Al Gore The Bore And Fraud

[hagopn]

The Hysteria Channel just showed a new series where a pair of scientists, one a certain Crowell, and the other a certin Milankovitch, had discoverec a repeated patten of global weather shifts, from hot to cold, hot to cold, and over and over again in cycles related to the shift in the earth's orbit and axis.

 

I will not elaborate on this as the works of these men have been published all over the place: http://books.google.com/books?id=yiKBaFuFr...Vos-sOxzLAsiU-g

 

What I wanted to point out was why Al Gore and his "global warming" hysterics were fraudulent attempts at slowing down Chinese industrial progress. Gore has no scientific basis for global warming other than the popularized notion that the ozone is going away, the CO₂ levels are rising, and solar reflection is being reduced and retention of solar energy is increasing as a result.

 

The above 150 or so year old set of theories knocks out the Al Gore bore out of the water and exposes the contemporary politician as yet again solely a lackey and tool for the various commercial trusts and cartels who want to maintain global hegemony.

Edited November 12, 2007 by hagopn

[DominO123]

The Hysteria Channel just showed a new series where a pair of scientists, one a certain Crowell, and the other a certin Milankovitch, had discoverec a repeated patten of global weather shifts, from hot to cold, hot to cold, and over and over again in cycles related to the shift in the earth's orbit and axis.

 

I will not elaborate on this as the works of these men have been published all over the place: http://books.google.com/books?id=yiKBaFuFr...Vos-sOxzLAsiU-g

 

What I wanted to point out was why Al Gore and his "global warming" hysterics were fraudulent attempts at slowing down Chinese industrial progress. Gore has no scientific basis for global warming other than the popularized notion that the ozone is going away, the CO₂ levels are rising, and solar reflection is being reduced and retention of solar energy is increasing as a result.

 

The above 150 or so year old set of theories knocks out the Al Gore bore out of the water and exposes the contemporary politician as yet again solely a lackey and tool for the various commercial trusts and cartels who want to maintain global hegemony.

 

There is abound evidence of global warming, satellite imagery has shown that polar ice melting in summer has beaten the worst case scenario this year. Global warming is not only due to human activity, but when we isolate each variable there is a very strong correlation between human activity (mosty CO2 production) and the part of the global warming which is left which is not attributed to natural causes.

 

You can visit any university science factulty environmental institute, you will hardly find anyone who will deny global warming. The controversial point is not if there is global warming, it is rather how much of it is attributed to mankind.

[hagopn]

There is abound evidence of global warming, satellite imagery has shown that polar ice melting in summer has beaten the worst case scenario this year. Global warming is not only due to human activity, but when we isolate each variable there is a very strong correlation between human activity (mosty CO2 production) and the part of the global warming which is left which is not attributed to natural causes.

 

You can visit any university science factulty environmental institute, you will hardly find anyone who will deny global warming. The controversial point is not if there is global warming, it is rather how much of it is attributed to mankind.

 

Precisely. And it is not at all determined precisely what percentage can be attributed to artificial output. The Gore Crusade is a political move and nothing else. The United States is the greatest and most voluminous polluter, as it has been for over a century now, but China was the one targeted as the "cause for the increase." This is a specifically political campaign.

[DominO123]

Precisely. And it is not at all determined precisely what percentage can be attributed to artificial output. The Gore Crusade is a political move and nothing else. The United States is the greatest and most voluminous polluter, as it has been for over a century now, but China was the one targeted as the "cause for the increase." This is a specifically political campaign.

 

We know it is considerable, because when isolating the non-natural parametter we can still draw a regression curve with a very significant correlation. The causality is there and the large body of collected data in the last two years have probably dismissed most of the serious skepticism that human activity plays an important part.

 

I think that it is better to act now on China, because if nothing is done they will become more dependent of oil and later it will be more difficult to take actions. I agree though, that the US is the last to talk about polution when they have sabotaged every serious plan to fight global warmig.

[hagopn]

We know it is considerable, because when isolating the non-natural parametter we can still draw a regression curve with a very significant correlation. The causality is there and the large body of collected data in the last two years have probably dismissed most of the serious skepticism that human activity plays an important part.

 

I think that it is better to act now on China, because if nothing is done they will become more dependent of oil and later it will be more difficult to take actions. I agree though, that the US is the last to talk about polution when they have sabotaged every serious plan to fight global warmig.

 

Yes, that is a hell of a good point. Consider it that the US was beginning to make all this noise during the Iraq War that managed to pour CO2 tonnage that made inudstrial output pale in comparison. China is not even 1/4 the way there, but we are listening to Al Gore making noise without looking at his own backyard.

 

There is no energy efficient mass transport to speak of in a large metropolis like Los Angeles because of the 1930's scandal involving a CONSPIRACY between GM, Goodyear, and Chevron. All the mass transport apparatus were taken down, ripped down, and the freeway system was introduced as a consquence. Hardly anything has been done to rectify that situation in the Los Angeles basin with its estamited 21,000,000 plus vehicles, which is more than all of China.

 

The greatest polluter in this region is the traffic, yet we look at China, who is seriously looking at using mass transport as subsidy, who during the communist regime was extremely conscious of this issue, who mandated usage of bicycles for intra city commutes, who even in today's period of advancement and growth is seriously looking at energy efficiency and superconduction alternatives such as the only production Maglev transport from the Shanghai airport to the city center. Europe, with its population of around 450 million excluding the CSU, produces less than half the CO output of the US.

 

A Chinese scientist at the Universtity of Houston proposed research and pioneered in this field with some of the prototypes of Yttrium based ceramic superconductor technology, but his ideas are not getting the support. This is all due to politics. It is a matter of control of strategic assets. Superconduction is here and it exists. I know, because I have seen it applied in the military. They would rather see more pollution until they are poised to control the alternative forms of energy production and usage.

 

 

[hagopn]

We know it is considerable, because when isolating the non-natural parametter we can still draw a regression curve with a very significant correlation. The causality is there and the large body of collected data in the last two years have probably dismissed most of the serious skepticism that human activity plays an important part.

 

I think that it is better to act now on China, because if nothing is done they will become more dependent of oil and later it will be more difficult to take actions. I agree though, that the US is the last to talk about polution when they have sabotaged every serious plan to fight global warmig.

 

Also, ironically, the studies that dismiss the effects of industrial and transportation output are mostly US based. There is nothing conclusive, as there is really no consensus. Common sense, though, would dictate that dumping tons and tons of material will have consquences, even if not immediately measurable.

 

I think China is beintg unfairly blocked when even Japan and Korea are higher polluters per capita. As I mentioned in my other post, China's self-control and self-regulation in this regard is on record. China does not like reliance and imperialist control as the Anglo-Americans have accustomed themselves to.

 

Although China is now beginning to show signs of relying on oil imports such as the exemplified in Venezuela and Ethiopia, China is not subject to industrial blockage, which brings to the table again the purely political intent of addressing global warming as a "crisis issue" all of the sudden when China is making its ascendency as an economic power.