MosJan Posted October 27, 2011 Report Share Posted October 27, 2011 Դավանափոխ հայերի և հայրենադարձության մասին http://hetq.am/arm/news/5815/davanapokh-hayeri-ev-hayrenadardzutyan-masin.html Հոկտեմբերի 27-ին «Սարդարապատ» շարժման նախաձեռնող խմբի կողմից կազմակերպվեց քննարկում՝ «Դավանափոխ հայերի զարթոնքը» թեմայով։ Թեման ներկայացնում էր լրագրող-պատմաբան Համո Մոսկոֆյանը։ Ըստ բանախոսի` կրոնափոխ հայերին պետք է բաժանել 3 մասի` համշենահայերի, ալևիների և զազաների: Համշենահայերը այժմ ամենամեծ հայկական էթնիկ խումբն են` իրենց քրիստոնեական և մահմեդական գծերով: Հ.Մոսկոֆյանը նշեց, որ համշենահայերը պահպանել են իրենց լեզուն` համշենահայերի բարբառը և ձևական պահպանում են մահմեդականությունը. նրանք պահպանել են իրենց բոլոր հայկական ավանդույթները: Նրա պարզաբանմամբ, 2-րդ հայկական մեծ խմբավորումը` ալևի հայերն են, որոնք այժմ ապրում են շատ մեծ զարթոնք։ Նրանք ժամանակին դարձան ալևիներ, այդ կրոնի համաձայն` մարդիկ կնության են առնում մեկ կին, նրանք խմորի վրա խաչ են անում, այլ սովորություններով ևս նրանք նման են քրիստոնյաներին: Երրորդ խումբը զազաներն են, որոնց նվիրված կոնֆերանսը տեղի է ունենալու Երևանում: Զազաների մեջ կան թրքամետ տարրեր, մարքսիստներ, օջալանականներ և այլն։ Ըստ Մոսկոֆյանի` այդ բոլոր խմբերի հետ պետք է ակտիվ աշխատել, քարոզչություն անել, նրանց մեջ արթնացնել հայությունը: Քննարկման ժամանակ անդրադարձ եղավ նաև հայրենադարձության հարցին։ Անդրադառնալով դրան` մասնակիցներից Գ. Չուգասզյանը մասնավորապես ասաց հետևյալը. «Ես կցանկանայի հարցնել, արդյոք քաոսը կավելանա՞ Հայաստանում, եթե մենք սխալ քայլեր անենք հայրենադարձության հետ կապված, օրինակ` համշենահայերի հայրենադարձումով։ Խնդիրը իսկապես երկսայրի սուր է, որովհետև մի կողմից մեր երկիրը հայրենադարձության ծայրահեղ անհրաժեշտություն ունի, այսինքն` հայրենադարձությունն է, որ փրկելու է մեր երկիրը այս վիճակից, սակայն վատ իրականացված հայրենադարձությունը վերջին հարվածը կհասցնի Հայաստանի Հանրապետության գոյությանը։ Դրա համար հայրենադարձության կազմակերպումը պետք է լինի չափազանց մտածված։ Սակայն, ես կարծում եմ, որ ֆիզիկական հայրենադաձությունից առաջ նախ հոգևոր հայրենադարձություն է պետք։ Հոգևոր հայրենադարձությունը նախ պետք է սկսվի Հայաստանում, հայաստանցիների հոգևոր հայրենադարձություն պետք է լինի, որից հետո հնարավոր կլինի ուրիշներին էլ ետ բերել։ Հայաստանում այսօր արտագաղթողների հարց են լուծում, սակայն մնացողները, ապրելով Հայաստանում, արդեն ուրիշի հոգևոր տարածք են մտնում, և օրենքը փոխում են, որ հեշտանա այդ հոգևոր միգրացիան դեպի օտարի հոգևոր տարածք։ Դա նշանակում է, որ պրոբլեմը նախ և առաջ Հայաստանի Հանրապետության ներսում է»։ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosJan Posted October 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 27, 2011 Dzer KArtsiq@ ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yervant1 Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 SARDARAPAT ORGANIZES DISCUSSION FOCUSING ON CONVERTED ARMENIANS Tert.am27.10.11 Sardarapat movement organized a discussion Thursday dedicated toreligiously converted Armenians. Titled "The Revival of Converted Armenians", the discussion wasmoderated by journalist-historian Hamo Moskofyan. According to him, currently converted Armenians can be divided intothree groups - Hamshen-Armenians, Alevis and Zaza. Of all these three Hamshen-Armenians is the largest ethnic group -both with their Christian and Muslim characteristics. This group, Moskofyan said, has preserved its language - the Hamshendialect - and is artificially preserving its Muslim status. The Hamshen Armenians have preserved all their Armenian cultures,he added. Alevis, according to him, are the second largest ethnic group, whoare now in a revival period. The third group is the Zaza that have some pro-Turkish elementsand Marxists. Yerevan will soon hold a conference dedicated to the issue of theZaza people. Hamo Moskofyan further said that active work should be done withall these three ethnic groups in an attempt to revive the Armenianelement in them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arpa Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 (edited) Այո, խիստ պատեհաժամ յոդուած Timely article է:I will write the rest in English so more of us can see and read.We are so desperate that we are placing the cart ahead of the horse, so to speak. http://www.cartoonstock.com/lowres/cga0226l.jpg http://www.cartoonstock.com/lowres/cga0226l.jpgWith all the emigration and