihilation. These facts are relevant to the perils that Armenia faces todaybecause of Turkey's pan-Turkic and neo-Ottoman foreign policies. Pan-Turkism Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, Turkey hasestablished ongoing relationships with Azerbaijan and Central Asia'snew "Turkic-speaking" countries: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan,and Uzbekistan. Turkey has invested billions of dollars and establishedTurkish schools and universities in these countries. Turkey's PresidentGul declared that "Kyrgyzstan is our ancestral homeland" while visitingthat country's International Ataturk-Alatoo University. Turkey hosts major gas and oil pipelines originating in Baku,coproduces weapons with Azerbaijan, and trains Azeri troops. InTurkic solidarity with Azerbaijan, Turkey has injected itself into theArtsakh/Karabagh conflict by closing its border with Armenia for twodecades. The Turkish-Azeri axis -- termed "one nation, two states"--harks back to its assault on Armenia during the genocide. One hundredyears has changed nothing. Turkey remains enamored of Turkic bloodbonds. In the former Armenian province of Nakhichevan -- now part ofAzerbaijan and emptied of its Armenians -- Turkey, Azerbaijan,Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan recently signed a treaty creating theCooperation Council of Turkic Speaking States. Let's be clear. Only Soviet control of the Caucasus and Central Asiafrom the 1920's to 1991, and Russian and Chinese dominance since then,have thwarted Turkey's pan-Turkic goals. For several decades, of course, Russia and China have possessed nuclearweapons. Turkey has not. Imagine what an arrogant, genocidal Turkeywould have perpetrated by now had it possessed nuclear weapons. Turkeycould still, unfortunately, acquire nuclear weapons or other WMDs. Turkey's dangerous imperial goals today also include "neo-Ottomanism." Neo-Ottomanism Turkey regards itself as the leader of not only its former coloniesin the Middle East and Balkans but also the entire Muslim world. Turkey is investing heavily in those regions. Its Education Ministry recently released multi-media material thatshows Armenia, Cyprus, and parts of Bulgaria, Georgia, Greece,Iraq, and Syria as being part of Turkey. Turkey claimed it was justa mistake. [abdullah_gul_t.jpg] Abdullah Gul "You are the grandchildren of the Ottomans. It will be the Ottomanswho will make the world tremble again. If the Ottomans do not comeback, the unbelievers will never be brought down to their knees." ATurkish clergyman thundered those words to a frenzied Turkish rallyin Belgium two decades ago. In attendance were his admirers: Necmettin Erbakan, soon to be Turkey'sPrime Minister and the latter's protégés, Recep Tayyip Erdogan andAbdullah Gul, Turkey's current Prime Minister and President. Far from renouncing its bloody Ottoman past, such examples illustratethat Turkey embraces and wants to recreate it. Consequently, itsthreats against Armenia must never be taken lightly. Turkish Threats During the Artsakh/Karabagh war, Turkish President Turgut Ozalrepeatedly threatened Armenia. Armenians, he warned, "had not learnedthe lessons" of WWI -- that is, the genocide. According to Leonidas Chrysanthopoulos, former Greek ambassador toArmenia, U.S. and French intelligence sources confirm that Turkeywas poised to invade Armenia in 1993. Ruslan Khasbulatov, a Chechenwho was Speaker of the Russian Supreme Soviet and an opponent ofRussian President Yeltsin, had secretly given Turkey the go-ahead toinvade Armenia if he toppled Yelstin. Fortunately, Yelstin survivedthe challenge. If not for the Armenian-Russian alliance of these past two decades,Turkey and Azerbaijan would have jointly attacked Armenia, withcatastrophic consequences. Despite Turkey's hostile record, some Armenians have fallen victimto the constant drumbeat of propaganda that Turkey is "reforming." Turkish non-Reforms Some even believe that acknowledgement of the Armenian genocide wouldbe tantamount to Turkey's having "reformed." That's absurd and aserious mistake. An acknowledgment, which would almost certainly be incomplete,insincere, or reversible, could psychologically disarm Armenians intoletting down their guard. By not owning up to the genocide, therefore,Turkey may unwittingly be doing Armenians a favor. [turgut_ozal_t.jpg] Turgut Ozal Turkey's actual record is one of repression, followed by mass violence,interspersed with so-called "reforms." In the 19th century, large-scale massacres of Armenians, particularlythose of the 1890s, followed Ottoman "reforms" such as the Tanzimat(anti-discrimination decrees). The Young Turk "reform" revolutionof 1908 -- cheered in the beginning by Armenians, Greeks, and othernational groups -- was followed by the 1909 Adana massacres, the1915-23 extermination, and genocidal attacks on Russian Armenia andthe Republic of Armenia. Then along came the new "reformed, modern" Turkey of 1923. Itconfiscated Armenian property, destroyed Armenian churches, andTurkified Armenian city and village names. In 1943, Turkey unleashedits malicious Capital Tax program against Armenians, Greeks, and Jews. Later came the devastating Istanbul riots of 1955. Did we mentionTurkey's massacre of Greek Cypriot civilians and ongoing occupationof northern Cyprus? The death squads and torture chambers? Therepression, deportation, and massacre of Kurds and other minorities,and the jailing of dissidents and journalists? All the while, we are told that Turkey is "reforming." Turkish Syndrome In addition to Turkey's policies, its political leaders pose a dangerbecause of what one may term Turkish Political Personality Syndrome. This syndrome is on full display today in "modern" Turkey's constantthreats, chest-beating, belligerence, malignant narcissism, hypocrisy,extortion, despotism, cruelty, crudeness, lies, broken pledges, and,of course, the use of violence. One cannot think of even one positive Turkish political quality. The countless victims of Turkish violence down through the centuriesare proof of Turkish leaders' disordered state of mind. [ruslan_khasbulatov_t.jpg] Ruslan Khasbulatov There is little indication that either Turkey's policies towardArmenians or their leaders' disorder will ever change. Indeed, theymay grow more threatening. Yet, Armenians still hope that Turkey will change. How to make themaware that the Turkish threat is here to stay? Education Young people will, of course, become the adults who conduct thepolitical, economic, cultural, and military affairs of Armenia. Theymust be equipped intellectually and psychologically to deal withTurkey. >From a young age, Armenian students must study -- but not in Turkishschools -- Turkish history, geo-politics, and language, and theirapplication to present-day Armenian-Turkish relations. The Turkish political personality and its violent and deceitfultendencies must be dissected and understood. This is not easy, for two reasons. First, Armenians are bombarded bypro-Turkish and "reconciliation" propaganda from around the worldand even by some Armenians. Second, we Armenians are unlike Turksand often have difficulty understanding their political culture. Ultimately, future generations of Armenians will have to choose whomto believe. Will it be the allegedly "reformed, modern" Turkey? Theinternational media that kowtows to Turkey? Countries that historicallyhave betrayed Armenia? Or will Armenians learn from the past and the hard-earned wisdom oftheir forebears? Their decision may determine whether Armenia lives or dies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.