A Struggle Within A Struggling Nation
#41
Posted 15 September 2002 - 11:17 AM
if you say one more time that Tigran The Great II was jew, i'd ask you to send me some of those books that state that.
yes, i agree that the latter Tigrans (IV...) could have been jews (because they were not from Artashesian Dinasty, but were put up by Romans) but to say that Tigran the Great II was jew (not his father, not his grand-father, not Artashes I himself, etc....) is just radicolous.
#42
Posted 15 September 2002 - 11:42 AM
as open-minded as i am (or at least think i'm) i still don't accept homo(/bi)sexuality to be a healthy way of life.
i don't mind having a homo next-door neighbour, but to justify and support them is just absurd to me.
i see those kinds of people, and just laugh at them, as how waird of life they had to become such. and no i don't believe that some are born with homo/bisexual orientations.
to justify them by saying that it was common at some time in the past (which i know it was, esp in Greece) is just as absurd. and it's funny to see that some "liberal/progressive" people do that.
and to be clear, no, i don't base my dislike of homosexuality on Christianity, as i don't consider myself to be religious (i haven't been in church, lit a candle, said a prayer, etc for ages).
oh, btw, how come almost all (or at least the ones i encountered (not sexualy ) or heard about) have having sex as the first priority of their life? how healthy society can this kind of people make up...
#43
Posted 15 September 2002 - 12:26 AM
Don't even think about Tigran Medz being a jew.First of all he wasn't.He was the nephew of Artavazd I (his brother's son).His grandpa was Artashes I.Are you people trying to say that they were Jews too? His mother and his wife were Parthians(King Mithridat's sister and daughter),No doubt.
Even if he was Chinese.Who cares?The king is has only the nationality of his country.Most Europian kings did not and do not have their country's nationality.The Russian kings Romanov dynasty was almost pure German.So?
#44
Posted 15 September 2002 - 01:14 AM
You have OBVIOUSLY not read my posts. To be a "sinner" you have to commit sins. The only sex that I have had in the past 20 years was with my ex-wife during a marriage and once or twice with a girlfriend that I had been dating for an extended period of time. Are you stating that my bi-sexual orientation without homosexual acts taking place makes me a sinner?
As for my other comments, they have come from years of reading in the areas of history, church history, genetics and geography. You have been fed the standard historical line developed during the 19th century for Armenian nation-building purposes. Much of this is myth.
#45
Posted 15 September 2002 - 05:28 AM
To say that being gay is a choice that some sickos make in life is like saying that you choose to have brown eyes (or whatever colour they are).
Why on earth would anyone choose to be gay or bisexual when they have to put up with the bigotry so proudly displayed by people as we see in this forum?
I suppose ducks choose to be ducks during shooting season too?
Clear up your logic. It clearly is not working. Or, sorry, but maybe it's just an unfortunate "condition that can not be cured these days" (whichever poor old creature from the dark ages came up with that line!).
Don't worry darlin', Jesus still loves you. I'll pray for your misguided soul.
Love,
Damien.
#46
Posted 15 September 2002 - 05:40 AM
Originally posted by Harut:
to the ones who don't like TigrannesIII
hey, aren't you the ones that tell all the time that society is most healthy with its diversity?
so, why are you trying to make TigrannesIII (and his kinds) one of your types, and not accepting the way his is. yes, he doesn't accept you the way you are, but i see you don't (accept his types) either.
Additionally, we are not only calling for acceptance of divesity - but recognition of human rights. Tigrannes is opposing this. Sure he can talk all he wants - and we would not actually do anything (physically) to him. But we would oppose any attempt by those like him to discriminate or act violently. This goes for those who act such toward women, minorities or anyone. If we lived in this nation in the 1860's or prior - we would actively be fighting against the practice of slabvery - how does this make us in the wrong? Just as now - we are speaking out against ignorant and wrong attitudes and practices. What difference does it really make if Damien likes it in the rear (or whatever) once in a while...or igf Hagarag fantasises about Tigrannes young muscular body (LOL - had to put that one in!) - well it doesn't mean anything. These are individual choices. Everyone should have the right to make them as long as (for instance) Hagarag doesnt actually touch or verbally harass pour defensless little Tigrannes...
#47
Posted 15 September 2002 - 10:13 AM
yete menk srants thekhenere chudenenk. ove gudeni
[ September 15, 2002, 11:17 AM: Message edited by: Vahe G. ]
#48
Posted 15 September 2002 - 10:30 AM
As for the Tigran information in was in a book written by Bernard Lewis BEFORE he turned on the Armenians, when he was our ally in his earlier days. What did Armenians say or do to him that turned him into one of our most powerful enemies?
