Jump to content


Photo

cease-fire violations by azeris


  • Please log in to reply
3266 replies to this topic

#2581 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 March 2021 - 10:12 AM

Armenpress.am
 

European Commission deplores Azerbaijani attacks on Shushi Cathedral during 2020 war

 
 
Share
 
1045115.jpg 10:32, 4 March, 2021

YEREVAN, MARCH 4, ARMENPRESS. In the response to the urgent written question sent to the European Commission by the Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Loucas Fourlas (Cyprus, EPP), the High Representative/Vice-President Josep Borrell states on behalf of the European Commission that the latter deplores the damages caused to the Shushi Ghazanchetsots Cathedral by the Azerbaijani armed forces, the European Armenian Federation for Justice and Democracy (EAFJD) said in a news release.

In the urgent written question addressed by MEP Fourlas, it is mentioned that the Azerbaijani armed forces targeted and attacked Shushi’s Ghazanchetsots Cathedral on 8 October 2020, in violation of international rules of war. The MEP asks the European Commission whether the latter is planning to take steps “to protect both the civilian population and places of worship” in Artsakh/ Nagorno Karabakh that are currently under the Azerbaijani control.

 
 

Responding the MEP, the European Commission states that it deplores the destruction of religious and historic monuments in Nagorno Karabakh and underlines the importance of preserving and restoring the cultural and religious heritage.

Furthermore, in his answer the High Representative refers to the United Nations Security Council Resolution 2347 (2017), which gives the definition of the war crimes, targeting of the religious, educational and cultural centers.

The European Commission also welcomes the mission initiated by UNESCO to the regions of Nagorno Karabakh currently under the Azerbaijani control aimed at establishing a first factural assessment of the Armenian cultural heritage. It will also contribute to supporting the preservation and restoration of the cultural sites.

Commenting on the response of the written question, the EAFJD President Kaspar Karampetian stated: “Azerbaijan has to bear full responsibility for the gruesome war crimes committed during and after the 2020 war in Artsakh/Nagorno Karabakh, including targeting civilian settlements as well as religious sites i.a. the Holy Savior Ghazanchetsots Cathedral in Shushi. Shushi has undeniably been a historical Armenian city, an important center for culture and education, and the symbol of the Armenian revival of Artsakh. The international community and the relevant organizations must closely follow and monitor the preservation of the Armenian religious and cultural heritage in the region. We should not allow yet another act of cultural genocide, such as the destruction of thousands of Armenian medieval cross-stones in Nakhijevan by the Azerbaijani authorities in 2006. Any attempt of demolition of historic Armenian presence in Artsakh/Nagorno Karabakh must be prevented and strongly condemned”.

 

 

https://armenpress.a...1RQPO9tigXeYjeU



#2582 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 March 2021 - 08:53 AM

Asbarez.com
 
Aliyev Claims Zangezur is ‘Historic Azerbaijani Territory’

March 5, 2021

 
 
46370430_DjOA3HvolhgkrSDIvn_MvUzVBFDtbhY

The Gates of Zangezur in Armenia

A “new transport corridor will pass through Zangezur, a historic territory of Azerbaijan, and will connect mainland Azerbaijan with its integral part, the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic, and Turkey,” Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev said during a speech at an economic conference.

Aliyev also declared that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has been resolved and all United Nations Security Council resolutions have been fulfilled through its aggressive attack on Artsakh on September 27, which sparked a full-blown war.

With such a provocative statement, calling Zangezur an ‘historic Azerbaijani territory’ and making reference to an imaginary corridor, the President of Azerbaijan deliberately undermines the implementation of the November 9 and January 11 trilateral statements,” said Armenia’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Anna Naghdalyan, who, once again, stressed that “Article 9 of the November 9 trilateral statement does not mention the establishment of a corridor.”

“Such rhetoric contradicts Azerbaijan’s obligations. It is a blatant challenge to international law, and in no way does it contribute to the stability of the region and threatens all states in the region,” added Naghdalyan.

“The statements of the President of Azerbaijan that Azerbaijan has resolved the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict by the use of force further illustrates who unleashed the war and who is leading the region through new challenges and further destabilization,” explained Naghdalyan

“As always, Azerbaijan is distorting the provisions of the UN Security Council resolutions, while these same resolutions express their support for the Minsk Group peace process, headed by the Minsk Group Co-Chairs,” said Naghdalyan.

“With his statements on the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process, the President of Azerbaijan contradicts the position of the international community, and first of all, the position of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmanship and Co-Chair countries, which clearly emphasizes the imperative of comprehensive settlement of the conflict. It is obvious to us that the attempt to suppress the right of the people of Artsakh to self-determination through the use of force cannot create grounds for the settlement of the conflict. The realization of the right of the people of Artsakh to self-determination and the elimination of the consequences of the war are the core elements of the peace process,” explained Naghdalyan.

 

 

http://asbarez.com/2...IVhLX5uM8-zw5lY

 


#2583 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 March 2021 - 07:48 AM

Petro dollars at work non stop for fake sultan!

GVWire

March 5 2021
 
 
Jeopardy! Regrets Armenia-Azerbaijan Clue
 
 March 5, 2021
 
 

At the end of the Jeopardy! shows he is guest hosting, executive producer Mike Richards reminds viewers of the wisdom of the late Alex Trebek — pitch in to make the world “a kindler, gentler society.”

Some in the Armenian community appear to be questioning the show’s own adherence to that message after the airing of an episode this week.

A clue focused on the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict has some saying Jeopardy! got it wrong.

The show regrets the situation.

“Our clue stated that Armenia ‘has been accused of irredentism, the reclaiming of old territory.’ We didn’t mean to imply either that Armenian policy is actually irredentist, or that irredentism is necessarily something to be condemned,” Jeopardy! replied on Saturday morning, a day after GV Wire℠ posted the story.

“Jeopardy! clues often involve reducing complex situations to a brief summary, and we always regret it when our clues come across as oversimplified and even as inaccurate or insulting to any person or group,” the show said.

The show airs locally in Fresno on ABC 30 (KFSN).

pngrEbEHcasZb.png
An image of the clue that aired on Jeopardy!, upsetting a prominent Armenian group. (Image: screenshot)
 
Clue Without a Clue?
“Jeopardy! clues often involve reducing complex situations to a brief summary, and we always regret it when our clues come across as oversimplified and even as inaccurate or insulting to any person or group.” — Statement from Jeopardy!

On the episode that aired on Thursday, the $1,600 clue in “Terms from History” upset Armenians.

“This country has been accused of irredentism, the reclaiming of old territory, over the Nagorno-Karabakh area in Azerbaijan,” the answer read.

“What is Armenia?” correctly questioned Jim Cooper, a screenwriter from Pacific Palisades.

For Armenian advocates, Nagorno-Karabakh is not considered part of Azerbaijan, but rather an independent land.

“The Armenian-American community is outraged by the blatant misportrayal of the Artsakh self-determination movement,” Alex Galitsky, spokesman for the Armenian National Committee of America Western Region said.

Last year, Armenia and Azerbaijan engaged in armed conflict over the disputed region, also known as Artsakh. Thousands died. Many Central Valley politicians side with Armenia. Both countries have said they are in the right.

