N. And I am circumcised.I do have to tell you that when things like so happened to me and I call customer support and get the answer that the system is down or something I start laughing. I tell them that they are most likely not telling the truth to me as systems nowadays do not go down that much, but that it is a common answer that they all practice. If it does happen often(once every 2-3 months i do take my business elsewhere.)
---
Edit -- my bad I accidentally deleted the message you are replying to below! --Sip
---
You know what Hagarag. You are one boring dude.
I think we should create a forum thread and pin it to the homepage so that it is visible all the time. it will have all your answers in it.
1. I am bi-curious sexual whatever...
2. My Armenian wife left me...
3. My Armenian wife aborted my 2 children...
4. Those Republican so and sos...
5. My conservative relatives...
6. I look 20 years old...
7. I can pick up much younger women...
8. The Turks slaughtered by relatives...
9. blah blah blah
And that way everyone will see all your answers and you do not have to post off topic comments
Circumcised Armenian Men
#1
Posted 09 November 2003 - 11:23 PM
#2
Posted 10 November 2003 - 12:09 AM
How did you know
- onjig likes this
#3
Posted 10 November 2003 - 03:27 PM
It's not because it's funny. Simply because Azat forgot to add it to his list of "Hagarag knowns"...Why is that so funny? I have yet to meet a Parska-Hay who is not circumcised... You're not alone Hagarag!
On-topic: I agree with Vava. For quite some time we were able to hide behind "Armenian". Nobody knew us and nobody prejudged us. We were neither Turks nor Moroccans. That was enough reason to be respected among Dutch people. But ever since the great migration wave from the Soviet Union in the last decade, our rep has turned from unknown and harmless, to known and harmful.
As for helping newcomers: if they want help, they'll get it. Sadly most are too arrogant to ask for help, and when you try to give it to them because you notice that they are doing something unacceptable, they diss you as they would do in their own country. I don't want to generalize though. I have also met some very decent Hayastancis who learned very quickly. But sadly, they are not the ones that stand out...
Then again, I don't know of too many Parskahays that would talk about it like it were a common conversation.
#4
Posted 10 November 2003 - 05:44 PM
But in any case, I think it's important not to deviate this threads too much in directions far away from the subject at hand.
#5
Posted 10 November 2003 - 07:30 PM
#6
Posted 10 November 2003 - 10:07 PM
#7
Posted 10 November 2003 - 10:11 PM
#8
Posted 10 November 2003 - 11:05 PM
I have yet to meet a Parska-Hay who is not circumcised... You're not alone Hagarag!
As it so happens, I am parskahye, and ....
#9
Posted 11 November 2003 - 03:36 AM
#10
Posted 11 November 2003 - 10:15 AM
For your information, after World War II almost all American babies were cricumcized. It was standard practice in hospitals especially in the larger cities and especially in the more affluent areas. There are thousands pf Armenian-American men born in the US until approximately 1980 who are circumcized.
#11
Posted 11 November 2003 - 10:26 AM
It's time someone said it, loud and clear: that infant circumcision -- including so-called "religious" infant circumcision -- is an atrocity and a fraud; that it's a brutal, perverse, outrageous violation of a helpless human being's right to his own body; that it's child sexual abuse in its most vicious, most destructive, most cunningly disguised form; that it literally censors a child's life -- kills part of the child -- even if he never realizes it, because it severs him from a uniquely specialized, uniquely sensitive means of perceiving, experiencing, sharing and enjoying his existence; that the reasons given to justify it are myths and lies; that it's the ugliest, saddest, most sickening scandal in the history of medicine and an infamy to societies that tolerate it and to institutions that sanctify it; and that anyone involved even remotely with cutting, tearing, crushing or burning off the foreskins of babies -- or anyone else by force, coercion or deceit -- is as guilty of causing human suffering as the monsters of Auschwitz and in the name of humanity should be exposed, confronted, stopped, brought to trial, and imprisoned.
Regardless of anyone's "reason" for circumcising a baby, the fact remains that infant circumcision is foreskin amputation by force -- the deliberate, irreversible destruction of a normal, natural, functional part of someone else's body -- living, protective, erogenous tissue that is rightfully his and that he instinctively wants to keep intact -- at a time in his life when he can't understand what is being done to him -- or why -- and can't speak for or protect himself.
Infant circumcision is, in other words, human vivisection -- legalized, institutionalized, sanctified human vivisection.
Reason and attempts at persuasion will not deter those who, driven by the compulsion to destroy what they secretly envy but can never have, and desperate to make their own tortured partial penises seem normal -- and for who knows what other god-awful reasons -- persist so relentlessly in defending, promoting, misrepresenting and performing this crippling, disfiguring mutilation.
The birthright of males -- all males -- to keep all of the penis they are born with must therefore be secured by law.
John A. Erickson
Biloxi, Mississippi
March 1998
http://www.sexuallym...d.org/iccah.htm
#12
Posted 11 November 2003 - 11:14 AM
#13
Posted 11 November 2003 - 11:17 AM
Atta boy Harut!i ain't giving up any bit of my ......
#14
Posted 11 November 2003 - 11:27 AM
Edited by gamavor, 11 November 2003 - 11:34 AM.
#15
Posted 11 November 2003 - 11:36 AM
So I kinda find it weird that "Circumcised Armenian men" has ended up in the "Women" forum.
#16
Posted 11 November 2003 - 11:41 AM
#17
Posted 11 November 2003 - 11:47 AM
Please tell me again that you are Armenian
#18
Posted 11 November 2003 - 11:52 AM
#19
Posted 11 November 2003 - 11:53 AM
Edited by Vahe G., 11 November 2003 - 11:53 AM.
#20
Posted 11 November 2003 - 11:54 AM
I think this is someone's way of telling us that she's impatient with the proposed name change to 'Gender Issues' as opposed to 'Women'.So I kinda find it weird that "Circumcised Armenian men" has ended up in the "Women" forum.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users