vacating the Homeland , we are so desperate յուսահատ that we are willing to fill the void with whoever and whatever, to once again turn Yerevan into a furkish town of a 100 years ago. furks and asszeris , be they , as some of us say were Christians Armenians at one time will be so willing to fill the void created by EMIGRATION.We will come back and address each of the quotes above.To start. How are we to convince them that it is "Better to be a Christian Armenian". i.e "Երանի Հայ Քրիստոնեայ եմ ասողին/Yerani Hay em asoghin".Ne mutlu Ermeni im deyene? Edited October 28, 2011 by Arpa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosJan Posted October 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 Ankaskats kuzeyi xosenq iys temayov.. PS. Arpa papik isk inchu es turqeren grum aphsos chi forumi GB or turqerenov vattnenq ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arpa Posted October 29, 2011 Report Share Posted October 29, 2011 (edited) Սփսոս Մովսէս: Դու եւ ես ջուր ենք ծեծում: Փորձում ենք շողգամից արիւն քամել:**Իսկ ինչ վերաբերի սրան, յաջորդիվ:PS. Arpa papik isk inchu es turqeren grum aphsos chi forumi GB or turqerenov vattnenq ??Այո, մեղաւոր եմ որ հակառակ իմ կրօնի այդ անիծեալ լեզուով խօսեցի:**YOU CAN’T SQUEEZE BLOOD FROM A TURNIPMeaning: You cannot get something from a person, especially money, that they don't have. You can only get what people are willing or able to give. A turnip cannot be coaxed, squeezed, or cajoled into producing blood. All efforts at obtaining blood from this vegetable will be futilehttp://www.calciumproducts.com/images/blog_photos/turnip.jpg http://www.calciumproducts.com/images/blog_photos/turnip.jpg Edited October 29, 2011 by Arpa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arpa Posted October 29, 2011 Report Share Posted October 29, 2011 In the above article we saw that this process has many obstacles - խոչընդոտ and issues.I also cited the cliché “placing the cart ahead of the horse”.Which comes first. Physical or spiritual repatriation?See highlight below- ---Loosely translated-“Before the physical repatriation, we need an spiritual repatriation. This process has to start in Armenia itself. What with all the spiritual alienation and emigration..”In other words. If these non-Christian “Armenians” do actually physically immigrate, are we willing and ready to accept them as is in their other religion? How many churches will be converted to mosques, or how many mosques will we build for them?Above, when I used a furkish phrase, it was intentional. Given that very few of them, if any speak and understand Armenian, in what language will we proselytize and preach to them? How do we talk to them. Not to mzention that "church Armenian" aka grabar. "Խորհուրդ մեծ եւ սքանչելի, որ Յայսմ Աւուր յայտնեցավ" ? They call “Astuats/God “allah” and Jesus “isa//yesou‘”, and they use “kilisa” instead of Yekeghetsi. just like the Arabs swear in the name of the three “prophets” - “Isa, Musa, Mohammed”.Քննարկման ժամանակ անդրադարձ եղավ նաև հայրենադարձության հարցին։ Անդրադառնալով դրան` մասնակիցներից Գ. Չուգասզյանը մասնավորապես ասաց հետևյալը. «Ես կցանկանայի հարցնել, արդյոք քաոսը կավելանա՞ Հայաստանում, եթե մենք սխալ քայլեր անենք հայրենադարձության հետ կապված, օրինակ` համշենահայերի հայրենադարձումով։ Խնդիրը իսկապես երկսայրի սուր է, որովհետև մի կողմից մեր երկիրը հայրենադարձության ծայրահեղ անհրաժեշտություն ունի, այսինքն` հայրենադարձությունն է, որ փրկելու է մեր երկիրը այս վիճակից, սակայն վատ իրականացված հայրենադարձությունը վերջին հարվածը կհասցնի Հայաստանի Հանրապետության գոյությանը։ Դրա համար հայրենադարձության կազմակերպումը պետք է լինի չափազանց մտածված։ Սակայն, ես կարծում եմ, որ ֆիզիկական հայրենադաձությունից առաջ նախ հոգևոր հայրենադարձություն է պետք։ Հոգևոր հայրենադարձությունը նախ պետք է սկսվի Հայաստանում, հայաստանցիների հոգևոր հայրենադարձություն պետք է լինի, որից հետո հնարավոր կլինի ուրիշներին էլ ետ բերել։ Հայաստանում այսօր արտագաղթողների հարց են լուծում, սակայն մնացողները, ապրելով Հայաստանում, արդեն ուրիշի հոգևոր տարածք են մտնում, և օրենքը փոխում են, որ հեշտանա այդ հոգևոր միգրացիան դեպի օտարի հոգևոր տարածք։ Դա նշանակում է, որ պրոբլեմը նախ և առաջ Հայաստանի Հանրապետության ներսում է»։ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yervant1 Posted October 29, 2011 Report Share Posted