Arine

I've never read it, but i heard from my friend that the line that say's "you're a slave, theif and....." is said by some Muslim. The muslim adn the ARmenian are having some kind of an argument, so teh Muslims says that stuff to that ARmenian.

Where i wrote " I can't stop thinking about your" I mean to say i can't stop thinking about Langosh and what's the name of that one dish with chicken and i think cheese on teh top???? I loved it.

Hi Traveller, I used to live in Hungary for a long time. I stayed in Balatonfured, around Lake Balaton. It was a very nice place, full of tourists. I also love Budapest, i think it's a very beautiful country. I think I missed Hungarian food more than Hungary itself, since your food is very delicious and I like to eat a lot. I can't stop thinking about. I also had many hungarian friends there. By the way, I used to speak Hungarian, or I should I say Modiour really good, but I forgot it unfortunatelly. My father had many hungarian friend who visited Armenia few times, and they said that they liked the country a lot, so I hope you like it too. I'm planning to visit Hungary again in the future.

I'm sure that Freddy Mercury had some ARmenian blood in him then, cause he can't be a Turk and be so talented. That's genetically impossible.

MJ, Es Stalini special agentnei shat erkar vaxt, heto vro tesa Hayastan@ kaurukand arets, iranits heratsa, chnaiats hetevits ira mardikein engel tarinerov, but i eventually escaped to US, where I live now . Erevi daia patchar@ vor chandipetsink. What years did u work for him? How old are you by the way? I'm 18, don't think that I'm trying to hit on you by asking your age. Just curious.

MJ, I knew Stalin personally too and I do remember him doing such a bad thing.

Temaits dursei sorry

I live in a place that's 99.9% American (white), so when american men say stuff like "I didnt' think that Armenian women were so beautiful " or some men telling me about theri girlfriends in high school who were beautiful, i do feel good that they think that ARmenian girls are beautiful. When I was about 17 years old a 40 year old would always come to my workplace and asked me out (he had a 7 year old) and he always told me that he wants an ARmenian girlfriend. The guy was Iraqi. he even told me that i looks like some actress, i think he said Uma Truman, but i don't look anything like her. It's nice that others see the good side of the ARmenians, not that we have any bad sides.

In the last sentence i meant to say shouldn't .

I remember the House passing the bill and Clinton rejecting it. So the next time when ANCA presents the bill to the president of the US (whoever it will be), the bill has to go only through the president right? I mean the president is the final stage for the recognition, if, of course, he signs the bill. Am I correct or not. In my opinion ANCA didn't do the right thing by trying to make Clinton recognize it at the last minute, cause it was Clinton's 2nd term and he wasn't going to run again, so that means that he didn't need any votes. ANCA should introduce the bill to BUsh at the end of his 1st term, cause he's running for the 2nd term. If he doesn't sign it then we should even be voting for him.

As a Turk, he should be worried about his country's problems. Whoever's a** we kiss it's our own problem. He forgot to mention how they lick America's a** along with Israel's and at least in RAmenia the minorities don't get killed cause they're not ARmenian. Of course he's going to say that we should forget about the past, he's a Turk. I would ignore such comments, he can shove it up his stinky Turkish a**.

It was Stalin who divided ARmenia into 3 parts ok not Azeris. Read history. Azeri politicians are no better than ARmenian ones. They both suck. If Azeri politicians were better than ARmenian politicans, then you wouldn't meet any Azeris in Moscow. Read the news.

My dad's boss is a Persian and he always tells my dad how repectable and hard working people ARmenians are in Iran. He said that his father's factroies stayed in business because of the Armenian engeneers. My dad gets alot of compliments for being ARmenian. There were many times that I heard American men telling me that when they were young they were in love with ARmenian girls from their high schools and that they were very beautiful and smart. The last guy that i met told me the same but he thought that ARmenians are Middle Eastern people and that we speak ARabic. Where I live there are a lot of Persians and some Arabs so in my college many of Persian and Arab guys always come up and start talking to me, after they find out that I'm Armenian they are like "oh really? wow" , but then they start wanting to date me, i don't know why. I can't even count how many times the same thing happenes. Everytime someone finds out my last name, they always know that I'm ARmenian "which is great cuase then they say stuff like "I didn't know that Armenian girls are so beautiful" I hate it when people come up to me and say stuff like "Didn't the Turks kill you"? or "You don't get along with each other right?" I noticed that most of the time people know about the Genocide, well at least they know that Turks killed Armenians.