Four months after the war ended, issues remain over POW exchanges and information about landmines.

Fresno Advocate Disappointed

Sevag Tateosian, an Armenian advocate from Fresno and former candidate for the State Center Community College District, was in disbelief.

“As someone who has watched the program with my family for decades, I’m disappointed at the lack of research by program staff. We are seeing more misinformation coming from the Azerbaijani government to the point that they are even alleging Armenian churches in Nagorno-Karabakh are Albanian churches,” Tateosian said.

Galisky, the ANCA-WR spokesman, said the Jeopardy! clue had a bias against Armenians.

” It is profoundly disappointing to see an American cultural staple like Jeopardy! use its platform to sanitize the genocidal violence perpetrated against the indigenous Armenians of Artsakh by the Azerbaijani government – one of the most repressive and authoritarian regimes in the world today,” Galitsky said.

The Los Angeles-based Azerbaijanian consulate had a completely different response. They referred GV Wire℠ to a tweet from Consul General Nasimi Aghayev.

“One of America’s oldest and most watched television shows @Jeopardy asked this question yesterday. Illegal, @UN-condemned occupation & ethnic cleansing of #Azerbaijan’s #Qarabagh region by #Armenia was exposed again. Watched by millions of people. Truth always comes out,” Aghayev wrote.

[Note: this story was updated Friday evening to include the tweet response from the Azerbaijani consul general. The story was updated again Saturday with a statement from “Jeopardy!”]

 
 
 

 



#2584 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 March 2021 - 08:42 AM

Jamestown Foundation
March 9 2021
 
 
Karabakh Conflict Far From Over and Could Explode Again Publication: Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 18 Issue: 39 By: Paul Goble

March 9, 2021 05:41 PM

pngZeKOcjH21r.png

 

Following the Moscow-brokered ceasefire and post-war declarations signed by Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan that ended the 2020 Second Karabakh War, the international community has generally concluded three things. First is that the Karabakh conflict is over; second, that the benefits of reopening transportation routes are so great that all sides will be interested in seeing the provisions of these declarations realized; and third, that the likelihood of any new fighting between the sides is minimal, not least because of the presence of Russian peacekeepers on the ground (see EDM, October 13, 2020 and December 16, 2020). Indeed, former Armenian foreign minister Vardan Oskanyan writes that this “stereotypical view” has spread so widely that it is distracting attention from the real situation. Namely, he argues, the benefits spelled out within these trilateral declarations are far less likely to be realized than most think, and the danger that more fighting may eventually break out is far greater (Hraparak, March 6; IA REX, March 7).

Oskanyan’s words deserve attention not only because they undoubtedly reflect the views of many in Yerevan but also because they challenge what is the received opinion in numerous world capitals. More than that, his argument finds support both in the current difficulties the parties face and the increasingly obvious fact that the economic carrots laid out in the declarations as the reward for regional cooperation will not be realized for several years at the earliest. This offers a virtual invitation for those opposed to the current settlement to engage in actions to torpedo it, even if they are not in a position to achieve their own alternative goals.

In his article, Oskanyan argues that when “stereotypes are formed in the international community, it is very difficult to dispel them” by arguments alone. Sometimes these stereotypes benefit one side, sometimes the other; but they often stand in the way of understanding what is in fact going on. In the past, the Armenian side benefitted from some stereotypes, and that is why relative stability in the South Caucasus was maintained from 1994 to 2020. But now, new stereotypes have arisen that threaten Yerevan’s interests and must be countered before they block Armenia from achieving any of its objectives, Oskanyan asserts (Hraparak, March 6; IA REX, March 7).

The former foreign minister points to three new stereotypes that he says have emerged in the last few months: 1) a belief that “the issue of Nagorno-Karabakh has been solved, 2)” a conviction that “Karabakh is Azerbaijani territory” and that the issues facing Armenians living there are only about human rights, and 3) a certainty that “the time has come to look to the future.” The train powered by such views, Oskanyan says, has left the station and is gathering speed. To stop it, Yerevan must work in “three directions: diplomatic, military and international-legal.” Otherwise, Armenia and Armenians will find themselves marginalized to the point of lasting defeat.

To prevent that from happening, Oskanyan continues, Yerevan must argue that the November 2020 ceasefire declaration did not “reflect the desire of the Republic of Armenia but was the result of a situation imposed on it by military force,” and that no “status quo imposed by military actions can ever be the basis for long-term peace in the region.” Moreover, he adds that “the Armenian side has never and will never aspire to lands that do not belong to it but will defend those that do.” Finally, “the achievement of the rights of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh to sovereignty on their land remains the chief task of the foreign policy of Armenia.”

According to Oskanyan, Yerevan must rebuild its military, launch an international diplomatic campaign by uniting Armenia, the Armenian diaspora and the people of Karabakh, as well as bring a maximum possible number of cases before international tribunals to challenge Azerbaijan’s most recent moves. Unless it does so, he says, “in the not-so-distant future, we will see the Nakhchivanization of the remnants of Artsakh [the Armenian name for Karabakh], the exodus of Armenians from Syunik [the Armenian name for the Zengezur corridor between Azerbaijan and the Azerbaijani exclave of Nakhchivan], and even the loss” of this region to Baku. That outcome would cut off Armenia from Iran and connect mainland Azerbaijan and Turkey by land.

However that may be, there are real and serious problems threatening both the ceasefire and the reopening of transportation links as detailed in the latter, January 2021, trilateral declaration. Ending a war is never easy. Problems always persist regarding the fate of casualties and prisoners, and questions are raised about compensation. But in this case, there are some more serious disputes that were not solved by real negotiations or a real agreement. Those outstanding issues, thus, call into question the optimism of the international community. Among the most critical of these is the continued role of Armenian military units in Karabakh. These units have entered into a symbiotic relationship with the Russian peacekeepers there (see EDM, December 8, 2020), even though Baku has demanded that they be withdrawn because, in its view, their continuing presence contradicts the November declaration (Doshdu, March 1, 2021).Yerevan has shown no interest in doing so, and Moscow is not pressuring the Armenians, thus leaving in place forces that could easily become another casus belli for Azerbaijan.

But an even more serious obstacle to any establishment of a lasting peace is the spreading fear that reopening transportation routes, something Moscow has promoted as central, is anything but a done deal. Earlier this month, for example, Armenia reacted with fury to Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s use of the term Zengezur for the corridor that is slated to be opened between Azerbaijan and Nakhchivan. Armenia saw that formulation as a move toward Azerbaijan’s seizure of what the Soviets declared and the international community recognizes to this day as Armenian territory (Kavkazsky Uzel, March 5; Windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com, March 7). And the possibility of a new Armenian-Turkish railway seems farfetched given the attitudes of both sides at the present time (Stoletie, March 3).

Given all this, the risks that a new armed conflict will break out remain all too real, especially if the international community comforts itself with the notion that such an outcome is impossible.

 

https://jamestown.or...-explode-again/



#2585 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 March 2021 - 09:40 AM

EurasiaNet.org
March 11 2021
 
 
 
Dispatch from Stepanakert: Karabakh’s Armenians await uncertain future Residents are torn whether to rebuild or leave: “If the Russians weren’t here, most people would have already left.” Ani Mejlumyan Mar 11, 2021
01-Unknown-1.jpg?itok=5jBERdJAThe market in Stepanakert (photos by Ani Mejlumyan)

In last year’s war, Karabakh’s Armenians lost three-quarters of the territory they used to control, and the safety of the remaining population now depends on a Russian peacekeeping mission whose mandate expires in 2025.

