as i see it - Pt. III
#1
Posted 20 October 2002 - 04:00 PM
******************************
I have at no time experienced Turkish ferocity
on my own skin – I have read about it
but never experienced it.
But I have come close – damn close:
I have experienced Armenian hostility.
And what has been my worst transgression?
Trying to share my understanding.
*
About convictions, certainties, and faith:
If the braying of an ass is louder
than the whisper of a wise man,
does that mean the ass knows better?
*
Fools and fanatics read not to learn
but to justify their hatred.
*
In 1915 we were massacred as a nation:
why can't we behave as one today?
*
We are so used to modifying history
with our own brand of nationalist propaganda that
any assessment that may be remotely objective
is branded as pro-Turkish.
*
To hate those who have injured us:
what could be easier?
To love them: what could be more difficult?
But what if both hate and love are,
in this context, irrelevant
and what matters is taking care of business
by doing what must be done?
#2
Posted 20 October 2002 - 04:01 PM
*********************
It is a mistake to use the mind
as if it were a disposable mousetrap
good for catching only one mouse
and in the process of catching it
to kill it.
An idea is not a dead end;
it is a living organism in an endless chain reaction
of assertion, contradiction and synthesis.
In saying this I am saying nothing new,
only paraphrasing the teachings of philosophers
from Socrates and Plato
to Hegel and Marx.
What killed Bolshevism was Bolsheviks
who appear to have forgotten or ignored
Marx’s dialectic and his assertion
"I am not a Marxist."
And what prevents us from solving our problems
and moving forward is our obsession
with received platitudes such as
first nation to accept Christianity and
first nation to suffer a genocide in the 20th century.
#3
Posted 20 October 2002 - 04:01 PM
*****************
The Levant has not been kind to Armenians.
It has made them mercenary,
which means more materialistic, unprincipled,
cunning, and philistine.
I am not saying all Armenians from
the Middle East are crooks.
What I am talking about here is
the dominant mentality, which no doubt,
like every dominant mentality,
has produced resistance,
and sometimes even active opposition
in a non-representative minority.
*
To say that the Levant has done
more harm than good to our ethos
is to state the obvious.
Think of our medieval architecture,
liturgical music, and illuminated manuscripts:
they are quintessential manifestations of our voki
and it is this very voki that the Levant negates.
*
"Money is rust and dirt in the hands;
to taste it is like eating one’s own flesh,"
Khachatur Abovian tells us.
And more: "Man must sell his soul
in order to covet money."
*
I see no connection between
our authentic self and the Levantine mentality.
They are both Armenian only in the sense that
Bach’s music and the Nazi ideology are German –
but the one might as well be a contradiction of the other.
#4
Posted 20 October 2002 - 04:02 PM
***************************
In 1998 I published a book titled
UNPOPULAR OPINIONS in which I raised
a few questions about our present situation,
among them the following two:
"If the threat of annihilation in 1915
could not unite us, what can?
If we remain as divided today as we were then,
what have we learned?"
In the acknowledgments of that book
I mentioned the names of 25 friends
whose encouragement and support I enjoyed
and to whom I dedicated the book.
On rereading these names
I notice that nearly half of them
are no longer on speaking terms with me.
It can truly be said of Armenian friends:
Easy come, easier go.
If keeping Armenian friends means
subscribing to anti-Semitism, racism,
fascism, Stalinism and similar aberrations,
I suppose I shall die friendless.
#5
Posted 20 October 2002 - 04:02 PM
*****************************
Endless tribal conflicts,
deranged fanatics preaching fear and hatred,
and ultimately war and massacre,
and countless dupes willing to kill and die.
No, I am not talking about Armenians and Turks
but the human condition.
Why do these things happened?
We may never know the answer
but in our efforts to find it
we may expose many lies.
*
I dream of the day when odars will learn Armenian
and Armenians themselves will speak only one language:
their own. Dreams are cheap, they say;
which is why the poor have as many of them
as the rich have privileges and luxuries.