In my opinion The House of Commons will recognize it too. IF they were totally against the recognition, I'm sure that Senate wouldn not have recognized it. I know that they're different brances of government, but still I think that if their government was against such recognition they wouldn't pass it. Am I correct? ANyone with me on this one?

Great news! I was just wondering if this is the final recognition of the gencoide by Canada? Does this mena thta the Canadian government is fully recognizing the Genocide?

They're animals not humans. All they're capable of is destroying what is not their's & killing others. A Turk is always a Turk. Even living around civilized nations doesn't change them a bit. I guess barbaric behavior is in their genes.

www.turkishforum.com "The great Turk is governing in peace twenty nations from different religions. Turks have taught to Christians how to be moderate in peace and gentle in victory."Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary QUESTION l. WAS EASTERN ANATOLIA THE ORIGINAL HOMELAND OF THE ARMENIANS? Even Armenian historians disagree on this question. Let us examine some of their contradictory theories while looking into Anatolian history. The Biblical Noah Theory. According to this idea, the Armenians descended from Hayk, great-great grandson of the Biblical patriarch Noah. Since Noah's Arc is supposed to have come to rest on Mount Ararat, the advocates of this idea conclude that eastern Anatolia must have been the original Armenian homeland, adding that Hayk lived some four hundred years and expanded his dominion as far as Babylon. This claim is based entirely on fables, not on any scientific evidence, and is not worthy of further consideration. The historian Auguste Carrière summarily dismisses it stating that "it depends entirely on information provided by some Armenian historians, most of which was made up." (1) The Urartu Theory. Some Armenians claim that they were the people of Urartu, which existed in eastern Anatolia starting about 3000 B.C. until it was defeated and destroyed by the Medes, with its territory being contested for some time by Lydia and the Medes until it finally fell under the influence of the latter. This claim has no basis in fact. No form of the name Armenian is found in any inscription in Anatolia dating from that period, nor was there any similarity at all between the Armenian language and that of Urartu, the former being a member of the Satem group of Indo European languages, while the latter was similar to the Ural-Altaic languages. Nor were there any similarities between their cultures. The most recent archaeological finds in the area of Erzurum support these conclusions very clearly. There is, therefore, absolutely no evidence at all to support the claim that the people of Urartu were Armenian. The Thracian-Phrygian Theory. The theory most favored by Armenian historians claims that they descended from a Thracian-Phrygian group, that originated in the Balkan Peninsula and by the pressure of Illyrians migrated to eastern Anatolia in the sixth century B.C. This theory is based on the fact that the name Armenian was mentioned for the first time in the Behistan inscription of the Mede (Persian) Emperor Darius from the year 521 B.C., "I defeated the Armenians." If accepted, of course, this view effectively contradicts and disproves the Noah and Urartu theories. The Southern Caucasus Theory. This idea claims that the Armenians are related racially and culturally to the peoples of the Southern Caucasus and that, therefore, they originated there. It is, however, supported only by the fact that Darius defeated the Armenians in the Caucasus. The Armenians are in no way related to any of the Caucasian races. The Turanian Theory. Some Armenians have adduced similarities of certain elements of the Armenian language and culture with those of some Turkish and Azeri tribes of the Caucasus to document a relationship, but this remains to be proved. Whichever, if any, of these theories is correct, it is very certain that the Armenians did not originate in Anatolia, nor did they live there for three to four thousand years, as claimed. They have put forward these ideas merely to support their claims that the Turks drove them out of a homeland in which they have lived for thousands of years, but they can not stand up to the facts.

