So their fist and only exposure to "Armenians" is a bunch of terrorists? Is that a good way to portray Armenia to the world? Sorry but in the court of public opinion, Armenians had a very low standing in those years.... You may be too young to remember, but I do. And Armenian Canadians were downright ashamed - how could you not be, when the only association some Canadians had with Armenians was the word "Terrorist" ?
There is always another way. I don't think Armenians have (or had at that time) reached a level of desparation necessary to commit the types of actions the group in question resorted to. It's like they had "Nothing to lose", when in fact, they had plenty to lose and sadly, they did lose.
This statement is outrageous!
How could you even think that the Canadian Parliament ceded to terrorists demands?? Where are the terrorists? What were they demanding? Would anyone "cede" to demands made a quarter of a century ago?? Your are complete disregarding the tireless efforts of countless Armenians who volunteer their time to achieve genocide recognition. You discount them all - whether it's through Hye Tad, student associations, political lobby groups, the ANCC etc., not to mention those who research genocide issues, write articles and raise the profile of forgotten genocide. Your statement above implies that these efforts have been worthless, while a "few gunshots" coerced the Canadian gov't to acknowledge the genocide. My oh my.... Dave, I'm sorry but you're WAY off-base on this one.