armo#1

Domino good question Number one represents first racist nation in the world not first armenian!!!! I am glad you raised that question

amerca hye Your are not analizying my aproach you were doubting and why would you care who am i anyway??? the majority of armenians are racist!!!!!!!! it is a fact that most of us allready know about it.

american hye see i told you people you are racists now you are calling me a turk is that really a matter who am i ?

Hey skittles don't you have better thing for man????? LOL Now whenever i notice this in women i will made them cry to death.

I know what your saying hybruin my wife used to say i am the best armenian women I am the best cook etc.. Most of them think they are the best. I havent seen any good armenians yet most of them are very racist.

Hi Armo#1 I would disagree with your opinion it seems like to me you judge everything based on your experience we all had those. I think parents will never want to see their kids suffering I am sorry for your bad experience, but at the same time you can not judge them because what happened to you. We all had bad lucks in our lifes you could have picked the person you loved and still be misirable you never know what is going to happen in the future Angelina jan i am not judging sirun jan what i am saying is do whatever you feel is right for your future. I love my parents more then anything and i think the reason why you can not understand me because you never was in my shoes you are too young probably to think the way i do, and another thing is remember always if you will love someone or allready have i have no idia there is no way you will not love that person if you love somone you are ready to concer all difficulties as it says love concers all but when you do not have those feelings you are being distracted by your partner because you do not have passion for your partner. So if my parents gave the chance to make my own disicion i know i would have been lucky for at least 2-3 yrs but not misrable for 15 yrs.

Sasun I personally regreted that i did not made my own disision and did not followed my heart instead i listened to what my parents had to say, but then again we are the ones who is going to live with our spouses not our parents so go with your heart. I believe if i married the person i loved i wouldn't be divorced now.

Armo, I have not doubt about God. My question is different. It is more of a follow-up question. People ask for proof of God, then I ask what kind of proof they want. That is my question Sasun jan sorry ap i was rushing Well anyways as i said before I do not think we can come up with a proof but good luck finding the proof will keep reading to see what kind of proof you have found.

Armo you are in a path of becoming a philosopher. Unless you chose not to become one, pardon me, but I couldn’t help reading your post, how old are you if you don’t mind asking? Sound like you are in your early 20? I just hope there are no kids involved in your marriage. But listening to your hart not always leads you to the right path in life. Take care and try to find something common with your spouse. Hey edo jan axper jan i wish i was in my early 20's but anyways it makes me feel good when people feel like i am in my 20's good to hear that. And one more thing FIO now days kids don'e even approve arrange marrige but my times where different. I tryed to love this woman but i just could not i had misirable 15 yrs with her untill i finally dicided i can not take it anymore so we end up divorcing. So my experience with parents was not successful so i would not recomend others to listen what their parents had to say thats not working all the time.

Sasun You are going to ask people proof in God existence, but i doubt you can find the proof because everyone of us percive God topic from our perspectives we look at the things from our points of views. The only proof is read the bible. One more thing Do you see energy? No!! but can you feel the power of energy YES! what i am saying is you can have light at home warm your kids up with the same energy and so on. I dont think any one of us can proof his existence but you can have faith in your heart and by having that faith toward the god you will feel his power. God exists and if you seek for him you will find him.

Hey Skittles Don't listen to your parents do whatever is right for you. From my experience i listened to my parents and end up marrying to a woman that i have no feelings for i hate to say this but i guess i am very misrable man because i should not listened to them. Do what your heart is telling you and follow your heart. Parents are not always making the right dicisions for their kids trust me on this one.

Which is more important to you and why: Intrinsic or extrinsic rewards??

What do you think We'd be wise to keep taxes, religious schools apart ?

We'd be wise to keep taxes, religious schools apart U-Hi case, nonetheless, seems a worthy challenge to so-called Blaine amendments, says Jay Bookman. Jay Bookman Atlanta Journal-Constitution A TLANTA -- Many religious conservatives contend that we live in a Christian country, founded by Christian men, dominated by people of the Christian faith. And you know what? They're right, we do. Culturally, historically and statistically, we are largely a Christian nation. But contrary to the hopes of some, we do not have -- and cannot have -- a Christian government. We cannot have Christian courts, Christian police, Christian social service agencies or a Christian foreign policy. Of course, that crucial distinction is always being tested, always under assault. It is, for example, the core inspiration behind efforts to place copies of the Ten Commandments in the Alabama Supreme Court building and in local courthouses around the country. The commandments are being used as a symbol of Christian dominance, planted in government buildings much like the flags that early explorers would stick into the earth to claim a spot for their king and country. It is a way of saying, "This is ours." Well, no, it isn't. As always, the main battleground in the war to maintain a secular government is the U.S. Supreme Court. This session, the justices will hear a case out of Washington state involving the so-called Blaine amendments, which were added to 37 state constitutions during the 19th century. The amendments typically bar any use of state money for religious-related purposes, putting a higher wall between church and state than the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (Editor's note: The case cited involves Joshua Davey, 1999 valedictorian at University High School in Spokane Valley. The state of Washington withdrew Davey's ,125 Promise Scholarship after he declared a theology major at Northwest College in Kirkland, Wash.) The amendments were originally inspired by anti-Catholic prejudice, to prevent tax money from being spent on parochial schools. In Washington, however, the Blaine amendment means that college students who are studying for the clergy cannot participate in the state's scholarship programs. Religious groups claim that such a ban is unconstitutional, and they're probably right. Denying scholarship money to those studying to be a minister, while allowing it for would-be doctors and teachers, is antagonistic rather than neutral toward religion, and does indeed violate the First Amendment. The Washington suit is part of a larger crusade being launched against Blaine amendments all over the country, including Georgia, Florida and Massachusetts. The push is being led by advocates of school voucher programs, who see the amendments as legal obstacles to state funding of vouchers for religious-based schools. The Blaine amendments certainly ought to be rescinded, both because of their history and because they sometimes force unreasonable restrictions such as Washington's scholarship ban. But before we take the second step -- agreeing to the use of vouchers to finance religious-based schools -- a deeper look at the history behind the Blaine amendments might be in order. In the 19th century, most Americans believed that this was not merely a Christian nation, but more precisely a Protestant nation, and they acted accordingly. Bible instruction was common in public schools at the time, and they typically used the Protestant Bible as the textbook for such training. Catholic parents, understandably offended, wanted their own taxpayer-funded schools where their children could be taught from the Catholic Bible. That in turn outraged the Protestants, who didn't want their tax money used to support "The Scarlet Whore of Rome," as the pope was too-commonly called. The Blaine amendments were a direct consequence. Those issues -- those religious-based suspicions and fears -- have not gone away. If school vouchers become commonly available for use at religious schools, the Nation of Islam would have equal call on the public purse as the Baptists, meaning taxpayer money could be used to teach kids that white people are all blue-eyed devils. Fundamentalist Islam would have equal footing as well. Even cults such as the Branch Davidians, which taught that David Koresh was Jesus Christ, could not legally be denied taxpayer money for their schools. Surely the wiser approach is to teach religion at home and places of worship, without taxpayer involvement.

I am missing the sweet armenian water makes me feel thirsty Nice sites i like it

i forgot about that thanks for reminding me about that