Meskhetian Turks' struggle for repatriation in Georgia Turkish News April 10, 2002 Acknowledging that the return and repatriation of Ahýska Turks proceeds too slowly, Georgia blames the matter, to a large extent, on economic impasse, refugee flows originated from wars in Abhazia and South Ossetia and the absence of vacant land in the region. However, it is known that more than one third of all villages Ahýska Turks left behind are vacant, and 70 percent of their agricultural land isn't being used MAHMUT NÝYAZÝ SEZGÝN From the time they were deported from Georgia in 1944, Meskhetian (Ahýska) Turks have been subject to unjust legal and social practices, ethnic discrimination and violence the parts of the Caucasus and Central Asia where they settled. Attacks and pressures that recently have been mounting on Ahýska Turks in Krasnodar, a Russian province, have drawn world attention to this 60-year-old human tragedy. Mahmut Niyazi Sezgin of the Ankara-based Center for Eurasian Strategic Studies (ASAM) takes a look at the historical origins of the Ahýska Turks' grievances to shed light on their current demands for return to their homeland in Georgia. he problems that emerged with mass deportations of the Turkish community dwelling in the Ahýska (Meskheti) region of southern Georgia in 1944 constitute the issue of Meskhetian Turks. The region attracted Turkish settlement well before massive immigrations of Muslim Turkish tribes which began in the 10th Century. In the 16th Century, the region was annexed to the Ottoman Turkish lands under the Province of Çýldýr. After 250 years under Ottoman administration, Ahýska region became a natural demographic and cultural continuation of the Anatolian mainland. In 1828, the Russian army occupied Ahýska and after the Edirne Treaty in 1829, Russia took over the region from the Turkish Empire. The Turkish population constituted a majority in the region until Russian annexation, and lost the majority as a result of the Russian policy of establishing a buffer zone between Turkey and the Turks of Caucasia and Central Asia by means of settling a pro-Russia Christian Armenian community in the region. The Moscow Treaty abandoned Ahýska to the Soviet administration in 1921, however, unlike other communities in the Caucasus, Ahýska Turks were not granted the right of autonomy. Perhaps that is why the mass deportation of Ahýska Turks in 1944 did not draw as much attention around the world as the problems of those communities did. Also unlike other communities deported by the Soviet regime, who were accused of collaboration with the German army and high treason, Ahýska Turks (some 150,000 people) were exiled to Central Asian Soviet republics (mainly to Uzbekistan) without any reason. Ahýska Turks were deported under inhuman conditions. Thousands of them (about 17,000) died of hunger, cold and unsanitary conditions en route. Their property was confiscated during deportation, and restitution was never made for their losses. Council of Europe and repatriation efforts When Georgia was accepted as the 41st member of the Council of Europe in 1999, it agreed to fulfil a number of commitments within specific time frames. Among them was 'adopting within two years a law permitting repatriation and integration (including the right to Georgian nationality) of the Meskhetian population deported by the Soviet regime, to begin implementation of this law within three years and complete repatriation of the Meskhetian population within twelve years.' More than three years has passed since the decision, however, and no preliminary effort or draft laws are in progress in Georgia. Her attitude toward her commitment was criticized several times in the Council's reports. Now, three years after the decision, Ahýska Turks are expecting Georgia to fulfil its commitment so they can go back to their fatherland. Acknowledging that the return and repatriation of Ahýska Turks proceeds too slowly, Georgia blames its lack of progress, to a large extent, on economic impasse, refugee flows from wars in Abhazia and South Ossetia, and absence of vacant land in the region. It is known, however, that more than one-third of all villages Ahýska Turks left behind are vacant, and 70 percent of their agricultural land is idle. On the other hand, a number of intellectuals in Georgia allege that Ahýska Turks are in fact Islamised Georgians, and they demand that it be obligatory for those Ahýska Turks who want to return to Georgia to take a Georgian surname in order to be a Georgian citizen. For that reason, there have been some evaluations claiming that, 'Not desiring to recognize the ethnic identity of Ahýska Turks and deeming the return of them as a heavy burden on herself, Georgia strives to keep the problem unsolved in order to weary Ahýska Turks to the extent that they opt not to return to Georgia. That would serve to create the impression that Georgia keeps its promises before the Council of Europe and alleviate the pressure that international community exerts on it about this issue, without really having to do anything about it.' Recent Developments Ahýska Turks' struggle for repatriation and the related discussions have intensified on several fronts in recent months. The statements of some Georgian officials since November 2001, for example, imply that Georgia is not willing to prepare the legal framework which would enable Ahýska Turks to return to Georgia, or to repatriate and integrate (including the right to nationality) into Georgian society. With these statements they mean that a resettlement of Ahýska Turks in their homeland, Georgia, is impossible at least for the moment. Instead, by emphasizing that the living conditions within the countries they currently dwell (Azerbaijan, Russian Federation, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine) have been developing, Georgia seems as if it wants to avoid implementing its promises of repatriation. Some Georgian officials say that the relevant legislation may be realized in 2005-2006 at best. Georgian Parliament Speaker Nino Burjanadze has said several times and on different occasions that any solutions to the problem may be found in 12-14 years. It seems that the Council's mandate that Georgia solve the problem of repatriation of Ahýska Turks within 12 years has been perceived by some Georgian officials as an excuse to postpone action for 12 years. Expressing in one of her statements that Georgia will solve this problem in its own way, even at the cost of being excluded from Council membership, Burjanadze could have, at the