*
I once knew an old lady in her eighties
who bragged about her devotion to honesty
and was honest enough to admit that
she had no friends but many enemies.
Such is life.
*
Once in a while I am urged to read the Bible.
Millions have read it and will continue to read it
but can anyone say the world has been
or will be a better place as a result?
*
In his old age, Tolstoy – an intensely religious person –
was not averse to uttering profanities
in his private conversations with fellow writers
like Chekhov and Gorky.
I am reminded of the Mekhitarist monk
who used four-letter words in his Armenian translations
of Greek classics and this
long before D.H. Lawrence and Henry Miller.
#6
Posted 21 October 2002 - 11:32 PM
Originally posted by Sip:
So Sagan says all girls lie. Nairi says Sagan is telling the truth, but Nairi is a girl therefore she must be lying when she says Sagan was telling the truth ... but Sagan was also a girl (I think) so she couldn't have been telling the truth ... so not all girls lie ... which means that Nairi was lying when she said Sagan was telling the truth ... ah forget it. I am going to sleep.
#7
Posted 21 October 2002 - 07:32 PM
#8
Posted 22 October 2002 - 08:11 AM
******************************
When dissidents are silenced,
the bloodthirsty grow fat on the blood of the innocent.
*
Both Zohrab and Shahnour asserted that
the word prostitution should be used more often
in our environment.
*
A fanatic would rather walk a thousand miles
in the opposite direction to misunderstand you
than take a single step in your direction
to understand you.
*
For a fool, winning an argument
is more important than opening his mind.
*
I don't hate Jews, only Zionists.
DEATH TO JEWS!
I don't hate Americans only the American government.
DEATH TO AMERICA!
*
Crusade is an anti-Islam word, granted;
but what about jihad?
What kind of word is that?
*
God helps those who help themselves
even when they go against His will.
Example: men or nations bent on suicide.
*
Some Armenians, define Armenianism
as murderous hatred for anyone
who dares to disagree with them.
It follows, disagreement and treason
might as well be synonymous,
and, as everyone knows,
treason is a crime punishable by death.
Other synonyms of Armenianism:
Ottomanism, Stalinism, Oxymoronism, moronism
#9
Posted 22 October 2002 - 08:11 AM
*****************************
When a man utters nonsense,
we call him a crackpot and ignore him.
But when a hundred million crackpots speak in unison,
we call it a religion.
*
To how many of our superpatriots – whose unspoken slogan is:
"My country, right or wrong!" – I could say:
Massacres happen because
there are people like you on the other side – people
who subscribe to the very same values and credo,
people with the very same outlook and disposition,
brainwashed, self-righteous, dogmatic, narrow,
and yes, bloodthirsty.
*
Apache Indians, Eskimos, Patagonians, Arabs…:
they all claim God speaks in their own language,
and I say they are all crackpots.
It is common knowledge and an established fact
that God speaks in Armenian,
and I say this not because I am an Armenian
but because it is the truth!
To say otherwise is to utter nonsense!
*
In his POINTS FOR A COMPASS ROSE,
Evan S. Connell, Jr. writes:
"…one thing about the Incas sounds unpleasantly familiar:
they thought they were the Sun God’s favorites.
It’s been suggested that the Incas
might have been descendants of Armenians…."
This may come as a surprise to some but,
speaking for myself,
nothing surprises me any longer.
#10
Posted 22 October 2002 - 10:05 AM
Originally posted by ara baliozian:
A fanatic would rather walk a thousand miles in the opposite direction to misunderstand you
than take a single step in your direction
to understand you.
When a man utters nonsense,
we call him a crackpot and ignore him.
#11
Posted 22 October 2002 - 05:00 PM
Originally posted by nairi:
It was my fault. Please don't blame Sipan.