#49
Posted 15 September 2002 - 12:32 PM
#50
Posted 15 September 2002 - 12:47 PM
#51
Posted 15 September 2002 - 02:41 PM
Sents anasun kyankume chem thesel. Es koratsa oo khupnuvats
#52
Posted 15 September 2002 - 03:40 PM
2)THOTH, you are hypocritical in that regard. Very. I'm not allowed to dislike gyotner because of their choice, but you can hate communists because of their lifestyle??
3)Don't compare the 1860's to present-day homos. Blacks are born with black skin. Homos are born normal, but chose their weird lifestyle for a reason. Black people never invited harrasment, but gays do. Especially with those sick parades.
4)Hagarag, you are already victim of the white genocide. Vahe is the type who undermines it. Your liberal views are the type that will unwravel us and finish us off. Vahe's type (and mine)have been around for a very very long time. If you asked Antranik ***** his thoughts on subjects, I guarantee you he would almost always side with Vahe and against you (if he didn't just shoot you in the head first). Also, Hagarag, anyone can write a story about Jesus. And I also doubt anyone has done that much extensive research on Armenian genetic lines.
#53
Posted 15 September 2002 - 03:51 PM
Originally posted by Vahe G.:
... Have you gone crazy or something. Are you the most stupid person in the world... you idiot...like a moron ... your a plain Idiot
... everytime you talk I have to call you out on how stupid you are. Call me Mr. Traditional Armenian. Theres nothing wrong with being one.
[ September 15, 2002, 07:03 PM: Message edited by: Sip ]
#54
Posted 15 September 2002 - 03:53 PM
But first, let me say that I am not sure if homoness is genetic or not. However, I am fairly certain that in many cases, there are many biological and/or chemical factors that contribute to it. From very early ages it is sometimes completely obvious that a little kid will most certainly have homosexual tendencies when it grows up (from VERY early ages) ...
So, having said that ... what goes on between a man and man; a man and a donkey; a midget, a man, and a donkey; a man, another man, a donkey, some baloons, and a sheep ... etc (you get the point) is none of my business. That is perfectly fine as long as I don't get involved in it somehow (against my will).
Now, I think you see the problem. Where do you draw the line? It is obvious that pedophillia is completely out ... I don't think anyone would argue. But where do you draw the line between "pure beautiful LOVE" and perversion ?
Gay homosexuals seem to say that their love is pure love as well ... just like what is between a man and a woman. I say, if that is true, then the line can easily be extended to cover 3 men and a midget, 4 midgets 2 clowns, and maybe a donkey, etc etc.
DO what you want! I don't care ... just don't try to classify it as a "family" and don't try to get my approval for it all the time. I couldn't care less if you love another man or your german sheppard. But don't tell me you qualify as a "family" and that your actions constitute "marriage". In my book, it does not.
[ September 15, 2002, 05:07 PM: Message edited by: Sip ]
#55
Posted 15 September 2002 - 04:07 PM
Originally posted by TigrannesIII:
THOTH, you are hypocritical in that regard. Very. I'm not allowed to dislike gyotner because of their choice, but you can hate communists because of their lifestyle??
Originally posted by TigrannesIII:
Don't compare the 1860's to present-day homos. Blacks are born with black skin. Homos are born normal, but chose their weird lifestyle for a reason. Black people never invited harrasment, but gays do. Especially with those sick parades.
#56
Posted 15 September 2002 - 04:56 PM
And I don't hate communists - where have I said that. I do believe however that the system espoused by Communisim is at its heart inhuman and I despise the totalitarian ends justify the means methods of those leaders/governments that have adopted sytems that they call Communism.
#57
Posted 15 September 2002 - 05:24 PM
#58
Posted 15 September 2002 - 05:33 PM
Originally posted by Vahe G.:
... Sip jan no offence axper but i can care less of how you think is winnning any arguement because theyre sure isnt only one way if you read carefully what I say its not all name calling tsaveth thanem. ...
As far as Tigrannes, I disagree with a lot of things he says and I also agree with him sometimes (like to some extent in this thread)... but at the end of the day, there still is respect I think and we are even playing football right now in some fantasy sports site.
#59
Posted 15 September 2002 - 06:01 PM
#60
Posted 15 September 2002 - 06:28 PM
Originally posted by Accelerated:
[QUOTE]Contrary to your belief, at its heart the Communist system is a much better system than capitalism, its just that human nature will never allow Communism to exist as Marx envisioned it.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users