same time, challenged the Council. This attitude disappointed both Ahýska Turks and also Georgians who support their repatriation. On the other hand, there is great curiosity about what the Council's sanction will be against a member state or irresponsible officials of such a state who do not keep their promises and clearly say that they will not, within the binding time limits. Another important factor affecting the problem's resolution is the attitude of the Armenian minority dwelling in the Ahýska (Javakheti) region. Armenians constitute a majority the in the region and Georgia's de facto control there seems vulnerable. The Armenian community even possesses certain amount of armed manpower. This Armenian minority strictly opposes the resettlement of Ahýska Turks in the region, and they have threatened to secede from Georgia and unite with Armenia if it takes place. Worrying that Javakheti will be Georgia's 'Artsax,' Georgian authorities take remarkable care to refrain from any development which might annoy this Armenian minority in an effort to curb the separatist potential of the region. According to a contradicting point of view stated a few weeks ago by the deputy chairman of a leading Armenian organization in the region, Georgia, in order to impede the repatriation of Ahýska Turks, utilizes the Armenian minority by portraying them as being opposed to repatriation. In March, Burjanadze visited Javakheti to talk about integration of the region and national unity, two things that have gained momentum in the last months. During this visit Burjanadze, when asked about the 'so-called Armenian genocide,' said, 'I hope that the Turkish nation has enough courage to recognize her tragic past.' By using such unfortunate words, Burjanadze probably tried to look sympathetic to the ultra-nationalist Armenians at the cost of upsetting Georgia's ally. On the other hand, an unfounded statement made by OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities encouraged circles that are trying to obstruct resolution of the problem by asserting that repatriation could increase tension in the region. After Sept. 11, and the advent of the United States' new Caucasian policies, the balance of the region was considerably alt red. American military advisers began to train the Georgian army and U.S. troops are in the region. On March 19, Turkish-Georgian joint military exercises were held in Javakheti. Just before these joint exercises, the Armenian media initiated a comprehensive campaign that said Turkey might use the opportunity to destabalize the region. 'The Turkish intelligence service will attempt a serious provocation in the region, to create a Georgian-Armenian clash. They'll do this by generating hostility between Georgia and Armenia and use the turbulent environment as an opportunity. Turkey would intervene in Javakheti as a matter of international responsibility.' Again according to those allegations, Armenians would have to leave Javakheti in 2003 for good, and Ahýska Turks would be settled in the region that is under de facto Turkish domination. Fueling these allegations are the decision of the Council of Europe, the time constraints put on Georgia, and the emergence of Turkey-Azerbaijan-Georgia solidarity. All these things are having a dissuasive effect in the Caucasus region. Add to that the beginning of more friendly relations between Russia and Azerbaijan after the treaty on the GABALA RLS Base and the loss of Armenia as a military base for Russian troops after American penetration into the region, and they might cause Armenians to support such speculative allegations. In some places that Ahýska Turks settled after deportation, their basic human rights are harshly violated. The most striking example is Krasnodar, a southern Russian province dominated by neo-communist political leaders, from which Ahýska Turks since 1998 have been pressured to depart. Authorities in Krasnodar have engaged in administrative manipulation, as well as outright intimidation in an effort to expel Ahýska Turks from the region. Major instruments of repression used by local authorities in Krasnodar have been ultra-nationalist Cossack groups who engage in organized thuggery. Local Ahýska Turks report that night time 'visits' are a common occurrence. During such visits Cossacks act with impunity, engage in robbery and vandalism. Ahýska Turks are meanwhile largely helpless to defend themselves, knowing that the aggressions against them will go unpunished. Local authorities support this ethnic cleansing. They don't demonstrate much respect for the rule of law, particularly their human rights obligations. Beside these, other economic and social tools are also employed against Ahýska Turks, such as discriminatory taxation and media or propaganda 'sieges.' Nowadays, local authorities in Krasnodar plan to deport Ahýska Turks en masse to Central Asia. To sum up: Unjust legal and social practices, ethnic discrimination and violence that Ahýska Turks have confronted since the deportations in 1944 have made it an immediate necessity, from the human rights perspective, to resettle them in their historical homeland in Georgia. Given that Ahýska Turks are, 'like communities under collective house arrest,' in Krasnodar, urgent steps are needed to facilitate the humane management of repatriation to Georgia. International institutions must be, without delay, set into motion. First of all Georgia, in accordance with her international liabilities, should prepare the required legal framework and convenient domestic social environment for repatriation. To speed up efforts within the legal framework of Council of Europe, by reinforcing Turkish-Georgian strategic alliance in the Caucasus, Georgia needs to demonstrate vitality in order to overcome this 60-year old human rights violation. The country especially needs to respect the timeframe for the repatriation process. It is very crucial for the implementation of the whole project. When the latest statements of Armenian organizations in Javakheti, which welcomes the repatriation of Ahýska Turks, are taken into consideration, it appears that repatriation will not just rehabilitate an unjustly treated community, but will also contribute to the long-desired peace and stability in the Caucasus. In recent times, as the United States' role in the Caucasus gradually has increased, the efforts to resolve Ahýska Turks' repatriation problem also has intensified. The problem's resolution is awaited with excitement and enthusiasm by Ahýska Turks who are anxious to be home again.

