New Hotel
#1
Posted 20 September 2006 - 06:17 PM
#2
Posted 21 September 2006 - 03:14 AM
#3
Posted 21 September 2006 - 08:11 AM
#4
Posted 23 September 2006 - 09:16 PM
#5
Posted 24 September 2006 - 07:50 AM
The buildin too...
#6
Posted 24 September 2006 - 07:53 AM
"Նուրբ ձևավորված համարները , հանդիսանալով շքեղության և հարմարավետության օրինակը, բաղկացած են առանձին ննջասենյակով և հյուրասենյակով:"
#7
Posted 24 September 2006 - 10:40 AM
#8
Posted 24 September 2006 - 03:43 PM
extremely ugly? A little bit exaggerated dont you think?
If you lived here you would know how much ugly architecture is going up in the country. THIS believe me is very nice. Typical acceptable Soviet architecture, not the garbage style ones. Personally I think it looks very decent. I just don't understand why it's located in the middle of no where.
#9
Posted 24 September 2006 - 06:09 PM
isn't the soviet rule over yet?
I wonder if those architects have ever thought of glancing through a western, japanese or ANY other architectural publication to see what's going on in the world today...and then we dare to call ourselves wise.
Edited by kakachik77, 24 September 2006 - 06:11 PM.
#10
Posted 24 September 2006 - 09:15 PM
#11
Posted 24 September 2006 - 10:30 PM
Thank you for the valuable information
No need to copy or glance into foreign styles. We have (dare to say) excelent home grown architecture. They just need to be creative in using new materials and colores.
#12
Posted 24 September 2006 - 11:45 PM
also, there was no mentioning of copying foreign styles (although that might be very authentic in a place like Armenia). Nonetheless, the materials that you are referring to be used...most probably will come from foreign places....yes you got to accept...foreign places make BETTER materials these day (for the exception of tufa), there is nothing authentic in the armenian materials...they are the same bad quality cement blocks that are still being used after the horrible experience with the 1988 earthquake.
Edited by kakachik77, 24 September 2006 - 11:48 PM.
#13
Posted 26 September 2006 - 04:07 PM
isn't the soviet rule over yet?
I wonder if those architects have ever thought of glancing through a western, japanese or ANY other architectural publication to see what's going on in the world today...and then we dare to call ourselves wise.
So basically the soviet architecture needs to go? Is the architecture of Republic Square and Opera trash? They are very soviet and beautiful.
One other thing to add I'm glad we have the tufa stone. It's quite unique to Armenian architecture.
As far as "whats going on in the world today" do you mean lots of glass, aluminum covered business buildings and so on? So why does Paris perserve their 200 year old residential buildings? I assume you think they need to progress too. Western architecure might be safe and stable, on the outside I dont see anything unique that interests me. Especially if you mean north american architecture. If you mean west as in Europe, then I repeat my example of Paris.
#14
Posted 26 September 2006 - 08:07 PM
why do you think parisians preserved their buildings? nobody is arguing for demolition of old beautiful buildings...in fact that is what exactly is going on in yerevan today! I already read few articles and not just building but the elimination of green space in the city is another big big issue...and instead they seem to be putting up these ugly outdated things. And if you look through a western publication today ( i am looking at architectural record magazine right now), the whole issue is on preserving green space, putting up roof gardens on top of building and building energy sufficient building (green buildings)...so you see it's not about glass and steel...
#15
Posted 26 September 2006 - 08:24 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users