Yervant1 Posted September 12, 2014 Report Share Posted September 12, 2014 NEW YORK TIMES BETRAYS ITS OWN INVESTIGATION AND GETS IT WRONG ON KARABAKHThursday, September 11th, 2014http://asbarez.com/126891/new-york-times-betrays-its-own-investigation-and-gets-it-wrong-on-karabakh/Screengrab from the New York TimesBY ARA KHACHATOURIANA mere two days after publishing an expansive and informative exposeabout foreign powers buying influence with US-based think tanks toaffect US policy, The New York Times published a sloppy article bylong-time Azerbaijani collaborator, Brenda Shaffer, who by usingofficial Baku's vernacular sounds the alarm for supposed plans byRussia to engineer another "land grab" in the region--this time inNagorno-Karabakh.In The New York Times article, "Foreign Powers Buy Influence at ThinkTanks," correspondents Eric Lipton, Brooke Williams and NicholasConfessore diligently combed over hundreds of pages of documents todetail how foreign--among them Azerbaijani-monies to think thanksare adversely impacting academic research and are influencing USforeign policy.It seems the Times frowns upon foreign powers influencing US policy,but its editorial board does not mind publishing pieces by knownlobbyists who use their years of entrenched advocacy for foreigngovernments to advocate issues that official governments cannot andinfluence public opinion.That's exactly what Shaffer does in her piece, "Russia's Next LandGrab" to convince the Russia-weary readers of the Times to beware ofa supposed land grab that will adversely impact Baku's interests.Prof. Brenda ShafferShaffer, who has been described by the Azerbaijani press as a"well-known Azeri government lobbyist," last year vocally defendedAliyev's re-election, which was panned by most observers includingthe State Department. Throughout her career as an "academic," Shafferhas been a fixture at Azerbaijan-centric conferences and symposiums,always advocating on behalf of the Baku government and its oil riches.The New York Times described Brenda Shaffer as "a professor ofpolitical science at the University of Haifa and a visiting researcherat Georgetown." What the paper neglects to say is that Shaffer is alsoa visiting professor at the Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy and hasspent almost two decades lobbying for Baku by presenting testimonyto Congress and speaking and international conference organized bysome of the think thanks that were at the center of the New YorkTimes investigation.The premises she presents to convince readers that Russia's "land grab"of Karabakh is imminent, are assertions that Russia's interests inArmenia make Karabakh the natural choice for such a move, claiming,with substantial evidence, that Russia masterminded the Oct. 27,1999 attack on the Armenian Parliament.She also claims that the meeting between Armenian and Azerbaijanipresidents in Sochi was a plan devised to move a military missionto Nagorno-Karabakh, a fact that was not reported by either party tothe meeting. In fact, if such was the case, the US and France wouldnot have welcomed Putin's efforts to broker peace. It turned out thatPutin's meeting with Armenia's Serzh Sarkisian and Azerbaijan's IlhamAliyev did not differ much from a meeting held last week between thepresidents and Secretary of State John Kerry in Newport, Wales onthe sidelines of the NATO summit.By publishing the Shaffer piece The New York Times deflects thereal reasons hampering a peaceful resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakhconflict--Azerbaijan's continued threats of war, violation of the ceasefire and inciting anti-Armenian hatred--and blames the villain du jour,Russian President Vladimir Putin for the unrest in the Caucasus. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onjig Posted September 12, 2014 Report Share Posted September 12, 2014 Other than what we print, there seems to be no one, with power, speaking for us. There is none in our government, at this time, who would listen, but it would be great to hear a voice in our favor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yervant1 Posted September 12, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 12, 2014 Such is the fate of small nations. No one is interested in a minnow when there are big salmons out there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.