As gloomy and perhaps simplistic as this will sound, I feel that we should discuss it. The question is: are we, as a people like this (below) ? is it one of the causes of our troubles over time ?
Today I had lunch with an uncle of mine, from Rumania. he is a very well balanced individual and a nationalist in a constructive, non-sectarian manner. He said that it is such a pity that Armenians never seem to like/enjoy/support other Armenians, especially if they are doing well. My grandfather used to tell the story, ficticious for all I know, of Talaat being told that a party of Armenians was coming to kill him, to which he responded: "Armenians ? By the time they get here there will be only one left. They will fight each other to death."
What do you think ?
Started by
Guest
, Nov 02 2000 11:35 AM
43 replies to this topic
#2
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 03 November 2000 - 12:04 AM
Boghos,
I think there is some truth to it, but also a lot of exaggeration. We are not that bad.
In my view we may be not the most supportive of each other nation, but we are not the worst example, either. I think our problem is the lack of unifying idea, and the unifying aspiration. The other reason of it is the host of absurd definitions of our identity.
We have been cheated by our own for centuries. This may have taken place for good reasons, sometimes, but it has generated generations of brainwashed, misguided, self-indulgent, but psychologically impotent scores of Armenians. I think things cannot be fixed in this generation, but there is a good chance in the next. Besides, a lot of filtering and sorting-out will take place in the coming 25 years, I think.
I think there is some truth to it, but also a lot of exaggeration. We are not that bad.
In my view we may be not the most supportive of each other nation, but we are not the worst example, either. I think our problem is the lack of unifying idea, and the unifying aspiration. The other reason of it is the host of absurd definitions of our identity.
We have been cheated by our own for centuries. This may have taken place for good reasons, sometimes, but it has generated generations of brainwashed, misguided, self-indulgent, but psychologically impotent scores of Armenians. I think things cannot be fixed in this generation, but there is a good chance in the next. Besides, a lot of filtering and sorting-out will take place in the coming 25 years, I think.
#3
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 03 November 2000 - 12:30 AM
I've heard the story, also. We're definitely stubborn, my father and I can attest to that . I think we need to stop dwelling on the past and look to the future. Simple as that. Don't forget our past, just stop pitying ourselves. When you pity yourself you tend to become selfish. I think that's one of our major problems.
Hell, not even ASALA could keep themselves together.
Hell, not even ASALA could keep themselves together.
#4
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 01:17 PM
Tigrannes I am in full agreement with you! Some of us like to wallow in the past. I dont think we should forget our past but if they want to whinge, why dont they get up and actually DO something about it!!
Oh everyone KNOWS we are disunited. Were are so known for it, and I think it's ridiculous. I have seen examples on this forum, but I wont point out because now is not a good time but for example, when some one new ever comes on unless they make a big show no-one exactly goes out of their way the welcome him/her.
I beleive that if we worked together through our troubles and after them instead of trying to backstab each other, then we would have got a LOT further than we have done....does'nt take a genius to see!
Every nation has it's troubles but it's how we deal with them that REALLY counts.
Oh everyone KNOWS we are disunited. Were are so known for it, and I think it's ridiculous. I have seen examples on this forum, but I wont point out because now is not a good time but for example, when some one new ever comes on unless they make a big show no-one exactly goes out of their way the welcome him/her.
I beleive that if we worked together through our troubles and after them instead of trying to backstab each other, then we would have got a LOT further than we have done....does'nt take a genius to see!
Every nation has it's troubles but it's how we deal with them that REALLY counts.
#5
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 01:21 PM
Our bonds are stronger than average, too!!!
10 Armenians and an odar in a room: united Hyes. The odar leaves and it's a different story...Just imagine if we did not have turkey to focus upon. It's the traditional idea of a "scapegoat" to focus one's aggression upon.
A question for the resident historians around here, have Armenians always been like this(specifically, prior to the late 1800's)?
10 Armenians and an odar in a room: united Hyes. The odar leaves and it's a different story...Just imagine if we did not have turkey to focus upon. It's the traditional idea of a "scapegoat" to focus one's aggression upon.
A question for the resident historians around here, have Armenians always been like this(specifically, prior to the late 1800's)?
#6
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 01:32 PM
Mike,
Just one comment
Turkey and Turks have nothing to do with the way I feel as an Armenian...
My bond with Armenia has nothing to do with the Turks.
Just one comment
Turkey and Turks have nothing to do with the way I feel as an Armenian...
My bond with Armenia has nothing to do with the Turks.
#7
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 01:50 PM
Pilaf by the way I can understand where you are coming from about scape goats and using one group to focus on but I don't think it's as simple as that with the Turks. I'm sure you don't need me to remind you of what their government has done. I think Armenians feel frustrated because what they have done is STILL not recognised and they have not got their due punishment, then we can feel it is laid to rest more.