[ October 22, 2002, 06:01 PM: Message edited by: Sip ]
#12
Posted 22 October 2002 - 09:10 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Nice guys don't always finish last.
Sometimes they just don't last.
What is human history if not a cemetery
of tribes, nations, and empires?
If we have come close to extinction
it’s because we were massacred mercilessly
by our enemies; and if we have barely managed to survive
it’s because we did to them
before they had a chance to do it to us.
During World War I, Tolstoy’s daughter
was a nurse in the City of Van.
In her memoirs she writes that
Armenians massacred Turks
with the same savagery
that Turks massacred Armenians.
According to Azeri historians,
our celebrated General Antranik
was a master practitioner of ethnic cleansing
(a euphemism for massacring innocent civilians,
including women and children).
Here is another historic incident
that may also be dismissed as anecdotal evidence.
About a thousand years ago
there was a Byzantine emperor by the name of Basil II
and a Bulgarian czar by the name of Samuel.
They were both warlike rulers with territorial ambitions.
Inevitably, there was a war from which
Basil II emerged victorious.
To render his enemies inoperative
and to pacify his western borders,
Basil had the entire Bulgarian army blinded.
When Czar Samuel saw his blinded army
he had an epileptic fit and died.
And now the punch line:
both Emperor Basil II Bulgaroktonus
(Greek for Bulgar-slayer) and
Czar Samuel of Bulgaria were Armenians.
.
Moral I: Real history is much more interesting
than the bowdlerized version we are taught at school.
.
Moral II: To have had an Armenian education
means to have been systematically moronized.
.
Moral III: To say we are "the good guys"
and our enemies "the bad guys"
is to confuse military inferiority
with moral superiority.
#13
Posted 23 October 2002 - 01:53 AM
Originally posted by Sip:
Originally posted by nairi:
It was my fault. Please don't blame Sipan.
#14
Posted 25 October 2002 - 11:35 PM
*****************************
To understand another does not mean
to adopt his values and worldview.
To understand an Armenian does not mean
to think and feel as an Armenian
in the same way that to understand a Turk
does not mean to think and feel as a Turk.
Understanding should not be confused
with surrendering one’s identity as well as humanity.
And yet, this is exactly what we are expected to do
by those who feel misunderstood.
*
If truth shall set you free,
lies shall enslave you;
and very much like truth,
lies do not recognize racial, religious,
ideological, and tribal barriers.
Soviet lies are as bad as Ottoman lies,
and Armenian lies are worse than both
because their aim is neither oppression nor exploitation
but cannibalism.
*
You may say what you wish about the Turks
and I will not contradict you.
But let us agree on this:
Turks have coined many lovely and
sayings and expressions. For instance:
when someone makes an unwarranted assumption
hostile to their image or interests, they say:
"Yedii boka bak!"
Words are easy to translate but not
their music and rhythm.
#15
Posted 25 October 2002 - 11:37 PM
****************************
Is it possible to systematically moronize
a person of average intelligence
by brainwashing him to believe that
he is just about the smartest operator around,
so that he no longer cares what he says
and he ends up uttering nonsense worthy of a crackpot?
Is it possible to moronize an entire nation that way?
Isn't that what the Nazis did?
Didn't they mongolize Germany by chanting the slogan
DEUTSCHLAND, DEUTSCHLAND UBER ALLES?
Gentle reader, suppose I were to tell you,
I don't hate Arabs but I support people
who advocate their extermination;
or, I love Arabs, they are nice folk,
but the world would be a better place
if they were all driven into the desert to die of thirst;
or, Arabs are wonderful folk,
DEATH TO ARABS!…
Suppose I were to say these things:
what would you think of me?
No need for an answer.
May I guess?…
#16
Posted 25 October 2002 - 11:37 PM
*****************
About my critics:
I read them only when I am in need of stimulation,
and nothing stimulates me as much as
human arrogance and stupidity.