For many here, the fate of Karabakh and its Armenian population seems to be hanging by a thread.

“The future is unclear,” said Tsovinar Barkhudaryan, a newscaster at the public broadcaster Artsakh TV. “People are thinking about staying or leaving. We don’t even know what’s going to happen in a week, let alone in four years.”

During the 44-day war, Barkhudaryan sent her children into Armenia for their safety and her husband fought on the front lines. She covered the war as a journalist. Her family is now back together and they try to focus on the day-to-day. “I’m still in hell,” she said. “I wish I had other news to report.”

After the war she did a story about a man in the village of Tomashen who lost a son during the fighting and whose home is now so close to the new front line that he can see Azerbaijani soldiers from his window. And yet he is staying and even brought his grandchildren there to live. “People like that are the backbone of Artsakh who will make us rise again,” she said, using the Armenian name for the territory. “Now, knowing his story and that my house is safe in Stepanakert, my husband is back from the war, and I have a job and children, how can I leave?” she asked. “What reason do I have to leave? It would be a betrayal to leave these people.”

During the war, well more than half (estimates vary) of Karabakh’s roughly 150,000 people fled into Armenia. Since then, many have returned, though estimates vary widely. Armenia’s minister of social and labor affairs, Mesrop Arakelyan, said in January that 95,000 had returned. The Russian peacekeepers have been facilitating the return of residents, and say that thus far 52,712 have returned.

But many locals doubt those relatively rosy figures. “The numbers are exaggerated,” said Yana Avanesyan, 26, who teaches international law and works with an NGO helping those displaced by the conflict. (International agencies working on the issue use more modest figures; the United Nations has calculated that about 68,000 people who fled from the fighting remain in Armenia.)

And the future will only get murkier. The November 10 ceasefire agreement that ended the fighting provides for a 2,000-strong Russian peacekeeping force to separate the remaining Armenian-controlled areas from the new Azerbaijani positions. But that Russian presence has to be renewed every five years, and either side could veto it. An Azerbaijani veto in 2025 could effectively mean the end of Armenian rule in Karabakh.

“If the Russians weren’t here, most people would have already left,” said sixty-something Lilia Matevosyan, who lives with her family in Martakert, a city to the east of Stepanakert. Before the war they grew pomegranates and grapes but their farmland has been handed over to Azerbaijan. “We want to stay but the land here isn’t as good, and there are problems with irrigation,” her husband, Kamo Balasanyan, said. “We’re left with nothing now.”

Many people look at the substantial infrastructure that the Russian peacekeepers have already built and come to the conclusion that the Russians are here to stay. Especially for older Karabakhis, that is comforting.

“It’s good that the Russians are here, it’s calm,” said Irina Parsadanova, an elderly woman selling dried fruit and honey in Stepanakert’s market. Still, she is stressed by the uncertainty. “We go to sleep at night not knowing what’s going to happen in the morning,” she said. “Where could we go? There’s nowhere to run.”

Many of the young people Avanesyan works with “don’t know what to do – stay or leave, and you don’t really have the moral right to ask them to stay,” she said. “The situation is chaotic now, people are dealing with day-to-day stuff and we aren’t really comprehending the full extent of what happened.”

The uncertainty of the situation was captured in a recent report from the UN, which found that 85 percent of the households who had fled the fighting and remain in Armenia “did not intend to move or were unable to communicate their intentions.”

Avanesyan herself hopes to stay. “I don’t think that my house someday won’t be mine,” she said.

But she is critical of the government’s efforts to attract people to return, including subsidizing rent and utilities and compensating them for lost homes, which amounts to “buying people with incentives, instead of coming up with a long-term strategy of recovering from the effects of the war,” she said. “I see a future here, but the government needs to bring some clarity.” 

Like many younger people in Karabakh, she mistrusts the Russian presence and assumes that they are just a temporary fix to a longer-term problem. “This is a bleeding wound,” she said. “As long as we have what we have, people on both sides are not satisfied. For me, war is not a question of ‘if’ but of ‘when’,” she said. 

01-Unknown-2.jpg

Stepanakert’s landmark pub, Bardak, has acquired some new decorations since the war: an unexploded Smerch rocket, a TV set donated by a friend from Hadrut – a town lost during the war – who took it as he fled, and a door from the ancient fortress in Tigranakert, another site lost during the war. “This door has to go back where it came from,” said Azat Adamyan, Bardak’s owner. “It’s our responsibility, even if our generation doesn’t do it then some other one needs to.”

He fought in the war, and has scars from a cluster bomb on his face and legs to show for it.

In spite of the uncertainty over the territory’s future, he said he is committed to staying. He’s even building a new restaurant in Stepanakert. “People say, why do you invest so much, what if the Russians or Azeris take it?” he said. “I don’t care, because if that happens then I also will have to leave my ancestors’ house, where I was born, and that would be even more painful.”

 

Ani Mejlumyan is a reporter based in Yerevan.

 


#2586 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 March 2021 - 09:59 AM

I wouldn't be surprised for this!

Panorama, Armenia

March 11 2021
 
 
British HALO Trust provided Turks with maps of minefields in Artsakh – 24News

The UK’s HALO Trust company, engaged in charitable activities in Artsakh, provided the Turkish special services with maps of the minefields in Artsakh, allowing them to successfully pass through those areas during the 44-day war in 2020, the Artsakh president’s special representative, Boris Avagyan, told 24News.

“I learned from reliable sources that the HALO Trust, which operated under the name of a British charitable organization and was engaged in landmine clearance, obtained maps of the minefields of the Armenian side during its activities in Artsakh and handed them over to the Turkish special services,” the media outlet quoted him as saying.

“As a result, the enemy was able to successfully pass through the minefields during the war. Under the pretext of studying dangerous areas, the company carried out reconnaissance operations throughout the territory of Artsakh.

“This company was founded in 1988 by Colin Campbell Mitchell, a British member of parliament and former colonel in the British army,” Avagyan said. 

 

https://www.panorama...Artsakh/2467496

 

 



#2587 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 March 2021 - 08:44 AM

Al Araboya, UAE
March 12 2021
 
 
No secret that Turkey plays extremely destabilizing role in our region: Armenia FM
Ismaeel Naar, Al Arabiya English
 

Armenia’s Foreign Minister Ara Aivazian heavily criticized Turkey on Thursday, saying it was no secret that Ankara plays a destabilizing role in the region.

“Well, it's not a secret that Turkey played and continues to play extremely destabilizing role in our region. That role was vividly exposed during the recent 44 days of aggression unleased by Azerbaijan,” Aivazian told Al Arabiya in an interview.

“That country not only merely supported Azerbaijan but was directly involved in all military actions and phases of this aggression starting from planning to ground operations,” he added.

After six weeks of fighting late last year, Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a Russia-brokered ceasefire for the enclave, which is internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan but mainly populated by ethnic Armenians.

