LIne in the Sand?

[Arpa]

A Line in the Sand?

 

Another “dynasty” bites the sand.

 

Another “ islamic republic”?

Those so called "countries" do not deserve the title of "democracy or republic".

What is the definition of "dictator"? Is it like " I say, you listen" , or is it "Do as I say, not like I do"? Or is it an editor of a "dictionary"? Regardless how "contradictory" they may be.

I am not the only one. Listen to the media and see how they are comparing this to the so called Iranian revolution./islamization.

 

The "Shah of Egypt" has just resigned. It is reminiscent of some 30 years ago when the Shah of Iran resigned and a subsequent ayatollaic “islamic republic” was created.

The so called “muslim brotherhood/akhwan muslimeen” has been banned for over 50 years, ever since Nasser hanged a few of them. We had not heard of them all this time, and now we hear it every other hour.

Is Egypt on the way to become another “islamic reepublic” like Iran? Who’s next?**

Or, will Egypt, like Sudan split into two with a North Christian-Coptic and south -muslim?

Is “corruption” an egypto-arabic word?

The Swiss Bank has frozen his assets.

Or is the Pyramid Scheme/Ponzi?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_scheme

 

**And these countries call themselves republics and or constitutional monarchies”?

Saudia, Jordan, Syria, Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco… and … and…furkey?

And imagine that the US aids, abets and supports many of those pretend countries where a girl may be murdered for ezxposing her hair. I mean the "hair" on her head.

Note that many of those so called countries were mere “lines in the sand” drawn by the Romans, the Greeks, and later by the ottomans and the Anglo-French. Survey the map and see how straight those lines are, and compare how crooked the Map of Armenia is. Who drew that map? mehmet or Ivan? Which is mightier, sand or mountain?

Those so called “countries” do not deserve “democracy”, they are better off with “shah-s” and dictators , the likes of Pahlavi, Moubarak, Qaddafi et al.

The least of “democratic” countries Armenia has had three presidents in the past 20 years.

Where are the Erwanduni, Arshakuni and Bagratuni Dynasties?

How many presidents have Egypt had? Not to mention that other non-country of ali-oghlu dynasty.

And here is the real knee slapper comedy that Egypt should become a "democracy/eshekracy" ala ankara :jerry:

Edited February 11, 2011 by Arpa

[Arpa]

Why are Armenians even talking about this? Is it a wishful thinking. Is it a death wish?

look ate this picture. Do they look like your cousins in Yerevan?

http://www.armenianow.com/sites/default/files/img/imagecache/600x400/arab-protests-emen.jpg

 

Why are we comparing Armenia with those primitive countries?

In the short time of less than 20 years Armenia has had several elections. It has had 3 presidents.

Compare it with the likes of Saddam (rest in piss), Mubarak of Egypt, dictator for over 40 years, Qaddafi of Libya, dictator for over 40 years….. -please add. Not to forget the ali-oghlu- president for life dynasty next door.

Even the “most backward ME country next door“ Iran has had so many presidents since…

Am I under the impression that some of us are yearning to emulate those primitive countries?

Remember the thread about “Protestants”?

What do Armenians have to protest about, beside the high price of oghi/vodka? Or,that chicken soup is taking over khash, and pizza is replacing khorvats?

 

http://hyeforum.com/index.php?showtopic=7028&st=120&p=181796&hl=protestant%20&fromsearch=1entry181796

 

Below the phrase “domino effect” is used. How about we substitute that with “armageddon”? I’m sure those who wrote that garbage are rubbing their hands together in gleeful anticipation.

I've got news for them. If and when those in Egypt, Libya, Yemen ...etc. succeed to establish "islamic republics" ala Iran, telaviv will be remanded to the dustbin of history-schmistory. See the reference to "neoconservatives"(aka telaviv lobby) below.**

**See who those so called “neocons” were. Wolfowitz, Perle and Feith. The ones who spread the lies of saddam having WMD s (weapons of mass destruction) Guess their ethnicity. Where in gehena are they now? Mission acomplished? Their main goal was to incite Georgy porgy to attack Baghdad, who, in his own mind was to avenge his father who could not conquer it.