What i was saying is that not only the fact that we are moaning we are such a minority, ans we will die out, preserve the race, this and that, but if that's REALLY the way they feel then why not start to unite! I think that's more the issue than how friendly you are with the odars! BIG wow!!!
By the way I forgot I am not speaking to you you annoyed me the other day.
What i was saying is that not only the fact that we are moaning we are such a minority, ans we will die out, preserve the race, this and that, but if that's REALLY the way they feel then why not start to unite! I think that's more the issue than how friendly you are with the odars! BIG wow!!!
By the way I forgot I am not speaking to you you annoyed me the other day.
#8
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 01:53 PM
Oh, and another thing relating to this topic. What was all that Hayastani's and Diaspora's shit going on in the other topic the other day?? Hyes are hyes!!!!!!!!!
#9
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 02:00 PM
Hayastantsi vs. Diaspora
I think some members of the Diaspora view the Hayastantsis as traitors for leaving the homeland. Keep in mind, the bulk of the Diaspora pre-late 1980's early 1990's was not in America by choice. I can't blame people for wanting what's best for their family, though.
I think the Diaspora has to invest more in the homeland. How can we not expect them to come join us in the Diaspora when we are having great financial success and the homeland is in ruins?
I think some members of the Diaspora view the Hayastantsis as traitors for leaving the homeland. Keep in mind, the bulk of the Diaspora pre-late 1980's early 1990's was not in America by choice. I can't blame people for wanting what's best for their family, though.
I think the Diaspora has to invest more in the homeland. How can we not expect them to come join us in the Diaspora when we are having great financial success and the homeland is in ruins?
#10
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 02:16 PM
Thank you. I can see both sides of the story, though I am not stuck on one or the other. Just a question: is it just to do with this definition or is the difference ethnic or not? Because I don't know remeber: If it is I have no idea whether i am Diaspora or Hayastani.
What i was thinking was on that thread was there was a disscusion, on whether how trashy one of them were????
What i was thinking was on that thread was there was a disscusion, on whether how trashy one of them were????
#11
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 02:26 PM
Hayastanti/Deghatsi= someone from Armenia, who has moved out.
Diasporan= Armenian born in another country.
Diasporan= Armenian born in another country.
#12
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 02:57 PM
Kazza,
You have misunderstood that thread, and the motivations beyond starting it. (:
[This message has been edited by MJ (edited November 02, 2000).]
You have misunderstood that thread, and the motivations beyond starting it. (:
[This message has been edited by MJ (edited November 02, 2000).]
#13
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 03:00 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Kazza:
By the way I forgot I am not speaking to you you annoyed me the other day.
Originally posted by Kazza:
By the way I forgot I am not speaking to you you annoyed me the other day.
Speaking of unity...what did I do ? BTW, my post wasn't a response to yours. I did not see your post when I composed mine (we must have been typing at the same time!).
MJ, I understand your saying "Turkey and Turks have nothing to do with the way I feel as an Armenian", but don't you think having a common enemy (or however you want to characterize the issue) unites Armenians as a group? Or do you see that as one of the main dividing issues???
#14
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 03:05 PM
quote:
Originally posted by TigrannesIII:
I think the Diaspora has to invest more in the homeland.
Originally posted by TigrannesIII:
I think the Diaspora has to invest more in the homeland.
Rich,
Check out MJ's post from today over at "Hayastan vs. Diaspora", there are some real hindrances to investing.
#15
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 03:09 PM
Mike,
I do recognize that the "common enemy" unifies many segments of our nation. It is a fact.
But what I am trying to articulate here is that there couldn't be more destructive, harmful, psychologically invalid identification of nationality by reverse association (no personal offense) thing to do. So what, if the Turks cease to exist by a miracle today, does it imply that we also cease to exist as a nation?
I think the hate, in general, is one of the most disgusting feelings characteristic to human beings, and it is very easy to fall hostage to such a dirty feeling. There is nothing for Armenia – real or imaginary, to gain from a feeling of hate towards Turks. Hate is only destroying the social fabric of our national identity. This hate dooms us to elimination. The only looser of that feeling is us. Nothing will happen to Turkey as a result.
I do recognize that the "common enemy" unifies many segments of our nation. It is a fact.
But what I am trying to articulate here is that there couldn't be more destructive, harmful, psychologically invalid identification of nationality by reverse association (no personal offense) thing to do. So what, if the Turks cease to exist by a miracle today, does it imply that we also cease to exist as a nation?