Turkey backs Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh, and has criticized the co-chairs of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)’s so-called Minsk Group for not resolving the long-running conflict in decades of mediation. The Minsk Group is led by the United States, France and Russia.

“Turkey, I would like to recall together with Azerbaijan on the threshold of the war, conducted a large-scale military drill with the involvement of Turkish Air Force. That country resorted to the now usual toolkit, if the expert of foreign terrorist fighters to our region for its power projection,” Aivazian said.

Aivazian warned that lessons must be learned from its experience of the Armenian genocide, which Turkey still refuses to acknowledge fully.

“160 years have passed since the Armenian genocide, yet Turkey continues to spearhead new atrocities against Armenia now in our region. And yet the South Caucasus is not the only target of Turkey,” he said.

(With background input from Reuters)

Watch the video interview at the link below


#2588 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 March 2021 - 08:48 AM

Panorama, Armenia
March 12 2021
 
 
 
‘Azerbaijan and Turkey are targeting Syunik, Armenia for their next attack’: ANCA alerts Biden, Blinken

The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) has warned U.S. President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken about a planned Azerbaijani attack on Armenia's Syunik Province.

“ALERT Joe Biden and Secretary Blinken: Azerbaijan and Turkey are targeting Syunik, Armenia for their next attack,” the organization tweeted on Thursday, March 11.

ALERT @JoeBiden + @SecBlinken/@StateDept: Azerbaijan and Turkey are targeting Syunik, Armenia for their next attack. #Retweet pic.twitter.com/aMPm4OXQWu

— ANCA (@ANCA_DC) March 11, 2021

https://www.panorama.am/en/news/2021/03/12/ANCA-Biden-Blinken/2467968


#2589 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 March 2021 - 07:34 AM

Words with no teeth is useless! You might as well stay silent.

Public Radio of Armenia

March 16 2021
 
 
European Parliament condemns Turkey’s use of Syrian mercenaries in the Karabakh conflict
 

The European Parliament has strongly condemned the use of Syrian mercenaries in conflicts in Libya and Nagorno-Karabakh, in violation of international law.

In a resolution on the Syrian conflict the European Parliament also calls on Turkey to withdraw its troops from Northern Syria which it is illegally occupying outside of any UN mandate.

It condemns Turkey’s illegal transfers of Kurdish Syrians from occupied Northern Syria to Turkey for detention and prosecution in violation of Turkey’s international obligations under the Geneva Conventions.

It urges that all Syrian detainees who have been transferred to Turkey be immediately repatriated to the occupied territories in Syria; is worried that Turkey’s ongoing displacements could amount to ethnic cleansing against the Syrian Kurdish population; stresses that Turkey’s illegal invasion and occupation has jeopardized peace in Syria, the Middle East and the Eastern Mediterranean.

 

https://en.armradio....abakh-conflict/

 

 



#2590 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 18 March 2021 - 07:30 AM

Public Radio of Armenia
March 17 2021
 
 
 
Made-in-Canada airstrike gear used in Armenian – Azerbaijani conflict was earmarked for Turkey
 
 

The serial number on Canadian-made air strike targeting gear that turned up in the Azerbaijani-Armenian conflict last fall matched that of restricted military equipment Ottawa had approved for export to the Turkish navy, newly released documents show, The Globe and Mail reports.

The House of Commons foreign affairs committee is probing how targeting and imaging equipment made in Burlington, Ont., by L3Harris Wescam and sold to Turkey ended up in the bloody conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh.

The matching serial number provides the strongest proof to date that Canadian military equipment was diverted by the Turks to its ally Azerbaijan.

Canada is obliged under domestic law and the global Arms Trade Treaty to prevent, detect and stop the diversion of military goods to users other than intended customers. It is also compelled to stop exports of such restricted goods that are shown to be used to harm civilians.

E-mail records made public in the Commons investigation show the Department of Global Affairs scrambled last fall to verify allegations by critics that Wescam gear had been found on Turkish-made Bayraktar drones that had crashed or been shot down in the conflict. Government officials contacted Wescam officials regarding footage and photos of drones that were circulated by Armenian forces, asking if this was indeed their gear on display.

In an Oct. 25, 2020, e-mail, Shalini Anand, the acting director-general of the trade and export controls bureau at Global Affairs, wrote to departmental colleagues with feedback from Wescam: “They have indicated that some of the images may be their product, but it is difficult to confirm.”

In the case of the imaging and targeting gear in one video, Ms. Anand’s e-mail said “a [Wescam] system with this serial number was delivered in September 2020 under permit number [redacted] approved … for end user Turkish Naval Forces.”

E-mails also indicate Global Affairs checked the end-use statement submitted to obtain export approval of the targeting gear, which said only Turkey would be using the equipment.

The “systems will be delivered and used by the final end user Turkish Naval Forces, who will use the [redacted] system for the purpose of surveillance and targeting.”

In the statement that was used to obtain export approval, Ottawa had been assured “the imported goods will not be diverted, re-exported or transferred … for any reason.”

The e-mails reveal that last fall there were more applications to export Wescam targeting gear where the ultimate user was declared to the Azerbaijani Air Force – but Ottawa never approved them before suspending all Wescam permits to Turkey last October.

According to The Globe and Mail, Wescam officials declined to comment on the information revealed in the documents. It also declined to say whether officials at the company believed the Turkish military had lied to them about its intentions for the targeting gear. Company officials also would not say whether they had eventually obtained confirmation on how many of its sensors ended up being used in drones in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

The Turkish embassy declined to comment on the revelations in Canadian government e-mails.

“We can neither confirm, nor deny matters of national security and commercial confidentiality,” the embassy said in a statement.

At the same time, the Turkish diplomatic mission said it welcomed at least part of the outcome of the conflict.

https://en.armradio....ked-for-turkey/



#2591 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 18 March 2021 - 07:35 AM

Monsters!!!!!

Panorama, Armenia

March 17 2021
 
 
Azeris destroy Armenian church in Karabakh's Shushi

The Azerbaijanis have destroyed Saint John the Baptist Church, commonly known as Kanach Zham (Green Chapel), in the Azerbaijani-held town of Shushi in Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh), Armenian expert in Turkish studies Varuzhan Geghamyan said on Facebook, sharing a collage of satellite images of the church on 17 October 2020 and on 15 February 2021.

“After the occupation of Shushi, the enemy began to destroy the Armenian cultural property. Satellite images show the church commonly known as Kanach Zham in Shushi has already been destroyed,” he wrote.

“If the current ignorant government remains in power, such a future awaits Syunik and Tavush,” he added.

161899214_10223316120441532_465809538563

 https://www.panorama...-Shushi/2470357

 

 



#2592 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 18 March 2021 - 07:36 AM

Panorama, Armenia
March 17 2021
 
 
Aliyev personally instructs to wipe off Armenian traces in Artsakh - Tigran Balayan

"The Azerbaijani dictator personally instructs to wipe off Armenian traces from the occupied areas in Artsakh," Ambassador of Armenia to the Netherlands and Permanent Representative to the OPCW Tigran Balayan tweeted on Wednesday, sharing photos of Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev's recent trip to Shushi and Hadrut.

During the trip, Aliyev has toured number of historical monuments and reportedly dubbed Armenian inscriptions on medieval churches as fake. After examining the videos of the trip, experts pointed to the fact that crosses from all churches where Aliyev visited were removed.  

