Khodja provide proof by your false accusations. As well as you need to read the article posted by Arad. There is a critical point in you statement, there is a immense difference between varied sources and valid sources. After reading the article provided by Arad, I do agree with Arad, there is absolutely no proof, just some off beat speculation by writers who are not even considered scholars in the field that they wrote about. Here is a back round of the authors of the “Holy Blood, Holy Grail” book. Lincoln, a writer and television producer for the BBC in England; Leigh, a novelist and Ph.D.; and Baigent, a sometime teacher with a degree in psychology have pooled their talents to produce a new book that will undoubtedly bring them some measure of notoriety. The book, the outgrowth of research for a series of specials for BBC television, has been creating controversy both locally and abroad. I hope seriously that this a bad joke on your part for considering a TV producer, a novelist and a psychologist for producing “scholarly works”. America-Hye, by finding one bible out of millions with an exclusion doesn’t prove a point. We must look at the teachings of the Church in its entirety. We know that before a bible was ever composed, the Church Historians and the Church Fathers preached a resurrected Christ undoubtedly. Not to mention the teachings of the Saints and Apostles prior to the bible. As well as, we must research the Siniaticus bible that was found. Who were to authors of it(I mean, who did the translating or the writing)? Is the book complete? Which books does this bible contain? You present yourself as an educated and literate individual, please look at the Church in its entirety, before making false accusations.