 

Among those so called countries is also the so called kingdom of Bahrain (means two seas). An island in the Persian Gulf. Look, and seew if you can locate it on the map;

http://travel.nationalgeographic.com/travel/countries/bahrain-map/

A so called country, state kingdom , with a population of ½ million, an area of 268 sq mi, smaller than New York City and Yerevan.

Yet it has a “king”. What is the definition of a “king”?

Is this his picture?

King Kong;

http://www.everypicture.com/shop/books/aa610302d72bacd6c86419709a3e2c1d/king-kong.jpg

 

Long live King Ashot!!!

 

 

http://www.armenianow.com/commentary/analysis/27812/armenia_arab_world_changes_influence

 

Analysis | 22.02.11 | 12:10

Potential Consequences: Armenia may feel influence of Arab world changes

 

By Aris Ghazinyan

ArmeniaNow reporter

“Global crisis cramps” across the Arab world are mostly being viewed through a pan-Islamic prism.

According to Russian political analyst Vladimir Korobov, the constant news from the East testify to the fact that the fire of revolution is growing bigger, and the events are developing by a radical scenario. “The Arab East, following Iran’s example, is implacably returning to its fundamental values. Perhaps, it’s not even a return, but an emergence of a new Islamic state capable of becoming a force world centers of power would have to reckon with”.

American publicist Michael Dorfman believes that “the neoconservatives’ long-predicted domino effect is what’s happening now in the Arab world” just like it did in the Soviet block and Latin America. “Fundamentalism is, in essence, a radical, and in many aspects even revolutionary movement, deriving from Koran grounds for its urgent and radical public ideas,” says the publicist. In what ways could these processes impact Armenia? A possibility cannot be excluded that radical Islamist forces might come to power in a number of Arab countries representatives of which fought against the Armenian nation during the Karabakh war. First of all it is the threat of the formation of a generally negative attitude towards Armenia as a state in conflict with Islamic countries. It’s not a secret that Turkey and Azerbaijan initially wanted to convey the Armenian-Azeri conflict a character of religious jihad. This course did not receive the support of the majority of Arab countries and Iran. However, the possibility that the situation might shift once radical forces come to power in a number of countries cannot be excluded; and even more so given the Islamic character of Turkey’s ruling political elite and its efforts to support the radical front of Arab revolutions. And besides, the Azeri authorities have been working in pan-Turkic, pan-Islamic and even pan-Caucasian directions. . In the pan-Islamic vector in particular, one and the same thesis is voiced as a rule calling for “liberation of holy lands from infidels”. In order to attract the attention of north Caucasian Muslims Heydar Aliyev developed a “pan-Caucasian thesis” according to which Armenia is violating the “peace and quiet of the Caucasus and occupies the lands of Caucasian Muslims”. For example, during one of his speeches at the international forum ‘Islamic Civilization in the Caucasus’ in December of 1998 the then Azeri president Heydar Aliyev voiced a thought: “The territory that today is called Armenia is, in fact, western Azerbaijan – it used to be a settlement of Azeris, Muslims… I do not think that Islam is forever wiped out on that land. Islam will return to where it used to be. I believe... that masters of that land – Muslims – will return there. That is why these lands cannot be erased from the map of Islam”. Today Ilham Aliyev continues his father’s mission. At the opening of the First World Forum of leaders of Azeri and Turkish Diaspora organizations he stated: “With the purpose of ousting Azeris from their historic lands and creation of the mythical “Great Armenia” there, for decades Armenians regularly subjected the Azeri and Turkish nations to ideological, military and cultural aggression. In 1918 an Armenian state was founded on the Azeri lands, to which Irevan – one of Azerbaijan’s most important cultural centers – was ceded as a capital.” Hence, a possible shift of power in a number of Islamic countries will create a potential threat to the security of Armenia. In that view, international efforts directed at preventing radicals from coming to power are objectively in Armenia’s best interests.

Edited February 22, 2011 by Arpa