Earlier, Armenian expert in Turkish studies Varuzhan Geghamyan reported that the Azerbaijanis have destroyed Saint John the Baptist Church, commonly known as Kanach Zham (Green Chapel), in the Azerbaijani-held town of Shushi. Geghamyan  shared a collage of satellite images of the church on 17 October 2020 and on 15 February 2021.

 

https://www.panorama...Artsakh/2470467



#2593 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 March 2021 - 08:28 AM

RazmInfo
March 18 2021



Turkey’s participation in the 44-day War in Karabakh: Part 1: F-16s

Razm.info has tried to analyze the participation of the Turkish Armed Forces in the hostilities in Artsakh since September 27. Our first article on this topic is about the possible use of Turkish Air Force F-16 fighter jets.

________________________________

On 27 July 2020, the Ministry of Defense of Azerbaijan announced about holding of a joint military exercise with the Turkish Air Force in Azerbaijan. The group of Turkish F-16 fighter jets arrived in Azerbaijan in late July. Turkish attack T-129 “Atak” and multifunctional UH-60 helicopters were also brought to Azerbaijan and Nakhijevan by Turkish military transport aircrafts. In parallel with the air force exercises, a separate ground force exercise was being held.

The actual military exercise was an expected event, as Turkey and Azerbaijan conducted joint military exercises regularly, and the air force exercises have been held since 2014, in fact, in August-September. However, the latest exercise of the Air Force, was different from the previous ones and had certain features.

The military exercise in 2020 differed from the previous ones by the choice of the venue and the characteristics of the units involved.

Five Turkish F-16s were stationed at Ganja International Airport in Azerbaijan. Although it was a dual-use airport during the Soviet era, it was renovated in 2006 to become an international airport and was used merely for civilian purposes. Previously, this airport was not involved in military exercises, and the Turkish planes were usually stationed at Yevlakh Airport: a dual-use airport, and one of the centers for UAVs of the Azerbaijani Armed Forces.

As for the Turkish “Atak” and UH-60 helicopters that arrived in Azerbaijan, they were stationed in the deep rear of the country, at the “Nasosnaya” air base, which is the location of the Azerbaijani Air Force fighter aircrafts (MiG-29). The deployment of the helicopters here was due to the fact that the ground force exercise was being conducted in parallel, and the helicopters were involved here to support the ground units. The ground exercises were being held at the proving ground northwest of Baku, with “Nasosnaya” Air Base being the closest to the site. We have not registered the participation of Turkish helicopters during the war. Moreover, at the moment there is no information whether those helicopters are still in Azerbaijan or not.

The composition of F-16s is of special attention. Although, it was not the first time that Turkish F-16 fighter jets arrived in Azerbaijan, however this group, that arrived under the pretext of participating in the exercise, was distinguished by the fact that it consisted of planes belonging to the 151st and 152nd squadrons of the Turkish Air Force. Though F-16s are multifunctional fighters and can perform a variety of tasks, in countries with large fleet of aircraft, like Turkey, squadrons have a certain “specialization”. So, the planes of the 151st and 152nd squadrons that arrived in Azerbaijan were specialized in suppressing the adversary’s air defense.


Colonel Gyokhan Gyurakar, who is referred to as the “operations commander” (in Turkish: Harekât Komutanı), also came to Azerbaijan with the planes from Marzvan Air Base (the 151st Squadron is part of this base). Officially, the operations commander is responsible for planning of operations, and if necessary, for their conduct.

Besides the planes mentioned above, the group also had at least one fighter from the 162nd Squadron of the Turkish Air Force. This squadron is multifunctional and has been in Azerbaijan in 2017 within the framework of a joint military exercise. July 29 was the announced start date of the joint air force exercise, and August 10 was the end date. Upon the commencement of the exercise, Turkish F-16s started flying over Azerbaijan, but did not leave Azerbaijan after the announced end of the exercise and stayed at Ganja airport conducting flights, including a demonstration flight over Ganja on 15 September.

Even after the start of large-scale hostilities on 27 September, Turkish Air Force fighter jets continued to be stationed at Ganja Airport until at least 4 October, when the Armenian side conducted missile strikes at the direction of Ganja. It should be noted, that although the spokesman for the Artsakh President had announced that the airport had “vanished”, the study of open sources and satellite images revealed that no significant damage was caused to the airport.


It is noteworthy that during the war, Azerbaijan deployed launching and refilling vehicles of Buk anti-aircraft missile system near the Ganja airport in order to provide additional air security. By the way, the Buk anti-aircraft missile system was placed in the position intended for S-125 anti-aircraft missile system.


However, after the missile strikes, the planes were moved to Gabala airport in deeper rear. This is also a civilian airport, 100 km away from the borders of Artsakh. A satellite image taken in mid-October where 4 fighters were seen parked in the airport, proves their relocation to Gabala airport.


On 22 October Hikmet Hajiyev, the aid to the president of Azerbaijan, announced about a rocket attack on Gabala. After this announcement, the Turkish F-16s transferred from Ganja airport to Gabala were again relocated, this time more to the rear, “out of sight” of Armenian missiles, to the civilian airport of Lankaran in the south, where they remained stationed until the end of the war.

An emblem of the 151st Squadron on the theme of Artsakh war, which appeared on a Turkish website selling aviation emblems and accessories after the end of the war, completes the “story of deployment” of F-16s of Turkish Air Force in Azerbaijan.


The emblem shows points on the map that correspond to the locations of Turkish planes during the war: Ganja, Gabala, Lankaran. By the way, the background of this photo is Lankaran airport.

Thus, we can state that a group of F-16s from the Turkish Air Force squadrons was sent to Azerbaijan, including units specialized in suppression of air defense. Additionally, the tactics of strikes by Azerbaijan at the beginning of the war, which were aimed primarily at the suppression of the Armenian air defense system, provide grounds for the following conclusions:

It is very probable, that before and during the war, the Turkish planes were engaged in revealing the location, composition, structure, tactics, and “weaknesses” of the Armenian air defense during their flights.


It cannot be ruled out, that these planes also took part in suppression of the Armenian air defense during the war.
And finally, it can be assumed that one of the tasks of Turkish F-16s in Azerbaijan was to safeguard Azerbaijan from the possible intervention of SU-30SM fighters of the RA Armed Forces.

https://razminfo.wor..._NYx-zwO4iTERLI


#2594 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 March 2021 - 08:44 AM

Panorama, Armenia
March 18 2021
 
 
 
Armenian expert: Azeri-occupied areas of Artsakh will suffer the same fate as Nakhichevan, if we don’t stop it

The Azerbaijani-occupied areas of Artsakh will suffer the same fate as Nakhichevan, if Armenians do not prevent it, expert on Azerbaijani studies Anzhela Elibegova said on Facebook on Thursday.

“The occupied territories of Artsakh will suffer the same fate as Nakhichevan, if we don't stop it. Our traces in those areas will be erased, the history will be edited, while you will be convinced that you have nothing to do with your historical lands,” she wrote.

The expert warned that Azerbaijan will commit “historical and cultural genocide” in those territories.

