QUOTE(Dave @ Apr 8 2006, 04:47 PM)
I think that the flag looks fine. It was accepted back in the Cilician days, in 1918, in 1991, and in the recent referendum, so the tricolor should remain unchanged.
This Yerakouyn is our flag and I accept it with pride. The tricolour is neither a “tashnakist” flag (symbolically or otherwise) nor is it the problem, the governing of the nation bearing this flag is another issue.
I reject the notion being shoved down the throats of Armenians that unless we give everything to Russia (read:lower our pants) we will loose Karabakh and Turkey will attack and so on so forth.
People forget that we got to this point in history because of Russian policies towards Armenians in the first place. The issue here is not Turkish persecution of Armenians but Russian imperialism in the Caucasus. From the Tsarist to Lenin’s betrayal of Armenians fast forward to 1988 and you'd realize that a lot of damage would have been averted if the Kremlin had acted what we would have characterized as "proper" political behaviour towards an "ally". You would also realize that there is no such thing as “alliance”, it is simply a hegemony over a weak subject.
If we understand that realpolitik dictated that Armenians would have to "vacate" Shahumian, Getashen and Martunashen then why are we so obtuse and refuse to understand that the same realpolitik would prevent Armenian "ownership" of Karabakh in the eyes of today's Kremlin.
In 1988 Gorbachev was mentioning Karabakh with it's Armenian name Artsakh in his speeches (to pacify us)yet he was saying and I quote "Karabakh has been attached to Azerbaijan in thousand threads" and soon after Kremlin heavy weight Pugo ordered the emptying of the above mentioned Armenian regions with a lot of casualties. I remember quite vividly a Canadian reporter, from CTV news who happened to be there showing the poor people uprooted from their homelands and simply “dumped” (his words) inside the Armenian border.
Russia, who handed Karabakh and Nakhitchevan to the Azeris in the first place, we are told by our leadership that is crucial to our national security. From what we have experienced in the past Russia is part of the problem that threatens our national security. And handing over our industrial assets one after the other simply wets the appetite of our friroeidhfnd (traces of friend can be found in that word) that realizes that we should praise Russia for keeping a sinking friend alive by giving him a tube to breath instead of simply lifting him to safety.
Russophiles of our nation would call that a help, I call it pimping. Therefore the pimping of our flag to match what we have become would not be inappropriate.
Q, the Komitas conservatory example was just a joke, but the reality of losing all levers of sovereignty is unfortunately very real.