October 29, 2011 (edited) When they don't care about the rich Christian Armenians immigrating, why should they care for the poor Muslim ones? CORRUPTION IN ARMENIA: ESTI HAMETSEK...By Oshin Peroomian Noyan Tapan29.10.2011 In what I can only characterize as the twisted modern-day version of"Gikor", our honorable President, Serg Sarkissian, has repeatedly askedthe diaspora to come and invest in the homeland and have an input inmaking Armenia a prosperous nation. For all those brave souls thatare actually considering heeding the president's call and do not have"friends" in the highest of places in the government of Armenia,I simply offer a story which should give some pause. In the fall of 2005, I bought a 2,500 square meter land on the hillsoverlooking Yerevan (in Nork). I purchased this land from Mr. AndranikGhulijanyan for a total sum of 88,000,000 AMD (about $ 195,000 atthat time). The original lot size owned by Mr. Ghulijanyan was 5000square meters. Since, I did not want to purchase the entire lot, Irequested that Mr. Ghulijanyan split the parcel in two halves so thatI could purchase only half the land (the amount I could afford). Mr. Ghulijanyan filled out the proper paperwork at the Republic ofArmenia's (RA) Kadatsr in Yerevan, which is the government bodyresponsible for issuing deeds in the RA, and requested that the deed beseparated into two. After doing their due diligence, the Kadastr splitthe original deed and issued two deeds each for 2500 square meters. Asa side note, the RA Kadatsr would not have completed this process ifthere were any leans or judgments against this parcel of land. After the Kadastr issued the two deeds, with the help of my lawyer inArmenia, we completed the transaction via notary public and recordedthe transaction with Kadastr. The RA Kadastr issued a new deed listingme as the titleholder for the 2500 square meter parcel. To this day,no state official has called into question the legitimacy of mytransaction and the deed that I hold. This is an important fact tokeep in mind as you read the rest of this story. In fall of 2006, a few months after my family and I moved to Armenia,I got a call from the Nork-Marash courthouse inquiring as to whyI had failed to appear in court. I had no idea what the phone callwas about so my lawyer and I headed to the courthouse to ascertainthe reason for the verbal summons (verbal summons are illegal inArmenia). To our surprise, we found that the city of Yerevan hadtaken Andranik Ghulijanyan to court for not properly paying for the5000 square meter land, which he had originally bought from the Cityof Yerevan. Since Mr. Ghulijanyan no longer owned the entire pieceof the land, I was subsequently included as a defendant in the civiltrial. In fact, not only was my summons to court done verbally, thecivil charges against me were also entered verbally (both strictlyagainst the rule of law in Armenia). The judge simply saw fit to addthe changes against me midway through the trial based on a verbalrequest from the attorney representing the city. The laws (in Armenia) are very clear in this matter. I did not purchasemy land from the city of Yerevan; and, when I purchased the land,Mr. Ghulijanyan was the rightful owner of that land. My transactionwith him followed the letter of the law and thus the only recourse forthe city of Yerevan was to sue Mr. Ghulijanyan for the money they wereowed for half the land (my half) and request his portion of the landto be returned. As a bona fide purchaser, there are several statutes(in Armenian law) that protect my purchase. The city officials hadwritten in their brief that since they wanted the original purchaseagreement of the land with Ghulijanyan nullified, it should followthat I my purchase agreement be nullified as well. Clearly not the case under Armenian law! During our civil trial, it became clear that a group of people (kadastremployees, bank employees and other officials and civilians) had beenarrested for falsifying documents and receipts and pocketing the moneythat was to be paid into the state treasury for the original purchaseof the land (when Ghulijanyan purchased it from the city). It turnedout that over a hundred transactions of this type where conducted witha massive loss to the state treasury. The state