“Whatever they cannot destroy, they will say that it is Albanian or belongs to the Udins. They will rapidly destroy whatever can be secretly ruined and eliminated. Then you will have to again apply to the UNESCO and similar organizations, remind about the khachkars in Jugha (Old Julfa) and try to prove ...

“History has a tendency to repeat itself and the handwriting of the enemy does not change. If you hope that they want peaceful coexistence with you, you are either a fool or a traitor,” Elibegova said. 

 

https://www.panorama...Artsakh/2471027



#2595 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 March 2021 - 08:01 AM

Perpetrators should be held responsible, otherwise it will repeat again. The time for talking about it is long past, we need action now!

Human Rights Watch

March 19 2021
 
 
 
Azerbaijan: Armenian POWs Abused in Custody

Investigate Abuse; Protect All Detainees

 

 

(Berlin) – Azerbaijani forces abused Armenian prisoners of war (POWs) from the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, subjecting them to cruel and degrading treatment and torture either when they were captured, during their transfer, or while in custody at various detention facilities, Human Rights Watch said today.

Azerbaijani authorities should investigate all allegations of ill-treatment and hold those responsible to account. Azerbaijan should also immediately release all remaining POWs and civilian detainees and provide information on the whereabouts of servicemen and civilians whose situation is unknown but were last seen in Azerbaijani custody.

“The abuse, including torture of detained Armenian soldiers, is abhorrent and a war crime,” said Hugh Williamson, Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “It is also deeply disturbing that a number of missing Armenian soldiers were last seen in Azerbaijan’s custody and it has failed to account for them.”

Human Rights Watch interviewed four former POWs who detailed their ill-treatment in custody as well as the ill-treatment of other POWs with whom they were captured or shared cells. They all described prolonged and repeated beatings. One described being prodded with a sharp metal rod, and another said he was subjected to electric shocks, and one was repeatedly burned with a cigarette lighter. The men were held in degrading conditions, given very little water and little to no food in the initial days of their detention.

Scores of videos showing scenes in which Azerbaijani officers can be seen apparently ill-treating Armenian POWs have been posted to social media. Human Rights Watch closely examined and verified more than 20 of these videos, including through interviews with recently repatriated POWs and family members of servicemen who appear in the videos but have not yet returned. Human Rights Watch also reviewed medical documents.

The accounts of torture and ill-treatment raise concerns that Armenian POWs still in Azerbaijani custody are at risk of further abuse, Human Rights Watch said. Azerbaijani authorities should ensure that Armenian POWs and other detainees still in custody have all the protections to which they are entitled under international human rights and humanitarian law, including freedom from torture and ill-treatment.

The armed conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh escalated on September 27, when Azerbaijan began a military offensive. Hostilities ended on November 10 with a Russia-negotiated truce. The peace agreement provided, among other things, for “an exchange of prisoners of war and other detained persons and bodies of the dead.”

The number of Armenian POWs still in custody remains unclear. By the end of February 2021, Armenia’s Representative Office at the European Court of Human Rights had asked the court to intervene with Azerbaijan regarding 240 cases of alleged prisoners of war and civilian detainees. In approximately 90 percent of those cases, the office said, they had provided photo and/or video evidence confirming that Azerbaijani forces had taken these people into custody.

Armenia’s leadership said that Azerbaijan has returned 69 POWs and civilians. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said that his government has returned all the POWs to Armenia but was still holding approximately 60 people as terrorism suspects. Human Rights Watch is not in a position to verify the claims by Azerbaijan or Armenia about the numbers of people remaining in custody or their status.

An Armenian Foreign Ministry representative in Yerevan told Human Rights Watch on February 24 that families are “increasingly desperate” to find their loved ones, especially in light of numerous credible reports of prisoner abuse.

All four former POWs who spoke with Human Rights Watch had been wounded before their capture. In one case, Human Rights Watch documented, an Azerbaijani officer provided first aid to a wounded Armenian soldier shortly after capturing him. Another Azerbaijani officer gave pain medication to another POW. One former POW said the commanding officer told his subordinates not to hit the POWs but that as soon as the commanding officer was no longer present, the soldiers would abuse them.

International humanitarian law, or the law of armed conflict, requires parties to an international armed conflict to treat POWs humanely in all circumstances. The third Geneva Convention protects POWs “particularly against acts of violence or intimidation and against insults and public curiosity.” Azerbaijan is also bound by the absolute prohibition on torture and other degrading or inhuman treatment in international law as articulated in both the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), to which it is a party.

“We heard accounts and viewed images of prolonged and repeated beatings of Armenian prisoners of war, designed, it seems, solely to humiliate and punish them,” Williamson said. “Torture and ill-treatment of prisoners of war constitute war crimes for which accountability is urgently needed.”

For additional details and former POWs’ accounts, please see below.


In February, in Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh, Human Rights Watch interviewed four former POWs who were captured under different circumstances and in different locations during the active fighting between October 15 and November 20 and returned to Armenia on December 14. They were among 44 POWs and civilians whom Azerbaijani authorities repatriated on a special flight from Baku to Yerevan.

Abuse During Capture in Nagorno-Karabakh

Three of the four soldiers were beaten by Azerbaijani forces immediately following their capture and/or during their transfer to the first detention site.

Davit (not his real name), 19, said that the Azerbaijani officer who captured him on October 15, on the outskirts of Hadrut, treated him humanely. The officer applied a tourniquet to stop the bleeding from his lower leg wound, gave him water, carried him to the nearby Azerbaijani camp, reassured him he would be taken to a hospital for treatment, and watched over him to make sure that other soldiers left him alone. However, when a vehicle arrived to drive Davit to a hospital in Baku, where he then spent several days, things changed:

They tied me up and threw me in the back of the car, face down, my hands handcuffed behind my back. Once they hit the road, one of [the Azerbaijani servicemen] started yelling at me and pummeling me with his punches. He had something like a windproof lighter and burned my hands with it. He used it to heat up a metal rod and poked me in the back with the rod. I fainted from the pain. When we arrived at the hospital, I was barely conscious. All my muscles were clenched. I could not move, could not speak. They threw me on a stretcher. I spent four to five days in the hospital, my left arm cuffed to the bed with two guards watching me round the clock. Sometimes, when the medical workers did not see, [the guards] punched me, mostly on the head.  

When Human Watch interviewed Davit on February 22, the scars from the burns on his hands and back were still visible.

Tigran, 20, was captured in Hardut district on October 20 with eight other Armenian soldiers, by a large group of Azerbaijani forces. A video, widely circulated on social media, showed Azerbaijani forces kicking, stepping on, and dragging the Armenian soldiers.

“They started beating us straight away and kept it up for three hours or so,” Tigran said. “Their commanding officers told them not to. But whenever those officers weren’t around, the beating resumed… They gave a spade to one of ours and told him to go dig his grave. He was so frightened he started digging.”

The soldiers also used a metal rod to poke the men who were tied up. Tigran, who was wounded, weak, and disoriented, does not recall the details of being poked but after he was transferred to a detention facility, he saw two puncture wounds on his body, apparently from the rod.