Sorry I didn't think that there was a Turk in here.

MJ, I agree with you that there are some things in this article that are true, especially the fact that ASALA had some connections with Islamic organizations, but you have to agree that the whole artcile is full of bull**** & a propoganda. They just don't like the idea that Armenians want an authonomy in southern Georgia. Some of them even think that we'll succeed in breaking away Javax from Georgia, as we did in Karabax even thought we went to war with them for 4 years. They also hate the fact that there's a lot of Armenian support of the Abkhazians in Georgia, after all there were ARmenians fighting the Georgians in the Abkhazian region. There's a russian joke about the georgians Vopros: Kto samaia tupaia natsia na Kavkaze? Gruzin vstaiot i govarit "Zato u nas vino lutshoe" ES anegdot@ arden Vratsineri intelectual astichan@ chuitsa talis.

Just because he's ancestors were from Persia doesn't make him Azeri. If he is Azeri then he's a Turk, since there was no "Azeri" nation before 1918. They are just as dumb as the Turks. During the Soviet Union Russians, Ukrainians & ARmenians were the only people active in science, arts, literature. I'm not saying that others didn't do anything but those 3 were the smartest. & don't forget that Armenia had the 3rd best Academy of Sciences in the whole Soviet Union, after Russia then Ukraine. sorry for my grammar mistakes guys I'm in a hurry.

MJ, I can assure you that i'm not the writer of the article.