had started criminalproceedings against the aforementioned group and had seized all theirassets. I will not get into how those assets were auctioned off andhow much money was actually put into the treasury since no one canactually give the correct number. The items auctioned off were atpennies on the dollar and probably made the corrupt officials handlingthis case even richer than they should be!! The president of Armenia,at that time the honorable Robert Kocharyan, had come up with a "kamhoghe kam poghe" policy and ordered every one of these landowners(whether complicit or not in the criminal activities) be taken tocivil court. It was clear from the judges manning these trials thata fair trial was not going to be possible. In nearly all the cases,the civil defendants were forced to pay what was owed to the state asecond time, even "defendants" that were bona-fide purchasers who didnot purchase their parcels from the city. Again, I don't think anyoneknows exactly by how-many fold these payments exceeded the original"loss" to the state budget. I was one of the lone holdouts. The lawyersfrom kadastr and the city said that this would simply go away if Ipaid what was owed to the city. It really didn't concern them that Ihad rightfully purchased the land (and not from the city) and that Ihad paid much more than the 33,000,000 AMD that the city was askingfor (the total sum was 66,000,000 for the 5000 square meter land). In my original trial, the judge was very prejudicial and did noteven want to consider the fact that there were people being heldon criminal charges in this matter. Armenia law clearly states thatcriminal proceedings in a given case supersede the civil proceedingsbecause any evidence and convictions stemming from the criminal trialwill have a direct consequence and relevance in the civil trial. Thejudge did not see it that way and did not want to postpone the trialuntil the end of the criminal proceedings. We questioned the judge'simpartiality and made a formal request for his removal. The courtmagistrate, by law, had to take the matter under advisement andnotify us in writing whether our request would be granted. About 15days after our request, my lawyer called and said that he had "heard"that the judge was going to announce a verdict in my case the followingday. I was completely shocked. Well, I shouldn't say that since someonewho has lived in Armenia as long as I have, rarely gets shocked atanything anymore. We showed up the next day at the courthouse andthe judge was clearly surprised to see us in the courtroom. In fact,none of the other parties were in court. He read the verdict andliterally ran out of the courtroom afterwards. We asked the courtclerk about the response to our request for the removal of the judgeand she handed us the refusal letter after the verdict was announced. Under Armenia law, one has 15 days to appeal court rulings and we wentahead and appealed the verdict. The case got assigned to the Appeal'sCourt (civil division). As an American citizen, I also notified theAmerican Embassy about the "troubles" I was having with the judicialsystem in Armenia. The Embassy was extremely helpful in many ways. They offered to be at the appeal's court proceedings and to writeletters on my behalf to the Foreign Ministry of Armenia. At the firstcourt session in the appeals division, we asked the three-judge panelto postpone the trial until the end of the criminal proceedings inthis matter. The judges said that they would issue their ruling onthat motion at the next session. I was very sure that the judges weregoing to rule against us so I asked the embassy if they could have anofficial present at the second session. Mr. Jeff Gringer, the deputyconsul for the US embassy in Yerevan, agreed to come to the trial. Asthe session began and we introduced the people in the courtroom(including the deputy consul), pandemonium broke out in the courtroom. What could only be described as a scene from a badly adapted JohnGrisham novel, the judges called a 15 minute recess and the Kadastrand City lawyers started frantically talking on their cell phones. Thecourt was called into session 20 minutes later and the judges agreedto postpone the trial and grant our motion. I wonder what would havehappened if the