Abuse in Alleged Military Police Custody

Three of the former POWs spent three to five days in the custody of what they understood was the Azerbaijani military police in Baku. Two of them, interviewed separately, said they were kept in separate rooms; one was held in a room with another Armenian POW. All three said they were handcuffed to a radiator in a position that would not allow them to lie down and had neither mattresses nor blankets. Once a day, the guards took them to the toilet, where they could also drink some water from the tap. Other than that, they were given no food or water. None received any treatment for injuries they had. Officers regularly entered their cells, screamed at them, punched, kicked, and beat them with wooden rods. Davit said:

I almost did not sleep there. At first, I would doze off, but they would come and beat me up so badly that I would not sleep out of fear again… They came in groups of two to four. One of them broke his wooden rod on me, hitting me so badly that I lost the use of my arm for a while. On my fourth day there, they beat me so badly that they actually broke two ribs.

Hovhanness, 45, captured on October 19, spent three days in that facility, alone in a room on the first floor. He said that several times a day, five to ten soldiers would come into the room to beat him with their fists, booted feet, clubs, and a metal rod. On multiple occasions late at night, his captors also forced him to perform exercises for two hours and beat him for his supposedly poor performance. On other occasions, they forced him face down on the floor, ordered him to lie still for two hours, left, and then returned and beat him for changing his position. Hovhanness received no food during the entire three days and if the guards or soldiers found him asleep, they would wake him.

Levon, 31, captured in Magadis on October 22 with another seven Armenian soldiers emphasized that the beatings were intended as punishment. Levon had multiple wounds he had received before he was detained, but that did not deter the Azerbaijani soldiers from beating him repeatedly and brutally:

It began as soon as we were brought to the military police in Baku – they beat us nonstop for one-and-a-half to two hours, pushing us to the ground, punching, and kicking us, two or three of them working on each of us. Once we were in the cells – I was put in a cell with another man from our group – they would run in, in small groups, several times a day and beat us. They did not interrogate us, did not really ask any questions, except things like, “Why did you join the fighting?”

They showed us some video from Ganja [second-largest city in Azerbaijan, where 32 civilians were killed by Armenian artillery strikes in October] … screamed at us and hit us. They mostly beat us on the arms and the upper body. My upper arms were literally black and blue. They yelled, they blamed us for… [killings of Azerbaijani civilians during the first war] and beat us… I actually told them, “I was two years of age at the time! … If you want to ask me any question, all it takes is to ask. If you want to kill me, just kill me. But do not do this to me!

Abuse in National Security Ministry Detention

All four of the former POWs were later transferred to the National Security Ministry detention facility in Baku, where they spent weeks being interrogated by Azerbaijani security services. They said that they received three meals a day, although the portions were small and the food was poor quality, and that medical workers examined their wounds and provided basic treatment. However, between interrogations, they were all beaten with fists, booted feet, and clubs.

Tigran described being tortured with electric shocks twice. On the first occasion, the torture went on for approximately 40 minutes. He said that every time he lost consciousness from pain, his torturers revived him and gave him more shocks. On the second occasion, the torture went on for approximately 10 minutes.

The Azerbaijan military forced all the POWs to speak on camera, in professional recordings, saying they did not want to fight in the war, blaming the Armenian government for their plight, and stating that Nagorno-Karabakh is part of Azerbaijan. Davit said his video was fully scripted and that when he did not get it right, an officer threatened him with an electric shock.

Hovhanness spent approximately 50 days at the National Security Ministry detention facility, having been transferred from the military police. He said that the guards entered his cell every day to kick and punch the inmates and that they beat him with clubs three or four times in the course of his detention. The beatings mostly took place in the cell and sometimes they went on as late as midnight. One of the blows damaged his kneecap and his knee still pained him at the time of his interview:

“They were hitting me even in front of the doctor [who changed the bandage on his wound during the first week he spent at the ministry’s detention facility]. They were beating every day and making us say ‘Karabakh [is] Azerbaijan’ every time they opened the cell.”

Humiliation, Insult at a Pre-trial Detention Facility in Baku

After several weeks at the Security Ministry detention center, the authorities transferred three of the four former POWs to the pre-trial detention facility No.1 in Baku’s Kurdakhani settlement. The former POWs described the conditions there as adequate and noted that they were not subjected to any physical abuse. They received a visit from the ICRC, which was able to connect them with their families. However, the guards called them names, forced them to chant “Karabakh-Azerbaijan,” and told them that Azerbaijan had taken over all of Nagorno-Karabakh and was advancing into Armenia, which caused them tremendous stress and made them fear for their families.

Applicable Legal Standards

The third Geneva Convention governs the treatment of prisoners of war in international armed conflicts, and articles 17, 87, and 89 all prohibit forms of torture and cruel treatment. Common Article 3 also prohibits “cruel treatment and torture” and “outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment,” torture or inhuman treatment, and “willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health” constitute grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions and are war crimes. Both the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in articles 7 and 10, and the European Convention on Human Rights, in article 3, prohibit all forms of torture, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, and require humane treatment of all those in custody.

 



#2596 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 March 2021 - 07:17 AM

Morning Star, UK
March 20 2021
 
 
 
Azeri president demands erasure of Armenian traces in occupied areas  
 

AZERBIJAN’S President Ilham Aliyev vowed on Wednesday to wipe out all Armenian traces from territories that have come under Azeri occupation following the end of the recent conflict over the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh.

He was pictured in the occupied Hadrut region, where he threatened to erase the Armenian inscriptions from a 12th-century church, branding them “fake.”

Mr Aliyev, who has a PhD in history, claimed that “Armenians wanted to Armenianise this church by leaving inscriptions in Armenian” during his visit to the St Astvatsatsin Church in the village of Tsakuri.

He said that the church looked like “a barn and a rubbish dump,” accusing Armenians of desecrating what he claimed was “an Albanian temple,” which he promised to restore.

The authoritarian Azeri ruler’s cultural destruction drew comparisons to the 1915 Armenian genocide in which 1.5 million men, women and children were systematically exterminated by Ottoman troops.

Between 1915 and 1922 it is estimated that 1,036 Armenian churches and monasteries were destroyed.

Armenia’s ambassador to the Netherlands Tigran Balayan said: “War crimes by President Aliyev’s regime continue at full scale.”

  https://morningstaro...traces-occupied    



#2597 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 March 2021 - 08:04 AM

The Barnabas Fund
March 23 2021
 
 
Azerbaijani soldiers accused of war crimes against civilians in Nagorno-Karabakh
23 March 2021

Armenian civilians from Nagorno-Karabakh have recounted harrowing details of family members killed while held captive by Azerbaijani forces, as well as the torture and abuse that they suffered while in captivity.

Azerbaijani troops began their invasion of Nagorno-Karabakh, an ethnic-Armenian enclave within the Muslim-majority Republic of Azerbaijan, at the end of September 2020. The conflict ended with a tripartite ceasefire agreement in November 2020, with Azerbaijan having taken significant territories which had formerly been held by the Armenian community.

Nagorno-Karabakh (mountainous Karabakh) is part of the historic homeland of the Armenian people, who around 301 AD became the first Christian nation, and the region still contains many ancient churches and monasteries. Karabakh was placed within Azerbaijan by the USSR in 1923.

525991c-lady-4x3-653x490_huc.jpeg Armenian Christians, including the elderly and children, took shelter in a basement from the fierce Azerbaijani aerial bombardment

Recent reports show that both during the invasion and afterwards Armenian civilian detainees were beaten and degraded, denied food and water, and prevented from accessing medication. Some died after suffering abuse, while others appear to have been intentionally killed.

