Byzantine Armenia

[gamavor]

 

Byzantine Armenia, 387-536 Byzantine Armenia is the name given to the Armenian part of the Byzantine Empire. The size of the territory varied over time, depending on the degree of control the Byzantines had over Armenia.

 

The Byzantine and Sassanid Empires divided Armenia in 387 and in 428. Western Armenia fell under Byzantine rule, and Eastern Armenia fell under Sassanid control. Even after the establishment of the Bagratid Armenian Kingdom, parts of historic Armenia and Armenian-inhabited areas were still under Byzantine rule.

 

The Armenians had no representation in the Ecumenial Council of Chalcedon in 451, because they were struggling against the Sassanids in an armed rebellion. For that reason, there appeared a theological drift between Armenian and Byzantine Christianity. [1]

 

Regardless, many Armenians became successful in the Byzantine Empire. The Macedonian dynasty of Byzantine emperors, starting with Basil I, were at least part-Armenian. [2] There were also some Armenian generals who served the Byzantine army.

 

 

Armenian Soldiers of the Byzantine Army

Armenia made great contributions to Byzantium through its troops of soldiers. The empire was in need of a good army as it was constantly being threatened. The army was relatively small never exceeding 150,000 men. The military was sent to different parts of the empire, and which took part in the most fierce battles and never exceeded 20,000 or 30,000. men.

 

“Basil II the Armenian infantry soldiers rescued his life, by creating a circle around him and escorting him, safe and sound, to the city of Philippopoli.” [3]

 

From the 5th century forwards the Armenians were regarded as the main constituent of the Byzantine army. Procopius recounts that the “Scholarii”, the palace guards of the emperor “were selected from amongst the bravest Armenians”.

 

 

 

Armenian soldiers in the Byzantine army are cited during the following centuries, especially during the 9th and the 10th centuries, which might have been the period of greatest participation of the Armenians in the Byzantine army. Byzantine and Arab historians are unanimous in recognizing significance of the Armenians soldiers. Charles Diehl, for instance, writes: “The Armenian units, particularly during this period, were numerous and well trained.” [4] Another Byzantine historian praises the decisive role which the Armenian infantry played in the victories of the Byzantine emperors Nicephorus Phocas and John Tzimiskes. [5]

 

At that time the Armenians served side by side with the Scandinavians who were in the Byzantine army. This first encounter between the Armenian mountain-dwellers and the northern people has been discussed by Nansen, who brings these two elements closer to each other and records: “It was the Armenians who together with our Scandinavian forefathers made up the assault units of Byzantine.” [6] Moreover, Bussel underlines the similarities in the way of thinking and the spirit of the Armenian feudal lords and the northern warriors. He claims that, in both groups, there was a strange absence and ignorance of government and public interest and at the same time an equally large interest in achieving personal distinctions and a loyalty towards their masters and leaders. [7] -

 

Armenian Emperors of Byzantium

The partition of the Roman Empire between the two sons of the Emperor Theodosius was soon followed by a predominance of foreign elements in the court of Byzantium, the eastern half of the divided world. The proximity of this capital of the East to Armenia attracted to the shores of the Bosporus a great number of Armenians, and for three centuries they played a distinguished part in the history of the Eastern Empire.[8]

 

 

References

^ http://www.metmuseum.org/explore/Byzantium/byz_6.html#4

^ http://www.metmuseum.org/explore/Byzantium/time.html

^ Guérin Sonegeon, Histoire de la Bulgarie, paris, 1913, p. 203

^ C. Diehl, The Cambridge Medieval History, vol. IV; See also Schlumberger, Un Emperor byzantin au X si�cle, Paris, 1890, p. 83 and 350

^ F. W. Bussel, Essays on the Constitutional History of the Roman Empire, London, 1910, vol. II, p. 234

^ F. Nansen, Gjennem Armenia, Oslo, 1927, p. 21; See also Pawlikowski-Cholwa, Heer und V�lkerschicksal, M�nchen, 1936, p. 117

^ F. W. Bussel, Essays on the Constitutional History of the Roman Empire, London, 1910, vol. II, p. 448

^ Vahan Kurkjian - Armenians Outside of Armenia

Byzantium and the early Islamic conquests By Walter E. Kaegi

 

 

 

http://www.answers.com/topic/byzantine-armenia

 

[neko]

 

The Armenians had no representation in the Ecumenial Council of Chalcedon in 451, because they were struggling against the Sassanids in an armed rebellion. For that reason, there appeared a theological drift between Armenian and Byzantine Christianity. [1]

 

This is no longer believed to be true by many people. It is now thought that the Armenian Church just used it as an excuse not to attend because it knew that collective decisions would be made there that the Church would disagree with. If the Armenian Church had attended, it would have had to have enforced those decisions in Armenia.

[hosank]

yes, many emperors were armenian...the friendship between armenians and greeks goes far.