ambassador had shown up at the trial (although wedid not have an ambassador to Armenia at that time). Fast-forward a few years to the fall of 2010. The criminals were triedand convicted. The state, in their criminal case, had clearly shownthat the convicted were the ones who had defrauded the state. So, withthe criminal verdicts at hand, our trial began once again. Even ifthe other laws that I mentioned in the beginning of the article werenot enough, now the judges had criminal verdicts in their processionclearly showing who was to blame for the fraud perpetrated on thecity. As the case proceeded, it became clear that once again thispanel was not going to be impartial. After hearing all sides, theyannounced that they were going to issue their ruling at a specifieddate. We went to the courthouse on that date in order to be presentwhile they read the verdict. In a twisted version of "the dog atemy homework" excuse, the judges told us that they had issued theruling but the computers were not cooperating and they couldn't readthe whole statement of the verdict. My attorney asked if they couldread the main ruling (whether they upheld the lower court's decisionor not) and that we would pick up the full text of the ruling at alater date. The lead judge on the panel said that the pages were outof order in the document and the whole computer system was on the"frits". The computers seemed to be working properly for all theother rulings that they read before they got to ours. I have too muchrespect for kangaroos to use their name to describe this court. Thelead judge said that we should come back in a week and they wouldread the verdict at that time. A week passed and we were notified incourt that the panel had decided to restart the proceedings, the samepanel that claimed that they had reached a verdict but couldn't readit because of issues with their computer system. In this next "phase" of the proceedings, the judges tried to see ifsomeone would come forward and pay the amount owed to the city so thatthe matter could be "resolved" via settlement. After exhausting theseoptions, the judges began with a sharp line of questioning for thelawyer representing the city of Yerevan. One judge actually asked,"Did the city sell land to Oshin? No! So why is the city asking fora land which it did not sell to Oshin". We were surprised that thejudges were taking our side and it was refreshing to see them followthe rule of law. We have the official audio-tapes from the trial wherethe judges harshly criticize the city attorney and tell her that theircase is without merit. They essentially say that the correct courseof action for the city was to sue Mr. Ghulijanyan asking for monetarycompensation for the part of the land that he no longer owned and thatI should not have been even included in this trial. The lawyer fromthe city is heard at the end of the tape saying, "The money owed tothe state MUST be paid and we really don't care who pays as long asit is paid" clearly showing the states intentions in the case (Kamhoghe kam poghe!). All indications were that the panel was planningto overturn the lower court's verdict,....until the verdict! Clearlythere had been pressure from the highest reaches of the governmentas is the case with nearly all matters involving the people vs. thestate or the city. In fact the judges didn't even read the verdictin court. The secretary gave us the ruling outside of court and said"Sorry, we did everything we could". The ruling basically upheld theverdict from the first court. We appealed this ruling to the highest court in the land dealing withsuch cases, the "Vechrabeg" court. Today, October 3, 2011, I got a formal letter from the "Vechrabeg"court that it had refused to even hear my case, exhausting all optionsopen to me within the boundaries of the RA. In their letter of refusal,there is absolutely no reason given for their decision. In all the verdicts handed down so far in this case, none of thejudges indicate what law I have broken during the purchase of theland and under which statute I must forfeit the land (because thereare none!). Even the judges on the audio recording ask the cityattorney "Under which statute are you asking for the forfeiture ofOshin's land". I love my country. In fact, very few