The alleged actions of Azerbaijan represent violations of the fourth Geneva Convention, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights

Civilian prisoner allegedly shot months after ceasefire

In one case Arsen Gharakhanyan, 44, is alleged to have been shot dead by Azerbaijani forces on 15 January, more than two months after the ceasefire. His body was discovered in a freshly-dug grave on 18 January. There was little decomposition evident and gunshot wounds through the forehead and chin were clearly visible.

Arsen was captured along with his father Sasha, 71, on 10 October. The following month, a video emerged of Sasha being forced to kiss the Azerbaijani flag and repeat the phrase “Karabakh-Azerbaijan”.

When Sasha was released on 14 December his wrists and ankles bore scars from where he had been tied with wire. His head was badly bruised where a solider had hit him several times with a rifle butt, and x-rays showed that he had also suffered a broken rib and a broken nose.

Arsen, meanwhile, remained in captivity. On 6 January a video emerged of him being forced to say “Karabakh is Azerbaijan”, and two days later another appeared showing him being mocked by Azerbaijani soldiers.

On 13 January, two days before he is thought to have been shot, the government of Armenia and the European Court of Human Rights requested information from Azerbaijan about Arsen.

53eaca1-family-children-4x3.jpg Barnabas provided food and warm clothing for thousands of Christians, especially women, children and the elderly, after they fled the fighting in Nagorno-Karabakh

Elderly civilian prisoner denied medication and beaten to death

In another case Eduard Shahkeldyan, a 79-year-old civilian, died while in prison in Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan.

When he and his wife Arega, 71, were first captured on 28 October, she remembers that Eduard was beaten and kicked while soldiers yelled “that he had surely taken part in the war 30 years earlier and this was his punishment for killing Azerbaijani people back then”.

Before being transported to Baku, the couple were held in a shed without adequate facilities or heating. They had not been allowed to take warm clothes with then when they were removed from their home. They were not given any food or water. Eduard was denied medication for asthma, and Arega medication for high blood pressure.

At Baku the couple were held separately for over a month. On the morning of 5 December Arega was told that Eduard had died in his sleep. When she was allowed to view his body it was clear he had been beaten about the face.

A death certificate later issued by Armenian authorities following an autopsy recorded the cause of death as head injury, brain swelling, acute disorder of brain function.

Fears of a new genocide

In December 2020 Azerbaijani soldiers were accused of beheading two elderly men, defiling corpses and desecrating graves during their advance into Nagorno-Karabakh. The exact number of civilians still held captive in Azerbaijan remains unknown but it may be as many as 90.

Armenia’s Representative Office at the European Court of Human Rights has raised the cases of at least 240 alleged prisoners of war (PoWs) and civilian detainees. Other Armenian sources had estimated in January as many as 1450 Armenian people missing, of whom 150 were at that time known to be alive and held prisoner in Azerbaijan.

The UK and many other Western nations appear to be unwilling to hold Azerbaijan to account for these abuses or to facilitate the release of the Armenian detainees.

The conflict and ongoing tensions have raised fears about the pan-regional ambitions of Azerbaijan and Turkey as well as the possibility of a new Armenian genocide.

Azerbaijan has also been accused of inflicting horrifying torture and mistreatment on captured Armenian soldiers held as prisoners of war during and after the conflict.

 
 


#2598 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 March 2021 - 07:41 AM

Panorama, Armenia
March 26 2021
 
 
 
f605d81f0c52c3_605d81f0c5304.thumb.jpg
Politics 10:40 26/03/2021Armenia
Azerbaijanis throw stones at Armenian cars in Artsakh

Azerbaijanis on Thursday stoned Armenian vehicles on Stepanakert-Karmir Shuka roadway in Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh), according to the Telegram channel Mediaport.

At around 1:30pm, they started throwing stones at the cars with Armenian license plates from the body of a passing Azerbaijani convoy, accompanied by Russian peacekeepers, near the crossroads leading to the village of Siznek.

The first Armenian car was not hit, whereas the second car was hit, the channel said. 

 

https://www.panorama...ian-car/2475678



#2599 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 March 2021 - 07:39 AM

Fu*ken monsters!!!!!!!!!!!!

Public Radio of Armenia

March 29 2021
 
Armenian van transporting bodies of the dead comes under Azerbaijani stone attack
 
 

An Armenian van transporting bodies of the dead came under Azerbaijani stone attack on March 28, deputy head of Goris community Irina Yolyan informs.

“The driver says that he left Stepanakert for Goris at night amid thick fog, he felt that the car was being hit by stones. The incident took place at 01:30 am. The driver did not stop, continued driving, and took the bodies to Goris.

Last week the Azerbaijani military threw stones at cars with Armenian license plates on the way to Karmir Shuka village of Karmir village in Artsakh’s Askeran region.

 

 



#2600 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,702 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 March 2021 - 07:49 AM

Armenpress.am
 

ECHR judgments confirmed that killing of Armenian in Azerbaijan is encouraged by authorities – Armenia Ombudsman

 
 
Share
 
1047443.jpg 15:03, 29 March, 2021

YEREVAN, MARCH 29, ARMENPRESS. The President of Azerbaijan, authorities of this country have been implementing a policy of hatred, enmity, ethnic cleansing and genocide against Armenia, citizens of Armenia and the Armenian people for years. The Turkish authorities have done the same or have openly encouraged the same policy, Human Rights Defender of Armenia Arman Tatoyan said in a statement, bringing just three examples of this.

“In his remarks at the congress of the “New Azerbaijan Party (March 5-7, 2021), the President of Azerbaijan proudly stated, “the younger generation has grown up with a hatred of the enemy." By enemy, he means Armenia and the entire Armenian people, who are hated by a whole generation.

 
 

During the military event in Baku on the 10th of December, in 2020, the President of Turkey compared the war in Artsakh with the Armenian Genocide in the Ottoman Empire and the massacre of Armenians in Baku in September of 1918. According to him, that day was a day of glorification of the souls of Ahmed Jevat Bey, Nuri Pasha, Enver Pasha, and members of the Caucasus Islamic Army.

The ECHR judgments have confirmed that killing of Armenian in Azerbaijan has ethnic motivations and is encouraged by authorities.

Therefore, no matter what process, program or words are used, these foundational facts cannot be overlooked.

This means that no one-sided process can develop at the expense of the life, physical security, or any other right of the citizen of the Republic of Armenia, or the normal life and peace of the Armenian population; and, the hatred and enmity towards Armenia and the Armenian people with state support has not only not diminished in Azerbaijan or Turkey, but due to lack of any responsibility, is taking on new manifestations”, Arman Tatoyan said.

Tatoyan noted that his statement is directly based upon and conditioned on the gross human rights violations recorded and continuing during and after the September-November 2020 armed attacks; and, it takes it into account that the issue has become the subject of widespread public debate.

He posted a photo on his Facebook account which was specially prepared during the war and was actively shared on Azerbaijani and Turkish social networks, and was widely used to promote Azerbaijani atrocities.

 

 

https://armenpress.a...Nh503bTKNS1fNxg






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users