Sip Posted April 17, 2008 Report Share Posted April 17, 2008 One should look at the number of brain cancer cases, before and after the cell phone became popular. I think they should strap some 0.5 watt continuous RF emitters on some mice and let them run around for a couple years to see if any of them develop any unusual tumors. For the heck of it, maybe they can even cranck up the output to 1 Watt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashot Posted April 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2008 Sip, this is when I say fry the bastard!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zara Posted May 21, 2008 Report Share Posted May 21, 2008 Cell phone radiation levels By CNET staff (updated April 11, 2008) What it all means According to the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association (CTIA), specific absorption rate, or SAR, is "a way of measuring the quantity of radiofrequency (RF) energy that is absorbed by the body." For a phone to pass FCC certification, that phone's maximum SAR level must be less than 1.6W/kg (watts per kilogram). In Europe, the level is capped at 2W/kg while Canada allows a maximum of 1.6W/kg. The SAR level listed in our charts represents the highest SAR level with the phone next to the ear as tested by the FCC. Keep in mind that it is possible for the SAR level to vary between different transmission bands and that different testing bodies can obtain different results. Also, it's possible for results to vary between different editions of the same phone (such as a handset that's offered by multiple carriers). It's important to note that in publishing this list are we in no way implying that cell phone use is or isn't harmful to your health. While research abounds and some tests have shown that cell phone radiofrequency (RF) could accelerate cancer in laboratory animals, the studies have not been replicated. Cell phones can affect internal pacemakers, but there is not conclusive or demonstrated evidence that they cause adverse health affects in humans. Conversely, there is not conclusive or demonstrated evidence that they don't cause adverse health affects in humans. So, in short, the jury is still out, research is ongoing, and we will continue to monitor its results. If your phone isn't listed here (U.S. customers) and you've purchased it within the last few years (the FCC Web site currently does not provide information on models certified before 1998), you can request the SAR information from the manufacturer or your carrier. You'll need the model number and FCC ID number, which is usually but not always listed in your owner's manual or under your phone's battery (you must pop the battery out). For links to the FCC's Web site, please see the More Resources section below. We'll continue to update the list as new phones are announced. To be the first to know when we've added more phones, subscribe to the On Call Newsletter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zara Posted May 21, 2008 Report Share Posted May 21, 2008 (edited) Ten highest-radiation cell phones (United States) Manufacturer and model - SAR level (digital) 1. Motorola V195s - 1.6 2. Motorola Slvr L6 - 1.58 3. Motorola Slvr L2 - 1.54 3a. Motorola W385 - 1.54 4. Motorola Deluxe ic902 - 1.53 4a. T-Mobile Shadow (HTC) - 1.53 4b. Motorola i335 - 1.53 5. Samsung Sync SGH-C417 - 1.51 5a. Motorola V365 - 1.51 5b. RIM BlackBerry Curve (AT&T) - 1.51 Ten lowest-radiation cell phones (United States) Manufacturer and model - SAR level (digital) 1. LG KG800 - 0.135 2. Motorola Razr V3x - 0.14 3. Nokia 9300 - 0.21 4. Nokia N90 - 0.22 5. Samsung SGH-G800 - 0.23 6. Samsung Sync SGH-A707 - 0.236 7. Samsung Sync SGH-A707 - 0.26 8. Samsung SGH-T809 - 0.32 9. Bang & Olufsen Serene (Samsung SGH-E910) - 0.33 10. Motorola Razr2 V8 - 0.36 Editor's note: When a phone is discontinued by a manufacturer or a carrier, it will be removed from this chart. Link to most phones and their SAR levels. Edited May 21, 2008 by Zara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashot Posted May 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 21, 2008 Tenk you Zara jan!!! That was good info!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.