have made the decision that myfamily and I have made, leaving the "good-life" in LA for a better-lifein Yerevan. My third child was born in Yerevan, and I am proud that Ilive in my homeland and contribute to its hopefully prosperous future(in my own way). However, the so-called sovereign judicial system herehas left me no choice but to seek justice outside the boundaries ofthe RA. My next stop in this journey will be the European court. We often here that the system is simply broken in Armenia andcorruption runs rampant. Everything can be bought since everything isup for sale. Well, everyone who has worked and lived here has storiesjust like the one above, which go a long way to prove that premise. Oh, what would Gikor think... http://asbarez.com/98962/corruption-in-armenia-esti-hametsek.../ Edited October 29, 2011 by Yervant1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arpa Posted October 30, 2011 Report Share Posted October 30, 2011 (edited) I don’t understand this. I cannot find any connection between Alawi-s and Armenians. Նրա պարզաբանմամբ, 2-րդ հայկական մեծ խմբավորումը` ալևի հայերն են, որոնք այժմ ապրում են շատ մեծ զարթոնք։ Նրանք ժամանակին դարձան ալևիներ, այդ կրոնի համաձայն` մարդիկ կնության են առնում մեկ կին, նրանք խմորի վրա խաչ են անում, այլ սովորություններով ևս նրանք նման են քրիստոնյաներին: Alawis are an offshoot of Islam who profess that Mohammed’s cousin Ali is the real prophet. They are also known as Shiites like those of Iran and other pockets in Syria and other places.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alawi The Alawis, also known as Alawites, Nusayris and Ansaris (‘Alawīyyah Arabic: علوية, Nuṣayrī Arabic: نصيريون, and al-Anṣāriyyah) are a prominent mystical and syncretic[7] religious group centred in Syria who are a branch of Shia Islam.[8][9] The current president of Syria, (top row second from left, Papa Hafez and Mama are seated), professes to have descended from the Alawi faith. Also note that, unlike Iran the women don't use any head/hair cover.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/F-assad.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/F-assad.jpg----To once again reiterate, Where is the connection of Alevis and Armenians?During the (Sunni)ottoman times, just as now the Alawis have been persecuted , as they still are today. Edited October 30, 2011 by Arpa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arpa Posted October 30, 2011 Report Share Posted October 30, 2011 (edited) When they don't care about the rich Christian Armenians immigrating, why should they care for the poor Muslim ones? Ծուռ նստինք շիտակ խօսինք. Or is it- Շիտակ նստինք ծուռ խօսինք? Yes indeed. Before we talk about the acceptance and welcoming of "islamized Armenians", let us go back a few decades, to the "big immigration" in the 1940-s when the immigrant-repatriots were despised and shunned, called all kinds of insultful names like "turk, Arab, aghber(meaning garbage)" etc. Is it any different now? i.e "give us your money and get lost, or your breathless body, satak/carcass/corpse will be found in a hole on a highway." Edited October 30, 2011 by Arpa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nané Posted October 31, 2011 Report Share Posted October 31, 2011 Ծուռ նստինք շիտակ խօսինք. Or is it- Շիտակ նստինք ծուռ խօսինք? Yes indeed. Before we talk about the acceptance and welcoming of "islamized Armenians", let us go back a few decades, to the "big immigration" in the 1940-s when the immigrant-repatriots were despised and shunned, called all kinds of insultful names like "turk, Arab, aghber(meaning garbage)" etc. Is it any different now? i.e "give us your money and get lost, or your breathless body, satak/carcass/corpse will be found in a hole on a highway." Not that I'm justifying the "label" but those who immigrated were called «ախպար» not «աղբեր». As I understand this was because the men addressed each other «եղբայր» կամ «ափար» ... which became «ախպար» in the lexicon of the locals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nvard Posted October 31, 2011 Report Share Posted October 31, 2011 like I said before, there shouldn't be a Muslim community in Armenia, and esp. in Artsakh..Say whatever you say, but it's a great threat for our homeland's existence..If