daos

sam te sho te skazal.

accely its not crap its common since how can armenians be pure indo european when they are not fair like the original indo europeans were???and how come half of the so called indo europeans are not fair??hmm can thise be posible that a advanced people came and mixed with the aboriginal population and since they were the rulling class.the original people in that region were forced to speak that languge???hmm yes i think i heard most of the anthropoligits and histoirans ay thise tha means if ur nation speaks an indo european languge but has many non indo european words it means that ur people are not indo european and it means if a nation consits of mostly swarthy people differing from the original indo europeans who were fair hmm i think that means that ur people are not fully indo european hmm ye that makes since because never has a human evolved in only 5000 years or even at all.

lol

whatever i can see that u got ur information mostly the internet rather then archiological fields of studies.so im not gona argue with u u can thin what u want but i want to ask u what exacly are u saying =)>

if armenians were the so called true indo europeans why then are they related to peopel who are all dark skinned dark haired and dark eyed.hmm i never heard anyone say that the original indo europeans were dark i ojnly heard that the original indo europeans were fair meanign white.so in thise case they must have been the rullin class of those people the languge is indo european but the people are not???

no my friend maby it is u that shoudl change the institution.becuase u base ur facts on how u fell rahter then on scientific finds. the scientist have siad that armenoids are related to pamirs but NOT THE SAME PEOPLE becuase armenians have there own history.u proved me a link of non sence the guy just posted his theory rahter then a educatinal account of what he has said.simmilar artifacts have been foudn all over near east and middle east so now we have to propose that those peopel where indo europeans once to?

and im not going to stop sayign whats true becuase im afraid of getting banned becuase i bet all of the people here are light skinned people who are from armenia and can not get past of the fact that ur not armenian >.<

thise guy is a armenoid =) lol liekt hat changes anything.http://med1nuc11.dfc.unifi.it/linnets/troe/images/p42f1.jpg

umm and if he is a real armenoid what thas that prove?becuase he probably is.but i dotn see ur point

umm adyghes are not kamlik???what are u talkng about circassians are kamlik??

and armenians dint originate in armenia they originated south in turkey and parts of syria.what about the cimmirians???they where and acient civilization of white europeans in the north cacusus they where driven out of there land by the scythians.and moved south wich cordinates of the white euorpean invasion.trust me i khow more then u about thise subject as i ahve studied it for 5 years.

ethicity is almost the same thing as racial type becuase most people in a ethincity would ahve same racial type.what do u eman there are no anceitn civilizations in the cacusus what about the adyghe,circassians.they are counted as aboriginals of cacusus.and jsut because they found some artifact of an acine tcivilization that they want to pin on armenians osent make it true.real armenians are decendent of hitties mittanis,phrygians and they are in the same branch as the kurds it has always been taught of like thise.then the iranians tribes invaded kurdistan and kurds learned iranian.how do u nkow that thise people could not have intermigled with the armenians.and no one said that armenains originated in the pamir they jsut have a slightly same look as those people if u look at the facial feutures so they must be RELATED...they all originated in asia minor form iran to iraq to armenia that is where those ancient people lived as found by the artifacts and each of there tribes had a uniqe culture differing form the others.and second persian is also a indo european languge =) sirry to ruin ur parade.

lol why is it when u prove somethign and the other person has no educational answere he resorts to insults maby becuase of stupidity??what im saying is that armenians are armenoid ARMENOIDS ARE TAUGHT AS BROWN PEOPLE because all the people the armenoids are related to have black hair dark eyes and tannish skin.that is what i am saying.

oops.... scroll down to the last ones or go to home and go to faces o men from asia minor.

the so called indo europeans were the cimmerians who invaded phrygia and also invaded most of the cacasus and invaded atleast half of thracia and most of the anotolian plains those were the people who were killing the natives of those lands. armenian languge has many non indo european words but no one focusus on those.armenians and all people related to them should look like thise http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=htt...l%3Den%26sa%3DN http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=htt...l%3Den%26sa%3DN

the real armenians are swarthy .as were the phrygians as were the mittanis as were hitties.thracians never starded off in europe they lived in asia minor with the early hittie people who did not yet develope an empire they lived side by side they were south ARMENOID by race so that mean they were all swarthy and not white they were brown by color if u wana jujge now. thracians remains shows hight consetrations of millinia in upper derma from thise scientists nkow that they mostly had BLACK HAIR,DARK BROWN EYES,AND TANNISH BROWN SKIN.and they also had narrow slits for eyes differing from the europeans."DIFFERING FROM THE EUROPEANS" meaning they were not white.but they had a NEAR EASTERN look as many armenians have today.armenains were never white they just have hwite people living in there county due to the admixture of people from north of the cacasus. ... thracian murals all showing them as a near eastern lookign people. http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp...rovo_kurgan.jpg http://www.ancient-bulgaria.com/images/Thr...n_something.jpg http://archeologia.bourgas.org/en/images/aleksandrovo.jpg http://www.ancient-bulgaria.com/images/Thr...man_on_hunt.jpg ... so before u start saying that thracians were some EUROPEAN RACE WICH THEY WERE NOT U SHOULD REALLY LOOK OVER THE MAJORITY OF FACTS.as for phrygians they were not one people and they were probalby not related to thracians they might of had a thracian tribe living amogst them like binthinians but they were not the same people they were a mix of diffrent cultures and races just as todays armenians are.