Georgians are nothing but porstitutes. They sold us every time they knew that they'll get something out of it. As much as I hate Turks, I have to say that Georgians are worse than the Turks. They are 5 faced bastards. But I think that sooner or later Georgia will be divided. Abkhazia recieved its authonomy about 3 or 4 months ago by the help of the Russians. At the same time Armenians in Javax were also rasing the question of their authonomy. Ossetians are considered to be the most violent people in that region and they always kicked Georgians a**** really bad everytime a conflict rose between them. In the beggining of the 20th century, Georgians were running away from the Turkish swords, and now they are inviting Turkish soldiers (NATO) to set up a military bases near Javax to control an airoport, knowing that it will impose a threat to the ARmenians living in that region. Once,I heard a Georgian guy saying that Sayat-Nova was 100% Georgians. He also got pissed off when I told him that Armenians built Tbilisi & Baku.

Georgian Times June 6 2002 Islamic flavor of Armenian terrorism By Giorgi Kapanadze, GT, Tbilisi The article published in GT on Armenian terrorism caused unrelenting repercussions. We received calls from Yerevan, Baku, and European countries and their diplomatic missions. We did "enjoy" warning e-mails too. One of the incognito senders who wrote just a 5-worded letter even threatened indirectly to give up publicizing the materials. We want to make it clear that all documents either published or bound to be published are provided through various reliable sources. Naturally, we can present Georgian version of all of them if necessary. We are also inviting Armenian officials to present their arguments and express their opinions. Islamic flavor of Armenian terrorism According to the data available to the GT, Armenian terrorists and terrorist networks have broad and, most importantly, business connections with the Islamic countries such as Iran, Afghanistan, Libya and Iraq. Among the secret materials of the Georgian special services, as our source informs, there is a scandalous document, according to which, Armenian organizations may be connected with the number one world terrorist, Osama Bin Laden. Moreover, after the September 11 events, the US government draws a particular attention to the US residents of Armenian origin. This shows that the US agencies consider it important to hold information about their activities. According to the official data, the total number of Americans of Armenian origin does not exceed 2 millions. Though, there are other sources that inflate this figure as high as 8m. Armenian communities are around the world today. Majority of them avoid staying in Armenia and are scattered in various corners of the world raising potential of Armenian terrorism. The statistics show that Armenian radical organizations committed more than 40 major terrorist crimes. They support Iranian, Irish and Palestinian terrorists. Armenian radical organizations such as "Armenian Clandestine Army", "Union for Armenians' Freedom" and others alike were connected with Abdula Ojalan, the Kurdish terrorist, and Kurdish radical party. Below we provide a comment made by a representative of a law-enforcement body who preferred to remain undisclosed. Although, this factor is not much of a substance for the GT's argumentation, it still appears significant enough: "Armenian terrorism roots go back to 20 -30s of the last century. It underwent various stages of development, political conjunctures, and world scale political developments. Armenian radical organizations has been operatin during the Soviet times. But by then a threat of Armenian terrorism was not so striking as it is now. Of course it does not mean that Caucasian terrorists are only of Armenian origin. Georgians also did have semi-terrorist and radical organizations at some time in the country's history. However, Georgian radicals posed only insignificant threat to communists and, if any, to civilians. Radicals were and currently are in Azerbaijan too. We hold information that there are few underground terrorists organizations in Baku. >From ethnic point if view Azeri may have some terrorist organizations in Georgia too since a lot of Azeri reside in Georgia. Moreover, there are a few regions in Georgia fully populated only by Azeri people. Then again there are villages along the southern border of Georgia where Armenians, too, are residing. Anti-Georgian policy propaganda is most intensive in these very regions, manifested through fighting to "regain these Armenian lands".There are demands of autonomous status and some other claims that completely contradict Georgian state and national interests. Therefore, my opinion is that the Georgian government has to introduce a special policy on activities of law-enforcement agencies such as Security, Frontier Defense, Intelligence, Internal Ministry and Prosecutor's Office. Although functions of the last is limited to investigation, having no scope for obtaining information. What do we need? We need fortification of borders. The fact that Armenians and Azeri are on the worst terms with each other at present, has a negative influence on Georgia too. Especially when Islamic countries, among them Iran and Lebanon supply Armenian radicals. Armenia has a good relationships