they wanna come and stay in Armenia, they should convert and become a part of this culture, get connected if you will..Otherwise I don't believe they care or consider themselves a part of our nation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Posted November 1, 2011 Report Share Posted November 1, 2011 kareli e u arhrajejt hishel te Garegin Njdehe inche asel ir orov "mtavorakanutune da Joxovrti Hoqebanutyan darpinne" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arpa Posted November 1, 2011 Report Share Posted November 1, 2011 (edited) like I said before, there shouldn't be a Muslim community in Armenia, and esp. in Artsakh..Say whatever you say, but it's a great threat for our homeland's existence..If they wanna come and stay in Armenia, they should convert and become a part of this culture, get connected if you will..Otherwise I don't believe they care or consider themselves a part of our nation.Yes Nvard, you are right.Let us once again read what was said above.Հայաստանի Հանրապետության գոյությանը։ Դրա համար հայրենադարձության կազմակերպումը պետք է լինի չափազանց մտածված։ Սակայն, ես կարծում եմ, որ ֆիզիկական հայրենադաձությունից առաջ նախ հոգևոր հայրենադարձություն է պետք։ Հոգևոր հայրենադարձությունը նախ պետք է սկսվի Հայաստանում, հայաստանցիների հոգևոր հայրենադարձություն պետք է լինի, որից հետո հնարավոր կլինի ուրիշներին էլ ետ բերել։------“Before the physical repatriation, we need an spiritual repatriation. This process has to start in Armenia itself. What with all the spiritual alienation and emigration..”Some of us would like to think that after all that centuries of alienation/assimilation and acculturation , turkification and programming will be reversed and deprogrammed overnight by simply physically moving in. That after all those years of turkification those people will be Armenianized in a few days. Armenianism is not simply a matter of citizenship, that any citizen of Armenia will automatically be an Armenian. Armenianism is much more than simple citizenship, you tell us what it entails. Even speaking Armenian is not all it takes. One can speak Armenian yet go to the mosque and pray to allah and mohammed. Will they celebrate tsnound or zatik, or will celebrate ramadan and eid?Lonok at the USA, where out of 300 million at least a 200 million are citizens. Are they all Americans, i.e even if the majority may be Christians but are they all Anglo-s? Some may have Shepherd’s Pie as their main dish, others- Pasta or shish kebab/khorwats, still others, like the Afro-Americans- chiitterlings**, a khash in their own way.Is Armenia BIG and SECURE enough to accommodate all those various cultures, when they say- “OK, we will move in and become citizens of Armenia but will keep our centuries old traditions and faiths? Is the Blue Mosque big enough to accomodate all those islamized Armenians, who will sing allah-u-akbar instead of Ter Voghormia/Astuats Mets? *** Will there be more minarets than Bell Towers/zangakatoun?---** http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c1/ChitlinsSmall.jpg/220px-ChitlinsSmall.jpghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChitterlingsChitterlings ( /'tʃɪtlɪnz/; sometimes spelled chitlins or chittlins in vernacular) are the intestines of a pig that have been prepared as food. In various countries across the world, such food is prepared and eaten either as part of a daily diet, or at special events, holidays or religious festivities.*** "Սուրբ Աստուած, սուրբ եւ հզօր, սուրբ եւ անմահ, որ հարյար ի մեռելոց, ողորմեա մեզSourb Asdvadz, sourb yev h'zor, sourb yev anmah, vor haryar i merelotz, voghormia mez."Speaking of “allah-u-akbar/almighty god/Հզօր Աստուած”…I don’t know who the author of the lyrics is. Is it Shnorhali or Narekatsi? Here is the hymn/sharakan from Makar Ekmalian’s patarak/mass.Who knows this sharakan?----ՍՈՒՐԲ ԱՍՏՈՒԱԾԾՆՆԴԵԱՆՍուրբ Աստուած սուրբ եւ հըզօր սուրբ եւ անմահ,որ ծնար եւ յայտնեցար, ողորմեա մեզ:ԽԱՉԻՍուրբ Աստուած սուրբ եւ հըզօր, սուրբ եւ անմահ, որ խաչեար վասն մեր, ողորմեա մեզ:ԶԱՏԿԻՍուրբ Աստուած սուրբ եւ հըզօր, սուրբ եւ անմահ, որ յարեար ի մեռելոց ողորմեա մեզ:ՀԱՄԲԱՐՁՄԱՆՍուրբ Աստուած սուրբ եւ հըզօր, սուրբ եւ անմահ, որ համբաձար փառօք առ հայր ողորմեա մեզ: Edited November 1, 2011 by Arpa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.