MosJan Posted February 27, 2013 Report Share Posted February 27, 2013 The British Museum: Stop misrepresentation of Armenian Heritage as "Ancient Turkey" The British Museum is misinforming visitors about the artifacts found within room 54, claiming they originated from Ancient Turkey and Ancient Anatolia. This is absolutely ridiculous and beyond inaccurate because there is no such thing as Ancient Turkey or Ancient Anatolia! This is a discrimination of Armenian heritage and shall not be tolerated. They refer to artifacts dated from 5500-300 BC from Kingdom of Ararat, known as "Urartu", present day Armenia, as “eastern Turkey.” They are trying to validate their point by stating that “most visitors use modern geographical references to decide which parts of the collection they wish to see.” As an educational institution they should be educating their visitors about the origins of the art and the culture it was created by, not manipulating them to “decide which parts of the museum they wish to see.” Other museums around the world, such as the Metropolitan Museum, acknowledge and respect the Armenian culture by properly naming their collections. Why is the British Museum trying to change history by giving the Ottoman Empire credit for art they never created? By deceiving visitors the British Museum is losing credibility as an institution that conserves historical importance. To:Neil MacGregor, The British MuseumJonathan N. Tubb, FSA Keeper Middle East, The British Museum Stop misrepresentation of Armenian Heritage as "Ancient Turkey"Sincerely,[Your name] http://www.change.or...ns_dialog_false Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yervant1 Posted February 27, 2013 Report Share Posted February 27, 2013 FORUM OF ARMENIAN ASSOCIATIONS IN EUROPE ACCUSES UNESCO OF CORRUPTION ARMINFOTuesday, February 26, 20:00 The Forum of Armenian Associations in Europe (FAAE) accuses UNESCO ofcorruption and demands paying attention to the demolition of Armenianmonuments in Makhijevan, FAAE President Ashot Grigorian said attoday's press conference in Yerevan. Grigorian said that on the threshold of the 100th anniversary of theArmenian Genocide, the organization declared the year 2013 as the yearof struggle against the cultural genocide and continues its struggleagainst UNESCO in relation to demolition of the Armenian cemeteryin Jugha. The Forum expressed its discontent with the fact that thedemolition was not fixed by UNESCO. Moreover, FAAE has learnt thatUNESCO received 1.5 mln USD from Azerbaijan. In 2011 FAAE applied toMs Irina Bokova, Director- General of UNESCO, but received "an absurdresponse". Afterwards FAAE applied to the UN Secretary General BanKi-moon and received a similar response. The letter addressed to the UN Secretary General said that during theexhibition of Armenian khachkars (cross-stones) in Paris in June 2011,the exact location of the cross-stones' origin was removed aftera complaint by Azerbaijan and Turkey. In response, the UN calledcoordinating this issue with the neighbors. The Armenian ambassador,who was present at the exhibition, agreed to the decision that thetitles of the exhibits should be removed. FAAE prepared a new letterto Ban Ki-moon and demanded setting up a special commission thatwill fix that the Armenian khachkars in Jugha were demolished and ashooting range was created in that place. Grigorian stressed that the fight will continue until all the demandsare satisfied. Grigorian also touched on the British Museum's response to theletter of the Forum of Armenian Associations of Europe (FAAE), wherethe Forum protested against the use of Ancient Turkey name for themuseum's room 54 and suggested renaming the room into Urartu, AncientArmenia. Grigorian qualified the response as "absurd". To reimind,the British Museum said: "We do not claim these ancient culturesare in any way Turkish and would also suggest they are not Armenianeither" and added: "When borders or country titles change we willchange accordingly". An Armenian delegation headed by Ashot Grigorian will shortly visitLondon to discuss this issue. The FAAE President also expressed hisindignation at the passiveness of the Armenian structures. "How longcan the Armenian Diaspora do the job of the Armenian Culture Ministryand History Institute which get financing?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yervant1 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 Once again it's shown here how much they love the turkish delight, I hope they choke on it dirty falsifying low lives. Note: turkish delight can be whatever you want it to be! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arpa Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 (edited) Once again it's shown here how much they love the turkish delight, I hope they choke on it dirty falsifying low lives. Note: turkish delight can be whatever you want it to be!Yes Yervant, I do hope that they also choke on such furkish delights as dolma and basturma. As if we don't have Armenian words for those native delicacies. Edited February 28, 2013 by Arpa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yervant1 Posted March 10, 2013 Report Share Posted March 10, 2013 News 9000 and growing supporters! http://d22r54gnmuhwmk.cloudfront.net/photos/1/yb/bw/IvyBbWSPNzjjoGf-44x44-cropped.jpg byGagik Avagyan Petition Organizer We Armenians are very humbled and grateful to Non-Armenians and thank you for your Kind support in our struggle. We also would like to remind to British Museum and Mr, Jonathan M. Tubb, that 1.5 million and more Armenians can't sign, because of the Armenian Genocide. Here you can watch Prof. Uğur Üngör making a presentation of his book. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yervant1 Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 BRITISH MUSEUM RENAMES ITS ROOM 54 FROM "ANCIENT TURKEY" INTO "ANATOLIA, URARTU"by Karina ManukyanThursday, July 18, 18:13The British Museum has renamed its room 54 from "Ancient Turkey" into"Anatolia, Urartu."In early 2013 the Forum of Armenian Associations of Europe (FAAE),expressed a protest against the use of "Ancient Turkey" name forthe museum's room 54 and suggested that it be renamed into "Urartu,Ancient Armenia."FAAE said that the values exhibited in the room had no relation toTurkey but to Urartu, an ancient state located in the territory ofthe Armenian Plateau. "This is just one example. Sometimes Armenianvalues, like carpets, are exhibited as Muslim values," FAAE said.In its response to FAAE, the Museum's keeper Jonathan N. Tubb said:"Our curators are very aware that Ancient Turkey is nonsensical froma historical point of view and so the naming of this room was thesubject of much debate, and continues as such."http://www.arminfo.am/index.cfm?objectid=4C5B9BC0-EFB4-11E2-B7C30EB7C0D21663 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arpa Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 (edited) And now we are anxiously waiting for that clownish non-linguist Sedrak to, once again tell us that the furkish non-language is a dialect of the Urartuan and that that furkish word dolma/toli/tolma is in fact an Armeno- Urartuan word. Edited July 19, 2013 by Arpa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosJan Posted July 19, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 Arpa let it go.. Strak has done and doing more then most of us can ever do for our homeland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamavor Posted February 26, 2014 Report Share Posted February 26, 2014 The Middle East keeper of the British Museum, Mr Jonathan Tubb, accepts the nonsensical character of the term, but justifies its use by pointing out that their aim is “to make the Museum's signage as simple and accessible as possible and avoid terms that would not be immediately apparent to non-English speakers; as many of our visitors come here from abroad.” He then adds, “When borders or country titles change we will change accordingly." First of all, this explanation is groundless and not objective, since Room 55 is entitled Mesopotamia and Room 57-59 - Ancient Levant. If the statement were true then the above mentioned rooms should have been called Ancient Iraq and Ancient Syria respectively. Secondly, such a statement is a direct offense to both the visitors, who are perceived as ignorant, as well as to the bearers of cultural heritage that is on display at the museum. As an educational institution the role of the British Museum is to educate their visitors about the true origin of art and culture and their creators. By falsifying the history and misleading the visitors, the British Museum is losing credibility as an institution that conserves exhibits of historical importance. This is an unacceptable distortion and revisionism of history. Therefore, we demand that the truth and justice be restored! This is painfully DUMB comment by this museum worker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sip Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 They should just call it "Ancient Over There" as opposed the "Ancient What Was Here". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.