with the former and slightly official with the latter". Extract from the document obtained by the GT from the intelligence: "majority of Armenian terrorist organizations are against a new railway line crossing Akhalkalaki territory. "Phedains", the paramilitary organization with their fighters deployed mainly in settlements of Bodovka, Orlovka, Pasophnis, and Sameba regions are fully controlled by Dashnaktsutun party. It was their order that Phedains physically assualted Sergo Darbinian, Mayor of Akhalkalaki, known for his pro-Georgian orientation. All mentioned organizations rely on regional structures of Russian military forces, namely the 62nd military base which is out of the official Tbilisi control. Recently, several explosions were made by them, aimed at destabilizing the region. Investigation materials related to Khatkovski case and the 1994 explosion of metro station in Baku are sound proof of the role of Armenian military forces in terrorist actions in Azerbaijan. The investigation concluded that the explosives were set off by Sadgala activists following the order from Armenian Security Services. In 1992, for the purpose of perpetrative terrorist acts, Armenian special services contacted the leader of Lezgian movement Sadgala. In 1994, they exploded Baku metro station killing 14 and severely injuring 42. The investigation found out that terrorists were trained and instructed by the members of special services and Armenians residing in various countries of the world. In 1993, Azerbaijani special services detained Russian citizen Igor Khatkovski on his attempt to conduct a terrorist act at Baku railway station. He admitted that he was hired by the Armenian national security department. In 90s, Armenian government sent Vazgen Sislian, the international terrorist from Yerevan to Khanked. This is the very terrorist who in 1981 played a leading role in attacking the Turkish embassy in Paris. Presenting himself as a fighter for Artsakha's freedom, Sisliani in his interview to a Russian newspaper said that the forceful policy is of great importance in attracting public attention to Armenian cause. There are also quite scandalous materials in the document. For instance: " participation of Armenian terrorist organizations in the state policy and international terrorism is confirmed by the investigation materials of English law-enforcement agencies concerning murder of Utsiev brothers in London. The investigation showed that members of theArmenian national security were actively involved in this case. Placing international terror among the state priorities, official Yerevan is making every attempt to link "Kurd issue" with this policy. In 1993, under the sanction of Armenian official organizations, Iezids residing in the settlement of Alagan started forming so called Army fighting for the freedom of Kurdish people. American government took a decision to apply pressure on terrorism-protecting countries. It is important that there are three main principles for the America's fighting against terrorism: 1. No deals with terrorists, no clandestine talks with them. 2. Terrorists are criminals, and legislation must provide for means of fighting against them. 3. Maximal pressure on states sheltering and financing terrorists, and those countries, which despite many warnings still maintain diplomatic, economic, and other relations with "sponsor states". The US government will impose political sanctions against such countries and call on the world to follow this principles. The US president Mr. Clinton in 80s signed a special law on imposing political and economic sanctions against Iraq and Libya. Sanctions were also imposed against those companies and countries, which were investing in prospecting and refining oil in Iran and Libya. Theses measures aimed at preventing the two countries from financing terrorist organizations." Importantly, terrorists manage to sow discord, panic and chaos among public. Frequently, international terrorism gives birth to problems that take many years to deal with. To demonstrate this, we can recall the 1996 Tel-Aviv and Jerusalem terrorist acts that left total of 60 people dead. It was mostly because of this terrorist act that ruined the peace talks in Middle East at the time, with by-elections announced and Israeli government changed. International terrorist acts are frequently entailed by confrontations among various countries. Namely, the 1996 terrorist act that took place in Lima, strained Peru's relationships with many countries.

The reason that I posted this article which I found it @ www.president.az was to show you that 75% of the so called history is fake. It talks about how Azerbaijan & Azeris are one of the ancient people on this planet, but there's no word about Azeris being Turks. It also says that Azeris had one of the greatest writers, & scientists & that those people contributed alot to the world, over the centuries, but the genius historian who wrote this article doesn't give us any names of those great Azeris scientists & writers. It doesn't mention anything about Azeris being turks, & Azerbaijan being first created in 1918 because of the oil in that region. Once an Azeri guy told me that (not that i was friendly with him) that Freddi Mercury from the Queen is Azerbaijani. I just don't understand whom are they trying to fool.