I think the hate, in general, is one of the most disgusting feelings characteristic to human beings, and it is very easy to fall hostage to such a dirty feeling. There is nothing for Armenia – real or imaginary, to gain from a feeling of hate towards Turks. Hate is only destroying the social fabric of our national identity. This hate dooms us to elimination. The only looser of that feeling is us. Nothing will happen to Turkey as a result.
#16
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 03:17 PM
Invest in the common man, not the government.
What about that cognac? How much could Yerevantsi cognac sell for, considering it's considered better than French?
What about that cognac? How much could Yerevantsi cognac sell for, considering it's considered better than French?
#17
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 03:20 PM
It's the nationalism that unites us. Hate for the Turks just happens to be part of that feeling right now.
And if the Turks cease to exist, we always have the Azeris....
The Turks will get what is coming to them. What goes around comes around.
And if the Turks cease to exist, we always have the Azeris....
The Turks will get what is coming to them. What goes around comes around.
#18
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 03:34 PM
I'm not advocating hatred of turks as an eternal uniting factor, I just wanted to acknowledge that it does unite us.
My point in my first post was that I think Armenians would be at each other's throats more without the turkish issue. That is, we'd have one less uniting factor. Your point is well taken MJ that uniting by "reverse association" is destructive. BTW, did you just coin that term?
Rich, I'm not a cognac fan, but I guess you've just given me reason to continue my periodic thread on Armenian Beers. I'll try to support my fellow Armenians again tonight by finding another kind
"No honey I'm not just drinking beer; this is for research and humanitarian causes."
My point in my first post was that I think Armenians would be at each other's throats more without the turkish issue. That is, we'd have one less uniting factor. Your point is well taken MJ that uniting by "reverse association" is destructive. BTW, did you just coin that term?
Rich, I'm not a cognac fan, but I guess you've just given me reason to continue my periodic thread on Armenian Beers. I'll try to support my fellow Armenians again tonight by finding another kind
"No honey I'm not just drinking beer; this is for research and humanitarian causes."
#19
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 03:52 PM
I think your argument about being at each other’s throat is not convincing. So that not to be at each other’s throat, we have to have a positive agenda. That is what I was trying to articulate for as long as I have been in this forum
In my view, the only positive agenda that we can have to unite us is our statehood and its eternality. All other divisions are fine. One can be socialist, another one may be right wing conspirator , that doesn’t matter in the national picture.
BTW, our ancestors have died exactly for this cause – to build an eternal statehood. All the conversations about dying for the religion, or for some other reason are BS. This was the sole reason beyond the Genocide, by the way.
P.S. The story I told you about Therzian is about 10 years old. I think the reason of his loses was that he was to romantic, and naive. He invested under the circumstances of absence of any legislature providing him with any protections. That’s why he couldn’t defend himself in the court. I don’t think that this type of thing could’ve happen today, since Armenia has some kind of legislative framework in place, to protect foreign investors. There are a lot of foreign investors in Armenia today – primarily in software industry. They are primarily from Europe. One of the major Armenian Banks is owned (more than 50% shares) by a UK Armenian businessman. The problem are not the people in Armenia, but the inadequate legal framework.
[This message has been edited by MJ (edited November 02, 2000).]
In my view, the only positive agenda that we can have to unite us is our statehood and its eternality. All other divisions are fine. One can be socialist, another one may be right wing conspirator , that doesn’t matter in the national picture.
BTW, our ancestors have died exactly for this cause – to build an eternal statehood. All the conversations about dying for the religion, or for some other reason are BS. This was the sole reason beyond the Genocide, by the way.
P.S. The story I told you about Therzian is about 10 years old. I think the reason of his loses was that he was to romantic, and naive. He invested under the circumstances of absence of any legislature providing him with any protections. That’s why he couldn’t defend himself in the court. I don’t think that this type of thing could’ve happen today, since Armenia has some kind of legislative framework in place, to protect foreign investors. There are a lot of foreign investors in Armenia today – primarily in software industry. They are primarily from Europe. One of the major Armenian Banks is owned (more than 50% shares) by a UK Armenian businessman. The problem are not the people in Armenia, but the inadequate legal framework.
[This message has been edited by MJ (edited November 02, 2000).]
#20
Guest__*
Guest__*
-
- Guests
Posted 02 November 2000 - 04:20 PM
quote:
Originally posted by MJ:
In my view, the only positive agenda that we can have to unite us is our statehood and its eternality...{edited}...BTW, our ancestors have died exactly for this cause – to build an eternal statehood.
Originally posted by MJ:
In my view, the only positive agenda that we can have to unite us is our statehood and its eternality...{edited}...BTW, our ancestors have died exactly for this cause – to build an eternal statehood.
That is clearly a positive agenda for the future--how then do we address the past at the same time?
How about Armenia built new schools and businesses in Yerevan using turkish denialist slave labor? Kill yergu birds with meg stone.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