*
Never judge an Armenian
by the opinion of another Armenian.
Some of our ablest men were shot, silenced, and
betrayed by their fellow Armenians.
As a result, what survives today
is not the best but the worst.
The survival not of the fittest
but of the scum,
and sometimes even
the scum of the scum;
or the lunatic fringe
of the lunatic fringe.
Der voghormia.
Kyrie eleison.
Lord have mercy.
*
It is not easy to share your understanding with readers
who understand everything,
know better,
are wiser.
*
"Hyena with a fountain pen!"
"Running dog of the bourgeoisie!"
In case you are too young to remember,
these were Bolshevik insults
levelled at critics of the Kremlin.
If you cannot criticize the views,
attack the person!
Stalin lives.
#17
Posted 25 October 2002 - 03:45 PM
To understand another does not mean
to adopt his values and worldview.
To understand an Armenian does not mean
to think and feel as an Armenian
in the same way that to understand a Turk
does not mean to think and feel as a Turk.
Understanding should not be confused
with surrendering one’s identity as well as humanity.
And yet, this is exactly what we are expected to do
by those who feel misunderstood.
Gentle reader, suppose I were to tell you,
I don't hate Arabs but I support people
who advocate their extermination;
or, I love Arabs, they are nice folk,
but the world would be a better place
if they were all driven into the desert to die of thirst;
or, Arabs are wonderful folk,
DEATH TO ARABS!…
About my critics:
I read them only when I am in need of stimulation,
and nothing stimulates me as much as
human arrogance and stupidity.
It is not easy to share your understanding with readers
who understand everything,
know better,
are wiser.
If you cannot criticize the views,
attack the person!
Stalin lives.
If there's anything unclear about my reply, please don't hesitate to ask. I'll be glad to provide you with a decent answer.
Nairi
#18
Posted 26 October 2002 - 07:59 AM
****************************
A hundred years ago an Ottoman sultan
could fornicate with as many as
a thousand concubines,
some young enough to be his granddaughters,
and no one saw anything remotely questionable in that.
That’s because he was not just a political
but also a religious leader.
He represented Allah on earth.
He was accountable only to Allah.
Which means he could fornicate
as well as massacre infidels in His name.
And I can imagine Clinton thinking
of Abdulhamid II and saying to himself again and again,
"Lucky bastard!"
Islam may be repressive and hidebound
to the point of being medieval
but it also has deep pockets of liberalism
for the privileged few.
Allahu akbar!
#19
Posted 26 October 2002 - 08:00 AM
*************
What do I share with some of my fellow Armenians?
Nothing but an Ottoman background.
A source of degradation rather than pride.
*
In the kingdom of the blind
the one-eyed is king.
But if the kingdom is Armenian,
the one-eyed is blinded too.
Misery likes company, they say,
and envy is tough on the privileged.
*
I don't believe in the moral superiority of the underdog.
I have been an underdog all my life
and I have no illusions about them.
#20
Posted 28 October 2002 - 10:01 AM
****************************
A fundamentalist has been defined as one
who believes the Scriptures
(such as the Bible or the Koran)
contain all the answers to all our past,
present and future problems,
and everything said or written after them
is either repetition or deviation.
If deviation it can't be worth reading or preserving.
So that if all the libraries of the world
were to burn down and only one copy
of the Scriptures remained,
mankind would lose none of its spiritual
and intellectual patrimony.
*
What is the difference between
a Christian and a Muslim fundamentalist?
To answer this question is not easy
because it raises many social, political,
historical, philosophical, theological and semantic issues.
But if I were to somewhat simplify these complexities
and take a rough guess, I would say that
the difference is about the same as that
which exists between a bishop’s b.s.
and a mullah’s merda.
In saying this I realize I may lose
some of my fundamentalist readers
(assuming of course I had one or two to begin with)
and in the process a fraction of my income from royalties.
To which I can only say, So be it.
Allahu akbar!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users